2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $9223.37Goal: $10000

RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Pilots for 9/11 Truth

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Pilots for 9/11 Truth | Result: Merged into 9/11[edit]

Pilots for 9/11 Truth (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete[edit]

  1. Obscure truthers whose only internet presence has long since gone away. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 15:20, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
  2. Stubby little stub. Let's boot it! - Rairyu75 (Talk) 15:26, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
  3. It's 5 sentences long. Make it an article or burn it all down already. CorruptUser 18:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
  4. Pizza SLICE.gifChef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 19:38, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
  5. 𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭 talk stalk 07:34, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
  6. I was thinking about a merge, but given how there is not much on the page worth transfering over, and none of the sources work, why not just delete? I could only see a reasonable transfer of 2 unsourced sentences. --Gale5050 (talk) 14:46, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Keep[edit]

Merge/redirect[edit]

  1. Perhaps a listing of 'obscure 9/11 conspiracy theory groups' as a subsection on the main 9/11 page (or a separate page if there are enough of them) would be the simplest way of handling such matters. Anna Livia (talk) 18:23, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
    There is a bullet list of truthers in the main 9/11 page. I certainly would not object to merging this into there and expanding that section. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 18:33, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
  2. Per Anna Livia and Cosmik. Techpriest (talk) 19:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
    There are likely to be a number of '9/11 - Twenty Years After, the Truth (Whether or not anyone agrees with me)' books coming out, so would be convenient to have something arranged ahead of time. 19:37, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
  3. Monet Ye 18:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
  4. Seems appropriate. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 18:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
  5. A minor listing of fringe or defunct groups would be more fitting. ℕoir LeSable (talk) 20:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
  6. I like the idea proposed by Anna Livia. 𝒮𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓃𝑒 talk 23:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
  7. This would make for a great little paragraph on the 9/11 page. It is vital that 9/11 "truthers" are relentlessly debunked.~April Chat? 21:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  8. -Flandres (talk) 18:42, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Goat[edit]

  • Their site appears to be down now, but was up this January. 𝒮𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓃𝑒 talk 15:27, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
    I'm honestly not finding much other online presence about them (at least, not as much as AE911Truth). It looks like a similar group, "9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers" (911pilots.org) has a bigger footprint among conspiracy theorist pilots now (given they have their own active Youtube channel and Twitter), but I haven't looked too deeply into this yet. ℕoir LeSable (talk) 16:06, 25 July 2021 (UTC)