User talk:Human/Archive24

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

This user was smitten by a bunny. Who the fuck knows why. But they got over it.

This is an archive page, last updated 4 January 2012. Please do not make edits to this page.
Archives for this talk page: <0>, <1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>, <6>, <7>, <8>, <9>, <10>, <11>, <12>, <13>, <14>, <15>, <16>, <17>, <18>, <19>, <20>, <21>, <22>, <23>, <25>, <26>, <27>, <28>, <29>, <30>, <31>, <32>, <33>, (new)(back)

You people have stood in my way long enough![edit]

I can haz bureaucrat please? I think you'll find my top quality jinx-baiting is more than enough to deserve additional powers. Ace McWickedThe Liquid Room 19:29, 15 January 2009 (EST)

Ehhh... I don't think so. Sorry, but I feel that a bureaucrat should at least be a fairly respected and/or prominent member of the community—and you're more of a casual user. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 19:56, 15 January 2009 (EST)
If I want Human to reply do I post on your talkpage RA? Ace McWickedThe Liquid Room 20:07, 15 January 2009 (EST)
Probably. I'm surprised he made me archive it! ħumanUser talk:Human 20:08, 15 January 2009 (EST)
If that was the criteria, I'd be a bureaucrat. Something which I neither especially want or expect to happen. --"ConservapediaUndergroundDiodeGoatspeed! 20:23, 15 January 2009 (EST)
Hey, cur made a funny! An actually funny funny! And on my talk page! Hey, everyone, cur made his first joke, and here, on my talk page! Check it out! ħumanUser talk:Human 20:25, 15 January 2009 (EST)

I'm prominent. Since it's either/or, I fit. By the way, I know what CUR means when it's not in caps. --"ConservapediaUndergroundDiodeGoatspeed! 20:30, 15 January 2009 (EST)

If I had a dollar for everytime I was told I wasnt respected nor prominent I would have a dollar now. Ace McWickedThe Liquid Room 20:27, 15 January 2009 (EST)
Then you could buy a beer at the saloon bar! (It's always happy hour there) ħumanUser talk:Human 20:29, 15 January 2009 (EST)

I am always much more prominent after a few drinks. Ace McWickedThe Liquid Room 20:34, 15 January 2009 (EST)

Well, let's head over there. I put a slug in the jukebox, so the tunes should be rockin'... ħumanUser talk:Human 20:42, 15 January 2009 (EST)

At what point...[edit] enough enough? TheoryOfPractice 20:45, 15 January 2009 (EST)

When the cream curdles? ħumanUser talk:Human 20:47, 15 January 2009 (EST)

It was intentional[edit]

19:40, 16 January 2009 Human (Talk | contribs | block) (24,178 bytes) (the div around it made the chalkboard overlap the main top box (for me, anyway)). It brought the chalkboard to attention: It made you notice it didn't it? No imanijation some people. Toast s.png (Crumpets) and butter 21:50, 16 January 2009 (EST)

No, it just failed formatting 101. Since the chalkboard balances the TOC, what's the problem? ħumanUser talk:Human 21:54, 16 January 2009 (EST)
The er, chalkboard is pretty damn obvious anyway. Do you think anyone could possibly miss it there? ħumanUser talk:Human 21:56, 16 January 2009 (EST)
If it looked more like a post-it note I could see the overlap making more sense. ħumanUser talk:Human 13:19, 17 January 2009 (EST)


Got an idea for the talk page link: 'best of a monotypic genus.' --"ConservapediaUndergroundDiodeGoatspeed! 12:06, 17 January 2009 (EST)

Which talk page link? ħumanUser talk:Human 13:18, 17 January 2009 (EST)
Oh, doh, you mean the random ones in your signature. Sure, sounds, um, great... ħumanUser talk:Human 13:18, 17 January 2009 (EST)
No yours. A monotypic genus has only one species, ha ha. --"ConservapediaUndergroundDiodeGoatspeed! 13:25, 17 January 2009 (EST)
Hmmmmm, yeah, I knew that, but I'm not sure what the "joke" means. Perhaps the "best of" part is throwing me off? ħumanUser talk:Human 13:46, 17 January 2009 (EST)
One is always the best out of a group of one. The species human is the only species in the genus Homo. Get it? --"ConservapediaUndergroundDiodeGoatspeed! 13:47, 17 January 2009 (EST)
Ah, I see. So it could equally be "worst of", or "greenest of", or.... "anythingest of". I could randomize that, but MW doesn't like nested "choose/option" setups :( ħumanUser talk:Human 13:49, 17 January 2009 (EST)
Darn. Oh wait: You could make individual ones. --"ConservapediaUndergroundDiodeGoatspeed! 13:50, 17 January 2009 (EST)
True 'dat. ħumanUser talk:Human 01:04, 18 January 2009 (EST)

