RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Jordan Lasker

Jordan Lasker | Result: ?

Jordan Lasker (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. This article is hot garbage. It says very little about Lasker aside from "he did some stuff alongside Emil Kirkgaard" and "he is suspected of having alt accounts on Reddit and Xitter." Like, okay? This is very clearly the product on an online feud, as is made clear by the fact that roughly 3/4ths of this article is focused on shit these suspected "alt accounts" are doing and saying. It's so fucking dumb, and we don't need shit like this on RW. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano^{Make a Reservation} 20:48, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
2. This is the sort of thing that might put us into trouble again. GeeJayK^{Where all evil dwells} _{Where every lie is true} 21:00, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
3. It is not proven Lasker is the person who owns the Cremieux Recueil and TrannyPorn0 accounts although the evidence suggests it is very likely (while I did not create the page I added some of this evidence based on quoting a X thread based on evidence someone else compiled) but since it is not proven I don't think it makes sense to have a page if it has not been proven Lasker is Cremieux. I could be wrong though seeming as the Cremieux account is one of the most popular HBD/eugenics accounts on X and are noteworthy. Anti-eugenicist (talk) 21:48, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
4. I don't think we need this drama. This is not meta-wikipedia, for bob's sake. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 22:50, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
5. Christopher (talk) 01:28, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Keep

1. While I agree the article is garbage, I don't believe the principle of having an article is garbage. I suggest someone quickly goes along, hacks out the pointless/risky crap out of the article [even if it reduces it to a semi-stub] and then leaves it for someone in the future to improve. After all, from what little I know about this person suggests to me is the very sort of person who should be covered by RW, esp as WP don't have anything on him. KarmaPolice (talk) 21:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

The article is fine as is. In fact, we should expand it! PolyStan (talk) 21:13, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

If the keep vote wins, I will indeed take a hacksaw to this article. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano^{Make a Reservation} 21:26, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

I can't comment on your talk page, but please don't do that either. People should absolutely know that he is a Nazi. And calling his account "Trannyporno" makes it all even more ironic, hahaha. People should also know about his fascist wikipedia propagandizing! PolyStan (talk) 21:35, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

I don't believe @PolyStan is a good faith editor (see their reverted edits on Jonathan Anomaly). They are also adding unsourced, dubious and potentially libellous claims. No evidence offered that Lasker is a "Nazi" same as the very questionable statement on Anomaly's article he is pro-Apartheid. My personal view is this is a troll account making a parody and deliberately adding over-the-top claims to discredit articles. They are also likely a sockpuppet of @Roggenwolf. Anti-eugenicist (talk) 22:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Special:Blocklist confirms that PolyStan and Roggenwolf share an IP and are thus the same person. Plutocow (talk) 22:26, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

1. Not a "garbage" article originally, there was no issue until this article was highjacked by a couple of troll accounts. I suggest reverting to the original version that I wrote [1]. Psychologist Guy (talk) 16:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
2. I think it's worth having an article on people like Lasker, so that people are aware of who they're dealing with if they come into contact with him or see something of his get cited. That said, I would like this article to have more detail on what Lasker actually says, rather than who he's affiliated with (although that stuff is good too). Carthage (talk) 16:34, 17 November 2024 (UTC)