User talk:Laurogeita Hamabost/Archive1

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an archive page, last updated 9 November 2016. Please do not make edits to this page.
Archives for this talk page:  , (new)(back)

Welcome[edit]

New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Laurogeita Hamabost!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

I realize that you were a BoN before but nonetheless.Owlman (talk) (mail) 03:30, 18 May 2016 (UTC) 03:30, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome. Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 16:45, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Autopatrolled[edit]

I'm pretty sure you're 95.something, so: Based on your edits and time on the wiki, you've been given RationalWiki:Autopatrolled status. This makes it easier for you to edit and lets you bypass the CAPTCHA. If you have questions, feel free to ask me or another editor.--JorisEnter (talk) 06:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 16:37, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Cooping[edit]

Posting something on the Chicken Coop. It's essentially RW's "mob justice" station, and it's drama-fuelled and messy as hell. Less coops, more smiles. Ugh. Mʀ. Wʜɪsᴋᴇʀs, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 18:08, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

How did it get this name? Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 18:16, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
It's probably derived from "Headless Chicken Mode" (HCM), in which everybody behaves like... well, a headless chicken. The Coop is intended to contain the headless chickens and stop them from causing drama all around the site - although it seems we may need to add a couple more fences to the Coop, given the dramafest last month.--JorisEnter (talk) 18:49, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
If I may ask, why is this even here? Has anything happened that might cause another (*sighs*) Coop case?--JorisEnter (talk) 18:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
What happened last month? Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 22:38, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Sysop[edit]

Based on your edits and time on the wiki, you've been given wizard RationalWiki:Sysop status. Let the ᴘᴏᴡᴇʀ course through your veins. Once the high wears off, see RationalWiki:Sysop guide for more information. If you have questions, feel free to ask me or another editor.--JorisEnter (talk) 17:46, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. How come I get this honor? I did not even put my name into some nominating contest... Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 19:39, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Sysop status can be granted if some sysop thinks another user is capable enough to be given 1337 p0w3rz.--JorisEnter (talk) 15:50, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Well thanks again. I hope my use of the blocking tool just now was okay. Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 15:58, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Usually, "joke blocks" are 0xπ seconds long and all the extra option boxes are left unticked (to avoid blocking someone's IP, for example).--JorisEnter (talk) 15:59, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
I just left the boxes pre-checked the way they were. And as for "joke" I do hope both take the warning to heart as I want this stupid fight to stop... Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 16:05, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
The boxes are pre-checked for vandals and other folks that should normally be blocked. And yes, I hope that this shitfest stops as well.--JorisEnter (talk) 16:08, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Gotta love it[edit]

How Owlman promises to lay off editing both article, only to go and revert me one last time. If he can have one last edit, then so can I. Typhoon (talk) 15:48, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Please just both stop it. Your childish behavior is reminiscent of India-Pakistan dickfights over stupid things... Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 15:58, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Ayn Rand[edit]

You do, hopefully, realize that "I don't like her" isn't enough to accuse Ayn Rand of racism, that some sort of proof is required? 132.3.61.82 (talk) 22:00, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

You do, hopefully, realize that locking the page isn't considered proof. 132.3.61.78 (talk) 22:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
You do hopefully realize that edit warring is considered bad style. Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 22:02, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Then you shouldn't be doing it.132.3.61.81 (talk) 22:05, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Look. I reverted you because you edited a page that had been that way for quite some time. Than you reverted me again and I locked the page. Instead of discussing it on the talk page you went on to revert again. So I locked the page. If you can get consensus that she was not a racist we can change the article to your version. But given what literally five seconds of google give me, your chances are slim Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 22:09, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Look, you reverted me because I removed erroneous information that you wanted to be true. Then when I restored the page, you reverted it to your version and said "there, I'm locking it because I want it to be this way." Five seconds of Google (the sum of your research according to you) is apparently insufficient for you to know her opinions on race. But you locked the page so therefore you are right.132.3.61.82 (talk) 22:13, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
I know her opinions on native Americans. Which are racist. Which is all I need to know. And please continue this debate on the talk page of the article and not my user talk. Thank you. Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 22:17, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
You already know everything you need to know, therefore you don't need evidence. Thank you.132.3.61.78 (talk) 22:27, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
You do realize that "do your own research" is a bad argument tactic.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 22:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC) 22:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
On that, Owlman, you are spot on. Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 22:18, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
I did not make that argument, I pointed out that she admitted she did 5 seconds of research and I called it insufficient.132.3.61.79 (talk) 22:26, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Please stop the ad hominem and keep the debate to the talk page of the article. Failing that I will block you for an hour. Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 22:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Talking about stuff on the wrong talk page is not a bannable offense.--Kugelschreiber (talk) (mail) (block) 22:33, 21 June 2016 (UTC) 22:33, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
I am not banning him. Just said that I'll block him for an hour if he does not stop what is clearly intended as making this a personal thing instead of a thing about issues. Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 22:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
You mean protecting this page, so that only autoconfirmed users can edit it?--Kugelschreiber (talk) (mail) (block) 22:42, 21 June 2016 (UTC) 22:42, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Are you saying I should do that instead of blocking his sorry ass for an hour if he cannot fucking read? Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 22:45, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
I am saying you should do neither, he didn't spam or vandalize this talk page or the Ayn Rand talk page.--Kugelschreiber (talk) (mail) (block) 22:52, 21 June 2016 (UTC) 22:52, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
On the other hand, Owlman, the burden of proof is on the person making the assertion. She is making the claim that someone is racist, I am making the claim that she should back up her claim. In a way, "do your own research" is a perfectly valid response.132.3.61.79 (talk) 22:39, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
I am not making any claim. I merely reinstated the previous version. Status quo bias. Google it. And it is plainly obvious that you are not arguing the issue in good faith but instead you are trying this about you and me. So please kindly fuck off my talk page and go over to the Ayn Rand talk page and address the issues raised there if you don't want your ass to be blocked. Cheerio. Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 22:43, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Protecting pages[edit]

