User talk:Avarice
--𝕶𝕾𝕳 🐅 21:00, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
Sysop[edit]
— Lunar|✉ 02:46, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
When reverting obvious vandalism[edit]
Please use the "rollback" button rather than "undo", as not only is it easier but it also doesn't require us to manually patrol the edit, and it also can revert multiple edits on the same page in one go. Plutocow (talk) 00:08, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Collaboration needed[edit]
An essay needs to be written to expose orthodox economics as pseudoscience.
--Janosabel (talk) 14:58, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Don't edit other people's userspace[edit]
Christopher (talk) 18:44, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Friiiiiiick didn't realize that was in the userspace. Sorry.
- – Regards, Avarice 18:49, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
164.116.230.185 is innocent.[edit]
All it did was edit the archive dot is links into archive dot ph links, and it got banned for 3.6 days! That is an odd thing to do, since it was not doing actual vandalism or hate speech. ResurrectingDeadLinks (talk) 05:25, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- @ResurrectingDeadLinks I did not ban the IP in question — that would be the edit filter, for "Vandalism (unicode)" — but you would appear to be correct. The Edit Filter messes up sometimes. It should be good now.
– Regards, Avarice 16:52, 24 May 2025 (UTC)- @Avarice FYI, pings don't work if you add them to a comment later - they have to be added in the same edit that you sign your comment.
{{ping}}
isn't anything fancy, it's fundamentally just an ordinary wikilink to a userpage, and it wouldn't be ideal if every page link generated a ping. - Last I checked pings sent by you won't work in any case, because your signature is embedded in a template. Perhaps they've fixed that. Christopher (talk) 17:21, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Avarice FYI, pings don't work if you add them to a comment later - they have to be added in the same edit that you sign your comment.
Thanks for trival edit to copyright article[edit]
Even though this Wiki is less edited than The Other Wiki, you edited in my chain of edits complicating a self-revert. Thank you! Did you spot it in Recent Changes btw? I'd like this article to grow!
Kabanamu (talk) 18:26, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- You're welcome, and yeah, I saw it on Recent Changes. Feel free to add to the article (if you want help, you can always ask). After ten edits and a day, your account can be autopatrolled, so I won't have to approve all your edits.
– Regards, Avarice No problem. 18:35, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Is there a full list of funny renames?[edit]
I want to know :D ResurrectingDeadLinks (talk) 23:56, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- It's very outdated, but yes, Fun:Best of User rename log. GeeJayKWhere all evil dwells Where every lie is true 00:03, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- Really, almost the entire Rename Log is gold.
– Regards, Avarice 01:52, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- Really, almost the entire Rename Log is gold.
Red links[edit]
When I merged House of Lords and House of Commons into Parliament of the United Kingdom, I intended to keep the new merged article a draft only for a short time, and then when it moved to main space, to re-create the two deleted articles as redirects. I did that now. Sorry for all the red link removal you did earlier. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 21:43, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
BoN pondering theology[edit]
![]() |
---|
Fuck you— Unsigned, by: 2a02:6ea0:da08:3031::12 / talk / contribs |
BoN gettin' philosophical[edit]
![]() |
---|
== Rétærd == Fægœt— Unsigned, by: 2a02:6ea0:ce14:3033::11 / talk / contribs |