User talk:Enchanted13/archive1

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Enchanted13!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Welcome to verb-land! Blue (is useful) 22:20, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. I look forward to my stay in chump-land.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 04:19, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
It is my understanding that Colonel Sanders was not really a colonel. Discuss. Corry (talk) 05:10, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
From my understanding, Sanders was in the Army, but never made it to the rank of colonel (he retired), contrasted to Colonel Tom Parker (an illegal immigrant who managed Elvis Presley) who achieved the honorary title of Colonel without even being in the Army. So, I would believe that Sanders received the honorary title, rather than the rank, although he may have well been a colonel in the Chicken Brigade. And I use the username Colonel Sanders here mainly I also use it on Illogicopedia.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 12:18, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
So what about Cap'n Crunch? Or Dr. Dre? WéáśéĺóíďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 21:49, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Cap'n Crunch doesn't exist but on a cereal box and Dr Dre has no MD or PhD I'm aware of.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 21:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)


No longer shall you toil in futility! Guide. Blue (pester) 19:46, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Much thanks, sir!--Colonel Sanders (talk) 21:46, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Sorry if I seem like a dick

Hi. I teach English as a foreign language in Spain and I have spent the last fifteen years of my life correcting English texts written by foreign language students. It is possible that I am a little too impatient/irritated when I see examples of "foreign English" in Real Life. So welcome to RationaWiki and I'll control my fingers from now on.Chat-smiley.gif--BobSpring is sprung! 22:20, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

thank you.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 22:24, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Can I bother you for a minute?

It seems something is broken, and some comments are not signed automatically as they should be, however I can't figure out what's wrong because everything is fine on my end. Could you please go to User talk:Nx/lqttest and start a new discussion? Under the edit form should be your signature as well as a link titled "edit signature". Does your signature appear there? If you click edit signature, is the box that appears empty? -- Nx / talk 20:16, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Woo! I made an edit!


is an admitted troll, if you didn't know. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 00:08, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I knew.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 00:10, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Look at is this way: If a few take the bullet of the troll, you wont have to. Because if they don't he will search for victims. --ǓḤṂ³ 00:11, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Aye.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 00:12, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
I think MC is a rather good writer. His insults can be rather eloquent. If only he used his eloquence to better ends. (((Zack Martin))) 09:22, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Heh, that's because his insults and baiting procedures never change. It's always the same - raise accusations about creeping fascism, wait for someone to bite, call them an aspie. Someone who never really changes the content of his posts has that much more time to work on style. Röstigraben (talk) 09:36, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
That really is quite pitiful Rostigraben. I quite like you, your contributions are generally spot on so I won't proceed any further but it frustrates me that you're willing to defend these sexually frustrated idiots with their irrelevancy and their determination to turn this site into an even nerdier version of wikipedia. MarcusCicero (talk) 11:22, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
But there it is again, why are you so hung up on the "sexually frustrated idiots determined to turn this into WP" angle? It is getting repetitive, and even when it just comes to trolling, you can do much better than this. Remember when you dressed up as the Libertarian Socialist - that was fun, lots of people jumped into the debate, and when it was over, nobody held a grudge even though we'd been royally trolled. Maybe you're behind one of the more unique characters who are currently accused of trolling, but I doubt it. Anyway, it's no wonder that most people ignore your main persona nowadays, because they only hear the same lines over and over again. You might get a rise out of newbies, but that's it. If you'd like to reclaim a bigger audience, you'll have to come up with something new once in a while. That would be more entertaining for all of us, and it would be a form of trolling that is less likely to result in tedious shouting matches and coop cases. Röstigraben (talk) 12:01, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
If you only knew the extent and the influence of my socks. I'm currently experimenting with a few things. And the idea that I'm merely trolling when I take the sexually frustrated idiots trying to make this into wikipedia-lite is nonsense. This is actually happening, before your eyes, but you're either too blinkered or too stupid to see it. MarcusCicero (talk) 12:27, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
MC, you are an idiot. What's this nonsense on sexually frustrated idiots trying to turn this into an even nerdier version of WP? Where's your proof?--Colonel Sanders (talk) 13:31, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
I almost love how irrational you guys are. If someone ever should say they are a troll, they are forever a troll. Their ideas must be worthless. Any concern they have must be trolling. Legitimate criticisms must be trolling. You guys sound a lot like Rob Smith taking Bill Ayers at his word that he wrote Obama's "Dreams" book. Srsly, what an irrational bunch of fucktards you are. Occasionaluse (talk) 15:24, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
OU, it's pretty clear as to why MC is here. He has proven time and again that he just wants to flame people.--User:Brxbrx/sig 17:22, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Agreed.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 17:25, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
You, and your inability to see the fucking obvious, are my proof. MarcusCicero (talk) 15:18, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Insufficient. Your claims are invalidated.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 17:19, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Sysop rights

Thanks for sysop rights and initialization. I am a sysop on Wikipedia, I'm familiar with my new privileges. --Max Sterling (talk) 20:03, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

No problem!--Colonel Sanders (talk) 23:23, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

The Schlaf's VP

He needs one. Maybe Ken making fat jokes? Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 02:52, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Maybe Swabby with his birdy skillz?--Colonel Sanders (talk) 19:20, 29 May 2011 (UTC)


