User talk:Human/Archive15

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an archive page, last updated 4 January 2012. Please do not make edits to this page.
Archives for this talk page: , (new)(back)


You saw the message about the viral extension I left a GK's talk? Sterilexx 20:20, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

Yes, I did. I'm in the middle of beta testing Phase 3 myself, but also making sure these functions enhance each other when crossing paths. It's a bit tricky, I wouldn't mind some help over there. humanUser talk:Human 20:23, 8 May 2008 (EDT)
Darn. I'll take off the extension for the evening... I'll have to reload in the morning. Still, the subtly of what we have amazes me. They won't notice for days. Sterilexx 20:26, 8 May 2008 (EDT)
No, leave it on. It's easier for me to tweak my end, after all the work you did getting it right. humanUser talk:Human 20:33, 8 May 2008 (EDT)
One hopes you aren't doing anything illegal, what with your running around secretively muttering technical-talk. --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 21:25, 8 May 2008 (EDT)
Why, you gonna call the Fibonaccian Bozotros Institute on me? Of course I'm not doing anything "illegal". :) humanUser talk:Human 21:38, 8 May 2008 (EDT)
RE: Phase 4. DarthNader and his crew require up to 50 stooge PCs for a dry run on Sunday. You don't need to do anything except visit a URL and leave your PC on. I have personally been able to commit 10 computers (including some neighbour's PC's whom I'm fixing) but need help with the remainder. How many can you provide for the test? On the day they will use zombies. Also I think we should change the code name to Botulinus - its appropriate on so many levels. Jollyfish.gifGenghisYou have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you. 05:09, 9 May 2008 (EDT)
I'm good for 3, 4 if my old laptop works still. Do they each need to get behind a different IP, or will they work from the same one? I'll see if I can scuttle up a few more, too. I agree on the code name. humanUser talk:Human 12:25, 9 May 2008 (EDT)
Being on the same connecion is not a problem as they use IP spoofing anyway. I've got most of mine connected to an 8-port router with the rest on wifi. Jollyfish.gifGenghisYou have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you. 12:32, 9 May 2008 (EDT)
Cool, just keep me up to date on the timing & url in the other place. humanUser talk:Human 12:35, 9 May 2008 (EDT)
I can bring about 100 systems online from various installations I've done over the years. I can ssh tunnel them through the main rig and we can handle the port allocs easily enough that way. DogP 13:38, 9 May 2008 (EDT)
Thanks for the help on that. Can you get on the hidden namespace at the moment? It seems to be locked for our timezone. We need to get D-hour sorted so that everything is synched. I propose it be GMT on the 16th so can we please get an agreement on the actual hour so everyone is singing from the same hymn-sheet? Jollyfish.gifGenghisYou have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you. 06:55, 10 May 2008 (EDT)
Guys, guys, I think we're all becoming just a touch too open in these discussions. I know I'm equally to blame. Let's revert to email or Forum 3 if we're gonna chat like this. RA's little 'open letter' business has done us in a little, I fear. Anyway, last note - that test worked just fine, btw. Over and out. DogP 14:36, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
Yes, and agreed, and perhaps, and that's good to hear! humanUser talk:Human 14:42, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
DAY 1 - The first day's ops have gone pretty well. Looking forward to Phase II and the rest! Jollyfish.gifGenghisYou have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you. 17:52, 17 May 2008 (EDT)


Make me Ides. See here for details.— Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs 13:36, 9 May 2008 (EDT)

Shouldn't that be "make me Ides, please"? Sheesh! No, not Sheesh!... humanUser talk:Human 13:39, 9 May 2008 (EDT)
What I lack in courtesy I make up for with a surfeit of gold. Precious dwarven gold.— Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs 13:40, 9 May 2008 (EDT)
Thanks for culling my luls. Sigh.— Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs 20:54, 9 May 2008 (EDT)
You're quite welcome ;). I liked the randomly generated link pipe text though! That was teh funny. humanUser talk:Human 20:57, 9 May 2008 (EDT)
They were definitely funnier than the "I'm not AmesG" links. Maybe we should have a "liberal pipe-cleaners" article.— Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs 21:02, 9 May 2008 (EDT)
Have you added the "rndnum" template to our template list yet? (Like it, btw) humanUser talk:Human 22:17, 9 May 2008 (EDT)
We have a template list??? Also, I can't really think of a use for rndnum beyond my self-centred signature stuff...— Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs 22:20, 9 May 2008 (EDT)
Yeah, sorry I provided no link. Click on "help" in the upper left, and find the link to "template list" or some such. Then add it and describe it. Goatspeed! humanUser talk:Human 22:25, 9 May 2008 (EDT)

ides - Doubts[edit]