If I may randomly bother you for a moment[edit]

Can I put Frankie Valli back in? It seemed to fit with the spirit of the list. (I think my fake-metalhead edit summary didn’t quite help my cause.) Normally, I'd take this up with Listener X, but he doesn't seem to be around right now. Unless, of course, I misinterpreted your frowny-face emoticon, in which case never mind. The electrocutioner 00:57, 18 January 2009 (EST)

It was fine with me, if you can squeak it by the mob, it's in. ħumanUser talk:Human 01:03, 18 January 2009 (EST)


Thanks for letting me take on the urgent task of unblocking the toilets and putting sand around the vomit. I shall do my best to sneak off for a sly smoke every now and then, and pad my timecard shamelessly... Worm (t | c) 03:02, 21 January 2009 (EST)

Hehe, you're welcome! ħumanUser talk:Human 15:02, 21 January 2009 (EST)


Ring, ring!

I send you uber sekrit electronic transmission through the nets. Ace McWickedRevolt 16:55, 21 January 2009 (EST)

So you did, so you did. ħumanUser talk:Human 21:47, 21 January 2009 (EST)

Thanks for cleaning up after me[edit]

Sorry about that, my need for lulz became overpowering. Icewedge 02:10, 22 January 2009 (EST)

Whatever I did, you are welcome... ħumanUser talk:Human 02:13, 22 January 2009 (EST)
Ruthless Vandal = me, tis' my vandal sock. Icewedge 02:18, 22 January 2009 (EST)

"Christian Domestic Discipline"[edit]

I came across this page from someone. I think it deserves some sort of mention on RW... At the very least in the pages mentioning that sarcastic conservativism is nearly impossible to distinguish from real conservativism. --Eira omtg! The Goat be praised. 20:15, 22 January 2009 (EST)

Wow, they sure know how to take the fun out of BDSM! I think you mean Poe's Law? ħumanUser talk:Human 20:18, 22 January 2009 (EST)
I can't figure out if they intend the spanking to be fun, or just a punishment (in which case, it had better not be fun!)... ħumanUser talk:Human 20:19, 22 January 2009 (EST)
EC x2!!) AAAArgh! Horrid!!!! (Er hi! Eira - long time no hear) Stick your comment in the saloon bar? Toast s.png (Toast) and marmalade 20:20, 22 January 2009 (EST)
Good idea, thanks crumpet - why didn't I think of that? ħumanUser talk:Human 20:21, 22 January 2009 (EST)

Don't bite the n00bs[edit]

I noticed your comment on Defiant Elements' attempted article. While I understand your want to call things as they are, I do think that we should take a lighter touch with newcomers, and try not to word things so brutally when criticizing their efforts. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 03:09, 24 January 2009 (EST)

For an example, I think a better way of putting your criticism would've been "I copyedited this a bit, but I still don't get what its trying to say. It's nice that you made an article, but it makes no point, addresses no issue, and has no footnotes or references. If the author wants to keep it, they can move it to their userspace, otherwise I think it should be deleted." It may seem overly civil to you, but this version manages to get the point across while still acknowledging the earnestness of their efforts. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 03:09, 24 January 2009 (EST)

I just saw how you did exactly that (more or less) on Defiant Elements' talk page. I realize you don't need to be lectured by me when it comes to talking with newcomers. However, I still think that your initial comment on the article's talk page was too brusque, and I think it would be better to avoid such cavalier treatment of them. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 03:44, 24 January 2009 (EST)


Harvester ant. For the poem, remember? --"ConservapediaUndergroundDiodeGoatspeed! 18:50, 25 January 2009 (EST)

