Difference between revisions of "User talk:ADefenceOfChristianity"

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎My case: reply)
Line 143: Line 143:
 
:https://i.imgur.com/JolqzrR.png {{User:LeftyGreenMario/sig}} 23:15, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 
:https://i.imgur.com/JolqzrR.png {{User:LeftyGreenMario/sig}} 23:15, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 
:[edit conflict]Ok, if I was skeptical before I'm not now. Calling someone a "big baby" is ''extremely'' immature and childish. As for your first point, did you write them as a "sad man". Second of all, LGM is female, so saying they are a sad man could be construed as [[transphobia]], especially if you sent it to Celeste instead. Third of all, your second point is what TC is trying to defend, but, other mods have confirmed it. Troll email spam is somewhat of a problem, and yes, harassment has a very low bar because harassment is a crime. Finally, we have read your case above...and refuted it, because you acted like a little child, just like you are now. Apologies and acting mature is the only way you will be saved. I'm done here. --[[User:Andrew5|Andrew5]] ([[User talk:Andrew5|talk]]) 23:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 
:[edit conflict]Ok, if I was skeptical before I'm not now. Calling someone a "big baby" is ''extremely'' immature and childish. As for your first point, did you write them as a "sad man". Second of all, LGM is female, so saying they are a sad man could be construed as [[transphobia]], especially if you sent it to Celeste instead. Third of all, your second point is what TC is trying to defend, but, other mods have confirmed it. Troll email spam is somewhat of a problem, and yes, harassment has a very low bar because harassment is a crime. Finally, we have read your case above...and refuted it, because you acted like a little child, just like you are now. Apologies and acting mature is the only way you will be saved. I'm done here. --[[User:Andrew5|Andrew5]] ([[User talk:Andrew5|talk]]) 23:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 +
::I'm cis, so it's not transphobic, but I didn't bother correcting. {{User:LeftyGreenMario/sig}} 23:21, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:21, 10 October 2021

Archives for this talk page: , (new)


New logo large.png Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, ADefenceOfChristianity.

This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble.

We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives.

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you.

If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be.

--It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 04:28, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

lol BibleStudy


BLOCKED by LeftyGreenMario

@LeftyGreenMario why did you block me? Are you afraid of the truth?! Got the shimmies, knowing of the Lord? Afraid, eh, so you had to silence me? I will never block any of your edits, so why do you do it to me then? "Turn the other cheek" quoth Jesus.

While I wait for the block to run out, I think you need to read a favourite passage of mines from Scripture.

Pslam 14 The fool

To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David.

1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.

2 The Lord looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, and seek God.

3 They are all gone aside, they are all together become filthy: there is none that doeth good, no, not one.

4 Have all the workers of iniquity no knowledge? who eat up my people as they eat bread, and call not upon the Lord.

5 There were they in great fear: for God is in the generation of the righteous.

6 Ye have shamed the counsel of the poor, because the Lord is his refuge.

7 Oh that the salvation of Israel were come out of Zion! when the Lord bringeth back the captivity of his people, Jacob shall rejoice, and Israel shall be glad. — Unsigned, by: ADefenceOfChristianity / talk / contribs

Does the Bible have anything to offer atheists?

Hey @2607:FB90:1800:B259:50DA:8760:122:E416, you've made a great question. Would you like to discuss about the Bible here? — Unsigned, by: ADefenceOfChristianity / talk / contribs

Bongolian stop acting like your the police.

Why do you believe that you have the right to delete my ATIM case? I have placed my complaint to the relevant page just as requested. Instead before anybody could see it, you have decided to delete it? Instead, you are an accomplice to the incredible amount of bullying that appears on this site.

Place my ATIM case now. @Techpriest, @Rairyu75, @Spud, @CircularReasoning, @Summa Atheologica please have a look at my ATIM case please. BibleStudy 00:29, 26 August 462739112 (UTC)

Bongo was in the right. Whine some more.𝔖𝔲𝔪𝔪𝔞 𝔄𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔬𝔩𝔬𝔤𝔦𝔠𝔞 (𝔮𝔲𝔢𝔯𝔢𝔩𝔦𝔰) (𝔰𝔠𝔯𝔦𝔭𝔱𝔲𝔯𝔞)
@Summa Atheologica Don't you see? GC constantly deletes my saloon posts and blocks me for NO reason. DM just throws insults at me. Both of them deserve a block. BibleStudy
Care to provide evidence of that claim? ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 00:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
@GrammarCommie You've blocked me for moving the endcollapse over Duce Mooslini comment. BibleStudy
Yes and? I already admitted I could have made a mistake due to how the logs were displayed. But are you actually going to provide evidence for the claim that "GC constantly deletes my saloon posts and blocks me for NO reason"? If not, then don't assume you'll be taken seriously. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 00:52, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
You sure know how to win friends and influence people, eh? PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 00:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Just for the record, this ATIM stuff might be my mistake as I suggested him to move his coop case to there. Of course I knew it wasn't going anywhere (come on, a 9 hours block in the middle of the night, it won't kill you) but I thought it would be better if a mod told him. I'm sorry. GeeJayK (talk) 01:11, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Some friendly advice: continuous litigation and relitigation will get you nowhere. If you have any legitimate interest in maintaining a presence on the site, you would do best to cut your losses. 𝒮𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓃𝑒 talk 01:19, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
I am so thoroughly confused here. -- Techpriest (talk) 12:52, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Basically bitching about other mods reverting their ATIM abuse and accusing GC of sock puppeting. PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 13:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

