The dose makes the poison

Poetry of reality Science

We must know. We will know.

Physics Chemistry Biology Astronomy Geology

A view from the shoulders of giants.

Physical science Experimental control Philosophy of science Lie detection Biology Kevin Folta Horizon problem John Snow v - t - e

“”All things are poisons; there are none that are not a poisons. Only the dose makes something a poison. Original in German: Wenn ihr jedes Gift recht auslegen wollt, was ist, das nit Gift ist? Alle Dinge sind Gift, und nichts ist ohne Gift; allein die dosis machts, daß ein Ding kein Gift sei.

—Paracelsus

“”Plants are not just food for animals, and animals are not just decorations on the vegetation. The world is not green. It is colored lectin, tannin, cyanide, caffeine, aflatoxin, and canavanine. And there is a lot of cellulose thrown in to make the mix even more inedible. Animals are not ambulatory bomb calorimeters. They starve, they ache, they abort, they vomit, they remember, they die, and they evolve.

—Daniel H. Janzen

The dose makes the poison is a phrase that refers to the fact that whether a substance causes toxic effects depends on how much of it is taken. A "toxic" substance is harmless if taken in small enough quantities, and a "harmless" one can be poisonous if taken in large enough quantities. For instance, despite cinnamon being a commonplace and wildly popular spice, consuming too much can potentially cause liver damage because of the coumarin content. Similarly, water intake is essential for survival, but overhydration is still lethal (not to mention drowning). The same principle applies to any other substance. Therefore, a "poison" is something that kills in an arbitrarily short time when an arbitrarily low quantity of it is used.

Examples

Dietary "poisons"

Toxins in everyday foods

Pure acetic acid can cause severe burns and many other issues, but humans consume small amounts of acetic acid all the time in vinegar.

One chemical used for rust removal and metal cleaning can cause respiratory and skin irritation, as well as severe damage to the eyes. It's hazardous and classified as a poison. When ingested, it can cause "a severe burning pain of the mouth, throat and stomach followed by profuse vomiting (sometimes bloody). Small doses of oxalate in the body can cause headache, pain and twitching in muscles, and cramps. Larger doses can cause weak and irregular heartbeat, drop in blood pressure and signs of heart failure. Large doses rapidly cause a shock-like state, convulsions, coma and possibly death." This substance is found naturally in many common vegetables, including broccoli, spinach, rhubarb, beets, onions, carrots, celery, cucumbers, peas, tomatoes, and potatoes. It's oxalic acid. Indeed, eating too many oxalic-acid-containing foods can cause kidney stones. Sorry, kids, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't eat your vegetables.

Antivaxxers often call out vaccines because they contain formaldehyde, which is a carcinogen. However, the amount of formaldehyde in a vaccine is much lower than that produced naturally by the body; the quantity of formaldehyde in vaccines is 1% that found in the human body. In addition, many foods (including pears, apples, cabbages, carrots, green onions, spinach, tomatoes, fish, cheese, and milk) naturally contain trace amounts of formaldehyde.

Nicotine is found in a number of vegetables, including tomatoes, eggplants, and peppers. The notion that tomatoes don't kill you because they contain "natural" nicotine cannot possibly apply, because the most well-known source of nicotine, tobacco, is also perfectly natural. The extremely small quantity of nicotine found in food may prevent Parkinson's diseasee, and so be good for you, which demonstrates that even a poisonous substance can be beneficial at lower doses.

Foods containing carcinogenic compounds include, but are not limited to, cocoa, celery, cinnamon, parsley, carrots, peaches, pineapples, mushrooms, turnips, and even broccoli.

One substance which has been described as being "very toxic even in small quantities" can cause gastrointestinal and neurological disorders, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, stomach cramps, burning of the throat, headaches, dizziness, hallucinations, loss of sensation, paralysis, fever, jaundice, dilated pupils and hypothermia; in large quantities, it may cause death. The substance in question is solanine, and is found in potatoes. And before you ask: yes, potatoes can cause solanine poisoning. Tomatoes, paprika, eggplants, peppers, blueberries, apples, cherries, sugar beets, huckleberries, okra, and artichokes also contain solanine.

Vitamin A is essential for proper functioning of the human body. But too much can cause liver damage, as well as other problems. In fact, the material safety data sheets for various forms of vitamin A look pretty scary, and (with their descriptions of animal carcinogenicity, skin irritation, etc.) make them sound like things you'd want to keep away from your body at all costs. If you didn't know beforehand what the chemicals in question were, you'd think they were hazardous poisons (and, indeed, they are, like oxalic acid, described as "hazardous"). If the dose did not make the poison, you'd have to stay away from pretty much every food ever.

