User talk:UnlicensedThinker

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, UnlicensedThinker!

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, Autopatrolled has been added to your user rights. This lets you bypass most of the abuse filters, bypass the CAPTCHA, and edit more frequently. If you have questions, bleat ask away.

We hope you enjoy your newfound ᴘᴏᴡᴇʀ — and these external tools:

  • Rbutr shows user-submitted rebuttals to your current webpage.
  • Google Scholar Button (Chrome, Firefox) searches your highlighted text in Google Scholar. Easily check academic citations!
  • web.archive.org and archive.is can save permanent copies of webpages. Never lose a crank website or racist Tweet ever again!

NekoDysk 13:12, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Block #100840[edit]

To the moderators: @Bongolian, @DuceMoosolini, @LeftyGreenMario, @RWRW, @RoninMacbeth, @Spud

On 19:47, 17 January 2019 @Dysklyver blocked me with an expiration time of about 9 hours (autoblock disabled) for the following reason: "Overdue for a block: Actively proving to be an unwanted misogynist asshole."

I checked RationalWiki:Blocking_policy and I read that:

  • "In general, RationalWiki discourages blocking, especially for extended periods of time."
  • "Blocking should only be used if somebody is maliciously editing a page or pages, as explained below."

Since it doesn't seem to me that I did any of the kind of malicious actions listed on RationalWiki:Blocking_policy#Malicious_editing, I ask Dysklyver to make clear: (1) which policy I violated to justify a 9 hours block and (2) when/where I violated such policy.

Thinker(unlicensed)

I'll be happy to unblock you, as per the mighty rules, if you'd just tell me what you think of their actual block reason, and whether you think it's accurate or not. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 20:16, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
(also someone else will probably eventually unblock you if I don't but that's my ask) ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 20:17, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Nine hours is not a particularly long block, but let's hear from @Dysklyver before unblocking you. Bongolian (talk) 20:22, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Putting toxic masculinity in air quotes is not a good sign, but not grounds to call someone a misogynist and probably not grounds to get banned over. The user is getting worked up over an ad like all the other anti-feminists, but that's about it, really. This is basing just on Saloon Bar, maybe this user posted actual misogynistic comments somewhere else? --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario!(Mod) 20:34, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Still uncomfortable about these kinds of blocks. Unless this person's alleged misogyny is reaching DarkMaster2 levels of disruption, I would advise unblocking. RoninMacbeth (talk) 20:51, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Agree. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario!(Mod) 20:52, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
To clarify the situation, the issue is encapsulated in Special:Diff/2033395, where the Thinker appears to make some pretty dodgy implications. Per RW:CS#C. para. 3 this is not allowed. misogyny is bad, etc etc. I have unblocked you, have fun. NekoDysk 21:16, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
@Dysklyver "where the Thinker appears to make some pretty dodgy implications. Per RW:CS#C. para. 3 this is not allowed."
What is not allowed? RW:CS#C. para. 3 says "Discussions here sometimes get heated, but resorting to personal attacks is strongly frowned upon, however justified they may seem. In particular, attacks incorporating racist, threatening, sexist and homophobic language and insults are not tolerated. Accusations of fascism or comparisons to Hitler are also best avoided (see Godwin's Law)."
Which part of RW:CS#C. para. 3 do you think I violated? Thinker(unlicensed) 21:47, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
I also support unblocking this user. DuceMoosoliniYour friendly RW dictator moderator 21:49, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Syops[edit]

If you make more mainspace edits I could make you a sysop. Commie Lib (talk) 23:24, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Sysop[edit]

Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, wizard Sysop has been added to your user rights. Feel free to let your newfound ᴘᴏᴡᴇʀ course through your veins. Once the high wears off, see RationalWiki:Sysop guide for more information. If you have questions, bleat ask away.Commie Lib (talk) 22:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

The horror. NekoDysk 22:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
I have created a monster. Don't disappoint. Commie Lib (talk) 23:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

To Be Honest[edit]

