User talk:Secret Squirrel/Archive1

This is an archive page, last updated 4 January 2012. Please do not make edits to this page.

Archives for this talk page:  , (new)(back)

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, Secret Squirrel! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

Hi, pull up a goat & make yourself at home Susan^{purrrrr ...} 19:58, 5 December 2007 (EST) I believe Cracker already gave you your inaugural block. Susan^{purrrrr ...} 19:58, 5 December 2007 (EST)

Curfew

Dont they turn this place off at 9:30 pm?

Nope! All night long you can edit/wandalize! Researcher 21:16, 5 December 2007 (EST)

That's shocking. how are we good Christian homeschooled kids supposed to get enough sleep to be ready for Andy's class on homosexuality and intelligent design tomorrow?

Moreover, with a world wide base, how could you justify a particular time as 9:30? 9:30 EST is not the same as 9:30 GMT. Researcher 21:19, 5 December 2007 (EST)

But we can block you if you want - just ask. Susan^{purrrrr ...} 21:20, 5 December 2007 (EST)

What is GMT, is that a liberal deceit thing like BCE?

Greenwich Mean Time, the time that all other times are based on. Researcher 21:26, 5 December 2007 (EST)

GMT is a LYING time. God created the world on American East Coast (New Jersey) time. Any timezone that isn't EST is deviant and immoral. DogP 21:29, 5 December 2007 (EST)

but GMT must be right: it's the time in the best place in the World: Yorkshire!

—User:SusanG, 21:42, 5 December 2007 (EST)

• wink* I know Secret SquirrelLivesforpullingyourleg 21:28, 5 December 2007 (EST)

Oh, I know now. GMT. Grinch Mean Time. It's part of the liberals War on Christmas. Secret SquirrelLivesforpullingyourleg 07:56, 6 December 2007 (EST) Andy told me this. He also told me I would be in for a really long spanking today if i dont get off the computer NOW and get to his homeschool for today's lesson on intelligent design and young earth creation. Secret SquirrelLivesforpullingyourleg 07:57, 6 December 2007 (EST)

Hi. Nice to see a new active contributor. :-) You're most welcome. But ... ummm ... just thought that I'd mention that one of the few "unwritten suggestions" here is that if you create red links then you should also think about creating the stub. :-) --Bob^{bing up} 08:10, 6 December 2007 (EST)

Why?

halo. skwis-kwis tenas muckamuck wake siah kahkwa kwitshadie.

Or goat. Besides I'm broke. Warren Terra 18:34, 6 December 2007 (EST)

Klahowya. Naika halo maika kumtux Heehee, kehwa naika smoke hiyu skookum lakkit-mokst-halo illahee-tupsoo. Secret Squirrel 18:58, 6 December 2007 (EST)

Oh heck no, I guessed and looked it up in a lexicon. Warren Terra

Maika klap chikamin hyak-hyak keschi naika chako hyas solleks swkis-kwis. Secret Squirrel 21:18, 7 December 2007 (EST)

Then I humbly apologise to you. Warren Terra 21:33, 7 December 2007 (EST)

Apologize not, just bein' silly Secret Squirrel 21:52, 7 December 2007 (EST)

But gimme your money anyway, and no, squirrel does not taste like wabbit. More like chicken. Secret Squirrel 21:54, 7 December 2007 (EST)

My mother would make both, (wabbits and squirrel) as hasenpfeffer, heavily stewed and pickled in brine for three days. Horse, goat, even roadkill would taste pretty much the same. Warren Terra

US States

Thanks for the interesting additions! human 18:22, 8 December 2007 (EST)

You're most welcome! Now can we keep the Ratatosk article, pleeeeeezze? Secret Squirrel 08:47, 9 December 2007 (EST)

I think Ratatosk is safe.Susan^{purrrrr ...} 09:05, 9 December 2007 (EST)

How would you like to save me some work and grab all the state flag pictures here and paste them in above the state quarter images? Just an idea... sorta like gathering nuts in May, I thought. human 19:04, 9 December 2007 (EST)

When I get a round tuit...or whichever of us gets to it first. No hurry, I assume? Secret Squirrel 21:30, 10 December 2007 (EST)

No hurry at all, Squirrel. I had a round tuit once, but I forgot where I put it... human 21:34, 10 December 2007 (EST)

contribs

Oh dear. It appears there is a very ridiculous article on spanking in the main space. I'll get right on it. Secret Squirrel 09:13, 9 December 2007 (EST)