Many health scares revolve around the presence of a "toxic" compound in a product, such as thiomersal in vaccines. The DHMO hoax parodied chemophobic fear-mongering by listing many scary facts about water, which was referred to by the name "dihydrogen monoxide" (or DHMO). A possible description of water could go along the lines of: "Dihydrogen monoxide can be fatal when inhaled, and forcing people to inhale DHMO is a widely used form of torture. You may not know this, but the air is full of DHMO, which you are constantly breathing in. The chemical is constantly poisoning you every day."

Drinking too much water can be fatal, but receiving minute amounts of Botox — made from the natural botulinum toxin, the most toxic substance currently known — is not. Ironically, Jenny McCarthy campaigns against vaccines because of the "poisons" contained in them, yet she has used Botox repeatedly.

Proponents of organic produce point out the fact that it has less pesticide residue than conventional food, but both kinds contain a safe amount, and organic food is not significantly different from ordinary food.

Exceptions

Some heavy metals, particularly lead, can accumulate in the body over time. Current wisdom is that there is no safe level of environmental lead exposure.

In the case of drugs, taking small dosages too often can cause the body to develop a tolerance, which would mean that more would be needed to achieve the desired effect (such as pain relief in the case of painkillers) and therefore cause the person to end up taking an unsafe amount. Conversely, in the case of arsenic, low-level consumption over time in an individual can cause tolerance to the point where erstwhile lethal amounts can be consumed without dying.

Another important exception to the rule is alcohol. Despite any potential benefits of low-to-moderate alcohol consumption, medical institutions have failed to find any "safe" level of alcohol consumption; although consuming alcohol in smaller amounts lessens the risk of cancer, there is no threshold below which the consumption of alcohol has no carcinogenic effects.

Appropriation by experts for hire

An example of an unscrupulous application of this ancient adage was provided by perhaps the tobacco lobby's favourite expert for hire, S. Fred Singer, in his disinformation campaign against the dangers of second-hand smoke. Alongside another expert for hire, Kent Jeffreys, Singer claimed that because the dose makes the poison, the Environmental Protection Agency had to focus on the threshold effect of second hand smoke and not on its quite obvious harmful effects. Thus, any recommendation on, let alone actions against second hand smoke should be postponed pending the results of research into threshold effects. This was a classic example of the muddying the waters and delaying actions that Singer and his astroturfing front organizations pioneered.

1986 California Proposition 65, or ignoring the dose making the poison

A Proposition 65 at a gas pump… yawn!

Proposition 65 was a ballot measure that passed by 63% to 37% in 1986 and became the law in California. The law states:

“”No person in the course of doing business shall knowingly discharge or release a chemical known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity into water or onto or into land where such chemical passes or probably will pass into any source of drinking water, notwithstanding any other provision or authorization of law except as provided in Section 25249.9. 25249.6. Required Warning Before Exposure To Chemicals Known to Cause Cancer Or Reproductive Toxicity. No person in the course of doing business shall knowingly and intentionally expose any individual to a chemical known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity without first giving clear and reasonable warning to such individual…

The law went further than the already existing Federal Clean Water Act of 1972, but notably Proposition 65 did not specify any minimum threshold for chemicals (thus falsely implying that the dose does not make the poison). The result of having no threshold was a proliferation of warning signs on virtually every California gas pump, retail store, even apartment complex and many products, simply to avoid lawsuits, but no other change in behavior. The proliferation of warning signs has been analyzed as a "wolf or puppy" warning: so many warnings about non-hazards numb people to warnings about actual hazards.

Yay! Celebrities got what they wanted… until they didn't like the results.

The campaign was notably supported by a large group of Hollywood celebrities, some of whom spread inflammatory falsehoods, one of the worst was Whoopi Goldberg's "The bottom line is that your children are going to die!" The backers did not actually expect the proposition to pass but were using it as a (failed) vehicle to get their candidate elected as governor. After the proposition did pass, its backers were generally unhappy with the results: David Roe (one of the drafters) said, "From my perspective, every warning is a failure."

A rare victory against the inanity of Proposition 65 was the rejection of the requirement for warning labels on coffee.

See also

• Dihydrogen monoxide
• E number
• Homeopathy
• Median lethal dose
• Precautionary principle — a tactic that is often used against the dose makes the poison rationale
• Toxin

External links

• Everything gives you cancer
• Here are the intriguing toxins that spice up our favorite holiday dishes, Ars Technica