Having now found out what this is about I feel that it is appropriate to make my misgivings public. Some will already know my feelings about this. I am sorry about the public posting, but as there has been so much other public comment I felt it best to be in the open about this. I have two objections.

  • We are discussing a nuclear option here, the consequences of which will probably be severe and far-ranging. Are we really prepared to do this and have we thought through the consequences? The procedure we are envisioning will be nothing short of devastating, and I am not sure I want a part in it.
  • I am not at all sure about our new "allies". Although the seem to have been helpful (indeed surprisingly helpful) with the coding I, for one, don't trust them - and I don't mind saying so. Once they have control of so much information and access to so many passwords will they really just shrug and walk away. Somehow I don't think so.

So I make this public request that we think again before the process goes too far. --Bobbing up 09:04, 10 May 2008 (EDT)

You make a good point, but the most damage that is likely to occur would be about 2/3 of teh innertubes being permanently deleted. After the fire the burned ground will spring afresh with life, I'm sure... humanUser talk:Human 19:42, 10 May 2008 (EDT)
I fear you do not take my objection seriously.--Bobbing up 07:00, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
Shouldn't that be the nucular option? Either way, I just want to know how big the BOOM is going to be? --Edgerunner76Save me Jebus! 15:09, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
Loud enough to be heard in space... the aliens are lining up for front row seats! humanUser talk:Human 15:15, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
Phase III is going according to plan. At what point should I ask the guys to back off? Jollyfish.gifGenghisYou have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you. 18:16, 19 May 2008 (EDT)
GK, Phase III hasn't ben activated yet! This is only Phase II! I'm trying to get control back as we speak, but we have a bit of a 'runaway process' problem. I'll keep you posted. --Doggedpersistence 18:20, 19 May 2008 (EDT)
Actually, it's Phase II.V (stupid Romans and their lack of decimals...). Baby steps, my friend, baby steps. --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 18:22, 19 May 2008 (EDT)
Some of our allies have turned up with stronger-than-promised firepower, exceeding goals already. Phase IV is going to be awesome! humanUser talk:Human 18:33, 19 May 2008 (EDT)
Is the final phase VI in honor of our most glorious triumph against the evil empire? --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 18:37, 19 May 2008 (EDT)
I refuse to classify our efforts by references to a silly space opera ;) humanUser talk:Human 18:53, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

OK, I got that process under control, and am releasing Phase II. Were done here folks, move along now, there's nothing to see. Final comment on Phase II - HHSG 54KJ SDLC 7S2C KXX0 JJDL 88BD UUIE JJYO. Over and out. DogP 19:08, 19 May 2008 (EDT)


Where the hell is everyone else today? This is/was Saturday! The day before I realize I have a lot to finish before Monday!

Refreshing the recent changes brought me no joy. :(

Um. So what are you up to. UchihaKATON! 00:13, 11 May 2008 (EDT)

Wait, I see excitement not far above! I will leave it to the techie type people and await exciting results impatiently. UchihaKATON! 00:15, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
Just came in after a nice little campfire... Oh, SNL news, the only part of the show that *doesn't suck*! Then I will make me an omelet, and enjoy food... what's up with you? humanUser talk:Human 00:18, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
I am up late not studying for exams and seeking out new and exciting thrills on the interbutts.
Actually that's a lie, I'm just looking for recent and somewhat-interesting thrills on all my usual hangouts. "Ides" looked promising, but confidential. Hmm. UchihaKATON! 00:23, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
I also blocked a wandal a few minutes ago... I feel I should ask, do you think one day was excessive? He was, after all, linking to repulsive and disturbing content. I just figured since nobody else was on, it might be necessary to fix it such that it remains fixed until other janitors come back to help clean up as well. He was mildly amusing, so his block can be shortened if anyone cares. UchihaKATON! 01:54, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
Did you undo the wandalism? A day is a bit longer than we usually bother with, since an hour usually sends them away to other pastures. However, I would have no problem with one day. What I like, is when I look at our block list, that it fits on one screen... People tend to block for different time lengths, sometimes based on their experience, and sometimes based on the travesty the wandal is presenting to us. I'm sure you did fine. humanUser talk:Human 02:08, 11 May 2008 (EDT)