You should move this to your user page or a subpage, it's weird here in the middle of your talk page. By the way, sorry to see your beloved Giants got pwned by the Beantown Gang. human 03:02, 30 December 2007 (EST)

Done. Tis ok, the Giants aren't my usual favorite team, that would be the Steelers, but I cheer whoever is playing against the hated Pats. Secret Squirrel 04:44, 30 December 2007 (EST)

Church

Well folks, I'm off to church. Andy asked me to ask you if any of you have any prayer requests. We will be praying for each and every one of you to see the light and accept Mike Huckabee as the one true leader of the Free World, and for God to pour out His righteous punishment on filthy sodomites and Islamofascists. You really should consider shutting down editing every Sunday morning so more people will go to church. TTFN, Secret Squirrel 09:22, 9 December 2007 (EST)

Which one is YOU?

We know you're out there!Warren Terra 13:47, 19 December 2007 (EST)

That iz sekrit I's not telling Secret Squirrel 16:44, 19 December 2007 (EST)

Thanks

for your awesome work in the article creation drive. For that, you can has one free goat, as photographed by yours truly:

--מְתֻרְגְּמָן ^{שְׁלֹום}

A goat....mmmmm yum! Thanks! Secret Squirrel 11:56, 30 December 2007 (EST)

Pats

Ain't it a bitch? [1] Г☭длессЛиберал 23:50, 31 December 2007 (EST)

There are still the playoffs. There are chances to beat them yet. ;) Secret Squirrel 00:04, 1 January 2008 (EST)

My favorite team is the Steelers. My second-favorite team is whoever is playing the Patriots. Г☭длессЛиберал 00:08, 1 January 2008 (EST)

The Patriots are the new Yankees! human 01:50, 1 January 2008 (EST)

I got two words for ya: "spy scandal" ;) Secret Squirrel 08:03, 1 January 2008 (EST)

Same here - good to know! Now if we can get Human on board. I think he may be a Pats fan. Secret Squirrel 08:03, 1 January 2008 (EST)

Not really an American football fan. Just enjoying the local teams doing so well recently. Anyone see Pete Rose on Sports Unfiltered? human 16:52, 1 January 2008 (EST)

nuts

I hope you have enough to get through the winter, on account of how I enjoy your editz. 06:26, 12 January 2008 (EST)

But, but...there are so many Nuts out there to crack! Secret Squirrel 07:09, 12 January 2008 (EST)

You make a good point there, Mr/Ms Squirrel. I doubt you will ever run out! human 07:40, 12 January 2008 (EST)

Must run now, have to gather more Nuts for my hoard and run around in the woods in camo for a while. Armageddon is coming, y'know.. Secret Squirrel 07:43, 12 January 2008 (EST)

Radioactive afikomen, test pimp

Saaaaaaaaaaay, Secret Squirrel... you haven't taken the test yet have you? Why not join in the fun. You can find out if you're as morally depraved as the rest of us :) -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 17:31, 16 January 2008 (EST)

"YOUR SCORE

"Your scored 0 on Moral Order and -2.5 on Moral Rules.

"The following categories best match your score (multiple responses are possible):

  1. System: Conservatism, Liberalism
  2. Ideology: Capital Republicanism, Capital Democratism
  3. Party: Republican Party, Democratic Party
  4. Presidents: Gerald Ford
  5. 04' Election: John Kerry
  6. 08' Election: Rudy Giuliani

Sounds about right since I'm in the big mushy morally depraved middle and have a snarky contempt for True Believers on both ends of the spectrum. And they got my choice in '04 right, but Rudy Giuliani??! No way. He's the closest thing to a real live Fascist to come along in U.S. politics in a long time. I am solidly Undecided for '08, as long as it's not Giuliani. Also, Gerald Ford? Naah, Harry Truman and Theodore Roosevelt are more like it. Secret Squirrel 17:48, 16 January 2008 (EST)

What is his policy on unclaimed acorns? human 20:04, 16 January 2008 (EST)

He prefers to bake them. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 02:57, 17 January 2008 (EST)