Protecting pages dosen't stop edit wars amongst sysops. Anyway, the edit war is over. Castigane and I are agreeing on making the article so much better. Hipocrite (talk) 22:09, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Let's hope you do. Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 22:11, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Really, that was accidentally apt, as well as amusing[edit]

"I don't think those that think you should not have a mop like your style, tone or way of handling this situation." Oh, I'm sure it does come down to such non-infractions as "tone" and "style." It nearly always does here. By the same token, one can behave like an utter boor, and cause a flight of decent people who won't endure it, and still be treated like a fragile snowflake if one's name is Ryulong. David Gerard will see to it.

No, my dear, I will either get my mop back because at least one person here has the balls to do it given that I did nothing wrong, or I won't. If this site is so insane that preventing a nut like Typhoon from constantly blocking both me and another editor is grounds for discipline of me, well, then I'm better off listening to my Adult Voice and getting the fuck back out of Dodge.---Mona- (talk) 14:46, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

I still think the way you are acting right now is unlikely to make people react favorably. Just like complaining to the ref won't do you many favors in sports. But have it your way. Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
well, then I'm better off listening to my Adult Voice and getting the fuck back out of Dodge.- -Mona- Why the hell are you still here then? How many times will you LANCB??--Kugelschreiber (talk) (mail) (block) 15:35, 26 June 2016 (UTC) 15:35, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Please, don't resort to namecalling. Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 21:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
That's a good point. Unfortunately, ad hominem attacks are rather common here at RW. Nerd (talk) 21:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Mona you have shown to not be worthy of being mopped, you have CONSTISTANTLY, at least three times, demopped someone mid-dispute. You are power hungry and unfit to even be on this wiki, and i suggest you leave for good this time. But hey, its not all bad! I heard conservapedia is hiring anti-progressive absolutists. Sandflapjack (talk) 00:57, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

No offense, but could you please carry on this fascinating discussion at some place that is not my talk page? Thanks. Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 14:34, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Dont worry, im basically telling her to fuck off your page and to stop whining Sandflapjack (talk) 18:31, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
I won't dictate you which tone to use, but I can plead with you to please be civil. Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 22:34, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

In West Philadelphia, born and raised...[edit]

Hello Laurogeita! I just wanted you to be aware of this, in the case that you might want to change your vote based on that. Regardless - all the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 23:33, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Is there a reason for the weird headline? another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 20:46, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

20:50 . . Laurogeita Hamabost (Talk | contribs | block) changed visibility of a revision[edit]

RW generally doesn't delete page revisions unless they're personal information, spam, or libel. Fuckups, however much one might wish to hide them, not included. ;) I've restored the revisions. Apologies! Mʀ. Wʜɪsᴋᴇʀs, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 21:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

But nobody should see this! This is really the beginning of a global conspiracy! another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 21:44, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Don't (((worry))), (((nobody))) will (((see))) your (((actions))). Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 22:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
(((okay))) another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 22:44, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
A Jewish conspiracy without me? Laurogeita Hamabost, you're so mean ;_; --Kugelschreiber (talk) (mail) (block) 13:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC) 13:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
I'm sorry, didn't you get the (((memo)))? I thought I had sent it to the "appropriate channels". Apparently "they" don't work any more... another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 22:14, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Prostitution[edit]