Yes, thanks! I think I'll have to claim the extra hour for researching them, but they sound interesting already. Too bad I couldn't be a carpenter ant, then I could start a band... ħumanUser talk:Human 18:52, 25 January 2009 (EST)
Maricosa or barbatus? I think I like maricosa more, since I listen to KPHX on the innertubes a lot, so I here a lot about the area. ħumanUser talk:Human 18:58, 25 January 2009 (EST)
The most venomous insect in the world, quoth Wikipedia. €₳$£ΘĪÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 19:26, 25 January 2009 (EST)
I have a rough draft prepared... too bad I can't be the colony, since that's where any "consciousness" as we know it resides. Before I submit my poem I will have to clean up that crappy WP article ;) ħumanUser talk:Human 23:10, 25 January 2009 (EST)
PS, I won't complain that you gave me a genus rather than a species. No big deal, it's a common head cold, any English schoolboy could catch it. ħumanUser talk:Human 23:12, 25 January 2009 (EST)
Here is something I channeled last night when it was below zero out. ħumanUser talk:Human 19:39, 26 January 2009 (EST)
I must say, I am impressed. Many people misunderstand the idea behind poetry, and you have managed to stay away from the cliched and boring. Congratulations! Z3rotalk 16:02, 30 January 2009 (EST)
Why, thank you [blush]! I try... ħumanUser talk:Human 19:35, 30 January 2009 (EST)

Reporting for mop, bucket and taser[edit]

Dear EddyP,

We regret to inform you that you have been demoted to the rank of sysop. You are requested to report to a bureaucrat, at your nearest possible convenience, to be assigned a mop, bucket and taser for the purposes of cleaning up the mess around here. If you have any further questions please refer to the enclosed pamphlet So you are now a sysop.

Your Sincerely,

Sir Reginald Albert Humfildink-Hollingsworth the Third, Under-secretary of the Chief-secretary of the Personal-secretary of the Minister.

You heard Sir Reginald, give me my taser! EddyP 13:27, 26 January 2009 (EST)

Couldn't you find it in your supply closet? Try looking harder! ħumanUser talk:Human 13:35, 26 January 2009 (EST)
Unaccountably there was no taser, just an old WW2-era banhammer. EddyP 13:39, 26 January 2009 (EST)

Trial of the century[edit]

may I borrow that bit you just put on CUR's talk page for something that's going on on the admin. abuse page? TheoryOfPractice 21:16, 27 January 2009 (EST)

Sure, it's a wiki, after all. Am I being tried in absentia or will I be invited once the gallows are built? ħumanUser talk:Human 21:20, 27 January 2009 (EST)
Relax, you're cool. TheoryOfPractice 21:21, 27 January 2009 (EST)

I feel fantastic...[edit]

that you moved my paragraph on "gateway woo" in the Acupuncture article to the top! It made my morning, which might be sad in retrospect. Alecwh 10:01, 28 January 2009 (EST)

Did I do that? Well, if I did, and it thrilled you, that's great! ħumanUser talk:Human 15:28, 28 January 2009 (EST)

Looking for v. sekrit way to ask about a sock[edit]

So I have a sock on CP and right now the edits I'm making aren't a direct challenge to anything obvious, but sooner or later I will "accidentally" criticize an organization near and dear to the hearts of several high level CP sysops (no, not the moonies). I'm wondering if you know of a way by which I can talk with someone who has had more experience with CP to ask about how far I can push this without it getting reverted. I'd like to do this without doing it where Ed or Andy could see it. As of right now, I'm trying to fly under the radar, not gunning for a sysopship. (I am not asking for cabal membership or anything like that, more is there a way to allow people to email me through RW/a way I could email a long time RW citizen?) Thank you kindly and vaya con dios. Hactar 15:28, 30 January 2009 (EST)

Ignoring your "purpose", since the only experience I have with it is reading about what people have done on here, to answer your question, yes, if you enable email in your "preferences", you can privately email any user who has also done so. To address your purpose, as I was reading, my first thought was "find someone who seems to have experience with this and email them". Certainly a few sock puppeteers of various stripes seem to be contributors here, and you may also be able to find others by following the various blogs and forums out there where CP gets discussed - I often see unfamiliar names posting about experiences on CP (although of course they might be here under other user names). I don't really see the point, though, CP is funnier without interlopers - that is to say, Andy or Ed et al are much more entertaining than, say, Bugler was. ħumanUser talk:Human 16:00, 30 January 2009 (EST)


For helping me with recategorizing the state articles. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 03:01, 31 January 2009 (EST)

