Media Bias/Fact Check
| This might be|
|But we're not sure|
Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) is a fact-checking website which indexes and ranks websites by left- or right wing bias (each website is ranked from "extreme left" to "least biased" to "extreme right") and by quality of factual reporting (each website has a "conspiracy level" and a "pseudo-sci level"). Although MBFC's methodology is ultimately subjective, it appears to be relatively consistent and reliable in its ratings. MBFC has extensions for both Firefox( ) and Chrome( ).
About the website
According to its "About" page, MBFC was started by Dave Van Zandt in November 2015. Other than Van Zandt, the website has five volunteers who perform source research, writing and assist in fact checking. Not much additional information about Van Zandt is publicly available online. A LinkedIn profile states that a Dave Van Zandt is the former owner of Van Zandt Webs and studied at William Paterson University of New Jersey. From the F.A.Q:
Media Bias Fact Check, LLC is a Limited Liability Company owned solely by Dave Van Zandt. He also makes all final editing and publishing decisions. […] Dave Van Zandt obtained a Communications Degree before pursuing a higher degree in the sciences. Dave currently works full time in the health care industry. Dave has spent more than 20 years as an arm chair researcher on media bias and its role in political influence.
According to their FAQ page, their methodology "is a simple tool that provides a general rating of bias" but it "is not a scientifically proven methodology." Their methodology page contains this disclaimer:
Disclaimer: The methodology used by Media Bias Fact Check is our own. It is not a tested scientific method. It is meant as a simple guide for people to get an idea of a source's bias. Media Bias Fact Check will always review and change any factual errors when brought to our attention. We make every effort to be as factual as possible. Our goal is to have MBFC rated as least biased by our own criteria.
MBFC's most trusted fact checking websites include:
The following are a selection of sources rated by MBFC, sorted by quality of factual reporting.
- Center for Inquiry
- Committee for Skeptical Inquiry
- Doubtful News
- National Center for Science Education
- New Scientist
- Science-Based Medicine
- Tax Foundation
- The Skeptic's Dictionary
- Skeptic Magazine
- Left bias:
- Left-center bias:
- Al Jazeera, American Civil Liberties Union, Anti-Defamation League, CBC, Electronic Frontier Foundation, The Guardian, Human Rights Watch, The Independent, NAACP, National Public Radio PBS News Hour, RationalWiki, Southern Poverty Law Center, The New York Times, The Washington Post
- Least biased:
- Right-center bias:
- Cato Institute, Christianity Today, Competitive Enterprise Institute, Council on Foreign Relations, Daily Telegraph, Foundation for Economic Education, Manhattan Institute, National Post, Reason, Salem Radio Network News, Wall Street Journal, Washington Examiner, The Washington Times
- Right bias:
- Left bias:
- Left-center bias:
- Least biased:
- Right-center bias:
- Right bias:
- Accuracy in Media, American Center for Law and Justice, American Enterprise Institute, Americans for Prosperity, American Legislative Exchange Council, American Thinker, Canada Free Press, The Christian Post, Chronicles, Conservative Daily News, The Daily Caller, Daily Express, Daily Mail, Drudge Report, Family Security Matters, Fox News, FreedomWorks, Heartland Institute, Heritage Foundation, Investor's Business Daily, Media Research Center, National Review,National Rifle Association, Newsmax, One America News Network, TheBlaze, The Sun, Townhall.com, WND,
- Ancient Code, Autism Speaks, Christian Broadcasting Network, David Wolfe, Environmental Working Group, European Union Times, Food Babe, Friends of Science, Globalresearch, Greenpeace, NaturalNews, PETA, We Are Change, WikiSpooks, YourNewsWire, Zero Hedge
- Above Top Secret, Age of Autism, Answers in Genesis, Coast to Coast AM, Collective Evolution, David Icke, Discovery Institute, Educate-yourself.org, Godlike Productions, Got Questions, Humans Are Free, Illuminati News, Infowars, Institute for Creation Research, Jesus Is Savior, SCEPCOP, Stormfront, Liberty Beacon, The Mind Unleashed, Vigilant Citizen, Whale.to, What Really Happened, WorldTruth.TV
- Hate groups:
- American College of Pediatricians, American Family Association, American Renaissance, Britain First, Concerned Women for America, The Daily Stormer, David Horowitz Freedom Center, Family Research Council, Jew Watch, Metapedia, Red Ice Creations, Smoloko News, Taki's Magazine, The Right Stuff, VDARE
- Other (includes propaganda, extreme bias, fake news sites):
- AbcNews.com.co, Alliance Defending Freedom, All News Pipeline, Before It's News, Black Pigeon Speaks, Breitbart, Cnn.com.de, Conservapedia, Focus on the Family, GoodGopher, Infogalactic, Knights Templar International, National Enquirer, The Gateway Pundit, WikiIslam
Reception from nutters
Predictably, MBFC has drawn ire from several of the websites that file under "Conspiracy/Pseudoscience" or "Questionable Sources" — typically, in light of their regular publication of fake news and/or general bigotry. For example, WND was rated by MBFC as having mixed factual reporting and right-wing bias. WND then included MBFC in their article titled "Phony Baloney: The 9 Fakest Fake-News Checkers". Zero Hedge, a website rated as conspiracy-pseudoscience, posted the same article on their website. Media Fact Watch[note 1] wrote their own negative article about about fact checkers which also included MBFC.
