| Great and terrible|
|On our shelf:|
“”Dan Brown writes sentences like 'The famous man looked at the red cup.'
Dan Brown is a very successful writer of action/suspense novels, including The Da Vinci Code, Angels and Demons, and The Lost Symbol. His plot-lines usually involve fact, pseudoscience and pseudohistory mixed in such a way as to leave less aware readers totally confused. How far Mr. Brown himself believes these ideas is a matter for conjecture.. Dan Brown has been sued twice by Jack Dunn who claims Brown copied his story and characters from The Vatican Boys (1997) into The Da Vinci Code (2003) and Angels & Demons (2000). Dunn claims that Dan Brown has no talent and has stolen his and that the Robert Langdon series of books and movies are "The Largest Literary and Movie Crime in History" (which is probably true).
- 1 Robert Langdon series
- 1.1 The Da Vinci Code
- 1.2 Angels and Demons
- 1.3 The Lost Symbol
- 1.4 Inferno
- 1.5 Origin
- 2 Other novels
- 3 External links
- 4 Notes
- 5 References
Robert Langdon series
Robert Langdon, the series' protagonist and Dan Brown's obvious self-insert character, is a world-renowned Harvard professor of history of art and "symbology", which isn't even a real thing.
Each novel follows almost the exact same formula: some important guy dies from unnatural causes; Robert Langdon gets mixed up and, implicated in a conspiracy, has to go on the run looking for historical clues in an over-touristed city with a female character who is very beautiful and very smart (but not as smart as Langdon), while being chased by an unstoppable killer. In the end, nothing is as it seems, and the explanation behind the whole thing is both "rational" and really stupid.
The Da Vinci Code
The Da Vinci Code tells the story of a conspiracy to hide the fact that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene and had children. The novel also depicts the Knights Templar as Gnostics who were in on the secret. The book uses footnotes to back up its outlandish claims even though they are bullshit.
This book was also made into a bad movie by Sony Pictures, starring Tom Hanks. Why, Tom?
A mercifully short summary
Jesus and Mary Magdalene got it on, went to France, and founded the Merovingian bloodline, the bloodline being considered the true Holy Grail. This conflicts with accepted Christian doctrine, and the equally realistic Indiana Jones and The Last Crusade. Many centuries of secrecy followed, or the rather more realistic Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Along came the Priory of Sion and the Knights Templar, tasked with preserving the secret of the Grail. The Roman Catholic Church, specifically Opus Dei, were eager to preserve Christ's lifestyle as a confirmed bachelor, and thus the fun begins.
Some of those who should have been keeping the secret decided to leave odd little clues around, Leonardo Da Vinci's The Last Supper being an example of this. A curator at the Louvre was murdered by a sinister albino monk, but not before he managed to leave clues written in his own blood. From this follows lots of running around the world, the sinister albino monk in hot pursuit, and finally a reading of Leonardo's secret message indicating that the Grail (Magdalene's remains) is buried beneath the pyramid in the Louvre. That's it.
If you want more crazy pseudohistory then watch National Treasure. At least in that case the author hasn't tried to sell it as being in any way factual.[notes 1]
The book was generally derided by critics and the literate, but this didn't prevent it from becoming the second-best selling book of 2004. Conspiracy theories sell — as do books with lots of implausible plot twists, plenty of action and exotic locations all wrapped up in short and easy sentences. The Da Vinci Code became the book that simply could not be avoided, and in the same way that born again Christians feel the need to share their profound discovery with everyone, innocent dinner party participants could scarcely escape having Brown's "revelations" shared with them.
The movie adaptation became the fifth highest grossing film of 2006, behind equally realistic Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest, Night at the Museum, Cars, and X-Men: The Last Stand.
The Catholic Church and Opus Dei were not overly impressed by Brown's book or the movie. The church urged a boycott, while Opus Dei asked that a disclaimer be added to the movie. As is often the case with religiously-motivated outrage, this probably just encouraged people to see what all the fuss was about.
In reality, the Merovingians were some of the most ineffectual royalty in European history. The French know the end of the dynasty as rois fainéants ("do-nothing kings"). The blood of Jesus Christ supposedly in their bloodstream did not prevent the kings from losing most of their power to their majordomos, until Charles Martel claimed the throne himself and ousted the last Merovingian king of France, with claims of divine sanction, in fact.