Have the decency to explain your reverts on the talkpage as i have. Please do not revert until you do AMassiveGay (talk) 20:26, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Actually, we're now 2 to 1. Prostitutes are human beings and their rights must be championed. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 21:01, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Whatever approach to prostitution you take, the first priority should be helping the people who work in prostitution, especially those who do so against their will. But doing something with or against ones will is a difficult concept in the capitalism of 2016. another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 21:23, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
there is championing rights and then there is fantasy and delusion masked championing rights. Where have my edits argued against the rights of sex workers? Claiming penetration by a stranger for money is the same as flipping burgers upholds no ones rights but the punters. AMassiveGay (talk) 21:20, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
i could not give less of a shit of how prostitution gels with capitalism, socialism, or any other ideology. I am more concerned with the reality on the ground rathef than idiotic either/or abstraction. AMassiveGay (talk) 21:31, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
The first right prostitutes should have is a right to help. The current system (regardless of Scandinavian model, US model or libertarian model) does too little of that. another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 21:53, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
i have no interest in continuing this conversation if you seem unwilling to read my previous statements on the prostitution talk page or misrepresent my views as to somehow being opposed to actions to improve the lives of sex workers or that i am opposed to decriminalisation or legalisation where it has been proven to work. What i am opposed to is any suggestion that prostitution isnt an appalling industry that damages all those involved, whether they are sex worker or punter. Please rep!y on the prostitution talk page. I apologise if i am abrasive, but this is a hit button issue for me. AMassiveGay (talk) 22:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
You still have not convinced me that for some magical reason sex work has to do that. Without fail and without exception. I know the experiment to prove either way is very close to impossible. But if you could provide a sex work in a world where there is no stigma, no danger no violence etc. associated with that work and you still have - excuse my French - fucked up people as the result, your point is proven right. If not, mine is. I think that the circumstances are way, way more important than the fact that genitals are (for the most part) involved in some form. another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 22:26, 8 July 2016
Please see prostitution talk page. Please read the walmart section. I do not want keep repeatinv myself. Sex is fundementally emotionally effecting. It does things for your self esteem. Your self confidence. Your self worth. You might get away with the odd one night stand and it not have any lasting effects, but if you so long term, it changes the way view yourself. How you view others. The effects are different if you doing the fucking or if you are getting fucked. Prostitution is this magnyfied. I am sure some can handle strain short term. I am sure some even enjoy it short term. But you cannot do it for any length of time and it not effect you. It is not flipping burgers. I posted a link that suggests 2 thirds of sex workers have pstd even when violence is not a factor. I i know many sex workers. They are not happy people. I know many people who use s3x workers. They are not pleasant people. No one gains long termAMassiveGay (talk) 22:47, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

We are family[edit]

Hello Hamabost, I wrote this, and you're welcome to see it too. I think it's good and indeed important that we don't let the care we all clearly have for our general humanist ideals collide when they could probably overlap instead. In the name of a nice discussion and mutual respect. All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 13:17, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Vandal bin[edit]

Unfortunately, I do not know if there is a better way. That's why I not doing it all at once. The other reason is that my finger hurts. Feel free to join my efforts. Nerd (talk) 00:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Where can I find the relevant list? Also we should remove permablocked IPs from their blocks as this also violates policy. another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 00:17, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Here it is. Nerd (talk) 00:21, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 00:38, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for helping. I think we got them all. The lists are getting familiar but I could not find any IP addresses other than the one I just paroled. Nerd (talk) 01:38, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Locking the page before you ran away from the talkpage[edit]

Respond here. ASAP. Don't just lock the page like a coward. Typhoon (talk) 17:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Here's why[edit]

Go to recent changes. Go to the IP's contributions page. You'll find that this IP asks many users "are you, or have you ever been, a Zionist?" They're a spamming troll that's JAQing off. PBFЯЗЭSPДCЗ (talk) 21:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

If you don't like that question on your talk page, remove it. Other people can deal with it the way they want. Sorry, but I am not convinced. What else do you have? another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 21:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

They also remove sourced info from the HAMAS article with no discussion. PBfreespace (talk) 21:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

I'm no expert on Hamas, but what I have read our coverage on the whole subject is pretty shit. another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 21:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

This person also admits they're using a proxy. Who the hell uses a proxy to edit RationalWiki? Someone who is blocked. They also like to blank entire sections of the Saloon Bar. They like to tell other people to fuck their own ass. Great IP you have here. PBfreespace (talk) 21:38, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Well whatever, do what you like. I just found it absurd to block him for a relatively inoffensive question. another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 21:42, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

I blocked him because he's the sockpuppet of vandal-binned user AvengeroftheBoN as well as Pizzameister. This user was involved with lots of drama about 8 months ago, and this user harassed another user for several weeks on a daily basis. PBfreespace (talk) 21:44, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

What happened there? Also, if it's a proxy couldn't it be practically anybody? I mean for all we know, you could log in with that proxy right now and edit, right? another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 21:49, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Quick overview: Mona, AvengeroftheBoN, and Arisboch enter scene. All want to edit Israel/Palestine articles, along with others. Mona was generally anti-Israel, while AvengeroftheBoN and Arisboch were pro-Israel. Users edit warred over multiple articles for several months. Arisboch participated in an online community which released personal information of Mona and other users here, resulting in him being banned forever. He argues it was unjustified due to an ex post facto rule change, and has returned as Kugelschreiber. AvengeroftheBoN was vandal-binned due to disruptive editing, but this user returned as Pizzameister. This user was then convicted by RW of being a sockpuppet, and he went dark afterwards. He has been editing under proxy IP addresses ever since. PBFЯЗЭSPДCЗ (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

What happened to Mona? Also, I am confused as to whether that Arisboch person released any personal information himself. another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 21:58, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Mona LANCBd several times, and is not currently active. Arisboch did not personally dox anyone, but Mona asked the administrators if he could be banned permanently, and they unanimously agreed. That should tell you something about him. There's pretty much a consensus that Kugelschreiber is Arisboch, and that he is allowed to stay unless he returns to being a massive dick. Which he's not doing for the time being, although I see the old him coming out here and there. PBFЯЗЭSPДCЗ (talk) 22:04, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Sounds like something I'd watch on Netflix. another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 22:05, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Edit filter[edit]