You know, we already had a Headless Chicken Hour over this like twelve hours ago. Why bother reviving it now? Yes, dropping Nazi bombs ain't cool, but I think letting sleeping dogs lie may be a better call sometimes. (for the record, I blocked and unblocked Fox when this all went down.)PFoster 00:31, 11 May 2008 (EDT)

Yeah... calling someone a Nazi is just "ok". Sorry, my trigger was late - because I spent some time thinking about it. It's not OK to call another editor a "Nazi" with no reasonable provocation (Gee, did the editor call for the extermination of the Jews? For the rise of the 4th Reich? No!!!). I called this one as I seed it. Fox was an ASSHOLE in this case, and deserves to get woken the fuck up. My block will most likely lapse by the time he awakes, but it should be on his record.
PS - what are your terms, degrees of talk, etc., by which you would call another editor a "Nazi"? If you want to absolve Fox, you really have to answer that question. I blocked him for just cause, in my opinion, and gently, considering the time of night. humanUser talk:Human 01:02, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
Now I HAVE to answer questions? Is that like last week when when Karajou told somebody - "You are going to answer that question whether you like it or not" ? And don't put words in my mouth - that's you being a bit of a jerk. I NEVER said it was "just ok" to call someone a Nazi. Okay then: my terms for calling someone a "Nazi" - I probably would not unless they were acknowledged, card-carrying members of some sort of white-supremacist/anti-semetic/racist group. It's not a word I throw around lightly. Other people have different standards, all the way down to folks who use the term "grammar Nazi." Fox was verbally abusive and obnoxious (he even told me to "fuck off) - but he also recently made an argument-not one I agree with, but one that I can at least understand - as to why his use of the term "Nazi" was warranted.I disagree wwith him, but I at least see where he was coming from. But the important thing to me - and others can tell me if they agree or not - is that I found it Karajou-esque for an admin to go digging through the edit histories and deal out a big block to a regular editor (not a bonehead vandal) the day after the offence happened, after a spot of HCM, after people had started to make a few tentative steps toward trying to patch things up a bit. Peace. PFoster 11:44, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
Well, it's all history now. I see he was unblocked after about 4 hours, which is fine, of course (I probably should have set the block at 3-5 hours or so, my intent was for it to be over by the time Fox was in daylight again, and the nine or so hours overshot that mark). The reason for my delay was to let it get resolved with all parties being able to edit (one problem with "HCM" is disputes getting hung up while some editors can't comment). Had he apologized, say, a few hours later, it certainly would have been a non-issue, we all sometimes say things that are over the top. Realizing that and admitting it is usually all it takes for feathers to become unruffled again. I didn't go digging through histories, by the way, I had simply kept the tab open to see how it worked out. Hopefully all is well by now. humanUser talk:Human 14:19, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
And I'm sorry for comparing you to Karajou. I'd rather be called a Nazi. PFoster 15:13, 11 May 2008 (EDT)

Unblocking Fox[edit]

I've unblocked Fox (after 4 hours, 20 minutes) on the basis that 8-9 hours is a bit too long by our standards, plus the thing seems to have died out by now. Re-block him if you disagree. NightFlareSpeak, mortal 04:35, 11 May 2008 (EDT)

See above, I am fine with that. I should have set it at just a few hours anyway, I didn't want him to actually be prevented from editing. Just wanted to "put it on his record", as it were, without interfering in any dialog. humanUser talk:Human 14:21, 11 May 2008 (EDT)

More nefariousness[edit]

Hey, is it possible you could rename me so that my name has actual dots where there should be dots in an IP address? Right now it just doesn't look quite right, and it wouldn't let me put them in to start with (bad wiki, bad).— Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs 14:31, 11 May 2008 (EDT)