Hehe, you're welcome. I thought you might have been taken away from your 'puter because you sort of stopped in the middle, I figured it was the sort of chore that should be finished to avoid confusion. I saw you made it back before I was done though ;) ħumanUser talk:Human 16:46, 31 January 2009 (EST)
I didn't realize that it looked like I had stopped. I try to keep the number of tabs I have open under thirty, so I was in the middle of loading the second half of the states when I started getting in edit conflicts with you. I still appreciate the spirit of helpfulness behind your effort, and thank you for helping. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 22:15, 31 January 2009 (EST)
Yah, me too (<30). But there was a lag between the last one you did, I was afraid you had, as I said, been put to sleep or some such real world intrusion on our real work. Actually, what I tend to do is a sort of "overlapping flow" thing on work like that - open 20 or so tabs, click edit on them all, start fixing the first ones to load and hit save, by then I can close some and open ten more. Not that it matters, now that we have the RAbot ;) ħumanUser talk:Human 22:20, 31 January 2009 (EST)


is hereby awarded the
Order of the lowercase
for his sterling work in chopping everything down to that state.

— Unsigned, by: Toast / talk / contribs

Thanks :) ħumanUser talk:Human 17:12, 1 February 2009 (EST)


Hey Human, there's a comment of yours in the middle of the Prez election article. Maybe you thought you were on the Talk page. Or maybe you were at the moonshine. That's what it'd be if it was me. DogP 18:56, 4 February 2009 (EST)

Thanks, the sig, it were an accident. I removed the sig and left the texty part. ħumanUser talk:Human 19:31, 4 February 2009 (EST)


I notice that the copyright on your website says "copyright Huw Powell 19-something-2008". Did you die in '08 and have been replaced by a bot by Trent, or did RA finally claim you for his ranks of the undead? Evil evil Phantom! 08:57, 7 February 2009 (EST)

Which of my websites? I must have missed one when doing EOY updates... ħumanUser talk:Human 17:00, 7 February 2009 (EST)
Hehe, I found one that says "© 1979 - 2006"! Thanks for the reminder... ħumanUser talk:Human 17:01, 7 February 2009 (EST)

Meth recipe[edit]

FYI, Methamphetamine/recipe, which you posted a year ago, is now nominated for deletion, because it seems to be a popular page in Google searches & may be bringing the wrong kind of attention to the site &/or be legally dubious. €₳$£ΘĪÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 18:06, 7 February 2009 (EST)

Or MAJOR renovation. --"CURtalk 18:07, 7 February 2009 (EST)
Thanks for the heads up, ferret! ħumanUser talk:Human 18:24, 7 February 2009 (EST)
Gone. €₳$£ΘĪÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 19:52, 7 February 2009 (EST)


Just sayin' Javasca₧ don't cast the first stone, and I won't throw it back

Hehe... ħumanUser talk:Human 16:31, 8 February 2009 (EST)


Did the discussion about categories reach any conclusion? If not, I think it would be best to continue the discussion until we reach one. (Otherwise much of the work involving categories is effectively on hold, which is not a good thing on a wiki.) Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 16:21, 8 February 2009 (EST)

I'm not sure, I might have lost track of it. Where did the discussion end up taking place, do you remember? ħumanUser talk:Human 16:32, 8 February 2009 (EST)
Category talk:People and Category talk:Conservapedia side-by-side articles, as I recall. Though it would probably be for the best if the discussions were continued on a single designated page. (RationalWiki talk:Categories, perhaps?) Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 16:49, 8 February 2009 (EST)
Yes, a more defined and logical place to discuss our categories, indeed. Is there stuff we should copy over to there in order to reinvigorate the discussion? ħumanUser talk:Human 17:48, 8 February 2009 (EST)

Small favor[edit]

My userbox collection is expanding, and I was wondering if you would be kind enough to enclose them in that scrolling box you have. I have tried looking at the code and doing it on my page, but it doesn't really seem to work. Could you do that for me? Thank you. Javasca₧ don't cast the first stone, and I won't throw it back

You use {{userboxboxtop}} and at the bottom, {{userboxboxbottom}} --"CURtalk 18:56, 8 February 2009 (EST)
Wall.gif Javasca₧ don't cast the first stone, and I won't throw it back I seem to be addicted to that image...