The edit filters are only visible to those with RW:TECH status (like me and Fuzzy). Filter 45, which he modified, was used to stop a particularly annoying IP-hopping vandal from a few months ago. As we have not seen him for quite a while, Fuzzy disabled the filter.--JorisEnter (talk) 21:33, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Edit Filter not visible[edit]

Some edit filters contain sensitive information, eg. doxing. Fuzzy. Cat. Potato! (talk/stalk) 22:07, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

and what would I have to do to view it? another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 22:35, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Be a tech. Fuzzy. Cat. Potato! (talk/stalk) 15:01, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
How and by whom are they chosen and what do they do? another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 15:06, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

In case you missed this[edit]

Hi Laurogeita! Just bringing you up to speed. All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 14:48, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 14:51, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
You're welcome as always, buddy! All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 14:51, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for nothing. Plutoniumboss (talk) 17:09, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
What is your problem? another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 17:16, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Identifying links in the WIGOs[edit]

You identified The Intercept in WIGOE and Jacobin mag in WIGO:Blog. There aren't a lot of norms but it is odd so I was wondering why you did that? I personally mark links when they come from normally shoddy sources like the American Conservative or Reason.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 04:23, 29 July 2016 (UTC) 04:23, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

I thought it might be interesting to know the source. Also, those two are not always accurate and neutral, are they? another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 18:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
I guess so but normally people have no problem with not knowing the source; I think it is somewhat unnecessary as well. Also, every source can be not fully accurate or neutral (and I hope they aren't neutral) but some sources are very unreliable and, therefore, it would be in the best interest to mark that link.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 04:08, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

The fingers you have used to dial are too fat[edit]

Editing from your phone eh, old timer? What with your rollbacks and rolled-back rollbacks to the campaign page. All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 21:43, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

I am not quite sure I understand. There have been some software bugs with my account those last couple of days. another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 22:18, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
I ask because on the phone, it's easy to rollback by mistake. Check your latest edits to this page - rolled back edits that you then reverse yourself. All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 23:20, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Voter legibility[edit]

If you read the criteria stated here, you will see that you are not yet legible to vote. Nerd271 (talk) 23:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

When will I be? another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 23:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
August 27th, 2016. That's exactly three months after you created your account. Nerd271 (talk) 00:01, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

My most unlucky friend[edit]

I tossed this together. Something something Aneris isn't right... is he? I'd love your input as well, if you dare. I trust your judgement on issues like these (and I know you know I'm not sealioning, though I am all over the f***ing place). All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:46, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Navs[edit]

Editing {{POTUS16nav}} tends to work pretty well. :)--JorisEnter (talk) 17:57, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Well in the saloon bar nobody could tell me how to do it. And I could not find it. another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 18:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Tell me you did not fuck up my navbar after you mangled my article on the campaign. Plutoniumboss (talk) 00:54, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Kaine[edit]

We have articles on Kaine and Pence. I think the content of the navbox detracts from what you tried to do, list the pros and cons of the candidates. Maybe we could talk this out. Plutoniumboss (talk) 23:06, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Use the article talk page not my talk page. another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 14:20, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
You got it, friend. Let's see if you actually respond this time, or just leave me holding my d*ck again. Plutoniumboss (talk) 14:41, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
You got one week to respond, then it gets cut. Just FYI. Plutoniumboss (talk) 19:03, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Your pettiness knows no bounds[edit]

Even when I move information - intact, mind you - to a related article, you see fit to revert it out of spite. You must be a tremendously lonely and ignorant person. Plutoniumboss (talk) 02:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Are you on the autism spectrum? Plutoniumboss (talk) 03:07, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

That's interesting[edit]

Instead of edit warring with me on subjects related to politics, now you are stalking me around the wiki and removing my other edits. That's not very kosher. Someone might have to remove your sysop rights if that keeps up. 14:23, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Unnecessary blocking[edit]

Why was that bon blocked for saying tesla was serb? AMassiveGay (talk) 16:59, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

There is a very longstanding edit war on WP about exactly that. Judging by her/his one other edit, (s)he is a Serb nationalist. And nationalists from the Balkan are not exactly the kind of people we want on this wiki. Also, feel free to find twenty five sources for Tesla being a Serb and twenty for him being a Croat. As if there were nothing more important in the world... another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 17:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
I unblocked -- 2's a coincidence, 3's malice. If they make another edit in the same line, free feel to block. Herr FuzzyKatzenPotato (talk/stalk) 17:05, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Okay. Feel free to weigh in on the Jasenovac debate at the Ustase talk page (feel free to edit in the needed diacritics) another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 17:07, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

A Question[edit]

You are an American. There is a conservative uprising against the current government. The Ku Klux Klan, Neo-Nazis, right-wing militias, Tea Party political organization, are all involved. The Ku Klux Klan takes over your town. The government drops leaflets on your town telling you to leave because they are about to bomb the town. What do you do? PBfreespace (talk) 02:28, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