I could try, although much wiki-breakage might occur (a dot might not be a legal character in a user name, or worse yet cause whackly parsing issues?). Also, if I might editorialize, the spaces make it easy to remember that you are you - the joke still works, I think. As far as the first thing I said, it is likely that "user:" is reserved for direct editing by that IP address - how could the software tell the difference? Let me ask around, I might talk to Trent soon, if I remember I'll ask if it will work. I'd prefer to know one way or another first, rather than making a mess that has to be cleaned up on the server (and potentially screwing up your ability to edit until it's fixed). Okay? humanUser talk:Human 14:39, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
Yeah, that's fine by me. Don't try anything that might screw up the software on my account! It's cool the way it is -- esp with my new sig.— Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs 14:49, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
Yup, that sig is tight. I'm surprised it took so long for someone to come up with it, so that makes you special ;) humanUser talk:Human 14:54, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
I suppose it would be churlish not to agree with you...— Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs 14:58, 11 May 2008 (EDT)


I have some questions that need answering, Human. --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 03:38, 12 May 2008 (EDT)

Apparently you have been Radio Shacked, so no further comment is necessary? humanUser talk:Human 12:13, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
I lobbied so hard to use the term "Fully Equipped" instead of "Radio Shacked", but you all went, "Noooo, let's make the code phrases even more byzantine." It's not like CPians are bright enough to crack any code we use, anyways. --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 12:26, 12 May 2008 (EDT)


I thought we were okay with using the Correct and Proper as God Intended British Spelling here...Not really a big deal, I just didn't want y'all to think I was an eee-literate Democrat voter... PFoster 11:40, 12 May 2008 (EDT)

Ah, I see. I picked Amlish for my FF speilchucker. We as a site are fine with using Commlish, Britlish, Amlish, etc., though we try not to mix them, unless very intentionally. All I would say is that Aschlafly is an American, so we should use Amlish on his article (whereas, say, an article about a British person or topic should be written in Comlish). humanUser talk:Human 11:54, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
I vote we all shift to Latin—there's no beating a dead language for consistency. --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 12:05, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
But then we won't be able to capitalischze "Bible"!!! humanUser talk:Human 12:10, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
You stupid fuel! Rational Edperception 14:45, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
Hey, er, fuel me once, fuel on me (don't light that match!), fuel me twice, er, won't get fuellled agin! humanUser talk:Human 14:47, 12 May 2008 (EDT)

The term 'Nazi'[edit]

When the term 'Nazi' is used in anger rather than in jest (like 'soup Nazi') it should be reserved for use against those who advocate genocide, or, at the very least, depriving an entire group of all their civil rights and confining them to a ghetto. It is not synonymous with the words "racist" "anti-semitic" or ""bigot". I'm not sure where it stands in relation to the term "fascist". I'd like to see Rationalwiki take a firm stance against innappropriate use of either term by users against other users unless there is clear evidence that the term is actually justified. Throwing either term around casually is an insult to the victims of the Holocaust, I don't see that as a joke. Rational Edbetter living through chemistry 15:31, 12 May 2008 (EDT)

Well, that's what I thought I did... btw, I think it's worse than "fascist" - for instance, I think the GWB admin comes very close to fascism, but they certainly aren't Nazis. A bit racist, probably, but not to Nazi levels. humanUser talk:Human 15:53, 12 May 2008 (EDT)

Do either of you actually know what Nazism is? SHahB 15:58, 12 May 2008 (EDT)

Yeah, National Socialism as practiced in Germany in the 30's and 40's. Now it is synonymous with the aggressive invasion of other nations and horrendous genocide along the way, and usually a nasty dose of anti-Semitism. Why do you ask? humanUser talk:Human 16:00, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
Shabby, your ignorance is only surpassed by your immaturity. Rational Edthink! 16:12, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
Lol, PoorEd. The irony is hilarious. SHahB 00:12, 13 May 2008 (EDT)
Do either of you know what irony means, Shabby? Rational Edthink! 09:20, 13 May 2008 (EDT)
PoorEd, your ignorance is only surpassed by your immaturity. Bohdan2 13:40, 13 May 2008 (EDT)
Running out of clever comebacks? Or even meaningful comebacks? C'mon, you can do better than that! Or can you? Rational Edthink! 13:43, 13 May 2008 (EDT)