Liberal deceit! God hates acorns because they promote atheism and devil worship! All unclaimed acorns will receive eternal damnation in the Lake of Fire! Amen.Secret Squirrel 07:15, 17 January 2008 (EST)

songs

Hey Seekrit Skwirl, can you try to add a short blurb as to what is cool about the tunez you're adding? Short comment or lyric quote is all. Thanks! human 14:48, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Nuts! er...Done! Secret Squirrel 15:22, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Thanks, it helps make the list more interesting... PS, did you know that "Yours Is No Disgrace" is a great Conservative song? We should add it to our list under war... & why. human 15:29, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Hmm, now where would you have gotten that one from? Three guesses and the first two don't count, I take it? Secret Squirrel 15:49, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Didja know.."Fast Car" by Tracy Chapman is a Great Conservative Song too. Really. Secret Squirrel 18:29, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Thanks

Thanks for taking care of that crap, it seems I pissed our latest wandal off somehow. Pinto's5150 ^Talk 19:28, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Yes, thank you Secret Squirrel. I feel a little bit apologetic, because he chose my name for his "password". -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 19:43, 21 January 2008 (EST)

No prob, rollback takes about 1/4 a second. Next time though I'll taunt them and turn 'em into a newt. Secret Squirrel 19:49, 21 January 2008 (EST)

'That come with the standard set of admin powers? :-) -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 19:57, 21 January 2008 (EST)

I don't know if I have the standard set, but for whatever reason I have rollback. Turning them into a newt is teh witchcraft OTOH and not an admin thing. Secret Squirrel 20:00, 21 January 2008 (EST)

WCG and HWA

You seem well up on this. Any particular reason?--Bob^{bing up} 04:42, 25 January 2008 (EST)

Nothing beyond once having a subscription to "The Plain Truth" back when I was young and naive (subscriptions were free y'know). I'm pretty well up on most of the televangelism scene, which I decided sometime in the late 1980s was patently ridiculous but continued to follow what was going on. Secret Squirrel 07:27, 25 January 2008 (EST)

Ok. Just curious. :-) --Bob^{bing up} 13:01, 25 January 2008 (EST)

Why? You a former victim member or have an interest in that group? Secret Squirrel 16:34, 25 January 2008 (EST)

For you

I brought you a present:

human 18:52, 27 February 2008 (EST)

COOKIEZ!!!!!!! Yum! Are they made of real squirrel scouts? Secret Squirrel 21:43, 27 February 2008 (EST)

I think so, yes. Enjoy! human 00:22, 28 February 2008 (EST)

Squirrelent Green! Secret Squirrel 07:15, 28 February 2008 (EST)

Onward squirrel soldier!

The administration thanks you for your actions in the service of the motherland. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 18:07, 6 March 2008 (EST)

My pleasure *bows* Always glad to be of service to teh cause. Secret Squirrel 19:19, 6 March 2008 (EST)

Come pretend to debate Bohdan at user talk:AmesG with me!

human 22:28, 12 March 2008 (EDT)

Google rankings

Just checking a few, as of March 13, 2008:

Pseudoarcheology #2

Vaccine hysteria #4

New Gwenson the actual article is #4, the top 3 are also on Rationalwiki

Erhard Seminars Training #30

Andrew Schlafly #6

Conservapedia #15

Mike Warnke #86

Starlight problem brings up Speed of Light at #12 and Young earth creationism at #13, but not the article itself

Young earth creationism #94

Long-eared jerboa #62

Fun:John R. Rice #1 if you include Fun:, not in the top 100 if you don't

No, goat didn't make the top 100...

Secret Squirrel 20:02, 13 March 2008 (EDT)

comment

Of all the luserpages on this wiki, your's may be the best. TmtamesP 01:29, 15 March 2008 (EDT)

I think some of theres otherz mite be butter. human 01:49, 15 March 2008 (EDT)

Yah. I vote God's userpage here as the best. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 02:07, 15 March 2008 (EDT)

Nah, mine's not teh best. There's hardly anything on it. No userboxes, no 400-word essay, no banhammer, no Bible quotes, no nothin'. Secret Squirrel 02:19, 15 March 2008 (EDT)

But you haf teh squirle scoute cookiez... human 03:51, 15 March 2008 (EDT)

But...but...teh Bibble versez. Teh banhammer. How can I has helpz Nobs with teh fight againt Communism with just has squirl scout cookyz? Andy is veeery disappointed in me. Secret Squirrel 10:47, 15 March 2008 (EDT)

"mission"

When placing the template, be sure to start a discussion on the talk page saying why you think an article should be deleted or moved. Otherwise, it's easy and lazy for anyone to go around tagging a bunch of articles and making a mess of the site. Best to focus on a small number at a time and pay attention to them.