This sounds like a South Park parody of Red Dawn. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 09:09, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
I think he is trying to make some crude point about Libya or Syria. Given that I am a dirty coward when it comes to war, I would have fled the US at the first sign of fighting. I don't own a house and most of my material possessions are either movable or easily replaceable. another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 15:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
The point I was trying to make is that if you've lived in a violent warzone for 4 years in a town controlled by an illegal armed group, don't cry about being bombed. PBFЯЗЭSPДCЗ (talk) 16:53, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Does that point apply to Gaza as well? another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 21:13, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
No, because Gazans are physically incapable of leaving the territory in question, whereas Syrians can cross the Jordanian, Turkish, and Lebanese borders, as well as into government-held areas. Israel doesn't let civilians out of the Gaza Strip, and therefore they are responsible for all civilians deaths caused by Israeli weapons. PBfreespace (talk) 19:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Look, I am no Middle East expert, but I just recently heard news of a "siege" in Syria where they let nobody in and out of certain cities (which is kinda the point of a siege) and Gaza has all those tunnels, doesn't it? another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 20:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Which they use for smuggling of weapons and such stuff.--The (((Kigel))) (talk) (mail) 14:52, 18 August 2016 (UTC) 14:52, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
But could you go out of Gaza in them? Getting out of Syria isn't exactly easy, either. another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 22:34, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Probably not en masse, the Egyptians won't let the Gazans into Egypt that easily if at all, they don't won't problems with either the Muslim Brotherhood OR their outgrowth Hamas.--The (((Kigel))) (talk) (mail) 04:11, 19 August 2016 (UTC) 04:11, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Green Party[edit]

What's wrong with you, Laurogeita Hamabost? The article clearly cites the wrong author, I replace the name with the correct author, which is easily verified by clicking the link, and you REVERT that?

And describing Greens as "bleeding heart liberals" makes this site look superficial and stupid. Is this your goal?

Do not revert a correction on naming an author; that makes zero sense. And do not revert back to the excessive injection of political editorializing without explaining yourself.

Lee (talk) 01:52, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Replacing Mehta for the link to the correct author was nice of you. Very well done. However, "bleeding heart liberals" is some funny snark — and I say that as a liberal. We're snarky here, bud. So don't be so high-strung towards Laurogeita, if you please. Thanks for your palpable concern. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 02:01, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Since reverting explained edits and corrections without explanation is the preferred behavior here, I do believe I'll bow out.Lee (talk) 02:25, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
"Bow out"? Also, Laurogeita rolled back your edit in order to prevent you blanking snark; not in order to prevent your author correction. I've since fixed things, so there's no need to mope. All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 02:32, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

No one appreciates well-placed snark that advances our goals more than me; IMO this is not that, but this seems an uncool way to handle the disagreement. Some suggestions if more contributors are wanted: 1) people should be asked to explain when they roll another's work back, 2) third parties acting as spokespersons for someone who can't be bothered to explain their rollback encourages this bad practice, 3) persons should be asked to change only the points they have a problem with, not all the other's work including needed corrections. This kind of game is exhausting and discourages contributions.Lee (talk) 01:07, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

SC poll[edit]

I modified your news item because I think implicitly "crediting" it to Maddow is misleading. She was just reporting the poll's results. If you don't like it go ahead and revert. --Ymir (talk) 23:22, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Fight! Fight! Fight! Fight! Fight! Fight! Fight! Reverend Black Percy (talk) 23:23, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
I think it is notable that Rachel Maddow cited it on her show and elevated it above the "some guy made a poll" level of news. But Template:BurgerKingSlogan (this should totally be a template producing a burger and "have it your way") another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 00:07, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Careful, we've been sued enough already! Reverend Black Percy (talk) 00:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
PS. That was actually a great idea for a template. Rock on. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 00:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Unfortunately I am too börk to write such a template :-( another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 00:10, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Trump for president- the best choice?[edit]

Trump has the power to make America into the cesspit that I've been waiting for years to happen. Hopefully, he does, so the news will finally be fun. Trump's laws will never get past congress, causing massive unrest in his voters and anger with "the system" that they thought voting Trump would get rid of. When this happens.... the far right go to work. I don't live in America, but you need Trump if you want some form of change in America. I don't support him, but he's cute, in a pug sort of way.The Unwritten (talk) 23:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Is it worth it[edit]