Dumpster fire leftovers?[edit]

Dare I even ask what those are?--Tom Moorefiat justitia ruat coelum 00:02, 9 February 2009 (EST)

Well, we had a good time hanging out and drinking behind the bar, and we kinda accidentally-on-purpose set the dumpster on fire. I remember something about burning nachos and a heated argument about... hotdogs and kicking or something? Ugh... ĵ₳¥ášÇ♠ʘ whats up?

Hi there[edit]

You're cute. Mei 19:53, 10 February 2009 (EST)

Er... thanks? ħumanUser talk:Human 19:56, 10 February 2009 (EST)
You're welcome.

Archive edit war[edit]

Finally! Support! Evil evil Phantom! 15:07, 11 February 2009 (EST)

I left a comment in the appropriate section of your talk page (I think). ħumanUser talk:Human 19:27, 12 February 2009 (EST)


Just sayin that I agree with CUR on this one. I would be a bit unhappy if the pretty Monotype was altered on my talk page, and the </font> really is not much of a big deal. ĵ₳¥ášÇ♠ʘ whats up?

I didn't muck up his page, I merely wanted my words to appear as they did. He could easily "reopen" his font tag after my comment ended... just as if I'd left an unclosed blink tag, someone could close it right after. I just didn't like him deleting what I wrote on the talk page when there were better solutions. Anyway, it's not a big deal in the grand scheme of things (either way). ħumanUser talk:Human 19:26, 12 February 2009 (EST)

Missing the old days[edit]

I miss the days when if you offended someone, he or she just ignored you. The silly old days of wiki-youth. Sterilewalkie-talkie 14:57, 13 February 2009 (EST)

Yeah... and vice versa ;) ħumanUser talk:Human 17:08, 13 February 2009 (EST)

Help - resetting passwords[edit]

Do you know how to reset a password? I have no idea what mine is/was, as it is "auto login". so unless my password really is •••••, I think I might need to have it reset. Thanks if you can help. --Sun mowse.pngEn attendant Godot"«Nous naissons tous fous. Quelques-uns le demeurent.» 16:59, 13 February 2009 (EST)

If you have email enabled (and if Trent fixed the email server!), you can have your pword emailed to you. Then you can change it in your "preferences". If you have truly lost it forever and can't make the email thing work, then it's gone bye-bye, since they are saved in an encrypted form, there is no way for any human being to decrypt them. As long as you can log in using your browser's ******, you should be able to change it readily at your preferences, though. ħumanUser talk:Human 17:07, 13 February 2009 (EST)
Thanks for the info. Unfortunately, you have to know the old password to change it. WFG
What browser are you using? Firefox can show you the password if you go to Options-Security-Saved Passwords and click Show Passwords. -- Nx talk 18:04, 13 February 2009 (EST)

islam feels lonely for not being ridiculed too[edit]

y'know, there's something called "islamic fundamentalism" out there that hates science even more, and kills women for BEING RAPED. Just to remind you. — Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs

True that. Surely this comment would be more useful at talk:Islam, though? ħumanUser talk:Human 17:09, 15 February 2009 (EST)
Just to remind you, CP takes care of that for us. And learn grammer. --"CURtalk 17:11, 15 February 2009 (EST)
What's the matter with BON's grammar, CUR? And, no, CP does a lousy jog of pointing out Fundy Islam's flaws. ħumanUser talk:Human 17:12, 15 February 2009 (EST)
Perhaps not capatalizing 'Islam?' And they do a lousy job, but this guy would appear to be slightly Islamaphobic. Sorry if I am wrong, but that is how he comes off, and if he is, CP does an excellent job at what he would want us to do. --"CURtalk 17:14, 15 February 2009 (EST)
Ah, ok. And Islamophobic? How can you read that when they specified "fundamentalist" Islam, which is pretty awful. ħumanUser talk:Human 17:16, 15 February 2009 (EST)
I looked at his contributions. Yes, fundamentalists Islam is pretty bad <looks over shoulder>, but I just got that feeling from him. I wouldn't block him or vandal him for it, but his comments did set me on guard. --"CURtalk 17:20, 15 February 2009 (EST)
Did he set your wolf/cheetah/cockroach/Poo-Bear senses tingling? Ace McWickedRevolt 17:24, 15 February 2009 (EST)
Would you stop being a dickhead? First of all, those last two don't apply. Second of all, don't initiate HCM. Third of all, can I take him to Admin Abuse? --"CURtalk 17:26, 15 February 2009 (EST)
CUR, if you insist on making random comments on every live thread just because you're bored, people are gonna have a chuckle with you. You really need to learn to laugh at yourself so we are all in on the joke. Second, don't be an idiot, and third, who and why? ħumanUser talk:Human 17:30, 15 February 2009 (EST)
Ace for beating a dead horse. Hey, got me there. --"CURtalk 17:32, 15 February 2009 (EST)

