Talk:Michael Coombs/Archive1
Defamation
Remove defamatory statements from this article. Michael Coombs (talk) 15:01, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- Mr. Coombs, it is not a defamatory article, it quotes your own words. By the way, they are cracking down on racist hate-speech on twitter. Your disturbing and racist twitter which advocates the murder of non-whites, will no doubt be suspended one day. Anti-Fascist for life (talk) 15:06, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- I just discovered you have been permanently banned from here. This means you could be blocked on site :) Anti-Fascist for life (talk) 15:10, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- Please do not antagonize Mr. Coombs, the poor man's blood pressure is already a tad too high. GrammarCommie (talk) 15:14, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Anti-Fascist for life We do not actually know that this is Michael Coombs. Anyone could sign up with that name. They have not done anything worthy of a block yet. CowHouse (talk) 15:18, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- Ok fair play. Let's wait and see what happens Anti-Fascist for life (talk) 15:33, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Anti-Fascist for life We do not actually know that this is Michael Coombs. Anyone could sign up with that name. They have not done anything worthy of a block yet. CowHouse (talk) 15:18, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- Please do not antagonize Mr. Coombs, the poor man's blood pressure is already a tad too high. GrammarCommie (talk) 15:14, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- I just discovered you have been permanently banned from here. This means you could be blocked on site :) Anti-Fascist for life (talk) 15:10, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- His latest tweet 5 hours ago describes RationalWiki as an "anti-White" and "hate" site. This coming from a deranged Nazi that has posted he supports violence against non-whites, including shooting the black MP David Lammy. Dr. Witt (talk) 15:26, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- A lot of the attacks against the right take after Saul Alinsky and other sophists and they attack the person and never even say what the person was wrong. Often it's because the person wasn't wrong and is just saying some politically incorrect Thoughtcrime. Dr. Witt, you are doing it yourself. You say Mike said something, and never even argue that he's wrong. You don't even say that you think he's incorrect. You simply go to attack him. For all I know you even think he IS correct and view it as he exposed some deep, dark secret that's not allowed to be said. Now I'm not commenting on the veracity of Mike's comment about RationalWiki or your comment about him, but simply on, Dr. Witt, your inability to make an argument. You just jump to insults when you should first say whether you think someone is right or wrong, and if wrong then say why you think they're wrong. Sophistry is bad. Merkel (talk) 04:52, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- Yea, but Michael Coombs/Mikemikev gets attacked more by the right than left, even people who share his Nazi political ideology attack him and think he's a troll: he's banned from The Right Stuff, Metapedia, Stumble Inn, The Phora, Anthroscape etc., those are all right-wing websites; the first two, far-right. Also, articles on individuals are not primarily meant to refute their beliefs, but just document the craziness they believe. Mikemikev's holocaust denial and conspiracy theories like white genocide are criticized and debunked on the separate articles; so of course Mikemikev is wrong - he's a delusional Nazi nutcase and pretty much everything he believes is a lie. Dr. Witt (talk) 10:33, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- A lot of the attacks against the right take after Saul Alinsky and other sophists and they attack the person and never even say what the person was wrong. Often it's because the person wasn't wrong and is just saying some politically incorrect Thoughtcrime. Dr. Witt, you are doing it yourself. You say Mike said something, and never even argue that he's wrong. You don't even say that you think he's incorrect. You simply go to attack him. For all I know you even think he IS correct and view it as he exposed some deep, dark secret that's not allowed to be said. Now I'm not commenting on the veracity of Mike's comment about RationalWiki or your comment about him, but simply on, Dr. Witt, your inability to make an argument. You just jump to insults when you should first say whether you think someone is right or wrong, and if wrong then say why you think they're wrong. Sophistry is bad. Merkel (talk) 04:52, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- I might inform Hope not Hate about Mr. Coombs :) Anti-Fascist for life (talk) 15:33, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Your choice. I know where to go to serve notice. I believe your parents will cooperate. Michael Coombs (talk) 15:41, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Michael Coombs Can you specify which statements you feel are defamatory? If they are unsourced or poorly sourced, they will be removed. CowHouse (talk) 15:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Michael Coombs Also, please see RationalWiki:Legal FAQ. RoninMacbeth (talk) 15:47, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- Everything on the article is sourced to his own words. I am generally confused to what defamation Mr. Coombs is talking about. I think he is scared he might get in trouble with the authorities in the UK for his obscene hate-speech. Anti-Fascist for life (talk) 15:51, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Entry for Michael Coombs/Mikemikev on Hapas Reddit
https://www.reddit.com/r/hapas/comments/7n2i7e/another_nazi_in_wmaf_specifically_considering_the/ Dr. Witt (talk) 18:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- this gun be gud БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 19:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Michael Coombs harassing MP David Lammy
I checked these sources, plus others, and it appears to be true that Michael Coombs has posted things that can be interpreted as threats, including violence, an racism, against David Lammy. Someone should alert the authorities, or Lammy himself. Laws have clearly been broken, such as the UK's malicious communications act.Nick Lowles Fan (talk) 21:39, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Michael Coombs trolling RationalWiki on Twitter
Mike is spamming nonsense about RationalWiki being "anti-white" on Twitter again a few minutes ago.
