Information icon.svg Our policy on articles on living people is under review. Your comments and inputs are welcome on the relevant project talkpage.

User talk:AgingHippie/Archive9

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search


Secular Pro-Life[edit]

I know I copied from another source, but I was going to change it while keeping the basic premise. — Unsigned, by: 131.91.7.108 / talk / contribs

Write it properly in your own words without a ton of red links and then post it. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 17:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Duplication[edit]

Look at my talk page.
Look at my archive.
How about, since this is the THIRD TIME I've had to explain this, YOU remove the duplicate material? --Castaigne (talk) 19:20, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Sorry. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 19:24, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you muchly. --Castaigne (talk) 19:26, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Also, I didn't mean that to sound -quite- so exasperated. --Castaigne (talk) 21:34, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Gamergate[edit]

Arcane (allegedly) outed someone in his first post. Practically everything since then has to be revdelled now.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 02:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Yep. Working on it. FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk) 02:13, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Found something else that needs redacting. Will edit in a second.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 02:15, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
On second thought, that last thing I did doesn't need to be redacted.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 02:17, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Sure? αδελφός ΓυζζγςατΡοτατο (talk/stalk) 02:20, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Re:Doxxing[edit]

Message received, won't happen again. Arcane (talk) 02:45, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Wheel warring[edit]

Well, it seems that your presence is needed at the Coop. |₹Λ¥$€₦₦ Star of David.png Never got enough hugs as a kid 00:09, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Why me? If this is at all Ruylong-related, or fallout from anything to do with him, I no longer give a fuck. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 00:10, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Well, just a run-of-the-mill wheel war. |₹Λ¥$€₦₦ Star of David.png I AM VERY DISGUSTED WITH THE TRASHY MAN 00:12, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

What happened to Project SJ?[edit]

Long story short, they left here and instead went and founded SJWiki. |₹Λ¥$€₦₦ Star of David.png: Antonio stella bottom tile 15:10, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Given SJWiki is an abysmal failure, they should come back. oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 15:16, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, because "a proven track record of abysmal failure" is exactly what RW looks for in contributors. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 15:38, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
They failed because their wiki was unpopular and closed to public editing, as far as I can tell. Bit like Citizendium, but not even popular at the start. RW doesn't have those issues, hopefully. Cømrade FυzzчCαтPøтαтø (talk/stalk) 15:41, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
They didn't feel welcome here. --Castaigne (talk) 15:38, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Reverting Edits[edit]

When people revert an edit without any mention of why, they should be ignored, not sided with. 94.192.105.51 (talk) 17:24, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

"In the current economic system we..." Who is this "we" you're writing about? This website isn't the place for your manifesto. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 17:26, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
No manifesto involved, just simple explanations. Obvious. What I wrote still stands: "When people revert an edit without any mention of why, they should be ignored, not sided with" 94.192.105.51 (talk) 17:30, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
When people make a bunch of opinions and blank out an article, without any explanation why, they are generally not sided with. -EmeraldCityWanderer (talk) 17:31, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
The editing was ongoing and no opinion, that was obvious. The article is extremely poor. New issues can be taken to the talk page. What I wrote still stands... "When people revert an edit without any mention of why, they should be ignored, not sided with" It stinks of arrogance and disrespect. 94.192.105.51 (talk) 17:43, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Who put you in charge? WèàšèìòìďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 17:57, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
No one is in charge it is a wiki. A collaborative effort. 94.192.105.51 (talk) 18:13, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Then maybe you could stop dictating rules to other editors. I also suggest creating a user account if you plan on contributing here. WèàšèìòìďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 19:05, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
I merely repeated what you posted and changed the subject. If it stinks of arrogance and disrespect, that's exactly what I got when you said it in the first place. Your majesty :-p -EmeraldCityWanderer (talk) 18:00, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
I would never be so arrogant and disrespectful to revert an edit without a reason given, which is what you clearly did. 94.192.105.51 (talk) 18:03, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Good for you. Do you want a cookie? ЩєазєюіδWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 19:05, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Grow up idiot! 94.192.105.51 (talk) 23:06, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
As I wrote on EmeraldCityWanderer's talk page, the rollback function (and its lack of an attendant edit summary) is a standard tool on RW. Get used to it. ScepticWombat (talk) 18:20, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks I will use it. 94.192.105.51 (talk) 23:06, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

