There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
Jim Crow laws
| The colorful pseudoscience|
|Hating thy neighbour|
|Divide and conquer|
“”There is a separation of coloured people from white people in the United States. That separation is not a disease of coloured people. It is a disease of white people. I do not intend to be quiet about it.
|—Albert Einstein, 1946|
The Jim Crow laws were state and local laws in the United States enacted between 1876 and 1965. They mandated de jure racial segregation in all public facilities, with a supposedly "separate but equal" status for black Americans, as well as imposing legal barriers on who private businesses were allowed to serve, including but by no means limited to requiring restaurants to designate themselves for one particular race, prohibiting black-owned barber shops from serving white clients whether the whites wanted it or not, requiring apartment buildings to designate themselves black or white, or prohibiting interracial athletic events even if entirely financed and organized by a private party. In reality, this led to treatment and accommodations that were usually inferior to those provided for white Americans, systematizing a number of economic, educational and social disadvantages. Jim Crow laws were particularly popular in the South, where southern hospitality was enjoyed by all colored folks who knew how to behave themselves, and avoided upsetting white folks by being uppity.
Some examples of Jim Crow laws are the segregation of public schools, public places, and public transportation, and the segregation of restrooms and restaurants for whites and blacks. The U.S. military was also segregated. These Jim Crow Laws were separate from the 1800-66 Black Codes, which had also restricted the civil rights and civil liberties of African Americans.
Segregation was officially ended in the US military with Executive Order 9981, which as signed by President Harry S. Truman in 1948. State-sponsored school segregation was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education. Generally, the remaining Jim Crow laws were overruled by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Separate but equal
Jim Crow laws were generally not so crude as to deny rights, instead enforcing segregation. In theory, both races would have access to their own versions of the same amenities and services. Buses in Montgomery, Alabama, had separate sections for blacks and whites. The Rosa Parks incident occurred when a black woman, sitting in the "white section" of the bus, refused to give up her seat to a white man. She was legally allowed to travel on the bus, but was not sitting in the area assigned to blacks. The area assigned to blacks could be changed by the bus companies and drivers, so it wasn't uncommon for blacks to be removed from seats needed for white passengers. The laws, and the way in which they were enforced, made a mockery of the notion of equality.
Black schools received less funding than white schools, and laws were enacted in the knowledge that they would disproportionately affect black citizens. One of the iconic images of this era is that of separate water fountains for blacks and whites.
Attempts to stall its destruction
Since the Southern Strategy and the Reagan era, desegregation of public schools, lead regulations, health insurance equity and poverty relief have slowed down and can be tied to the stagnation of black wages today. The Affordable Care Act is attempting to address at least one of these concerns.
While libertarians, almost inherently, are opposed to government discrimination, such as Jim Crow laws, their views on the remedy of the Civil Rights Act are mixed. Title II of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibited discrimination in public accommodations. Some — but not all — libertarians are opposed to the idea that a privately-owned business can be told by the government that they must serve everyone; according to these libertarians, this is in opposition to the idea of freedom of association for individuals (or corporations — same thing to them apparently). Rand Paul has questioned Title II, Peter Thiel has expressed opposition to both women's suffrage (the Nineteenth Amendment in the US) and "welfare beneficiaries" (reasonably interpreted to mean minorities).
- Black brute
- One-drop rule
- Red herrings in Holocaust denial, where Jim Crow laws are used as a tu quoque argument to downplay the Holocaust
- Whataboutism is the same tactic as above used by Soviet propaganda and past and present Stalin apologetics to excuse Soviet wrongdoings. In modern times, it is often used by Russian, Chinese or North Korean politicians or sympathizers as an excuse, too (often along the lines of the old Soviet propaganda-phrase "And you are lynching Negroes").
- Separate but equal
- Apartheid - South Africa seeing what America did and thinking to itself: We can do better!
- Einstein at Lincoln, Snopes
- Lawrence Otis Graham, Our Kind of People: Inside America's Black Upper Class. Harper Collins, 2009. p.335.
- Separate is Not Equal: Brown v. Board of Education, Smithsonian
- Examples of Jim Crow laws, Ferris State University
- Charles Martin. Benching Jim Crow: The Rise and Fall of the Color Line in Southern College Sports, 1890-1980. University of Illinois Press, 2010.
- Beginnings of Black Education, Virginia Historical Society
- What If Black America Were a Country?, The Atlantic
- Charts: The economic gap between blacks and whites hasn’t budged for 50 years, The Washington Post
- Context Matters: A Better Libertarian Approach to Antidiscrimination Law by David E. Bernstein (June 16, 2010) Cato Unbound.
- Libertarianism and the Right to Discriminate by Robert A. Levy (March/April 2016) Cato Policy Report.
- Rand Paul's rewriting of his own remarks on the Civil Rights Act by Glenn Kessler (April 11, 2013) The Washington Post.
- The Education of a Libertarian by Peter Thiel (April 13, 2009) Cato Unbound.
- 11 questions to see if libertarians are hypocrites: Eleven questions that expose their contradictions and faulty logic by R.J. Eskow (Sep 12, 2013 12:19 PM EDT) Salon.