He also just showed up here on a sock IP. Jellybeans (talk) 14:36, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Mikemikev is active again on twitter and gab posting racism. Debunking spiritualism (talk) 15:04, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Is Michael Coombs a John Doe in a lawsuit against Daily Stormer?
There is a lawsuit against Daily Stormer by Dean Obeidallah; the defendants are Andrew Anglin, as well as 10 John Doe's who Obeidallah’s attorneys are tying to identify. One of those Doe's is possibly Michael Coombs who is one of the most active posters on Daily Stormer.MrsBlintz (talk) 02:48, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Infighting in the alt-right, Michael Coombs not liked as a pedophile
“”You've openly admitted on Gab just two posts ago to being attracted to underage girls.
|
| —VarangianGuard1488 |
“”You outright said multiple times that you are sexually attracted to underage girls.
|
| —VarangianGuard1488 |
“”That makes you a pedophile. Just because you try to call it ephebophilia doesn't change the facts.
|
| —VarangianGuard1488 |
“”Yes, most men feel some attraction to women near the age of consent. We've been over this haven't we?
|
| —Michael Coombs |
http://archive.is/fXk1kAgent47 (talk) 08:17, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
Just dumping this link here
Mikemikev is listed on this blog as one of the most extreme online anti-Semites that can be found on Twitter. While I agree with that, the article wrongly labels Michael pro-Brexit. In actual fact he isn't since he supports polish immigration into UK. Several white nationalists like Mikemikev and Richard Spencer are against Brexit.Agent47 (talk) 16:58, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
article was written by an antifa
article was written by Atlantid an antifa, probably with aid of JuniusThaddeus
Both Atlantid and juniusThaddeus go around the internet causing problems for Metapedia/Rightpedia
More recently, they've both (more JuniusThaddeus since he wrote Frost's article on Enyclopedia Dramatica) been attacking Gregory-Lauder-Frost and other patriots or nationalists.Hexagon (talk) 14:57, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 14:59, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- This is likely someone from Rightpedia, probably "Wyatt".M87 (talk) 15:26, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Twitter ban
there's a weird word filter that prevents anyone making edits. however he's now suspended from twitter for racism: http://archive.is/2nPCM Oranges (talk) 10:34, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Since banned, he's resorted to creating twitter socks (also all locked): sock 1, sock 2, sock 3 etc. Oranges (talk) 10:37, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
You might want to mention
http://archive.is/u8pOV This Michael coombs guy has been creating loads of accounts on here impersonating other users. The link is a ratonalwikwiki page that logs his socks. And since he was banned from twitter, he's created dozens of accounts also impersonating users there too.MrSheen (talk) 21:19, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- 109.144.219.141 is his latest sock IP.
https://twitter.com/Antifungal16/status/1027183971250196480
Far-right watch also discovered this rationalwiki article and has contacted Twitter to ban Michael Coombs latest sock account (Antifungal16): https://twitter.com/jdpoc/status/1027156429906558976MrSheen (talk) 15:21, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
OK
So the majority of the article is basically a series of his tweets and forum posts without examining why they are wrong. Isn't this a little problematic? RoninMacbeth (talk) 02:32, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
- It's best to just quote his comments and let them speak for themselves, see examples for other alt-righters: Laura Loomer, RageAfterStorm, Peter Sweden, Millenial Woes. It's pointless to go into detail why the things Mikemikev believes are wrong, because they blatantly are, and no explanation is needed; there are already detailed pages that thoroughly refute all his crazy beliefs from Holocaust denial to the white genocide conspiracy theory.Octo (talk) 12:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Conservapedia
Michael is now trolling Conservapedia on a bunch of socks, like here. They created a Rightpedia article and he seems upset with it. Punisher (talk) 14:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
This whole article is smears written by antifa
https://en.rightpedia.info/w/RationalWiki Varg88 (talk) 21:56, 9 November 2018 (UTC) (Michael Coombs sock)
- That's funny Michael, because 90% of the article just quotes your own internet comments. You typed these things. Are you smearing yourself then? Punisher (talk) 09:37, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Michael Coombs is back
He's back trolling this wiki on a bunch of Ips and as the user Varg88:
United Kingdom - Telefonica UK Limited. 91.210.189.23 (talk) 09:51, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- I could care less. I can't even be bothered to block the IPs. — Dysk (contribs) 09:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
More of Mikemikev's socks