Just wondering why you persist? It's clear that you're not going to get a fair shake here, so why invest so much time and energy in something so pointless as defending yourself? The Present King of France (talk) 04:13, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Well I don't know. My repeated attempts to get people to listen that you and I are in fact different people went no where. But look, when Danton was betrayed by Robespierre, he still gave them quite a show at his trial. He knew he was going to the guillotine. But he would not go gently into that big night. And while you may ask what it matters how a man falls down, if the fall is all that's left, it matters a lot. On a totally unrelated note, if you have the technological possibility to create a new account, I advise that you do, because other than adding sources to WIGO entries you have done nothing that anybody would recognize as a "pattern of behavior", so you are likely to be unmolested with a new account. Me on the other hand, well... Let's just say there is a certain paranoia me or "my ilk" are trying to subvert the wiki. I am not the Ombud's man 16:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
I think you missed the point of my question. This is not a case of Danton and Robespierre, this is a case of Bugs Bunny and Elmer Fudd: there is no "fall," because there was nothing noble here to defend. The only thing to be lost is whatever effort you put into your entries, which will disappear as soon as it doesn't fit someone's agenda.
As for creating a new account, that's something I won't do. First, I'm one of those stodgy old academic types who doesn't know how to do that. Second, and ultimately much more important, there's no virtue in my doing so. I learned about the site because one of my students told me it was funny, and I thought many parts were. I joined in order to try something new (and I am grateful for learning how to use a wiki- I may take those skills to one that matters now), and to try to fix some egregious errors. But I naively stuck my nose where it didn't belong, and quickly learned plenty about the site's fatal flaws. PBF's errors I can understand— I have aquarium decorations that are deeper than he. But if the best moderators this community can elect are able to conclude that you and I are the same person on such scant evidence, then there is no, was never any hope for its success. The best it will ever do is "mildly amusing," and it appears to be declining even from that. The Present King of France (talk) 18:53, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
I certainly understand the sentiment and we are clearly of two different generations, with the idealism of youth still present in me while it is (mostly?) gone in you. At any rate, if you intend to create a new account at some time, this can be done if you have a "moving" IP; some internet providers assign you the same IP all the time, while others have one that moves and jumps around a bit. Just look at "whatsmyIP" or a similar service a couple of times in a row. If you intend to step away from this wiki - which I deem flawed in some ways but not beyond saving - you are of course free to do so. At any rate, you would have to not use this account long enough for your IP to change (if it does) and then create a new one. While there is no checkuser (i.e. they cannot find out your IP unless you tell them), they do block or bin the IP of the account (usually by just checking the box that does that), but they cannot rangeblock your IP (usually the aforementioned IP moves happen within a "range" of IPs). At any rate, I hope you can become a valuable user at some wiki that values you. Wikivoyage is one of the better ones and remarkably drama-free.

Formal notice, even though you already know about it[edit]

A case involving you has been raised at the Chicken Coop. Feel free to comment.

-President Donald J. Trump (talk) 23:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

When the Donald coops you... another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 23:38, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Source it dawg[edit]

What, you got too sick skater tricks in you?! You can't even source?! Of course you can!! Light that shit up and source it properly!! Your dope ass meme guide, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 19:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Where do you get those videos from? Also, why do those videos promote the abomination that is green asparagus? What do you mean arguing for the sake of argument? 20:38, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

More China, please[edit]

Please, please, please keep Rob going on China- it's driving my wife crazy, and I haven't stopped laughing since he started. Jagulard (talk) 21:08, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

I will try, but I don't know how to go about it. Have a nice day. And if you see celebrating Latinos today, it's because many Latin American countries have independence day today (not just Mexico). What do you mean arguing for the sake of argument? 21:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
I think you only need to mention the topic, or even simply reply to one. My wife is fuming over his Great Wall response. And yes, I was aware of the importance of this day. There's a small Guatemalan community nearby, and to help them celebrate, I went to the restaurant and ate their food for my lunch. Jagulard (talk) 22:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Guatemalan food is spicy and has Mayan influences, right? There is a spiciness equator somewhere in Central America, south of where the food is rather bland. Though if you go further South it gets spicier again, I think. And I will try to raise the issue at an appropriate time and place. Where was the great wall comment again? What do you mean arguing for the sake of argument? 10:20, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Yes, Guatemalan food tends to be spicy, but not terribly so. Of course, that tends to be a pretty subjective judgment. However, based on my own experience, the idea of a "spiciness equator" makes sense to me. Jagulard (talk) 17:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
That reminds me: I need to get some Latin food soon. Where is the Taco Truck on every corner when you need them? What do you mean arguing for the sake of argument? 17:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, that was awesome. Although that last bit about the nursery schools was maybe too much- now I'm certain he's a Poe. Jagulard (talk) 21:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

How to create your own draft generator[edit]

Click this link: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User:DiamondDisc1/Create_your_own_draft_generator-DiamondDisc1(talk) 04:00, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Unblocking your proxies[edit]

I have reblocked them. If you do it again then I will push for your desysoping.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 22:18, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

My proxies? I am not the Ombud's man 22:23, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
IP addresses aren't supposed to be blocked more than a short while, they're reassigned after a while, anyway and you'd hit an innocent user with this kinda ban.--The (((Kigel))) (talk) (mail) 00:49, 26 September 2016 (UTC) 00:49, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
True, but the original ban was placed by Joris a month ago. Besides it being odd that this user picked these IPs, this user blocked an unrelated IP for the same amount of time.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 01:06, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Racialism[edit]

There was a big ol' copivio by a big ol' racist here. Please don't restore or archive this material, thanks!