If you want to go on a cleanup binge, it might be even better to discuss at talk:main, so we can all hash out what the criteria are (I had to fight like hell to keep the US State srticles in main, and you seem to enjoy them... keep that in mind). human 20:06, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

Maybe the best place to discuss all this is at Project_Whitewash, where you can sign yourself up while you're at it. DogP 20:07, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

Please not to be killing all our lulz. It's part of our heritage. :-( --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 20:11, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

But...but...teh mission! Artikles has not makes contributionz to teh refuting Conservapedia and crank ides. Encyklopedia too much has stupidity. Can must be cleand up Secret Squirrel

Can not ALL cleaned up be. Nooes. Must some lulz keep. DogP 20:14, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

Lulz must in Fun: go now!! Secret Squirrel 20:15, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

SS, please attend to one article at a time. Please discuss on the talk page. You just created 20 discussions without contributing to any (PS, I'm gonna grind that "mission" template under my heel since it encourages this lazy drive-by templating...) I'm sure there were some that could be moved or killed, but let's discuss them one at a time. human 20:17, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

teh obligatory break

I hope you archived all that stuff you removed... it's considered RW policy. The {{talkpage}} template helps make it easy. human 22:05, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

ZOMG! Someone used my template. And as Human said above, we don't allow discussions to float off into the ether (whatever that means), so get on archiving or you'll be gangblocked (whatever that means). Thunderkatz^Ho! 22:30, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

That's odd, then. Bohdan repeatedly "archived" his talk page, even explicitly stating he was archiving... and then never made an archive page. It was only just recently that I got fed up and combed through his talk pages history, making archives where he didn't. Yet, I didn't see you swoop down on him when he failed to do so. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 22:44, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

Bohdan is the required exception to the rule. Nobody ever said anything sensible on his talk page anyway, especially him. human 22:49, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

Careful, or I'll tell Hans Johnson that you have double standards! :P -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 22:56, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

Bohdan also holds our puppies hostage, so we're not allowed to criticize him. Thunderkatz^Ho! 06:31, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

I hate my dog. He can keep 'em, as far as I'm concerned. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 06:32, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Everything OK SS?

Have I missed something?--Bob^{bing up} 07:20, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Say No More Marghanita Laski 07:24, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Hey Seekrit - what's up? Why the mad dash to remove lots of good stuff, including much good work you'd done yourself? DogP 12:09, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

He's been threatened with being blocked for removing stuff from his talk page without archiving it.Barbara Shack 12:13, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Where? I asked him to archive it, above, but there was no threat of a block that I can see. human 13:27, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Actually, I did (jokingly) threaten that the sysops would "gangblock" him, though I'm not really sure how that would be accomplished (we all take turns blocking and unblocking?). Thunderkatz^Ho! 20:34, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Ah, ok, I glossed right over that as I thought it was a "joke". human 20:59, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

No, I think it's something else - we were busy together on catting duties, and I may somehow be responsible. Lemme know Squirrel. DogP 13:04, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

I'm glad he's back. I hope no fluffy tails were ruffled more than necessary. human 00:42, 23 March 2008 (EDT)

I demand an immediate payment of $10,000,000.00 into my Swiss bank account now! Secret Squirrel 09:55, 23 March 2008 (EDT)

Done. human 18:28, 23 March 2008 (EDT)

Invitation

Come over to Category Food Fight and help us figure out an approach to Categories that everyone likes. Best, DogP 19:13, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

How many?