CUR, stop being so fucking melodramatic and learn to laugh at yourself and with yourself. Secondly - there is no chance in hell that you can cause a HCM so again, stop being so fucking dramatic. Ace McWickedRevolt 17:33, 15 February 2009 (EST)

I might if it wasn't so hard to tell whether or not you were actually joking or insulting me. Next time, please put a lol so it's more obvious. --"CURtalk 17:37, 15 February 2009 (EST)
Your skin - it be too thin dear CUR. The only time I have actually insulted you purposely and maliciously is when I told you to get fucked. Ace McWickedRevolt 17:42, 15 February 2009 (EST)
CUR, please assume good faith on the part of other editors. He was obviously making a light-hearted funny on a slow day. You bring it up in almost every conversation, surely you don't expect others to stay out of the joke? ħumanUser talk:Human 17:48, 15 February 2009 (EST)
CUR, I don't think you've ever seen true HCM. Pinto's5150 Talk 17:53, 15 February 2009 (EST)

In all fairness[edit]

Hey, I left a bit of a scree on RA's talk page, and it really wouldn't be fair if I didn't also post it on your talk page. I haven't been paying much attention, and I don't know who's more strongly holding this grudge, but it clearly still exists.

Closure sounds great in teen angst poetry, but it doesn't happen in real life. And by God, you would think you weren't just talking about a bunch of internet bullshit to begin with, listening to this drama. Seriously. Take a walk, get laid, get some perspective. Make some bad decisions, then come back and consider dominionism and fundamentalism. CorryTobias was a never nude, which is exactly what it sounds like. 01:31, 17 February 2009 (EST)

Please don't think that the large quotation marks are a sign of egotism. CorryTobias was a never nude, which is exactly what it sounds like. 01:42, 17 February 2009 (EST)

Thanks for the cc. I mostly want him to shut up with the accusations, so I called him out to follow up. I know it's just a dusty corner of the innertubes and all, and doesn't matter, but I really don't like being accused of abuse and brutality by another well-respected editor without evidence, etc. As I said, thanks for the cc. ħumanUser talk:Human 01:45, 17 February 2009 (EST)
Fair. I hope the two of you come to terms. CorryTobias was a never nude, which is exactly what it sounds like. 01:55, 17 February 2009 (EST)


So, remember long ago you and I were trying to solve the problem of using indentations on the Schlafly Generator template? Whelp, I finally figured out what the problem is. Turns out MediaWiki needs all of the text in the same paragraph, not only in appearance, but in the actual page. That is:

<choose><option>Hi my name is CUR</option><option>Hi my name is Andy Schwafwy</option></choose>

Instead of

<option>Hi my name is CUR</option>
<option>Hi my name is Andy Schwafwy</option>

I did a preview test on the actual generator, and it works fine. I haven't implemented the fix yet, however, as it kind of makes the thing a bitch to edit. Any thoughts? --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 21:26, 17 February 2009 (EST)

Have you tried using
--><option>Hi my name is CUR</option><!--
--><option>Hi my name is Andy Schwafwy</option><!--

It may work. - User \scriptstyle(6\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}n^{-2})^{1/2} 21:33, 17 February 2009 (EST)

Seems like a strange place to be discussing it, but, yeah, sure. Did it work? ħumanUser talk:Human 22:27, 17 February 2009 (EST)
It works! Huzzah! I'm currently implementing it. --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 00:23, 18 February 2009 (EST)
"Π" (obviously your parents were atheists to give you such a pagan name so you're probably obese), you have merely four edits so far, none of which convey meaningful information. I looked at your contributions and I doubt you've taken half the statistics courses that I have, so I'm confident you're a complete denialist. Your atheistic worldview has led you to deny that translating the Bible prevents atheism. Nobody seriously doubts that ignorance and lack of experience lead to surprise about many things. At this point I suggest that you open your mind and free yourself from bias for your sake, and you will only wish you had done so sooner. But you have free will to do as you like, including even insisting that 2+2=5. --Andy Schlafly 22:48, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Fix the typo: "...contributions and see you're suffering from evolution syndrome, so it's obvious to me you'rea victim of Professor values." Please. ħumanUser talk:Human 00:50, 18 February 2009 (EST)
Done. --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 00:56, 18 February 2009 (EST)
Cool, thanks, I appreciate the complexity of pasting together all of those assquotes into coherence. Goat know he can't... ħumanUser talk:Human 02:51, 18 February 2009 (EST)


I give up. Where did that name come from?! ĵ₳¥ášÇ♠ʘ whats up?

