User talk:GleoLenzic

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, GleoLenzic!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 12:23, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

New articles about Robert Charroux's works[edit]

Hello,

I've recently bought a bulk of used books, two of them being the works of pseudohistorian Robert Charroux : "Le Livre des Secrets trahis" (1969) and "Le Livre des Mondes oubliés" (1971), another from Pauwels and Bergier "Le matin des Magiciens" (1960). Both Charroux's and Bergier's works are a toxic broth of ignorance, pseudohistory, conspiracy theory and shoehorning.

Since I have these books at hand and plenty of time, I think it could be useful to write some refutations to deconstruct those fallacious arguments. Is it ok to put those refutations as articles ?

Also, altough the books are in French, I could easily translate the main ideas in English. Is it ok to write an English refutation, or must it be in French for the sake of exactness ?

Thank you for your answers — Unsigned, by: GleoLenzic / talk / contribs

Really, the question is, how important or influential are those books? There are millions of books about pseudoscience. We can't have pages about all of them and we shouldn't have pages about ones that aren't really notable. But we should have pages about the most famous, important and influential ones. Still, the best thing to do would be to create the pages you want to create as drafts first. Afterwards, they can be moved to main space or essay space or wherever they belong. And currently, the feeling from most of the community seems to be that we should only have pages in other languages that are translations of pages that we already have in English. So really the best thing to do would be to create any new pages in English. You can always translate your own work into French and create a French version of the page afterwards. Spud (talk) 13:34, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
I think Robert Charroux has been quite influential - he predates von Däniken and was seen as one of Däniken's sources, along with "The Morning of the Magicians" (which predates both), so I think it could be interesting to shed light on some of his works. I will start a draft and we would see if they're worth keeping. Thanks for you answer GleoLenzic (talk) 14:48, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Also, he has both French and English Wikipedia pages, so I think that' sufficiently noteworthy. Bongolian (talk) 08:29, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Autopatrolled[edit]

Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, Autopatrolled has been added to your user rights. This lets you bypass most of the abuse filters, bypass the CAPTCHA, and edit more frequently. If you have questions, bleat ask away.

We hope you enjoy your newfound POWER — and these external tools:

Notice of demotion[edit]

Information icon.svg Message from the RationalWiki Ministry of Demotion and Personal Impediment

Dear GleoLenzic,

We regret to inform you that you have been demoted to the rank of sysop. You have been granted a mop and bucket for the purposes of cleaning up the mess around here.

No questions are allowed. If you have any further questions, (further questions are permissible) please refer to the enclosed pamphlet So you are now a sysop.

At your leisure, please go to the dungeon Room 202 to see the reward mops and hammers you can work towards having!

Sincerely, JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 20:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)