So, how many articles r u goona redirect to Andy's page? The user formerly known as DLerner 06:40, 22 March 2008 (EDT)

Many! Andy is Mr. Redirectee RationalWiki:Redirecting as many things as we can to Andrew Schlafly - Secret Squirrel 06:46, 22 March 2008 (EDT)

Scientology

You want to help me develop this article?
Scientologists really believe this. ^{— Unsigned, by: Barbara Shack / talk / contribs}

Absolutely - can't resist slamming Scientology! Secret Squirrel 10:16, 22 March 2008 (EDT)

On Weals

Welcome to Phase 4 -- "Arbitrary acts of Mayhem".85.25.151.22 22:22, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

• I can has barnstar? Secret Squirrel 22:29, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

Sure. Have two.^{— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs} 21:25, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

User:Bunchanumbers

What are you going to do about all the other anonymous editors??? We can't say they're all me.^{— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs} 21:25, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

But they are! Secret Squirrel 21:26, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Not tiring are you, brief mortal? It's only [insert time here]. You could probably do a few more redirects?^{— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs} 21:52, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Redirects are insignificant next to the power of the Force. Secret Squirrel 21:54, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Grr. You fight like a dairy farmer!^{— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs} 21:56, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Dairy farmer eh? Does this mean you're a lactating cow? Secret Squirrel 21:59, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Hmmm... close, but I'm afraid I'm going to have to pass it over.

Blue team! What do you think??^{— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs} 22:00, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Insufficient. Can't start rewriting the classics like that. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 04:58, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

Deadliest catch

Feeling rebellious, are we? :) ~ Jellyfish! (Talk • Contribs • Logs) 21:43, 22 May 2008 (EDT)

Skull und Bones

Just to warn you for next time, don't make pages that use an ampersand "&" like you did with Skull & Bones. & in a wiki URL tells the software that a command or action of some sort will follow it. Using one can screw some things up (ask TMToulouse, IIRC, about the problems of Penn & Teller if you really want to know). Hopefully no harm done, but you probably shouldn't do it again. Thunderkatz^Ho! 11:57, 24 May 2008 (EDT)

Um, okie dokie. That was a redirect to Skull and Bones anyway. Secret Squirrel 12:11, 24 May 2008 (EDT)

My mistake

Sorry, Secret Squiggle. I thought you only made the FBDO article as a lulzy redirect to Ben Stein, so I figured it wouldn't have any wikilinks. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Sock of BluesPotion, et al} 05:57, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

Um, okie dokie. It's entirely a Benjamin Jeremy Stein protege anyhow, only links to Stein, only liked from Stein. Secret Squirrel 06:05, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

Not worth getting into a fight over. If you hadn't noticed, this isn't Wikipedia talk pages are community property.   ^Contribs_Talk 20:25, 27 May 2008 (EDT)

She's right, you know. "... the user talk page space is public and does not belong to the user. No deletion of talk page material is permitted, but archiving may be done periodically." item number 4. Is this all over the squirrels playing outside my bedroom at dawn today that I sprayed with icky air freshener? ħuman 20:48, 27 May 2008 (EDT)

No, it's because of my Secret Squirrei account, I'm afraid. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Sock of BluesPotion, et al} 20:53, 27 May 2008 (EDT)

also:"Please note that all contributions to RationalWiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.2 (see Project:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here.". But, like I say it's not worth the hassle. Come back tomorrow Secret when you've slept on whatever caused the storm.   ^Contribs_Talk 20:54, 27 May 2008 (EDT)

Dinsdale! You've not gone over to the dark side?   ^Contribs_Talk 15:12, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

You *can't* seriously believe my Conservapedia account is a squirrel. Secret Squirrel 09:36, 12 August 2008 (EDT)

Enjoy ...

... your demotion.   ^Contribs_Talk 10:36, 12 August 2008 (EDT)

(thought you'd been done ages ago!)   ^Contribs_Talk

Heh, this is the first time I've been granted admin status anywhere. I guess this is yet another too little, too late thing, which seems to be the story of my life, but thanks! Secret Squirrel 21:27, 12 August 2008 (EDT)

Hey, welcome back Squirrel! I still get a chuckle out of the hunting and fishing articles... ħuman 17:20, 12 August 2008 (EDT)

I think his last visit was just a drive by. Genghis^pillaging 17:23, 12 August 2008 (EDT)

Apologuise

I can't remember if I've apologised for this before or not... but anyway, sorry about the "Secret Squirrei" thing. It was stupid. Will you stay and enjoy our goat-related foodstuffs? <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Holy Roman empire} 18:23, 12 August 2008 (EDT)

Apology accepted. But no, I will not stay and eat goat-related foodstuffs. Ewwww... Even goat milk is nasty stuff. Secret Squirrel 21:27, 12 August 2008 (EDT)

I agree emphatically. Carrot cake is nice, though. Have some carrot cake <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Holy Roman empire} 11:56, 13 August 2008 (EDT)

There's not much goat in it... ħuman 17:16, 13 August 2008 (EDT)

That's probably a good thing. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Holy Roman empire} 17:20, 13 August 2008 (EDT)

wandalism

I hope I didn't offend, I thought the Fark mascot would look good on your page.

