From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Check our privilege
Social justice
Icon SJ.svg
Not ALL of our articles
Warning icon orange.svg This page contains too many unsourced statements and needs to be improved.

Equality could use some help. Please research the article's assertions. Whatever is credible should be sourced, and what is not should be removed.

The general limits of your freedom are merely these: that you do not trespass upon the equal rights of others.
Dwight D. Eisenhower

Equality is the state of being equal with all other human beings one encounters, politically, socially, economically, and academically. While this may seem obvious, attempts at achieving equality often run into problems because of differing ideas on what it is that should be "equal."

Many of the revolutions in the 18th and 19th centuries focused on political equality. These revolutionaries sought to create states where citizens could meet as equals, not as lord and vassal or colonizer and colonized. However, as the 20th century dawned, many of the newly "equal" people realized how much material inequality still existed. Moreover, their de jure equality did not mean much without being seen as equal to their "betters." This is why many of the movements of the 20th century were more focused on social and economic equality than political equality. (This focus on things other than rights is often known as "egalitarianism.")

In political science, the two concepts of liberty and equality are sometimes seen as antithetical, because too much liberty leads to gross inequalities in wealth, whereas only strong government action can lead to real equality. (Some anarchists contest this idea, believing that full liberty is impossible without full equality and vice versa.)

A contrast is often made between "equality of opportunity" and "equality of outcome" during partisan bickering over "equality."

Equality and Affirmative Action[edit]

A good case in which different ideas of equality come into conflict is in Affirmative Action. From the perspective of some, affirmative action is necessary to bring disadvantaged people into equality with advantaged people. Without some kind of support, equality will never happen. For others, however, that very support creates inequality, as people are not being treated the same now. (This type of thinking tends to ignore history and differences of power between groups.) These two conceptions of equality (while using the same term) make discussions of AA very difficult and contentious, and in the case that its goals will be ultimately achieved it's likely that it'll disappear from the system.

See also[edit]