She's[edit]

a woman whom I used to like the songs of til the place i work (a supermarket) decided her songs needed to be played more than a radio station plays them. Seriously, supermarket radio is terrible for employees. --Miekal 02:20, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Spoilery link. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 02:26, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
She is an evil liberal abomination who is ruining the moral foundation of the United States of America. --Elvis is King (talk) 02:32, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Of all the musicians influencing "The moral foundation of America" I'm fairly certain Swift is the one doing the least amount of that. --Miekal 02:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Her flagrant disregard to modesty and decency promotes egotism, drug use, alcohol use, self abuse, lack of intelligence, and selfishness. --Elvis is King (talk) 02:41, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
... Are we still talking about taylor swift?--Miekal 02:47, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Yes. If you doubt any of my claims, listen to her song "Wildest Dreams." It is axing at the very foundation of decency and describes a Satanic trip of decedance. --Elvis is King (talk) 02:52, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Is she the one all the musicians on my Twitter feed were thanking (...saying things like "I never thought I'd say this but thankyou Taylor Swift")? Stood up to the latest scheme to disempower artistic creators? Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 02:57, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

She's an ignorant socialist who hates America and uses her body to make a living. --Elvis is King (talk) 02:59, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Indian department stores are always playing Taylor Swift... LlamaPastor31 Over 78,323 served! 03:06, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
That makes sense since it's a socialist country. --Elvis is King (talk) 03:11, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Yup, she got Apple to pay musicians during the three-month free trial period of Apple Music. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 03:08, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
AKA socialism. --Elvis is King (talk) 03:11, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
We hate her less than sheryl crow at the moment though. During the super bowl, a snowstorm the night before/day of knocked out our satellite feed, so ontop of being completely dead from superbowl+ snowstorm, the same 3 songs kept playing on repeat for around a full day. @AH, yes, because she said she wouldn't use apple music thing til they payed artists royalties. --Miekal 03:09, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Listen to "Wildest Dreams" and tell me I am wrong. --Elvis is King (talk) 03:13, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Ah. Brains and guts. I'm sure that's why the Colonel wanted to import her picture. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 03:15, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Chicken Boy is in love with her, and if you deny this, you're clueless. --Elvis is King (talk) 03:19, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
OK. LlamaPastor31 Over 78,323 served! 03:48, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Did you listen to it? --Elvis is King (talk) 03:53, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
It's not really a kind of music I know enough to have an opinion about. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 04:16, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Do you end every sentence with Peace? LlamaPastor31 Over 78,323 served! 10:57, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
It's built into the signature. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 14:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
For much lulz, you should watch Overly Attached Girlfriend read Taylor Swift lyrics. PsyGremlinTal! 15:37, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Deleted "GOD=7 4" Page[edit]

Forget a blog, it's got its own wiki: god704 wikia com. :)--SpecialFFrog (talk) 18:37, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Oh my fucking God. That is so fucking amazing. I can't look... but I don't want to look away. |₹Λ¥$€₦₦ Star of David.png Flipping out the buttered fuck crumpets 19:11, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Why thank you.[edit]

Thank you very much sir. I very much appreciate that. :) I promise not to abuse this... POWER! UNLIMITED POWER!!! *Force Lightning* QuantumDude (talk) 00:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Also... Do you really think I was bitching? :( I'm sorry I didn't want to be seen that way. QuantumDude (talk) 00:41, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Help[edit]

Idiot abound. Bin or ban please.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 02:11, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Multilevel marketing[edit]

I started a talk on the mlm page regarding the changes I made to the article. Rather than just reverting the text, it'd be more constructive to discuss the validity (or lack thereof) of the changes there. Thanks. Peace.