ДЛеяиея ^{Come see if I suffer fools gladly} | ^{A place for my stuff} 07:12, 16 August 2008 (EDT)

You do' know that same image was the mascot of Frugal Squirrel's Survivalist Forums as early as a decade ago? Secret Squirrel 08:01, 16 August 2008 (EDT)

I didn't. I wasn't using the internet much a decade ago, I had just had my bar mitzvah and my dad didn't me to get in trouble online, too late for that now I suppose ДЛеяиея ^{Come see if I suffer fools gladly} | ^{A place for my stuff} 08:06, 16 August 2008 (EDT)

Chickenhawk

So because I don't fall for your stupid "Libertarians are the only hope for the future" crap I need to go suck up at the Daily Kos? Go Fuck yourself you prick SirChuckB^{Whatever happened to Skip It?} 22:36, 22 August 2008 (EDT)

Well, I did block teh skwirrel for 3 seconds for that rudeness... ħuman 03:26, 23 August 2008 (EDT)

Wikipedia

I can't say it there, so I will say it here. Stop being such a tendentious putz. tmtoulouse ^harass 22:05, 23 August 2008 (EDT)

What is this "Wikipedia"? Never heard of it. Is it anything like Conservapedia? Secret Squirrel 21:40, 24 August 2008 (EDT)

Exactly like it, only with a terrible liberal, anti-American, anti-Christian bias. Not neutral to the truth like CP. ħuman 22:48, 24 August 2008 (EDT)

Anyone care to fill me in on what Tmtoulouse finds so objectionable? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 00:22, 12 September 2008 (EDT)

Skwrl went nuts (get it?!?) a few days ago to try to delete the EL (in line) to RW at WP:CP. Check old "random" intercom messages. ħuman 00:50, 12 September 2008 (EDT)

Um, why? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 00:57, 12 September 2008 (EDT)

No one knows. He was mad at us? ħuman 01:22, 12 September 2008 (EDT)

For what? Not being nice enough to Rem? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:24, 12 September 2008 (EDT)

Now that I think about it, Secret Squirrel is the only other libertarian here. Heh, and I never even noticed he was one 'til just a few minutes ago. : | Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:24, 12 September 2008 (EDT)

Ah, yes, but "true Libt" or "kiddie Libt"? Who is to decide? ħuman 01:30, 12 September 2008 (EDT)

Last I checked, libertarians do not as a rule support labor unions, stronger minimum wage laws, living wage ordinances, trade restrictions, import tariffs, limits on CEO salaries and bonuses, or making it illegal to move jobs overseas. But whatever. Secret Squirrel 10:41, 26 September 2008 (EDT)

Kiosk

Eh, what was French for that? ħuman 00:01, 12 September 2008 (EDT)

Doctors for Disaster Preparedness

Great sleuthing skills you have there SS.--Bob^{bing up} 13:17, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Just call me Bond. James Bond. Secret Squirrel 13:24, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Did you know this stuff already or did you just go out and find it now?--Bob^{bing up} 15:03, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

I knew it already, didn't think it worth a mention until the new article on the Oregon petition appeared and I couldn't resist noting the Schlafly connection. Secret Squirrel 15:16, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Louie...

This may be the beginning of a beautiful friendship. Researcher 09:50, 7 October 2008 (EDT)

Feed me acorns and I'll stay out of your bird feeder :" Secret Squirrel 17:02, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

Emailz

I would like to discuss something in private with you. Would you please enable your email? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 04:11, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

I can has Very Important skwrl mail? Secret Squirrel 17:02, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

You can haz! Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 17:41, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

Moonies

Wouldn't it have been better to have "Unification Church" as the category?

TOAST

^{and butter} 08:57, 30 October 2008 (EDT)

Oops...BAD skwirl. :) We can go ahead and move the category - I won't mind. Thought it would be appropriately snarky. Secret Squirrel 09:01, 30 October 2008 (EDT)

See you've already deleted it. (You can't "move" categoties) It was just that some things didn't actually fit as moonies - you can't call a newspaper (sic) a moonie.

