User talk:AOAPJM

Welcome

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, AOAPJM! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

Welcome to RW! 32℉uzzy, 0℃atPotato (talk/stalk) 20:39, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Sysop

Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, wizard Sysop has been added to your user rights. Feel free to let your newfound POWER course through your veins. Once the high wears off, see RationalWiki:Sysop guide for more information. If you have questions, bleat ask away. Herr FuzzyKatzenPotato (talk/stalk) 21:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Wow, thanks! Although I take offense to the "general lack of insanity" part of your statement. AOAPJM (talk) 21:09, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

"echo chamber"

Nice page -- can you try and find some articles to link to it so that people have a better chance of reading it? Thanks. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 22:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, I think the term is already mentioned in a few, so I'll link those first. AOAPJM (talk) 22:26, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Awesome. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 22:30, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Nice work

Sexual Bolshevism. See tip from AH above. Herr FuzzyKatzenPotato (talk/stalk) 02:30, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Revisiondelete

Hello! we don't revdelete ordinary diffs on RationalWiki. We save it for cases such as posting personal information without permission, or obvious extremely vile trolling. Thanks. Bicycle^wheel 20:22, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Ooops, sorry. Thanks for telling me. – AOAPJM ^(talk) 19:44, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

No problem. Bicycle^wheel 13:46, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Jeremy Corbyn

Have a look at my talk page for more on Corbyn and his stance with regards to Israel. As I am currently not a sysop I cannot edit the page on Corbyn as it is sysop protected. Thank you in any case for your more accurate rewording. Avengerofthe BoN (talk) 18:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I've added information about Corbyn and al-Quds Day to the article. – AOAPJM ^(talk) 19:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome and thank you. Also, a minor nitpick, at one point you spell it "taboid" without the l. I would correct it, but ... yaknow... Avengerofthe BoN (talk) 19:35, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Duh! Thanks for correcting me. – AOAPJM ^(talk) 19:37, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

No problem! Avengerofthe BoN (talk) 19:42, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi Joshua, May I suggest you not assist Avenger in circumventing the removal of his sysop status by making edits he wants -- as against disagreement by nearly everyone else -- on the Jeremy Corbyn page. See the bottom of the Corbyn talk page to observe how he's using you.---Mona- (talk) 19:59, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Mona I am sure User:AOAPJM is capable of making decisions without your aid. That is all I am going to say on that for now. Avengerofthe BoN (talk) 20:05, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Please, take your feud somewhere else. I was alerted to some missing information, I re-added it as I thought it seemed relevant. If you disagree with the specifics, then please say so. I'm definitely not pushing any kind of agenda, and I don't wish one to be pushed on the Jeremy Corbyn article, either. Other than RationalWiki's evil Communist NWO agenda, that is... – AOAPJM ^(talk) 20:09, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

It was in no way my intention to bring any argument to your talk page. I wanted to inform you of something that I thought relevant with regards to Mister Corbyn and thought linking to my talk page would be the best way to do so. I apologize for any inconvenience caused. And I sincerely hope Mona and you don't cross paths at cross purposes again. Avengerofthe BoN (talk) 20:18, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

I didn't think it was your intention to bring any argument to my talk page, and you haven't really given me any inconvenience. And it's okay, thank you for showing me the information: I think some of it was definitely way over the top, not going to lie, but I added what seemed appropriate to the article.

And like I said – I'm not pushing any agenda and I don't mind people disagreeing with the specifics and if the content was wrong or misleading, I don't mind being brought up on that, quite the opposite. But telling me not to add information and telling me I'm being used doesn't really help anyone; I am fully capable of making my own decisions, thank you very much, and if you must know I am generally in favour of Corbyn, not against. – AOAPJM ^(talk) 20:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Believe it or not, I am also in favor of Corbyn, at least based on what I know about his stances thus far. However, there are some issues about which I firmly disagree with him. One of them is the fact that he is too close to Hezbollah and their sympathizers (something which I intended to point out in the article). Another is his stance on Homeopathy that seems to be either wobbly or dog whistle support. That being said, he would still be the preferable option over David Cameron, but we should aim to point the whole picture, even though some might find that hard to swallow. Avengerofthe BoN (talk) 20:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Joshua, I didn't mean to offend you. I merely suggested you read the Jeremy Corbyn talk page and to see why, in my strong opinion, Avenger has been using you to circumvent a consensus (or near-consensus). If you read that talk page and disagree, so be it but I thought you'd want to see what other users were saying about the type of edits Avenger wanted as well as his antics. Please consider that Avenger's sysop status was removed for a reason. Anyway, I'll leave it at that -- I didn't want to start a war on your talk page! Thank you. ---Mona- (talk) 21:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Icke