I'M BACK

Yeah!!!! BibleStudy

God's Chosen Puppet

Bongolian (talk) 07:32, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Ok. (Profile) - (Spoke!) 13:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

What? ADefenceOfChristianity (talk) 05:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

So what's going to happen to me?

Am I about to get permabanned? BibleStudy

That eventuality is possible. If you think you shouldn't this is your place to make your case. Knight CommanderIn ServiceTo HerGoatness 00:52, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
You are permabanned for now, but there is a thread at RW:ATIM's talk page. If you want to defend yourself without trolling, do so here. --Andrew5 (talk) 01:08, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Why am I being permabanned? I believe I have done nothing wrong. Can someone please get me out of the vandalbin? Why do people think I am a vandal? I have never created spam nor have intentionally B L A N K E D pages. I have never moved or changed people's comments. Have a look through my contributions!BibleStudy
I did this last night at the request of someone else. This block has absolutely nothing to do with vandal binning or the ATIM case. I want an explanation on why you thought it appropriate to send another editor the same email 4 times in one minute. IDK if anyone else here can see this, but your block has email disabled for a reason. -- Techpriest (talk) 09:25, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
If you feel you are being treated unfairly and it is not going to stop, contribute to Christian wikis such as these Christian wikis: List of Christian wikis. PineForest (talk) 10:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
I can carry over your incomplete statement but it may hurt your case.--Andrew5 (talk) 11:18, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

My case

Here is my case. This will be quite long however since I have vandalbinned, I have no choice but to place a wall of text. Please take your time to read through this since I have taken a huge amount of time on this.

Basically the gist is RationalWiki is overrun by bullies and pseduo-kings who mock bully and abuse their powers aganist those who disagree with them. It is a site dedicated not to rationality but irrationality!

According to this website,it is dedicated for freedom of speech. Yet when I first created this account on this horrible website, I created a challenge for evolutionist in the Saloon Bar (https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Saloon_bar&diff=prev&oldid=2353503). Almost immediatly, instead of engaging into the discussion like rational people do, it was immediatly placed under a trollcollapse (YET WHEN I DID THE SAME THING TO OTHER COMMENTS, PEOPLE CONSTANTLY REMOVED IT). Upset I eventually wrote respectfully to both trolls GrammarCommie and RockfordTheRoe (see https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:ADefenceOfChristianity/Archive1, post "GrammarCommie and RockfordTheRoe"). Were they punished for abusing a poor Christian who wants to help poor souls? NOPE! Got away sotch-free!

I was vandalbinned by both Rockford The Roe and LeftyGreenMario even through I AM NOT A VANDAL. I HAVE NEVER VANDALISED. I HAVE NEVER DONE ANY OF THIS!!!

I have been constantly blocked by LeftyGreenMario for small edits in the mainspace. (One was for evolution https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Evolution&diff=prev&oldid=2353917 and the other atheism https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Atheism&diff=prev&oldid=2361334) What happened to freedom of speech? What about to respectful debate. When did blocking and vandalbinning the correct course of action to debate? Are you so afraid that my points are actually true that you need to revert and block me? Do you actually believe that I am right and afraid of it?! This is what is called "cognitive dissonance" And most of this website reeks of it.

Instead the bullying continue, this time with GrammarCommie and DuceMooslini (who is not gonna lie is probably a fascist) who have blocked me for no bigger reason but to be a bully. DuceMooslini insults (probably coming from an 12-year-old boy) like "I showed your mom my cock last night." I try to show this to LeftyGreenMario but he refused to respond (Archive 1:LeftyGreenMario hypocrisy).

GrammarCommie has ascused me of "moving a comment". Yet when pressed for evidence HE REFUSE TO SHOW. Thus, GrammarCommie has blocked me for no bigger reason than to bully me and the "moving a comment" was just an exuse.

Eventually sickened by the behaviour I did the right thing and took my complaint to GrammarCommie to the ChickenCoop (https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&diff=prev&oldid=2355448) What happened? Did something happened? NOPE. "Don't abuse the coop. Take it to the ATIM! ("You shouldn't do this" post in Archive 1. Said by PanGalacticGargleBlaster) So I did! (https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&diff=prev&oldid=2355563) What happened? Well Bongolian delete my ATIM post and ban me!

I have also been vandalbinned by LeftyGreenMario even though for the last flipping time "I AM NOT A VANDAL".

