RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation/Archive64

This is an archive page, last updated 25 February 2023. Please do not make edits to this page.

Archives for this talk page:

<1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>, <6>, <7>, <8>, <9>, <10>, <11>, <12>, <13>, <14>, <15>, <16>, <17>, < List>, <18>, <19>, <20>, <21>, <22>, <23>, <24>, <25>, <26>, <27>, <28>, <29>, <30>, <31>, <32>, <33>, <34>, <35>, <36>, <37>, <38>, <39>, <40>, <41>, <42>, <43>, <44>, <45>, <46>, <47>, <48>, <49>, <50>, <51>, <52>, <53>, <54>, <55>, <56>, <57>, <58>, <59>, <60>, <61>, <62>, <63>, <65>, <66>, <67>, <68>, <69>, <70>, <71>, <72>, <73>, <74>, <75>, <76>, <77>, <78>

, (new)(back)

CarlSaganFan

Here we have a single-issue editor who only seems to show up once every few months to promote apologia and whitewashing for eugenics. This user has been warned over this before and I have taken the liberty of putting them in the vandal bin, but since this user has been doing this for years, I don't think vandal binning alone will solve this problem and there needs to be a firmer line drawn in the sand. I support a topic ban from eugenics, as this user clearly can't leave this topic alone despite being told to stop. Plutocow (talk) 05:44, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Perhaps it's not worth the effort given that CarlSaganFan's edits are few and infrequent. Bongolian (talk) 04:32, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

How do topic bans work again? And how are they enforced? --Luigifan18 (talk) 04:33, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

There is no automatic way to enforce them. Someone has to remember that one exists. They can be found here: RationalWiki:Active sanctions#Topic bans. Bongolian (talk) 04:59, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

I see 14 edits in about a year and a half. I'm not sure that a coop case is really worth the effort.Bob^{"Life is short and (insert adjective)"} 09:23, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

As usual, Bob is right. With such an infrequent editor, it really isn't worthwhile doing anything. If they were to become a frequent editor, that would be a different matter. For now, rollback their edits and hopefully they'll see their changes aren't sticking and piss off. Spud (talk) 10:13, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

I'll have to agree. If CSF starts posting more frequently nothing stops us from having this discussion again.-Flandres (talk) 16:13, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

I think the vandal bin is enough for now. GeeJayK^{Where all evil dwells} _{Where every lie is true} 20:12, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

I concur. (Noting for the record that I did not scramble my mobile account password, just in case I wish to return. I do not wish to return right now, however.) --Andrew5 mobile (talk) 01:18, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi, Andrew. Vee^Meow? 01:20, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

My short stint on RW is now over. Expect to see me…not in the near future. Andrew5 mobile (talk) 01:29, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

This thread is silly, and should be archived immediately. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 02:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)