Nice one! - David Gerard (talk) 18:16, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Haha, thanks! Although there's a lot of work to do, practically anyone in any position of power is part of the Reptilian Conspiracy according to Icke. There's only a certain amount of crazy I can deal with. – AOAPJM ^(talk) 18:34, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

In the local dialect of Berlin "Icke" or "Ick" (depending on context and the mood of the speaker) means "I". I just wanted to have that said... Avengerofthe BoN (talk) 19:56, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

"Icke bin ein Reptilien." – J. F. Kennedy – AOAPJM ^(talk) 21:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

CP GG SS

Conservapedia has Quinn's doxed birth name on their page so it's best not to feature it here in any form.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Ah, ok. Fair enough then. – AOAPJM ^(talk) 21:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

hey wait

want ninja for all that fun?--"Paravant" ^{Talk & Contribs} 22:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

I would appreciate it... How does ninja mode work? (Still getting used to things around here). – AOAPJM ^(talk) 22:16, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Ninja is a user rights group that allows you the magic ability to take and give Bot to yourself, and works via the same way any other user rights addition or removal works. --"Paravant" ^{Talk & Contribs} 22:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Sounds good. – AOAPJM ^(talk) 22:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Steadfast Trust

Thanks for the work on the Steadfast Trust article, and related nationalist weirdness. I remember writing those up back in the day, good to see other people are still interested in documenting them. Balaam (talk) 20:22, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Ah thanks, but thank you for creating them in the first place. It's always good to keep an eye on what's going on in the crazy world of the Internet far-right brigade. – AOAPJM ^(talk) 21:29, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

I sent you an email earlier today, although I've just realised that you won't be able to reply as I have a defunct address associated with my account. Oops! Oh well, there's always the address I provided in the body text if you're interested in the proposal :) Balaam (talk) 15:03, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

It sounds like a good proposal, although I tend to stay out of Gamergate-related controversies. I've sent a message to the other user though, and thanks for the offer! From what you've said, I'm glad that you think I would be a good person to have on board. I've sent a message in the body text just now. – AOAPJM ^(talk) 15:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Draftspace

Hello! Sorry about this but putting Draft:in front of a title doesn't put the page in draftspace, because we don't have draftspace. Those two articles are currently in mainspace. Perhaps you could move them to userspace until they're ready? thanks. Bicycle^wheel 18:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Oh ok, sorry about that! Just moved them now, no probs. Thanks for telling me :P – AOAPJM ^(talk) 19:13, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

No problem. If only creating a new space was that easy... Bicycle^wheel 19:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Daily Stormer pages

Are these two pages: "Daily Stormer/Troll campaigns" and "Daily Stormer/View among white nationalists" supposed to be sections within the Daily Stormer page? If so, that's not how they're appearing. You might want to move them. Bongolian (talk) 17:37, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

They were meant to be separate pages (I didn't want the main page to appear too encyclopaedic), but I don't object to them being merged into The Daily Stormer's RationalWiki page. – AOAPJM ^(talk) 17:41, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Oh, sorry -- I just merged Daily Stormer/View among white nationalists and Daily Stormer/Troll campaigns in. Apologies! The page is small enough that plenty more material can go directly in -- especially pictures, if you've got any. FuzzyCatPotato!™ (talk/stalk) 21:20, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

OK, thanks very much. – AOAPJM ^(talk) 22:03, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

re

No problem man. I'm fairly knowledgeable about that site and lil andy. More so than I probably should be.-Maeve (talk) 03:30, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Deletion warining

Someone wanted to let you know that they think The Rational wiki article "Rappin' For Jesus" should be deleted as its not within Rational wiki goals., a page you created, should be deleted, but has given no reason. Please discuss this assassination attempt on this article's entry on The Rational wiki article "Rappin' For Jesus" should be deleted as its not within Rational wiki goals.'s Articles for deletion page if you wish to defend your creation.