RationalWiki's 2018 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2835Goal: $5000

Mark of Cain

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
The colorful pseudoscience
Racialism
Icon race.svg
Hating thy neighbour
Divide and conquer
Dog-whistlers

The Mark of Cain is an old American religious belief-cum-serving of eugenicist woo that creates the foundation of American religious-based racism and also, subtly, the entire Creationist movement.

Premise[edit]

Here is the text from Genesis, chapter 4:

11 And now art thou cursed from the earth, which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother's blood from thy hand;
12 When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth.
13 And Cain said unto the LORD, My punishment is greater than I can bear.
14 Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that every one that findeth me shall slay me.
15 And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.

A literal reading of this passage could be easily make clear a science-fictional idea where a certain segment of humanity descended from the lineage of Cain would be cursed with an aberration in skin pigmentation. Even though the mark would likely have been superficial to identify Cain himself for what he had done, and therefore would not have been inheritable, since Lamarckism doesn't work.

Execution[edit]

The weak attempt to preserve antebellum racism in America worked because Southern Protestant preachers said they read the Bible in a way that included a teaching wherein blacks were inferior due to a descent from Cain's brood.[1] As such, it was a basic violation of the First Amendment to restrict exercise of religiously-approved doctrines regarding interactions with blacks. The Southern Democrats were apt to maintain social order and be seen as quasi-religious by not challenging these precepts. The Southern Baptist Convention did not formally renounce its racist past until 1995.[2]

Modern iterations in creationism[edit]

The hinge of the Creationist movement is that human beings are divinely created by God. However, considering this level of literalism in their doctrine, it is easy to see this view also extends to the later chapters on Genesis. It may not come up a lot, but if they believe in Noah's Ark and the Exodus, they probably have to, by default, accept this view. As such, according to Creationists, Cain-ites would still walk the earth marked as a cursed line, damned for eternity to the 7 deadly sins. The fact the Creationist set also tend to be pro-austerity fiscal policy advocates who use blatant and obnoxious stereotypes about Welfare Queens and Dangerous Black Men gives this theory further credence.[3]

Mormons[edit]

The Mark of Cain theology was most blatant in the teachings of Joseph Smith, founder of the Mormon religious movement. Smith tied the Mark with the Curse of Ham, claiming in the Book of Abraham that Ham's wife was a descendant of Cain.[4] It was only in 1978 that the President, Prophet, and Seer had a vision that said they should allow black Mormons full participation in the faith.[5] However, ceremonials for the Church still maintain the idea of the Mark of Cain. Now they believe, however, that a prayer and blessing can remove the curse upon Baptism into the Church. They no longer believe that removal of the curse will result in black people becoming white.[6]

References[edit]

  1. Priest, Josiah Slavery as it Relates to the Negro or African Race. (1843)
  2. Baptists Renounce Racist Past; The Southern Baptist Convention Pledged To eradicate Racism From Its Membership. Orlando Centinel, June 21, 1995.
  3. With creationists, this is hard to pin down, because they spend so much more time on superficial topics such as the giants in the days of Noah and where Cain got his wife.
  4. Wilford Woodruff, Diary of Wilford Woodruff. January 16, 1852. "The Lord said I will not kill Cain, but I will put a mark upon him and it is seen in the face of every Negro on the earth, and it is the decree of God that that mark shall remain upon the seed of Cain and the curse until all the seed of Abel should be redeemed and Cain will not receive the Priesthood or salvation until all the seed of Abel are redeemed. Any man having one drop of the seed of Cain in him cannot hold the Priesthood, and if no other prophet ever spake it before I will say it now in the name of Jesus Christ."
  5. Official Declaration 2. lds.org.
  6. Mormonism and racial issues/Blacks and the priesthood/The "curse of Cain" and "curse of Ham." fairmormon.org.