--Youlovedave (talk) 18:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Let's reverse that back on you - you started a talk on the mlm page regarding the changes made to the article. Rather than trying to make your edits (Which we find revert worthy at the moment) the status quo, it'd be more constructive to discuss the validity (or lack thereof) of the changes there. Thanks.--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 18:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank You![edit]

I was more insane than usual lately, and that shit was the result. Thanks!

Userpage/Talk 22:47, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Wait ....[edit]

It was a double posting

Binning[edit]

That guy's edits are hours apart, or dozens of hours. I don't see how the bin makes a difference there. Tempted to parole him. Your thoughts? Page is now semi-protected til Monday anyway. Alec Sanderson (talk) 16:50, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Knock yourself out. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 17:19, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

capitalization[edit]

is the devil And you know It. --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 19:58, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Papua New Guinea[edit]

Hello AgingHippie! You previously deleted my page for Papua New Guinea for not being on mission. Can you take a look at the page in my User space (User:Bongolian/Papua New Guinea) and let me know if it would now meet your approval? It is much expanded. Thank you. Bongolian (talk) 05:01, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Nice work! Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 15:08, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! I will move it to main space then. Bongolian (talk) 19:12, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Do me a favor buddy[edit]

Since you're one of the last people here who I know and who I respect, will you do me the honor of blocking this account? Don't disable account creation (I'm running on a dynamic IP at this point), but just block this account? Thanks, buddy. - Gooniepunk, now known as John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt (talk) 09:06, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Fuzzy beat me to it. Keep well. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 15:08, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Can I please have Ninja?[edit]

I make a lot of minor edits, and am trying to create a bot. KOMF 666 03:34, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

You probably won't agree with the paper itself[edit]

But this is the greatest abstract ever written. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 16:41, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

You might be interested[edit]

In the discussion currently going on at talk:Apartheid Avengerofthe BoN (talk) 21:18, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

I might, but I'm not. Look at my contributions for the past little while. Arguing politics with strangers on the internet is no longer something that really thrills me. But thanks for thinking of me. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 00:19, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
What could possibly be more interesting and un than arguing politics on the internet with complete strangers!? --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 00:21, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
^ 142.124.55.236 (talk) 00:46, 21 September 42015 AQD (UTC)
No problem. Avengerofthe BoN (talk) 13:56, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Just so you know, AH, I reinstated two weeks of sysop-level protection on the Zionism article. Paravant had protected it in the first instance, and then ChrisAmiss extended it to January. That last is too long, I agree, but the two weeks I've given it is necessary for the reason all three of us have sought protection, to wit: so that reasonable people who won't edit war and/or vandalize can polish the article without warring interfering. ADDING: I changed the level on your Israel protection for the same reason Paravant made Zionism and a few other articles sysop-level only: some otherwise sensible people won't refrain from edit warring and refusing to accept the majority's decision otherwise.---Mona- (talk) 15:11, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
The thing Mona fails to mention is: My humble self and Arisboch disagree with her on the issue of Zionism. And we both just so happen to have had our sysop rights taken away by Paravant, who shares Mona's views on Zionism. Avengerofthe BoN (talk) 16:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
You lost your sysop for being an idiot and aris list them because it was the most expediabt non-mod lock solution to the problem of edit wars. Saying it was because of your ideology is lying and you need to stop it.--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 16:11, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
@Mona, 2 weeks is a bit long, a few days to a week is more ideal and I only picked long ones out of tiredness of edit wars.--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 16:13, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
I really feel it will need two weeks, mostly because ChrisAmiss is a very busy student and has to ration the time he gives to the Zionism article, but still has stuff he wants to add (I can get to my finishing text this week); it'd be good if could do that in peace without being saddled with edit warring. "They" likely would repeat their behavior and I don't want Chris so frustrated he quits -- the guy knows a whole helluva lot.---Mona- (talk) 16:19, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

As for Avenger, it isn't even true that Paravant and I necessarily hold the same views on these issues; Paravant was prickly with me when I first arrived at RW and proceeded to have fits of outrage over what then appeared to be a rightwing Zionist lock on any article pertaining to Israel. Avenger and Arisboch's misbehavior escalated in close to direct proportion to the more that I, Chris and others were making successful arguments for our edits and these became increasingly incorporated in Israel-related articles. It is only in that way that Avenger's ideology has anything to do with the current state of affairs.---Mona- (talk) 16:26, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