If you want to engage in constructive dialogue with RWians, I would advise not engaging with Ikanreed. Like I said, I trust him. But he's a zealot, in the best and worst ways. RoninMacbeth (talk) 18:26, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Indeed I'm not discussing very much with ikanreed anymore, that accusation of racism is the reason. I think it is important and I explained why. If you don't want to adjudicate that, then no problem. But I don't see why it shouldn't be considered on the page "All things in moderation". Thinker(unlicensed) 19:53, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Partly because it isn't really anything the moderators should get involved in for now, partly because if the mods did get involved, well, it probably wouldn't end too well for you. RoninMacbeth (talk) 20:15, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Alleged, Allegedly allegation[edit]

I have to say, I don't see the point in your argument. CNN has a certain bias, so what? It should be obvious from our discussion in the Saloon that others think your point represents a weak hypothesis. It proved so annoying it was finally collapsed, I don't want to continue indefinitely with this argument but I think there is a real difference in the two cases you offered:1) CNN: 'Empire' star Jussie Smollett attacked in possible hate crime and 2) CNN: Conservative activist allegedly attacked on UC Berkeley campus. In the second case the alleged assailant is identified in the story. In the first case the attack is a rewrite of a police report with no identified perpetrators. Media is free to assume the event took place because the police reported it. No one can sue CNN for that. Your complaint just makes you appear to be intentionally annoying.Ariel31459 (talk) 23:32, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Invitation RW discord[edit]

You are hereby invited to the discord. Have fun.

Secret club[edit]

You are hereby formally invited to the cabal, of which there is none. Oxyaena Poke me 21:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Please do not uncollapse troll comments[edit]

It's not helpful. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 18:56, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

It isn't worth it.[edit]

Why are you trying to fight against the hordes of degeneracy that lurk here ? Go do more profitable ventures. — Unsigned, by: 2601:ca:8200:34a:547d:c472:fe15:52a / talk

Block #103049[edit]

To the moderators: @Bongolian, @DuceMoosolini, @LeftyGreenMario, @RWRW, @RoninMacbeth, @Spud

On 19:00, 20 March 2019 @Ikanreed blocked me with an expiration time of about 52 minutes for the following reason: "You're not entitled to troll".

I contest this block since I don't see my actions are trolling. I also point out that ikanreed is continuing his personal attacks by making up false accusations against me, precisely that I am a racist, that I defended every nazi mass murderer, and that I posted white nationalist (oh God, I'm not even a nationalist...) talking points (click, click). He also keeps collapsing my comment on the Talk Page of Christchurch terrorist attacks. Thinker(unlicensed) 19:26, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

It was trolling. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 19:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
It was trolling. Don't like the collapse, I'll give you the troll picture instead. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario!(Mod) 19:29, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
I weep crocodile tears for you, UnlicensedThinker. Did you know that as a sysop, you have the capacity to unblock yourself? Bongolian (talk) 19:31, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Was this trolling? Because ikanreed has blocked me from writing to any page of RW, included the Saloon Bar. Thinker(unlicensed) 19:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
It's either trolling or outstanding ignorance on how words work. Not flattering to your complexion either way. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario!(Mod) 19:39, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Just unblock yourself, and please stop calling every mod over to handle stuff that you can take care of on your own.DuceMoosoliniYour friendly RW dictator moderator 19:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Do not ping the moderators because you are blocked. It makes you seem foolish. Talk on the relevant talk page, and if others don't agree with you, that's the end of the game. Ariel31459 (talk) 21:57, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

You understand don't you[edit]

That the solution to not being called a conspiratorial racist shit is to stop being a conspiratorial racist shit? ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 19:06, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

To be more clear, I don't want to have to keep reading your garbage shitposts. It's tedious and tiring and fills up pages of the saloon bar with racist bullshit. Go do literally anything else with your time here, I can't take anymore of exactly what you do. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 19:08, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
"stop being a conspiratorial racist shit?"
@Ikanreed Still waiting for a link to a racist statement I made.
"I don't want to have to keep reading your garbage shitposts."
Who's forcing you to do that? Thinker(unlicensed) 22:22, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Stop being so intellectually dishonest. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario!(Mod) 23:34, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
@LeftyGreenMario ikanreed keeps calling me a racist, I ask him for a proof of any racist statement I made, he of course doesn't give any, and you say that I am the intellectually dishonest one... Thinker(unlicensed) 09:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)