MBFC has rated some propaganda outlets as being "least biased". For example:
- The United States' Voice of America and allied Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, which are considered to be propaganda outlets by some, and are also regarded as sources to be treated carefully by Wikipedia.
- Until October 2018 MBFC rated China's Xinhua News Agency as "least biased", but the rating has since changed to the somewhat more reasonable "left-center bias". Xinhua has been criticized by Reporters Without Borders as being the "world's biggest propaganda agency, and is regarded by Wikipedia as a source "to treat carefully". Xinhua may still be using techniques that tend to evade MBFC's rating system: government-picked journalists, political indoctrination of trainee journalists, recapitulation of government reports, allowing some critical or sensitive reporting in English but not in Chinese, no demarcation between the Communist Party and Xinhua administrators, defense of repressive regimes (e.g., Zimbabwe, Burma, Sudan and Pakistan), and preparation of "internal reports" that are intended only for Communist Party leaders. An analysis of the French-language Xinhua site found that 80% of news stories about China were positive, indicating that there is a systematic absence of critical reporting.
Other questionable ratings:
- Epoch Times is rated as "right-center bias", but gives no mention of their positive reporting of pseudoscience in their "Beyond Science" section.
- Prior to its re-evaluation as a conspiracy website in November 2018, American Herald Tribune was described as "usually factually based and sourced".[note 2] The website has articles describing LGBT people as "perverts", the Sandy Hook massacre as a "staged event", and 9/11 as a "false flag". The editor of the website, Anthony Hall, hosts a YouTube program called False Flag Weekly News and has supported an "open debate" on the Holocaust in a video for a Holocaust denying organisation. The website also includes articles written by Robert David Steele who famously believes "there is a colony on Mars that is populated by children who were kidnapped and sent into space on a 20-year ride."
- Category:Google News Fact Check — websites that frequently appear in Google News' "Fact Check" section
- MBFC rating: conspiracy-pseudoscience. Factual reporting: mixed.
- MBFC's page on American Herald Tribune was rewritten when it was re-evaluated and the quote ("usually factually based and sourced") has been removed. According to the new description:
The main theme of the website is human rights. Most articles do not utilize loaded language and many are sourced properly. Sounds good right? That is only part of the story. As I mentioned there is a wide variety of writers, some of which are conspiracy theorists. [...] While many articles on this website are credible there are just as many that are in the tin foil hat realm of conspiracy theories. Overall, we rate the American Herald Tribune a Conspiracy website.
- Methodology, MediaBiasFactCheck
- Voice of America (8/15/2016) Updated (7/5/2017) Media Bias/Fact Check
- Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty (M. Huitsing 5/8/2018) Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty] Media Bias/Fact Check
- Uncle Sam Got a Shiny New Propaganda Bullhorn for Christmas: A new partnership is turning Radio Free Europe into an anti-Russia propaganda machine. by James Carden (January 6, 2016) The Nation.
- Americans Finally Have Access to American Propaganda by Elspeth Reeve (Jul 15, 2013) The Atlantic.
- See the Wikipedia article on Potentially unreliable sources.
- Least Biased Media Bias/Fact Check (archived from October 10, 2018).
- Xinhua News Agency (M. Huitsing, 1/6/2018; Updated by D. Van Zandt 10/14/2018) Media Bias/Fact Check.
- Xinhua: the world's biggest propaganda agency (September 30, 2005 - Updated on January 20, 2016) Reporters Without Borders.
- The World's Biggest Propaganda Agency by Gautier Battistella et al. (2005) Reporters Without Borders.
- The Epoch Times (M. Huitsing 8/21/2017) (Updated 1/31/2018) Media Bias/Fact Check.
- Beyond Science The Epoch Times.