TOAST

^{and butter} 09:15, 30 October 2008 (EDT)

Ah, okay ;) There was this great photo opportunity I saw recently, Scientology and the Lyndon LaRouche group were both tabling at the same Washington D.C. metro station at the same time. And what newspaper box was right next to the two tables? Heh. Should have snapped a photo. All we needed was that woman who sometimes peddled The Watchtower and Awake! at the same metro and it would have been perfect. Secret Squirrel 09:19, 30 October 2008 (EDT)

Dragons

How'd you know about dragon-kin when writing the dragon article? --"CUR^talk 18:53, 10 February 2009 (EST)

Sqwrl knowz all. Secret Squirrel 11:09, 15 February 2009 (EST)

You know much about therianthropy, but are obviously not one. What gives? --"CUR^talk 11:14, 15 February 2009 (EST)

I know a lot about Scientology too, and televangelists, and alternative health quackery - I wrote much of RW's content on those topics - but are obviously not any of those either. Let's just say squirrels gather a lot of nuts and engage in scatter-hoarding behavior. Secret Squirrel 11:27, 15 February 2009 (EST)

Yes, but why would you have gone to howls? Why specifically annoy a bunch of fringe crazies? Time wisest Phantom! 11:30, 15 February 2009 (EST)

*groan* We aren't fringe crazies, for the last time. --"CUR^talk 11:32, 15 February 2009 (EST)

If you have reputation as a dyed-in-the wool rationalist, what must the rest be like? You have given no justification other than "I do some stuff that's a bit like what a cheetah does". Time wisest Phantom! 11:34, 15 February 2009 (EST)

Some have unusual beliefs- that does not mean that they are crazy. Others do not have unusual beliefs. Someone not being a rationalist does not mean that they are crazy. Do not be a zealot. --"CUR^talk 11:35, 15 February 2009 (EST)

I don't want to get in another war with you, but I still think it was justified. Time wisest Phantom! 11:36, 15 February 2009 (EST)

(EC)There is no question some are. . . weird. For example, one person is a member of Voluntary Human Extinction. But it is not my place to tell people what to believe- unless they are trying to force their beliefs on others. But therians are a varied group. Some of us can only be described as New Age-y oddballs. Some are hardline Republicans. Some are indentical to most other people. What can I say? --"CUR^talk 11:41, 15 February 2009 (EST)

I would consider several things that you have said to be "crazy", particularly the stuff on starfish being sentient, but you are free to think them, and as therianism seems, on the whole, to be somewhat irrational, I think saying that the sort who would go to howls would be crazier than normal. Time wisest Phantom! 11:45, 15 February 2009 (EST)

The way I see it, someone has no right to tell others what to believe, assuming:

• They do not claim that a religious belief is science.
• They are not trying to force it on others.

That doesn't mean we don't comment- but we don't tell a specific person what to believe. Does that make any sense? --"CUR^talk 13:10, 15 February 2009 (EST)

(UNDENT)someone has no right to tell others what to believe Bullshit. Say I believe in a flat Earth, or Santa Claus. Say hate the Jews. Or the blacks. Or I believe women should not have the right to vote and should undergo FGM. Are my beliefs "right"? Do people not have the right--nay the obligation--to tell me that I can't function in society while holding those beliefs? TheoryOfPractice 13:14, 15 February 2009 (EST)

TOP, you know perfectly well what I mean. At least, one would certainly hope so. I was talking about religious or spiritual beliefs, not rascism or anti-Semitism. As for a flat Earth, if they claim their belief is backed up by science, then yes, we should challenge it. Otherwise, we have better things to do then argue with that particular person. As for Santa Claus, I see no reason to engage in that argument, either. --"CUR^talk 13:19, 15 February 2009 (EST)

*Ahem* Debate:Otherkin is here. Secret Squirrel 11:38, 15 February 2009 (EST)

Squirrel, have you been readin' agin? I told you all that book-learnin' that was dangerous...TheoryOfPractice 11:18, 15 February 2009 (EST)

Skwrl knowz all. Book-learnin' not necessary. Secret Squirrel 11:33, 15 February 2009 (EST)

Back on topic, Secret Squirrel still hasn't answered the question, and I am getting suspicious. I might inquire around at some places that would know. --"CUR^talk 13:13, 15 February 2009 (EST)