He wanted potentially identifying information to his person removed from his talk page, especially since he's interested in getting involved in the whole anti-MP thing. Since it's quite a way down in the history, I couldn't get rid of it without getting rid of quite a bit of other stuff. Is there an issue with that? --מְתֻרְגְּמָן שְׁלֹום

Yeah, we don't like to blank the history. There is a problem, since there is a simple solution to his having IDed himself - he could have simply created another user name, either abandoning Angband or maintaining it as a puppet. Having done it once, do we do it again? How much are we willing to "hide" permanently this way? And how are you going to coordinate people's comments when you start the same conversation in several places at once? humanUser talk:Human 17:30, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
ANSWER to the last question? After all, you polled me, not I you. humanUser talk:Human 01:27, 13 May 2008 (EDT)

Re:Banning AmesG[edit]

I agree with your idea to ban Ames 100%. SHahB 00:09, 13 May 2008 (EDT)

We should ban user:Oscar. Do you know what he's calling himself these days??— Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs 00:32, 13 May 2008 (EDT)
User:Oscar (notorious user that he is) now edits under the name User:Radioactive afikomen. SHahB 00:53, 13 May 2008 (EDT)
I couldn't agree more with the proposal to ban User:SHahB. Pinto's5150 Talk 01:10, 13 May 2008 (EDT)
Make me a sysop!— Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs 01:21, 13 May 2008 (EDT)
Hmm, methinks Mr. Shabby Troll is begging for a short block. humanUser talk:Human 01:29, 13 May 2008 (EDT)
Why did you block me? Aren't you the user who sent me the email about blocking AmesG? The email confirming he is a conservative parodist? Bohdan2 01:34, 13 May 2008 (EDT)
Because you are Bohdan. --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 13:52, 13 May 2008 (EDT)


Someone calling him self Haggar??????? vandalized 3 of my wikis in as many days. Here's his latest exploit. It was at Wikinfo. Sysops here be vigilant. Proxima Centauri 16:29, 15 May 2008 (EDT) The vandal's contribs [1]Proxima Centauri 16:39, 15 May 2008 (EDT)

Never fear! We shall! <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 16:31, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
Thanks for the tipoff, PC. Screens up to Seven! humanUser talk:Human 16:33, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
PS, those are "your" wikis? Wow... humanUser talk:Human 16:34, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
I'm a sysop at Wikinfo. I'm an ordinary user at the others and I care about them. They're my workplaces where I do unpaid work. Rationalwiki is also one of my wikis. Proxima Centauri 16:39, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
Grawp and his freshly coined socks are actually banned here (by some punk called Jellyfish) for the next few days. They're also quite easy to spot, so they don't pose much of a threat. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 16:35, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
I love your name, Jellyfish. I hope you find a way to sting Ashllafly. I started an account there but I had to stop. A wellwisher warned me I was close to getting banned. I already knew that. Then the other Conservapedians warned that wellwisher to keep quiet or risk being banned too. It' a wonderful place Conservapedia. I realized that I was putting other people at risk as well as myself. I don't know why that other Consercvapedian wanted to carry on editing there but I couldn't take the decision for him/her. So I no longer edit there. My acount is still unbanned, just. I don't use it. It's not under this name. Proxima Centauri 01:00, 16 May 2008 (EDT)
I like my name, also. My own sock on Conservapedia was epic fail. :( <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 18:36, 16 May 2008 (EDT)


How about demoting Spica to sysop. He's been involved a long time. He looks capable and loyal. Proxima Centauri 13:20, 16 May 2008 (EDT)

The only way to ascertain his loyalty is to put him before HUAC! --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 13:26, 16 May 2008 (EDT)
Follow the link near the very top of this page, if you'd like to start a discussion (where no one will see it, probably!) humanUser talk:Human 13:36, 16 May 2008 (EDT)

Everbody needs a little controversy[edit]

I write a purposefully controversial article, and I don't get any controversy? Shame! : ) --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 15:25, 16 May 2008 (EDT)