For the record, I am not right wing. Avengerofthe BoN (talk) 16:30, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Yes, you are. Liberal on pelvic issues, or even econimic ones, doesn't remotely begin to redeem your authoritarian and illiberal views on things like collective punishment and hyper-nationalism. But your label is ultimately irrelevant -- your views were not the reason for your demotions; your behavior is.---Mona- (talk) 16:38, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Hyper-nationalism? This probably the last thing any of the people who personally know me would ever accuse me of. For the record, I have publicly advocated (on this site) for the removal of two nation-states (Iran and Saudi Arabia) already and I will now up the ante and add a third one: Let's get rid of Germany. Today is a good day to say so. Avengerofthe BoN (talk) 16:42, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
You are uber-nationalistic in your view of the State of Israel, which you most assuredly do not want to abolish. Your fantasies about other nation-states are irrelevant, and quite silly. And now. I'm reverting to my usual (never invariable) practice of ignoring your prattle.---Mona- (talk) 16:51, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Could you please enlighten my how calling for a state that killed six million Jews (to say nothing of the millions of other victims) to be removed from existence as a polity is "silly"? At least compared to advocating for the end of a state that was explicitly founded as a place of refuge for those that escaped these murderous attempts of the state of Germany to have a world without Jews? And if your justification at some point involves human rights... Well human rights are precisely the grounds on which I call for a removal of all current powerful structures both in the Islamic Republic (and for that matter in the self-proclaimed "Islamic state") and in Saudi Arabia. The Wahhabi state must be wiped off the map. And the Iranian regime must disappear in the trash heap of history. Do you have any compelling reason why not? Avengerofthe BoN (talk) 17:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

30 consecutive days without a Coop case[edit]

We came soo close. 29 days, 10½ hours. WėąṣėḷőįďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 17:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Does it even count? Is anyone actually cooped? The current "case" could be easily moved onto one of the article talkpages. Typhoon (talk) 17:05, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
I'd have to note that during most of that time the Coop was simply modlocked, so nobody could have started a Coop case even if they wanted to.--JorisEnter (talk) 17:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Well yeah, that's the whole idea of locking it. ;) 141.134.75.236 (talk) 17:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
I often read RW through recent changes. It was unusable. Hipocrite (talk) 19:21, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Ladies and gentlemen... We got him[edit]

Quote: "There has been no actual coop case this month.". All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 16:51, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

In my opinion, a more appropriate title would be "All quiet on the coop case front." Nerd271 (talk) 16:55, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
lol.-DιαμοπdDιςc1(talk) 04:48, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
I would enjoy seeing you return. Bongolian (talk) 05:42, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Some documentaries worth a watch[edit]

Hey, I don't know if you will get this message but I thought you might want to see these documentaries.

  • 13th - how the US the state and federal government have exploited the loophole in the 13th amendment allowing slavery for criminals.
  • Do Not Resist - the increasing militarization of US police forces driven by the war on drugs/terror/crime et al and the mentality of the police.

--Owlman (talk) (mail) 00:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

You've been nominated as a moderator[edit]

You've been nominated in the upcoming moderator elections. See the nomination at RationalWiki:Moderator elections/Nominations. Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 04:22, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

It's been...[edit]

...More than 33 days since an edit in the CC. Please come back? CorruptUser (talk) 05:05, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Going on 42 days... :) Herr FuzzyKatzenPotato (talk/stalk) 19:18, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
That's it! I'm starting a coop case to ban AgingHippy for ignoring his promise. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 19:19, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
76 if you ignore the troll trying to get Joris banned (who was immediately reverted). Christopher (talk) 19:21, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Why wasn't this archived? Christopher (talk) 10:08, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Just because...[edit]

You've been nominated in the upcoming moderator elections. See the nomination at RationalWiki:Moderator elections/Nominations. Cheers, Cosmikdebris (talk) 04:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)