RationalWiki:Saloon bar/Archive224½
Oh No[edit]
There is a dinosaur in the back alley! What do we do? ROAR Z-Rex (talk) 20:13, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- shoot it.--
-brxbrx 21:21, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- I have 54 hit dice. WHAT NOW? Z-Rex (talk) 23:04, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- let's see. dinos are animals, right? that's 1d8. So I think I can knock you out with a pit of boiling acid. 10d6 acid damage, 10d6 fire damage, each round. Suck it.---brxbrx 23:58, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Awakened. And you don't keep pits of boiling acid large enough for Gargauntuan creatures. And I have class levels. Z-Rex (talk) 00:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- Fine. I have a Deity level of 3, in accordance with DnD 3.5 rules (updated from 3.0), and I use my deity power of domain manipulation to create
a pit of boiling acidan ocean of boiling acid beneath you. My domain encompasses the entirety of the Demi-plane of RW:Saloon Bar, and RW:Saloon Bar talk. The area of the ocean you are falling into happens to be covered by an anti-magic field, caster level 40 (appropriate for a deity, who general have 20 class levels and 20 HD in outsider). The anti-magic field also works as an anti-psionics field, because we are playing with the Psionics/Magic the same rules, as described in the Expanded Psionics Handbook. ---brxbrx 00:14, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- Fine. I have a Deity level of 3, in accordance with DnD 3.5 rules (updated from 3.0), and I use my deity power of domain manipulation to create
- Awakened. And you don't keep pits of boiling acid large enough for Gargauntuan creatures. And I have class levels. Z-Rex (talk) 00:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- let's see. dinos are animals, right? that's 1d8. So I think I can knock you out with a pit of boiling acid. 10d6 acid damage, 10d6 fire damage, each round. Suck it.--
- I have 54 hit dice. WHAT NOW? Z-Rex (talk) 23:04, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Oh No[edit]
I created the first archive for this page. Leninist123 (talk) 17:21, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- A talk page... has a talk page. This place is screwed up. The unbusinesslikeman of business 17:32, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- No, this is a talk page for a project page that just happens to be used for talk. This is a talk page for a talk page! Real first name and last initialTalk, talk, talk skim my contributions 21:21, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
- Is there really any point to archiving a single, brief, and admittedly odd, discussion?--User:Brxbrx/sig 21:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
- that's not an archive, it was concurrent with the debate and its talk page. Real first name and last initialTalk, talk, talk skim my contributions 21:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
- I mean here--User:Brxbrx/sig 21:30, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
- that's not an archive, it was concurrent with the debate and its talk page. Real first name and last initialTalk, talk, talk skim my contributions 21:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
- Is there really any point to archiving a single, brief, and admittedly odd, discussion?--User:Brxbrx/sig 21:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
- No, this is a talk page for a project page that just happens to be used for talk. This is a talk page for a talk page! Real first name and last initialTalk, talk, talk skim my contributions 21:21, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
No you did not create the first archive. First archive is here: RationalWiki talk:Saloon bar/Archive1.
Everything appears to have been kicked out of whack when Mindless Cheerleader moved [RationalWiki talk:Saloon bar] to some nonsense location & RNS moved it to [RationalWiki talk:Saloon Bar]. What a bunch of fuckin morons. Wěǎšěǐǒǐď
Methinks it is a Weasel 21:40, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
HAHA YOU DIDNT CREAT THE FIRST ARCHIVE AND U THOUGHT U DID DANG MIGHT AS WELL GO CRY YOURSELF TO SLEEP NOWISwagHard (talk) 05:38, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
THE BAR HAS BEEN GOATSE'D AGAIN[edit]
....can't see how in the history. P-Foster Talk "Armed with the knowledge of our past we can charter a course for our future"--MX 20:04, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- So what's it gonna take to turn off IP edit now? -- Seth Peck (talk) 20:05, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- That's just a band-aid...what we need to do is LOCK THE FUCKING DATABASE. Occasionaluse (talk) 20:14, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
NITE MOAD. P-Foster Talk "Armed with the knowledge of our past we can charter a course for our future"--MX 20:18, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Guide to the Book of Mormon[edit]
Hello,
I'm new to RatWiki membership (though I've browsed for a while), and I consider myself an ex-Mormon (I'm currently being raised Mormon and still have to go to church and all of its activities, etc.). Since we have a guide to the Bible, I thought it would be fun to make a guide to the Book of Mormon as well. What do you guys think? — Unsigned, by: TheIrrationalShark / talk / contribs
- Sure, if you're happy to take the lead on it, since most of us won't know as much about it as you. Wěǎšěǐǒǐď
Methinks it is a Weasel 06:24, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm currently working on it. It may take a while, though.
- WHO CARES IF YOUR WORKING ON IT ISwagHard (talk) 05:39, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Uuuurgh[edit]
UUUUrgh!
(retch)
BBLAARRGHHHGGHHH
SophieWilder 20:12, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- *Fetches mop* What did you drink? Humorless fascistsociopath 20:15, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- That stuff they're trying to find a name for in there. SophieWilder 20:33, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Tsk tsk. Humorless fascistsociopath 20:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- That stuff they're trying to find a name for in there. SophieWilder 20:33, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
An important message[edit]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5v2UGsb4-_c --TechCheeseprotest 01:37, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Bestiality[edit]
Any fellow heathens partake in acts of depravity lately? I had an extra cup of coffee this morning. Wasn't hard to fight any of the zoophilia urges inherent in godlessness. Successful day.— Unsigned, by: some tosser or other / talk / contribs
- Oh dear, this one's not even trying. To be a successful troll you need to needle us, not make blunderingly ridiculous claims. Go back to the start; think abut what you're trying to achieve. What's your aim?SophieWilder
13:57, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- lulz. And deserved doom shall be unto you (talk) 13:28, 9 November 2013 (UTC)