I am reasonably certain[edit]

That the contents posted here are cribbed from a John Fuerst publication, "The Nature of Race": https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwjSzePng67PAhXMGD4KHd9FBH0QFggeMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fosf.io%2Fgyen4%2F%3Faction%3Ddownload%26version%3D2%26displayName%3DThe%2BNature%2Bof%2BRace%2BFinal-2015-06-17T14%253A28%253A52.398000.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGhtl6FxwYvlzcwL-saB4Hlr3qwbw&sig2=aXPXiiZibAIrqIGpe81Wrg FuzzyCatPotato!™ (talk/stalk) 22:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Please tell me that that constitutes a breach of copyright and we have to blank this nonsense? Reverend Black Percy (talk) 00:02, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
That constitutes a breach of copyright and you have to blank this nonsense. BicyclewheelToxic mowse.gif 19:04, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Dat feel when the trash has been taken out. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 19:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
A racist and a plagiarist? So not surprised.--The (((Kigel))) (talk) (mail) 19:26, 28 September 2016 (UTC) 19:26, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Now plagiarism is a special kind of evil. I am not the Ombud's man 19:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Denmark[edit]

A long time ago, right at the start of RationalWiki, one of the first users was one User:AKjeldsen, a citizen of Denmark and all-round nice person. Somehow a whole slew of silly jokes and memes grew around this. His blog about Conservapedia was an early gathering place for critics of that site, most of whom (including me) ended up here. Then he left - things had got a little rough-tempered and we were bereft of our token moderate Christian. BicyclewheelToxic mowse.gif 19:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

I always become a saucer-eyed kid looking to scooch up closer and listen closely whenever any of you old timers tell of the olden days of RW. I'm not even kidding, for the record — I've dug through some old CP talkpages and the RW memorial with the fascination of some kind of amateur anthropologist uncovering a new tribe. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Wait, you are saying the site had a heavy Nordic presence even in its earliest days? I am not making any triple scandinavian crosses joke, but I totally could...I am not the Ombud's man 20:22, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Fingers +++crossed+++ that you will Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:27, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Fingers crossed? You see how they take over? You could just as well have said "you bet your ombud" I am not the Ombud's man 20:32, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Or just "ride your moped like the wind!" Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:35, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Well moped my ombud, I'm telling ya. I am not the Ombud's man 21:10, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
(EC) I look back too and marvel at the difference between then and now. We were like a bunch of kids having a laugh at all the idiots. The only thing we had in common was getting thrown out of Conservapedia. You could do anything and say anything. Eff knows how we ended up being a proper foundation with legal documents and accounts and all that stuff. BicyclewheelToxic mowse.gif 20:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Once which I'm actively involved in running, for one. And who am I? I'm a kid half your age who only found this site last May. Not saying I haven't worked my ass off to earn the trust of the community. I'm just saying... "For every thing, there is a season". Or something. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Well there are quite a few large companies that got started as just a few friends thinking they could take on the world. And amazingly, some of them did. I sometimes wonder how some yokels from the nowhere of Wacken, Germany managed to create the biggest heavy metal festival the world has ever seen, for instance. I am not the Ombud's man 20:30, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Never mind the fact that Bill Gates started Microsoft something like this Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:40, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
At the least Bill Gates knew about computers. If my knowledge about the guys behind Wacken is half way accurate, they basically made it all up as they went along. I am not the Ombud's man 21:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
++++++++++++++++++-Guess Who? 22:16, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
This is a false +++flag+++ to blame it all on the +++Nordics+++ when in reality the people behind Trump are Scots. (Or at least part of his ancestry is) I am not the Ombud's man 22:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Good Point[edit]

Thanks for adding that point about the election to the Progressive Era article. It deserves more attention; I will try to build on it. Jagulard (talk) 22:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome. I actually stumbled upon that when I gave a long winded answer to my brother on the question "How come the Republicans started out as the Northern anti-slavery party and are now the Southern racist party". I am not the Ombud's man 22:13, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Coop notice[edit]

A case involving you has been raised at the Chicken Coop. Feel free to comment.

Reverend Black Percy (talk) 22:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Not again. I am not the Ombud's man 15:32, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Hey, talk to Owlman... Reverend Black Percy (talk) 15:33, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
I fear that might only add fuel to the fire, sadly. I am not the Ombud's man 15:34, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
You're right. Despite the civilized calm of this particularly dull coop case, it's started to attract bad mojo. (What is that, some maddening feature of the coop itself!?). Anyways, not worth it. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 15:41, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
For the record, I voted "No" to both proposals. My personal recommendation — for those that want it — is that we all just try our best to be nice and work together, et cetera. Inb4 this is archived and we can all get back to business. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 15:43, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
*Sigh* A thing out of curiosity though, she says that anything touching on Israel Palestine is a godawful mess. Do you agree? And do you have any interest in trying to fix it? Maybe we could, maybe we can't... *shrug* I am not the Ombud's man 15:48, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
I made the mistake of mentioning her once in unflattering terms (see above). Apparently, this was enough to disturb her long-LANCB'd spirit, stirring it from its resting place (with a vengeance). Now, I've certainly always been nice to her, and as she herself stated clearly, she considered me a "friendly party" (up until I committed the massive faux pas of dropping her name next to Ryulong's in the recent coop), saying just now in the above coop paste (in reference to me):
"...seeing myself compared to Ryolong by a party I'd thought to have been friendly..."
What this actually means is the following: no amount of being overtly friendly towards this person seems to be able to build up any "good faith"-buffer in her mind. Conversely, however, nothing could make up for the appaling transgression of mentioning her name once — admittedly negatively, as an example of an editor who has in fact been prone to being 2fast2furious behind the keyboard — even in passing. She also told me to go to hell, which is — one must concede — a truly mature level of expressed emotion to indulge over the internet at her age. That's the lesson. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 16:06, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
And as for Israel/Palestine — like always, I'm not touching that topic with a ten feet Reverend pole. Somebody has to try and remain a netural party — there will always be a need for moderating the behaviour of editors involved with that topic, I'm afraid... Reverend Black Percy (talk) 16:06, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
I understand the sentiment. I am not the Ombud's man 16:09, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

