RationalWiki:Chicken coop/Archive5

This is an archive page, last updated 8 December 2018. Please do not make edits to this page.

Archives for this talk page:

<1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <6>, <7>, <8>, <9>, <10>, <11>, <12>, <13>, <14>, <15>, <16>, <17>, <18>, <19>, <20>, <21>, <22>, <23>, <24>, <25>, <26>, <27>, <28>, <29>, <30>, <31>, <32>, <33>, <34>, <35>, <36>, <37>, <38>, <39>, <40>, <41>, <42>, <43>, <44>, <45>, <46>, <47>, <48>, <49>, <50>, <51>, <52>, <53>, <54>, <55>, <56>, <57>, <58>, <59>, <60>, <61>, <62>, <63>, <64>, <65>, <66>, <67>, <68>, <69>, <70>, <71>, <72>, <73>, <74>, <75>, <76>, <77>, <78>, <79>, <80>, <81>, <82>, <83>, <84>, <85>, <86>, <87>, <88>, <89>, <90>, <91>, <92>, <93>, <94>, <95>, <96>, <97>, <98>, <99>, <100>, <101>, <102>, <103>, <104>, <105>, <106>, <107>, <108>, <109>, <110>, <111>, <112>, <113>, <114>, <115>, <116>, <117>, <118>, <119>, <120>, <121>, <122>, <123>, <124>, <125>, <126>, <127>, <128>, <129>, <130>, <131>, <132>, <133>, <134>, <135>, <136>, <137>, <138>

, (new)(back)

Irrationalatheist.

User is abusing bin/block privileges. To whit: Three non-friendly blocks vs. Earthland in a 24 hour period. Vandal binned a new user after a single talk page edit. Suggest tarring and feathering. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 20:57, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Support. -- =w= 21:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Suggest egg & flour attack, followed by toilet papering. It's more fun & easier to wash out than the tar & feathers. ωεαşεζøίɗ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 21:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

3 non-friendly blocks in a 24 hours period is too few. 21:05, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Promote.--Bob^{It's cold!} 21:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Plus two previous non-friendly blocks and a totally-uncalled-for vandal bin? I'm not so sure. I'd promote for a while at least. –SuspectedReplicant retire me 21:08, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

IR is too ready with the bin & block. Seems to use them as argument points. Promote. ^yummy &  ^honey_{(or marmalade)} 21:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Joking aside, I suggest we rehabilitate Irrationalatheist and train him to the greater good. What is the wiki equivalent of waterboarding? Promoting him for a short period so the message sticks? 21:13, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

72 hours? A week? A day? TheoryOfPractice (talk) 21:13, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Agree with a promotion - then lets see what he has to say for himself. Aceⁱ⁹ 21:17, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

LANCB. ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 21:18, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

(ECX2)Three days I think. We don't do ideological blocks. I've been avoiding Earthland's essay/talkpage saga (FFS everyone, if you don't like his stuff, don't read it!), maybe other people should too if they can't control themselves. Totnesmartin (talk) 21:20, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

I have already demoted him. When to restore is up to you guys. -- =w= 21:19, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

I think three days is reasonable. Did he really bin that new editor after one edit? ħuman 21:50, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

He did. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 21:57, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, because the link above doesn't show it. That was why I was agreeing, since EL can unblock himself (right?) and is equally nasty to IR. But binning a noob is bad. ħuman 00:56, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

I say a week promotion and three day block, unless it is too late to input my opinions, in which case I would like a sandwich and pickle. And maybe some salt & vinegar chips (That's crisps to all you Brits). --The Emperor _{Kneel before Zod!} 22:57, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Three days of promotion is enough, although it would be nice to hear from him. - π 23:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Looking at his user page, it looks like he's leaving and never coming back. I assume for the crime of not agreeing with his actions, thus making us irrational and Uncyclopedia and so forth. --Kels (talk) 23:11, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

He can have his rights back in three days regardless of whether he has left or not. His new sock will earn them in that amount of time any way. - π 23:13, 9 February 2010 (UTC)