Might be more controversial on CP? Rational Edthink! 19:15, 19 May 2008 (EDT)


Since you're not a RC addict like the rest of us, I should probably inform you I've nominated a new sysop. Sort of. Check it out, anyway. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 14:29, 17 May 2008 (EDT)

It shows up on my watchlist, so I don't miss it. But thanks! humanUser talk:Human 14:43, 17 May 2008 (EDT)

Signature help[edit]

What do you put in your "preferences" for the random talklink signature? I'm lost... Lyra (dust) 19:06, 17 May 2008 (EDT)

Never mind User:Lyra Belaqua 19:07, 17 May 2008 (EDT)

Did you find it? Help:wikisig tells how. Basically put Lyra/sig in the prefs thing, but then at /sig, transclude another sub page so the complicated part stays off the talk pages. humanUser talk:Human 19:08, 17 May 2008 (EDT)

Offensive weapon of gun[edit]

I am really sorry for that, I suppose I was being a bit paranoid... Oh, and thanks for acknowledging your own pwning! ;) Lyra (Tell me, have you seen the motherless breadfish?) 02:37, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

Well, I think we've forgotten our trespasses on and by each other by now. I'm sorry I accidentally implied that you might be in that group I carelessly labeled "LP template whores". PS, where is that link regarding my "own pwning" supposed to go? humanUser talk:Human 15:28, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

Definitely not criticism[edit]

Red and yellow?

<font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 20:38, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

Really. I tried purple text and it was a bit icky. What I was doing, following your lead, was allowing the blue link to stand out as obvious. Making it dark red sort of runs counter to the wiki user interface, right? humanUser talk:Human 20:43, 18 May 2008 (EDT)
Fair enough. It's just that anything other than blue on SEARING HOT YELLOW BACKGROUND is often hard to make out. The way that template is now is fine, though. Apart from the fact that the highlighting on the link doesn't work in some pages. For reasons unknown. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 20:47, 18 May 2008 (EDT)
When you edited the link color, you only did one "half" of the potential output, I think. We could mellow out the yellow a bit if you think it's important? humanUser talk:Human 20:50, 18 May 2008 (EDT)
Nah. It needs to be bright to show it's Fun. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 20:51, 18 May 2008 (EDT)


Is that stupid point of view? Sandal point of view? SHahB 22:16, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

Excellent. My ill-conceived meme stumbles on to live another day. :) <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 22:18, 18 May 2008 (EDT)
I think it's the Snarky Point of View --Eira omtg! The Goat be praised. 02:07, 19 May 2008 (EDT)
Eira would be correct on that. humanUser talk:Human 12:09, 19 May 2008 (EDT)
Sadistic Point of View? --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 15:00, 19 May 2008 (EDT)
Yeah, there's a bit of that, too, although we try to tone down the pleasure gained from another's pain. Unless, of course, they like it. humanUser talk:Human 15:03, 19 May 2008 (EDT)
Are you talking about SHahB, resident nuisance, or Sid, whom enjoys the killing fields of CP? --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 15:10, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

Protecting talk pages?[edit]

What's the policy regarding sysops protecting the talk pages of non sysops? I was recently threatened. --SHahB 23:00, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

First we perform this check: Is the editor Bohdan? If Yes: Laugh If No: Take Action. Pinto's5150 Talk 23:08, 19 May 2008 (EDT)
Is your name User:Human? No, it looks like your name is User:Pinto's5150. Too bad. SHahB 23:09, 19 May 2008 (EDT)
Shabby, can we keep this on Community standards? I'm sure Human will pop in soon enough to defuse you in a slightly more legitimate way. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 23:11, 19 May 2008 (EDT)
I think I addressed that on your talk page before you even posted here. Or about the same time, anyway. Off to HCM at Talk:CS! humanUser talk:Human 23:15, 19 May 2008 (EDT)


Apologies for my completely accidental block last night. I was aiming at Bohdan because as usual he was annoying, and my mouse slipped as I aimed at his name, and I got you instead. It was totally unintentional. DogP 14:02, 20 May 2008 (EDT)