Ever read Harry Turtledove? ТyTalk. 02:13, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Worldwar series.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 02:17, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
I liked those, but the library is missing the first one. But they have the complete Great War->American Empire->Settling Accounts series. ТyTalk. 02:18, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Nice. Plus, why library? Stephen Colbert said libraries are for free loading grannies! I buy all my books! (Quote from I Am America (And So Can You!)--Colonel Sanders (talk) 02:22, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Cheaper. ТyTalk. 02:26, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Yes. I recommend America (The Book) if you haven't already.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 02:27, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
I read it, then donated it. ТyTalk. 02:30, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Does a really good job of documenting how screwed-up our system is. Donated it? Where? McDonald's?--Colonel Sanders (talk) 02:33, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

The thrift store. ТyTalk. 02:33, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Ahhhh. I keep all mine on my shelf by my desk. Currently reading Decision Points for the epic laughs.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 02:35, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Good times. Currently reading The Conservative Nanny State . ТyTalk. 02:37, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Meh. Somebody's gotta feed Rush Limbaugh.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 02:40, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

oh look.

The trolling stopped after I binned Alyssa Brandt and ex-troll cheerleader. How interesting. RatMaster háblame 00:45, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Yup. You were right. And I gave Alyssa a 31.41 minute block for the hell of it.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 00:49, 13 June 2011 (UTC)


Did you have any reason/evidence to think this vandal spree was lockett related? Out of curiosity. RatMaster háblame 01:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Per Amerwiki wandalism and speculation from others. But I guess it was that fascist Bryant doing it. Cheerleaders are leading a new world order!--Colonel Sanders (talk) 01:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Don't go crazy!

Cool off Colonel. Refrain from the salty language. Cheerleader fascists aren't going to take over the world. It is just spam.--George (talk) 01:32, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

I've calmed. But, George, you are wrong. Cheerleaders will take over our world when we least expect it.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2011 (UTC)


*boink* —rms talk 18:20, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Of course, RMS...--Colonel Sanders (talk) 13:40, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


Hey man, there is this guy who deleted Conservapedia:RuneScape article with practically no support stating that "it makes Rational Wiki look bad." Is that legal? -- DasRationalpersone Socks cat 1.JPG (Annoy me!) 14:50, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Yes, it is. I'll look into it, I've been busy.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 13:39, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
I moved it to your userspace User:DasRationalpersone/Conservapedia:RuneScape--Colonel Sanders (talk) 13:42, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Col. Snaders in film

enjoy. ТyLonely. Ever so lonely. 23:47, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 23:50, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Don't bite newbies/IPs

He may have meant it as a joke, it is usually best to assume poor judgement rather than poor intent. No harm done though. - π Moderator 01:21, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

OK.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 01:23, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


Thanks for teh syzopz... I can has teh sealburger? My primary mission here is to spread illogic. If by any chance, I can contribute in such a way as to chip away at the enormous amount of bullshit and woo that is in the world, all the better. Cheers, and thanks for the ops.... I think... Gruntled (talk) 21:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)


You okay? ТyYes? 00:52, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Yeah. Just being my silly libertarian nonsensical self. Why?--Colonel Sanders (talk) 00:55, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
The red, not the red, anything but the red! Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 01:06, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Meh.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 01:09, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
I think I know what happened. Imagine RW is a beach. You've been hanging out in the roped off section. But as usual, a shark got through and gave you a pretty nasty bite. We often have this problem, used to happen to me. Am I correct or have I been hitting it to hard again? Тycommunications wire 01:59, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Huh?--Colonel Sanders (talk) 02:02, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
You got in a debate, and ya got bit. Am I right? Тycommunications wire 02:03, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Naw, I'm used to that treatment from big government advocates.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 02:07, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

But then I guess that begs the question: what is it?--Colonel Sanders (talk) 02:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

What is what? ТyYarrr 02:23, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
I dunno. Eh?--Colonel Sanders (talk) 02:26, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
What is the 'it' you refer to? ТyYarrr 02:31, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Whatever we were talking bout.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 02:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry to butt in, but I would like to help the Colonel as well. He has not been on Ameriwiki lately, but has contributed some good articles. Now, judging by what he told you, and this may be a stretch interpreting semi-coherent nonsense, he..... well, is deceived by Colbertesque personas.--George (talk) 02:55, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

My theory

I think the fixation on fascist/Neo-Nazi/Communist cheerleader nonsense he has spewed has to do with that troll who was.... trashing the site? It seems the essay and block reasons have his attention fixated on it. Also, seeing from RC how he has personally blocked for eternity vandal binned parodists publishing information on said..... terrorist? This may be a bit of a stretch, but perhaps this could explain this nonsense?--George (talk) 03:30, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

And since this ain't Ty's page, Ken.

Snicker. And it might, and I see I'm not the only one who uses that term. </lostalgia> Тyrant 03:32, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
You see my hypothesis as possibly vaild? And, I have never heard snicker used not referring to a candy bar.--George (talk) 03:41, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

What are you saying, George? I thought you were a good guy.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 04:27, 18 July 2011 (UTC)