It's the correct splignel of you user name, of course! Or is it Icelandic for "talk"? ħumanUser talk:Human 23:21, 18 February 2009 (EST)

Oh, man... Why "hate to say it"? Now I'm bummed. User:Mei 03:35, 19 February 2009 (EST)

Huh? ħumanUser talk:Human 22:23, 20 February 2009 (EST)


ToastToastand marmite 22:13, 20 February 2009 (EST)

I hope you are well? ħumanUser talk:Human 22:17, 20 February 2009 (EST)
I've been worse. :) (I've also been better) Thanks. ToastToastand marmite 22:18, 20 February 2009 (EST)
You're welcome. Nice to see you back! ħumanUser talk:Human 22:24, 20 February 2009 (EST)

Thats for fixing my fix[edit]

I had forgotten that the original spelling of "trusworthy" counted in that case. --SpinyNorman 18:51, 21 February 2009 (EST)

No big deal. Institutional memory, and all that... ħumanUser talk:Human 22:19, 21 February 2009 (EST)

Kiwi Kop.[edit]

Irritated. Ace McWickedRevolt 02:34, 24 February 2009 (EST)

Sorry about that... no excuses available that I know of... ħumanUser talk:Human 16:53, 24 February 2009 (EST)


I demand to be remade a sysop!

because? Totnesmartin 09:05, 26 February 2009 (EST)

That is not your concern. Your concern is to accede to my demands and make me an admin.

BON's can't get sysopship. Start by taking out an account, and I'll make you a sysop. TheoryOfPractice 10:56, 26 February 2009 (EST)
(EC)I think you'll find that this is User:Marcus Cicero who got de-sysopped after going on a rampage and blocking everyone he could find for a non-trivial amount of time. Redchuck.gif ГенгисGum disease 11:08, 26 February 2009 (EST)

Yeah, but I was bored today and fancy having the powers back. Was wondering if I could remain a sysop, without doing any editing, and won't block anyone. Basically I'll just log in when I'm bored, threaten a few editors with indefinate blocks, and then disappear again. Is that ok? MarcusCicero 11:12, 26 February 2009 (EST) (I'm a little high)

Really? Thats a binding agreement! BON was me so you better get sysopping. MarcusCicero 11:07, 26 February 2009 (EST)

Ian Paisley[edit]

Sorry for deleting your fucking lame article, but it really was fucking lame. feel free to restore you hidden edits if you want it on your list of created articles. Totnesmartin (I really am off out now!) 05:14, 27 February 2009 (EST)

Hehe, no big deal. I just saw it on your "todo" list and decided to have some fun with it. ħumanUser talk:Human 14:11, 27 February 2009 (EST)
Ed has his writing assignments, I have my "to do" list... Totnesmartin 13:48, 1 March 2009 (EST)

Kendoll Pictures[edit]

I've been kicking around ideas for the Ken Quote Generator and I was wondering... Is there anyway we could get like a random picture page? if nothing else, even a bot that could go through and add a [[Image:Penguin.jpg]] Type picture links to a page... I was thinking that if we could do that, we could add options to all of them and randomize inside another template... What do you think? SirChuckBFurther bulletins as events warrant 23:12, 4 March 2009 (EST)

It should be do-able. If you look at the "sex" template, it lists 13 random articles from the category it adds to pages. Since I think people have been catting our images (better idea in a moment) it should be possible to add a carefully crafted link (or embed the image) randomly. Better idea on top of that - add "category:kendoll image" to selected images and pick only from among them. ħumanUser talk:Human 23:10, 4 March 2009 (EST) (PS, you left an unclosed nowiki tag that borked your sig.)
Oh, good idea... I'll get started on that tonight before bed. SirChuckBFurther bulletins as events warrant 23:12, 4 March 2009 (EST)


Second or third? User:Mei 21:20, 6 March 2009 (EST)

