RationalWiki:Main Page testing area
The Shakespeare authorship question, also known as "Anti-Stratfordianism," is a fringe theory asserting that William Shakespeare of Stratford-upon-Avon was not the author of the plays attributed to him. First developed as an idea in the mid-19th century, the theory gradually took wing in late Victorian times, establishing a prolific literary vogue for amateur historians and a whodunit-addicted readership, whose mostly unreadable products now tally up to several thousand books and articles.
While all but a few members of the academic community ignore or disparage anti-Stratfordianism, it has achieved a slight degree of acceptance as a legitimate research topic among a small number of tenured professors. In late 2007, Brunel University of London began offering a one-year MA program on the Shakespeare authorship question, and in 2010, Concordia University in Portland, Oregon, a provincial hotbed of anti-Stratfordianism, opened a multi-million dollar Shakespeare Authorship Research Centre, under the direction of Oxfordian Daniel Wright, a Shakespeare scholar and Concordia's professor of English.
By intimating and diffusing a sense that there has been a gross centuries-long cover-up by the cultural and critical establishment of a scandalously repressed "truth", they appear to be trying to mobilise public opinion to pressure academia itself to take them seriously. These are the same sort of crank tactics that have allowed Moon landing conspiracy theories — and more recently, climate change denialism — to take hold.
Our purpose here at RationalWiki includes:
- Analyzing and refuting pseudoscience and the anti-science movement;
- Documenting the full range of crank ideas;
- Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism;
- Analysis and criticism of how these subjects are handled in the media.
We welcome contributors, and encourage those who disagree with us to register and engage in constructive dialogue. Consider writing an Essay, or comment on others. You can participate freely in existing Debate pages, or start your own.
you can write an article here, read up on what a RationalWiki page is and our community standards. Take a look at the help pages if you're having trouble. Our to do list is where we pile up ideas for articles. See if anything piques your interest!
Need to know What is going on? We present regularly updated selections of the finest lunacy the Internet has to offer. Get up to date with the latest goings-on, or participate in the dialogue.
What is going on...
Creationism portal • Creationism • Answers in Genesis • Creation Museum • Creation science • Banana fallacy • Baraminology • C-decay • Complex specified information • Discovery Institute • Evidence against a recent creation • Falldidit • Horizon problem • Intelligent Design • Young earth creationism
Global warming portal • Global warming denialism • Climategate • Denialgate • Effects of global warming • James Inhofe • Global warming • Global warming conspiracy theory • Oregon Petition • Anthony Watts
Alternative medicine portal • Alternative medicine • Acupuncture • Autism and pseudoscience • Bloodletting • CAM • Chelation therapy • Chiropractic • Crystal healing • Evidence for homeopathy • Faith healing • Folk remedy • Herbal supplement • Homeopathy • Massage • Raw foodism • Vaccine denialism
Conspiracy theories portal • Conspiracy theories • Conspiracy theorists • 9/11 conspiracy theories • Bermuda Triangle • Chemtrails • Freemason • Illuminati • Monsanto • Moon landing hoax • Project Blue Beam • U.S. dollar bill folding tricks • War on Christmas
Logic portal • Logic • Rhetoric • Ad hoc • Argument • Argument by assertion • Argumentum ad hominem • Cherry picking • Heuristic • Logical fallacy • Negative proof • No True Scotsman • Non sequitur • Occam's razor • Paradox • Open mind • Poisoning the well • Post hoc, ergo propter hoc • Red herring • Straw man