There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
Supreme Court of the United States
| Part of a series on the|
|Standards of review|
|Other legal theories|
|Defining moments in law|
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) consists of nine lifetime appointed people who sit in judgment on whether or not laws (local, state, or federal) are in compliance with the US Constitution and have the final say on how the federal laws are to be interpreted. This power of the courts is called judicial review, and the precedent for its use by the SCOTUS was established in the 1802 case Marbury v. Madison. The Supreme Court also hears lawsuits between states, as with the recent suit against Colorado's legalization of marijuana.
The members, or "associate justices," are appointed by the President, and take office upon confirmation by the Senate. The last time the Senate voted not to confirm an appointment to the Supreme Court was in 1987 with Robert Bork. Since justices are appointed for life, appointments are sometimes the most lasting legacy of a president.
One member appointed the same way as the other justices, serves as "chief justice," who, although still only having one vote on cases, has the interesting and sometimes important power to assign the writing of majority decisions (when they are in the majority) to one of the associates. This can be used to influence the exact nature of a decision — the chief justice might vote with a four-justice minority (or more importantly, a five-justice majority) in order to assign the decision writing to a justice with a weaker stand than the other members of the majority.
In practice, the most powerful member of the Court is rarely the chief justice but the one or two "moderate" members who are very often the swing votes on contentious issues. Anthony Kennedy is purported to be one such justice on the current Court (see below).
Due to the Roberts Court's conservative majority, its decisions have been some of the most conservative in decades. Members of this five-man group include:
- John Roberts (Chief Justice): A George W. Bush appointee, Chief Justice Roberts has opposed (of all things) the Endangered Species Act, and has been criticized for heading an "activist court"; the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, Gonzales v. Carhart, and Shelby County v. Holder debacles are commonly cited examples. On the other hand, he voted to uphold most of Obamacare as constitutional.
- Samuel Alito: He has argued that Congress cannot prevent private citizens from owning submachine guns. Guess who appointed him? Dubya, of course!
- Clarence Thomas: A George H. W. Bush nominee, Thomas is the court's biggest wingnut, questioning Barack Obama's birth certificate and believing that corporate and PAC sponsors of political advertising should not be required to disclose who paid for them.
- Neil Gorsuch: Nominated by Donald Trump to replace the deceased Antonin Scalia, he's the newest addition to the court and one of the youngest at 50. He was forced through after Mitch McConnell nuked the filibuster for Supreme Court picks, a year after McConnell himself refused to give a hearing to Merrick Garland, the liberal pick by Barack Obama the year before. You probably know Gorsuch most by his support and lobbying for the Hobby Lobby ruling. Gorsuch has been accused of plagiarism.
Mostly reliable liberal Justices who were appointed by the last two Democratic Presidents since 1980 (Clinton and Obama). During Obama's first two years with a Democratic Congress, there were calls for the two remaining Clinton appointees to retire in 2010, in order for Obama to appoint younger replacements. Sadly, this did not happen, thereby risking two or even three appointments by Donald Trump.
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg: The oldest member of the Court, she was a Clinton appointee, and was a volunteer lawyer for the ACLU. She is also a
misandrist[note 1] feminist.
- Stephen Breyer: He has defended the Supreme Court's use of international law and is a stalwart advocate of abortion rights. Yes, another Clinton nominee.
- Sonia Sotomayor: Sotomayor was both the first Hispanic person nominated to the Court and Barack Obama's first appointee.
- Elena Kagan: As Obama's second appointee, Kagan has been criticized for everything from playing softball,[note 2] to not being a judge.
- Anthony Kennedy: Nominated by Ronald Reagan, octogenarian Kennedy is most definitely not one of "those" Kennedys. Said to be the court's swing vote, being the member who sits ideologically between the four left-wing members (see below) and the right-wing "Four Horsemen." Kennedy is a fairly reliable vote for conservative economic ideology, but he has a well-noted libertarian streak and emphasis on "human dignity" that largely explains his votes with liberals on social issues like gay marriage. Incidentally, should he vote with the liberals (with no other partisan justices defecting), he chooses who will write the majority opinion as he is senior to all those in the liberal wing[note 3].
Other supreme courts
Of the US states, 48 have a single court of last resort (called the Court of Appeals in Maryland and New York, the Supreme Judicial Court in Maine and Massachusetts, and the Supreme Court elsewhere). Oklahoma and Texas each have two courts of last resort, a Supreme Court for civil matters and a Court of Criminal Appeals for criminal matters. A state supreme court's interpretation of its state constitution and its state statutory and common law is final and is binding on both lower state courts and all federal courts, including (at least in theory) the Supreme Court of the United States. Federal courts may still adjudicate whether a state's constitution and laws conflict with the U.S. Constitution or federal law.
Also, many other countries have similar ultimate judicial arbiters with one name or another. They tend to be comparatively functional and non-partisan.
- Some people just can't tell the difference between treating women like actual human beings and hurting the feelings of sexist pricks.
- It goes to show that the less material criticism there is to work with, the more ridiculous the mudslinging will be.
- Sometimes Chief Justice Roberts rules with the liberal wing, as seen in King v. Burwell(2015), meaning he writes the ruling.
- Nebraska and Oklahoma Sue to Overturn Legal Weed in Colorado, Mother Jones
- Court Under Roberts is Most Conservative in Decades, The New York Times
- Supreme Court Rejects Appeal Over Obama's Citizenship, The New York Times
- "This Week in Crazy: Clarence Thomas"
- Neil Gorsuch’s plagiarism—or is it plagiarism?
- "Anti-capitalist!" "Radical leftist!" "Socialist autocrat!" "Revolutionary progressivism!" Good god, if you can't stomach using the "c" word, she probably isn't one.
- Which Supreme Court Justices Vote Together Most and Least Often, The New York Times