I dunno, who was on first? ħumanUser talk:Human 21:22, 6 March 2009 (EST)
What? User:Mei 21:28, 6 March 2009 (EST)
Huh? ħumanUser talk:Human 21:30, 6 March 2009 (EST)
I meant TK. You said second but I thought it was third. User:Mei 21:30, 6 March 2009 (EST)
I guess I should have said "who was the one I missed?" ħumanUser talk:Human 21:38, 6 March 2009 (EST)

category:people who are fun


Dude, I need a wiki-break- Real life intrudes. Take good care, will see you soon. TheoryOfPractice 21:40, 6 March 2009 (EST)

Hey best wishes and all, hope it's good things and not bad, etc. See you! ħumanUser talk:Human 21:42, 6 March 2009 (EST)

Obscure books[edit]

Please explain to me why we have something that the *only* reason it's there, is cause someone listed it on a "guide to the bible" list. To say that "someone might write it" would be the same logic as to say "someone might right an article on the first poem written by Shakespeare, so I should red link it". At some point you ask "what does this serve, and who wants it". 49 references are not cause we write about it 49 times, but because the template shows up 49 times on pages, with a list of books no one even knows are in the bible. That's my argument. Same argument, by the way, for why I think all the indepth math articles are out of place here. They do nothing to further any "mission".--Sun mowse.pngEn attendant Godot"«Nous naissons tous fous. Quelques-uns le demeurent.» 23:56, 14 March 2009 (EDT)

oops, cross posted with you. I'll post on my page.--Sun mowse.pngEn attendant Godot"«Nous naissons tous fous. Quelques-uns le demeurent.» 00:00, 15 March 2009 (EDT)
OK, see you there. Thanks! ħumanUser talk:Human 00:04, 15 March 2009 (EDT)

Honor Killings[edit]

This discussion was moved to Talk:honor killings.


Any chance of getting that drama with RA going again? That usually provides some light reading in the evening... MarcusCicero 07:36, 19 March 2009 (EDT)


I listened to this and thought of you, for some reason. Redchuck.gif ГенгисGum disease 11:12, 22 March 2009 (EDT)

Fat lot of good the link will do him, out in the states. Evil evil Phantom! 11:14, 22 March 2009 (EDT)
Er, it worked for me. It's mainly only TV and sports coverage that are restricted because of licensing & copyright issues. Redchuck.gif ГенгисGum disease 17:44, 22 March 2009 (EDT)
I only listened to it in the background, but it surely sounded amusing. I must pay more attention next time. Thanks :) ħumanUser talk:Human 23:31, 22 March 2009 (EDT)
Damn, I just went to play it louder, while working so I would pay attention, and it's gone! (up through midnite tonight, well, that was half an hour ago!).  :( ħumanUser talk:Human 19:33, 23 March 2009 (EDT)

Happy 2yr anniversary![edit]

Happy Anniversary Human bean! :-) (per message to group) where's the ice cream? Refugeetalk page 05:06, 25 March 2009 (EDT)

Hehe, thanks! Oh, sorry, the ice cream was left outside your door last night - is it still there or did the roaming feral cats get it? (Or Toast's pet hedgehog?) ħumanUser talk:Human 15:26, 25 March 2009 (EDT)


rel="nofollow" is a html thang, right? There is no equivalent in wiki mark up? Fox 06:21, 29 March 2009 (EDT)

Ignore. Sid answered this for me elsewhere. Fox 06:50, 29 March 2009 (EDT)

Because I know you're a fan. And I respect that. Really.[edit]

[1] TheoryOfPractice 19:17, 31 March 2009 (EDT)

Cool, thanks. She should set one up in every major (and minor) city of the world ;) ħumanUser talk:Human 19:36, 31 March 2009 (EDT)

Eno Lirpa[edit]

Is that near Looflirpa? :) Totnesmartin 03:54, 1 April 2009 (EDT)

I think it's closer to Lirpa Tsrif. Hehe. ħumanUser talk:Human 04:19, 1 April 2009 (EDT)

Section Deletion[edit]

Sorry 'bout that. I deleted a section that was obviously vandalism, figured no one would mind. But again, my bad. Barryap 20:58, 1 April 2009 (EDT)

No big deal, reversion is easy. I think it was intended more as parody, by the way. ħumanUser talk:Human 21:11, 1 April 2009 (EDT)