Latter created a recent attack article that was deleted: Oliver Smith, also the Julius Daugbjerg Bjerrekær article. His reason for the latter is using this site to attack people from OpenPsych who banned him, but he impersonates an anti-fascist while doing so. OpenPsych share his own racist views, but banned him - so did Metapedia and Stormfront, he regarded as a troll by people who share his white supremacist beliefs.Aeschylus (talk) 21:05, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- How do you people track this guy's every online move? ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 21:41, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- He shows up on the racialism talk every month or so on a new account and is easily identifiable based on what he says, particular phases and same behaviour; also any account attacking Smith is a giveaway. It will probably go silent for another 3-4 weeks and then it starts up again...Aeschylus (talk) 22:57, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- There's now a long-term abuse page for him at Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/MikemikevAeschylus (talk) 22:57, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- He shows up on the racialism talk every month or so on a new account and is easily identifiable based on what he says, particular phases and same behaviour; also any account attacking Smith is a giveaway. It will probably go silent for another 3-4 weeks and then it starts up again...Aeschylus (talk) 22:57, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Mikemikev as Radiant Orb was made a sysop (by mistake) and desysopped and blocked. His early edits were anti-racist/hereditarian so he tricked someone into giving him sysop rights, later though he started posting racist and anti-Semitic statements. He often creates fake accounts with a different POV, last year was pretending to be a member of Hope not Hate so be more cautious on here when making new users a sysop... Arcticos (talk) 01:17, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Recent
A recent number of Mike's accounts, including trolling Edward Dutton:
- Digger
- Yuri Bezmenov
- Super Hans
- Comrade hypothesis
- 183.88.221.63 SimonandSimon (talk) 16:09, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Mike is also trolling Dutton on Reddit as "Edward Button", while trying to pin that account onto Smith:
Invitation to Mikemikev
Mikemikev has been socking on countless accounts here claiming his article contains "defamation". As I recently responded to @D:
“”I don't understand what Mike is doing, just wasting his own time. He claims his article contains "defamation" yet all it does quote is his own postings of Holocaust denial, anti-Semitism, neo-Nazi/white nationalist politics, sexism etc. The article mirrors what is on his remaining social media profiles such as Gab (Twitter banned him). If he's claiming he's being defamed if he's being called a Nazi or white nationalist, why is this all over his social media? His most recent comments are virulently anti-Semitic. I see no defamation on the article.
|
So I would like to see what Mikemikev has to say since he continues to scream "defamation" but cannot show any evidence for this.
Is Mikemikev no longer a Nazi/white nationalist and so is complaining the article is defamatory because it only reflects his old political views? The problem with that is his current Gab account is filled with same old extreme racism, anti-Semitism and his support for far-right/Nazi groups. I see no change in his political views whatsoever and everything on the article is accurate and well sourced.Tobias (talk) 16:08, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
- I'm unlocking this for 24 hours so Mike has a chance to respond on point. However if he shows up to troll and attack me, it will get locked again. Mikemikev needs to specifically list what is "defamation" on his article and I'm giving him a chance to do that. Failure to do so would mean he's (as expected) a total liar. Tobias (talk) 16:17, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Mikemikev is impersonating RationalWiki mods/sysops on fake emails
This idiot Mikemikev is creating fake emails of mods and sysops here, users he's impersonating yesterday are Johns and Bongolian. He's also falsely now accusing Johns of being a meatpuppet of another account because Johns banned a blatant Mike sock on the spiteful mutant hypothesis article. REllis (talk) 13:56, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
List of recent Mikemikev socks:
@Johns @Bongolian Agent Orange is not yet blocked and he's trolling the Saloon Bar again. REllis (talk) 16:37, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Mikemikev (Michael Coombs) has been emailing me inappropriate dick pictures on a fake email. I have had about ten of these from Michael. The guy is clearly not well in the head. I will probably remove my attached email on here, I am tired of Mike's drama and impersonations. Please just block this troll on sight. Johns (talk) 16:44, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Those accounts have all been blocked by various sysops now. Bongolian (talk) 17:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- All now blocked including more: Black Betty, Dotty Red and 60,000,000 Lampshades (renamed). He is posting false allegations you, me, Johns and Knight are all the same person. I guess this is why he's a lolcow with a Kiwi Farms thread with close to a million views.REllis (talk) 20:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Those accounts have all been blocked by various sysops now. Bongolian (talk) 17:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Question
What sort of psychological gratification does MC get out of creating large numbers of RW accounts that obviously him and which he knows will be blocked upon recognition? Anna Livia (talk) 18:43, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- You know, given that he visits the site often and obviously monitors recent changes constantly, you might be able to ask him that yourself!
- I wouldn't put too much faith in his answer, but we could at least try...-Flandres (talk) 18:53, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Paraphrasing a law aphorism, "Don't ask questions unless you can verify the answers." Bongolian (talk) 19:09, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- As he gets blocked on sight, I doubt I will get a response.
- 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.' Anna Livia (talk) 23:07, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Can I deduce from Username 'Ridiculous Manchild' that I touched a nerve? (Or was he forcibly renamed?) Anna Livia (talk) 22:43, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Paraphrasing a law aphorism, "Don't ask questions unless you can verify the answers." Bongolian (talk) 19:09, 1 May 2021 (UTC)