That woman seems to be a bit deranged and/or hate Ryulong... I am not the Ombud's man 16:13, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry I emailed her, I should have known better. Jagulard (talk) 20:24, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Apology accepted. Why the hell did you do that, if you don't mind me asking? As a result of this, she asked me to go to hell. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:25, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Hey, hell is a cool place, its where Christopher Hitchens is, remember Th hug.gif I am not the Ombud's man 20:29, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
I'm kidding- why would I do that? I'm one who originally suggested that the Intercept might not be entirely credible and objective. Unfortunately, in doing so I made a "new guy mistake" and stepped in a nasty mess I wasn't aware existed until I looked into that sordid history. I'll give you two guesses as to who actually did contact her- but I suspect you already know those names. Jagulard (talk) 20:34, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Well I do not know that history, but apparently it is rational to wish it not t come back, so here's me keeping my fingers crossed. I am not the Ombud's man 20:36, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
It's actually entertaining, if you like your bathos with a large dose of blind rage. Jagulard (talk) 20:41, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
What's bathos? I am not the Ombud's man 20:43, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
"An effect of anticlimax created by an unintentional lapse in mood from the sublime to the trivial or ridiculous." When something steps over the line from pathos (i.e. it is no longer merely pathetic, it's laughable). The Present King of France (talk) 20:50, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for the correction on my user page! Probably wouldn't have noticed it if it wasn't for you :).--WMS (talk) 00:43, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome. I am not the Ombud's man 01:09, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

There are apparently technical problems with the (un)blocking[edit]

I am not going to argue why I was blocked by Weaseloid, for that, the Chicken Coop is probably more appropriate. However, even though DiamondDisc1 has since unblocked me, I cannot open a case in the coop as it says I have been blocked. Can anybody please explain me what is happening here? Also, I am very much against being blocked, but that's besides the point right now. I am not the Ombud's man 02:43, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Fixed.-DiamondDisc1(talk) 02:56, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

"Capitalist sexis cissexist pig"[edit]

What on earth does that even mean, haha.--WMS (talk) 18:17, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Who knows; I found it funny (btw, last time I checked there was a problem with my unbinning in that it does not seem to have taken effect technologically) I am not the Ombud's man 18:20, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
That's certainly strange.--WMS (talk) 18:28, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Certainly. And Weaseloid is constantly re-implementing the bin in what he claims to be a moderator decision. Does he have the right to do that? I am not the Ombud's man 18:54, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Yep. ŴêâŝêîôîďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 19:14, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Paroled you.-DiamondDisc1(talk) 19:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Not anymore.-President Donald J. Trump (talk) 19:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Pbfreespace3 blocked me[edit]

Can I please be unblocked? Apparently the reason given has to do with this essay I am not the Ombud's man 21:23, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

In my opinion, you should, ironically, take it to the bin. —チーズバーガー • めん Spinning-Burger.gif (talkstalk) 21:33, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Don't you mean the coop? Also I can't since I have been blocked for three point six days (though I can still use my talk page). Also, I have been put into the bin, so I can only edit once every half hour. I am not the Ombud's man 21:55, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Unblocked.-DiamondDisc1(talk) 22:10, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Unfortunately, old friend, the unblocking seems to have not worked. I am not the Ombud's man 16:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Try now.-DiamondDisc1(talk) 18:55, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
I hope it works now. Is there any way I can get out of the bin? If you could do something for me regarding that I'd be grateful, old friend. Th hug.gif I am not the Ombud's man 19:14, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Would the prosecution please make a case - any case - towards rehabilitation?[edit]

So now that I am blocked and binned (aka limited to my own talk page every half hour) there remains little reason to keep using this account and either RW will lose my edits or some new account will be accused of being me. Probably both. At any rate, I am willing to give this another shot if someone tells me what exactly the behavior you want me to cease is. I have already given you a "stay away from Israel" pledge - such as it is - so I cannot give you that. But please, if your grievances are anything besides "I just don't like that person" I will give them due consideration. Otherwise, have fun chasing witches and ghosts in this month of Halloween. I am not the Ombud's man 16:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Give old Percy a break[edit]

I took it upon myself to do this. It might not last. I'm not going to fight a moderator over it, were he to argue (for whatever reason) that you stay in the bin for now, despite the "no" vote leading and despite the many days elapsed now. I won't argue with that.

I'm not here to discuss the drama. I'm talking directly to you. I think you like me. Please just remain seated and keep your limbs inside the ride for the coming time? It'd mean a lot to me. All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 19:32, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

I hope I won't let you down. I am not the Ombud's man 19:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
You're out now! :-)-DiamondDisc1(talk) 20:43, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Please have a look at my edits to the world as a RW talk page article. I am really no WWI expert, but it seems I am the only one editing that particular part... I am not the Ombud's man 20:48, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Noted.-DiamondDisc1(talk) 20:58, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. And no pressure. I am not the Ombud's man 20:59, 9 October 2016 (UTC)