RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Pilots for 9/11 Truth

Pilots for 9/11 Truth | Result: Merged into 9/11

Pilots for 9/11 Truth (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. Obscure truthers whose only internet presence has long since gone away. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 15:20, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
2. Stubby little stub. Let's boot it! - Rairyu75 (Talk) 15:26, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
3. It's 5 sentences long. Make it an article or burn it all down already. CorruptUser 18:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
4. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano^{Make a Reservation} 19:38, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
5. — 𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭 ^{talk stalk} 07:34, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
6. I was thinking about a merge, but given how there is not much on the page worth transfering over, and none of the sources work, why not just delete? I could only see a reasonable transfer of 2 unsourced sentences. --Gale5050 (talk) 14:46, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Merge/redirect

1. Perhaps a listing of 'obscure 9/11 conspiracy theory groups' as a subsection on the main 9/11 page (or a separate page if there are enough of them) would be the simplest way of handling such matters. Anna Livia (talk) 18:23, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

   There is a bullet list of truthers in the main 9/11 page. I certainly would not object to merging this into there and expanding that section. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 18:33, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

2. Per Anna Livia and Cosmik. Techpriest (talk) 19:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

   There are likely to be a number of '9/11 - Twenty Years After, the Truth (Whether or not anyone agrees with me)' books coming out, so would be convenient to have something arranged ahead of time. 19:37, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

3. Monet ^Ye 18:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
4. Seems appropriate. ☭Comrade GC☭^{Ministry of Praise} 18:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
5. A minor listing of fringe or defunct groups would be more fitting. ℕoir LeSable (talk) 20:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
6. I like the idea proposed by Anna Livia. 𝒮𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓃𝑒 ^talk 23:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
7. This would make for a great little paragraph on the 9/11 page. It is vital that 9/11 "truthers" are relentlessly debunked.~April ^Chat? 21:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
8. -Flandres (talk) 18:42, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Goat

• Their site appears to be down now, but was up this January. 𝒮𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓃𝑒 ^talk 15:27, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

  I'm honestly not finding much other online presence about them (at least, not as much as AE911Truth). It looks like a similar group, "9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers" (911pilots.org) has a bigger footprint among conspiracy theorist pilots now (given they have their own active Youtube channel and Twitter), but I haven't looked too deeply into this yet. ℕoir LeSable (talk) 16:06, 25 July 2021 (UTC)