I have started at that point to become desperate. Apparently I heard you allowed to have sockpuppets on RationalWiki for some reason so I create a sockpuppet so I can try to get myself out of the vandalbin. Response? BLOCKED (thanks Plutocow). Then, LeftyGreenMario change the block length for 3.14 months! I have read the Community Standards and you're not ALLOWED TO BLOCK SOMEONE FOR THAT LONG WITHOUT A COMMUNITY VOTE! So I wrote an email to LeftyGreenMario and again he refuse to respond back. And here we are now.

As such I ask for the following response:

  1. Block GrammarCommie and DuceMooslini and revoke his sysop role for 3.14 weeks for bullying me and harrassment.
  2. Block LeftyGreenMario for 3.14 weeks and revoke his sysop role for blocking a user for long without community permission
  3. Block Bongolian for 3.14 weeks for removing my post on ATIM and allowing the bullying to happen.
  4. Give me a sysop role since apparently everyone who has been at RationalWiki long enough and who is not an obivious vandal will eventually get a sysop role.
  5. Allow more opposing viewpoint in science and religious articles to create a fairier balance.
  6. GET ME OUT OF THE FLIPPING VANDALBIN BECAUSE I AM NOT A VANDAL!!!!

Thank you very much those who took the time to read through more wall of text. Praise you and the Lord.

-- BibleStudy

You're not going to be taken seriously if you double down on your behavior and try to get several well-established users banned. You should understand that you're not in a position to be making negotiations. Plutocow (talk) 04:31, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Bullies are bullies no matter if they are "well-established" or not BibleStudy
Spamming people's email is bullying, so by your own logic you should be banned. Plutocow (talk) 04:45, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Mama mia, ADefenceOfChristianity, that's a lot of effort you spent for results that's not going to happen. 🍝 --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 05:37, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
My favorite part is that this apparently took you a huge amount of time. Buck (talk) 06:43, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
@ADefenceOfChristianity This is a lot of guff without actually addressing the reason you are blocked right now. Let me reiterate: you got blocked here because you send a user the same email 4 times in a single minute. This is spam/harassment. I want to know why and whether or not you won't fucking do that shit again. Give me a sastisfactory answer and we can all be on our way. I do not care about your trollcollapses or whiny beef with other people, I just flat out don't want you to spam the inboxes of our users. (Also LOL, you're literally asking for a moderator and several active community members to be blocked, good luck with that). Also your vandal bin sticks because the vandal bin is meant to limit people who rapidly spam the site with their drivel, not because those in it are automatically vandals. -- Techpriest (talk) 10:22, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
ADOC, I'm dissapointed in you, regardless if the email spam is true (please, if you did email spam, admit it.) If you want people to start opposing, apologizing for everything is required. Don't just ignore this message, it might be your 1 saving grace. --Andrew5 (talk) 17:17, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
A mod has confirmed your abusive emails, but will give an olive branch if you reply in the next 71 hours sastisfactorily.Andrew5 (talk) 21:55, 8 October 2021 (UTC)


"lock GrammarCommie and DuceMooslini and revoke his sysop role for 3.14 weeks for bullying me and harrassment." Huh? I literally keep forgetting that you exist. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 23:02, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
I, for one, support blocking DuceMoosolini. That user is a menace to society. Pumpkin pixel glow.gifChef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoTry our pumpkin spice lasagna! 02:06, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
That mom didn't deserve the rooster. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 02:18, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

@LeftyGreenMario you big baby. Why are you trying so hard to be the victim here? Literally the worst thing I wrote in that email was that you were a sad man. Seriously, I have been mocked, harrasessed and bullied far far worst than this. I know you guys are backing LeftyGreenMario here because you want some reason to block me. He is a massive liar. Why?

  1. I have already sent emails to people before and NOBODY HAD A PROBLEM WITH IT
  2. I only sent 1 email not 4. HE TRYING TO PRETEND THAT I SENT MORE BUT THIS ISN'T TRUE
  3. Seriously if you consider my email harassment then you have a very low bar for what should be considered harrassment.
  4. Has anyone actually read my case above? Or is everyone distracted by this manufactroversy?

BibleStudy

https://i.imgur.com/JolqzrR.png --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 23:15, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
[edit conflict]Ok, if I was skeptical before I'm not now. Calling someone a "big baby" is extremely immature and childish. As for your first point, did you write them as a "sad man". Second of all, LGM is female, so saying they are a sad man could be construed as transphobia, especially if you sent it to Celeste instead. Third of all, your second point is what TC is trying to defend, but, other mods have confirmed it. Troll email spam is somewhat of a problem, and yes, harassment has a very low bar because harassment is a crime. Finally, we have read your case above...and refuted it, because you acted like a little child, just like you are now. Apologies and acting mature is the only way you will be saved. I'm done here. --Andrew5 (talk) 23:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
I'm cis, so it's not transphobic, but I didn't bother correcting. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 23:21, 10 October 2021 (UTC)