Sued for copyright infringement
The background of The Da Vinci Code is borrowed from a book named Holy Blood, Holy Grail. This book was sold as a non-fictional historical account of Christ's babymaking with Magdalene and the subsequent cover-ups instituted by the Catholic Church. The authors sued Brown for copyright infringement, but the case was decided against them. The judge ruled that history and theories are not protected by copyright law, regardless of their accuracy. The moral of the story here is to avoid presenting confabulation as fact if you want to sue people who write novels based on your junk.[notes 2]
Angels and Demons
Angels and Demons is more or less a prequel to The Da Vinci Code. In this book, the Illuminati have apparently placed antimatter (in a miraculous annihilation-proof container) somewhere in the Vatican, although it all turns out to be a dumb prank in the end. Brown seems to have decided that scientific absurdities would be a good complement to conspiracy theories.
This was also made into another movie starring Tom Hanks. It was marginally better than The Da Vinci Code because it didn't take itself too seriously and knew that the whole thing was a bit of a farce. In this respect, it was not like the book. Plus, the movie changed the story so that Angels and Demons was a sequel to The Da Vinci Code, because apparently only George Lucas and Peter Jackson are allowed to make prequels.
Brown's character and a pretty girl search Rome's most famous tourist destinations for clues to the location of a jar of antimatter stolen from CERN (by the Illuminati, of course) that will annihilate the Vatican in 24 hours when it explodes, while being chased by a literal Assassin. Yeah.
The book features the collection of extremely large amounts of antimatter, portable containers that can hold it without being annihilated, and the main character's survival of a fall from a helicopter by using a nine square-foot tarp as a parachute. However, the most absurd suggestion of the book by far is that two people could have a fight in the fountain in the Piazza Navona without anyone noticing.
The Lost Symbol
While it contains the usual level of pseudohistory which readers have come to expect, in this novel Mr. Brown goes somewhat off the deep end with the pseudoscience — especially with its enthusiastic promotion of Noetic science, although Brown's self-insert manages to debunk crap like the Washington, D.C. street design conspiracy theory.
Dan Brown's hero has to race around a capital city solving strange enigmas while being pursued by a homicidal maniac and showing how clever he is to a pretty girl — so it's really the same as the last two.[notes 3] The only change in this one is that the Masons are really really Good Guys, and the CIA is responsible for security in Washington.
If a conspiracy theory is even alluded to in this book, then it has conclusively jumped the shark.
It's just plain fucking awful.
A mad scientist obsessed with overpopulation, The Divine Comedy, and transhumanism kills himself, setting off a convoluted chain of events in which the protagonist and a hot girl must run around Florence solving puzzles while being chased by the authorities, yadda yadda yadda. It was also adapted into a Tom Hanks movie.[notes 4]
Another dumb pseudo-intellectual mess, which deals with the origin of life (spoiler: it's physics). Brown set the novel in Spain, perhaps as an apology for inaccurately painting the country as a corrupt, impoverished dump in Digital Fortress.
After the assassination at the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao of a brilliant Elon Musk-Steve Jobs hybrid that supposedly discovers the secret of where and how life started, the protagonist and a pretty girl run around avoiding a hitman and searching mystical clues for the fifth fucking time. There is also a talking supercomputer. And the King of Spain and a Catholic Bishop are secretly gay lovers. And apparently the people who run conspiracy theory forums have journalistic integrity.
More of the same, most notably a lot of fails in what refers to Spain (cranberry juice being very popular there when said plant in Spain grows only in very localized zones) and especially the city of Seville, that for him is basically a third-world hellhole with a very poor healthcare system.
- Debunking Da Vinci
- The official website of the movie for The Da Vinci Code
- The "Dan Browned" article on TV Tropes
- Though a bunch of National Archives employees were likely diagnosed with self-induced concussions after they left the theatre.
- Another moral is: if a novelist has a hit using your work as a plot device, reissue your book with a sticker saying "the truth behind the novel" instead of getting on your high horse.
- Well, if you're a Christian and learn the true identity of the love interest in The Da Vinci Code, it's ...kinda creepy.
- It's anyone's guess why they decided to skip The Lost Symbol, a book dealing with Freemasonry and set in Washington. Probably because National Treasure was more entertaining.
- Talking Books
- Tom Chivers, "The Lost Symbol and The Da Vinci Code author Dan Brown: 50 factual errors", The Daily Telegraph, 25 September 2009
- "All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals in this novel are accurate."
- Life After 'The Da Vinci Code'
- Laura Miller, "The Da Vinci Con", The New York Times, 22 February 2004
- The Dan Brown Code, Language Log
- Box Office Mojo
- Rois faineants
- Judge rejects claims in ‘Da Vinci’ suit, NBC
- “Dumbest Thing Ever”: Scribbling in the Margins of Dan Brown’s Inferno
- Scroll down to Literature
- Have fun