Don't worry, DogP. I corrected the imbalance moments later by blocking you for being Human! All is well.  ··  _‡ . ¥ ʌп° 14:04, 20 May 2008 (EDT)
Thanks DogP. It was no harm, since I could unblock myself. Luckily you didn't accidentally block someone who couldn't! And, as we saw, even if that had happened, there were others around who could fix it. humanUser talk:Human 14:11, 20 May 2008 (EDT)
It's a good thing you guys only have blocking power instead of powerful automatic weapons of gun. Talk about friendly fire! Rational Edthink! 14:29, 20 May 2008 (EDT)

extra points for pairs (etc) of the same card[edit]

8 - 10 - 8 - 8 - K

I got two of "Mrs Bun the Baker's Wife" -- king me, fool.  ··  _‡ . ¥ ʌп° 15:03, 20 May 2008 (EDT)
Next exercise (this one failed, see header...) is to get the MW software to successfully deal up to, say, 8 hands of Texas hold-em. As if. humanUser talk:Human 15:09, 20 May 2008 (EDT)

bunchasquiggles new sig[edit]

  _ _ ·· ·· п п 19:29, 20 May 2008 (EDT)

by humanUser talk:Human 19:29, 20 May 2008 (EDT)


Mwahahahaha!  ni ebnamuħ   19:04, 21 May 2008 (EDT)

You need this: Anarchy dd00dd namuH.png ! ħψAnarchy dd00dd.pngUser talk:Human 19:06, 21 May 2008 (EDT)
You're both clueless. Human: Namuh shouldn't be reversing individual characters. Namuh: why is your sig italicised??? It's all so wrong. ~ Jellyfish! (TalkContribsLogs) 19:08, 21 May 2008 (EDT)
Namuh should be reversing characters - all of them! Looks like he left one "closing" ' off the end. See the datestamp? ħψAnarchy dd00dd.pngUser talk:Human 19:10, 21 May 2008 (EDT)
In that case his sig should be a complete reversed image of yours. Folks, no one seriously doubts that Namuh's sig is all screwed up right now. I doubt logic will hold you back, though! Godspeed. ~ Jellyfish! (TalkContribsLogs) 19:13, 21 May 2008 (EDT)
I laugh at your logic! BAH! HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Goatspeed (the goat be praised) --Eira omtg! The Goat be praised. 19:39, 21 May 2008 (EDT)


OK, hands up, I goofed. So how do I make sure I only block the user name, and not the IP as well? Spica the Hiver If you tolerate this, then your children will be next... 04:35, 22 May 2008 (EDT)

On the block page there's 3 check boxes (I think) - one says something like "Automatically block this address ...... - just make sure that's UNchecked. SusanG  ContribsTalk 04:45, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
(edit conflict) When you arrive at the "block this user" screen, there is check box labeled Automatically block the last IP address used by this user, and any subsequent IPs they try to edit from. Uncheck that option. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 04:46, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
Two minds with but a .... SusanG  ContribsTalk 04:49, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
Thanks guys. Sorry, Spica, I should described how when I left my little note. ħψAnarchy dd00dd.pngUser talk:Human 13:09, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
By the way, the only time it's really an issue is if someone wants to undo a "longer" block - they also have to pay attention and undo the IP block as well if it's there. In the case of a repetitive genuine vandal who appears to be simply making new usernames, blocking their IP might help - although if they are using proxies, it is of no avail anyway. ħψAnarchy dd00dd.pngUser talk:Human 13:18, 22 May 2008 (EDT)


I just updated and expanded my essay. Just wanted to pimp this masterpiece as much as possible let you know. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 16:38, 22 May 2008 (EDT)

Your shiny new signature[edit]

You should change the randomized green bit to be in that whacky font as well. I have spoken. ~ Jellyfish! (TalkContribsLogs) 20:24, 22 May 2008 (EDT)

It's an idea I will take under consideration. I have to decide if I truly lurves my new sig first. Btw, the font is called "random symbols that look like the letters, that I found below the edit box, plus the anarchy image". Thanks for your interest in our fine products. ħψAnarchy dd00dd.pngUser talk:Human 20:30, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
I must admit, I liked your old one a lot better than this. The choosing-symbols-that-look-kinda-like-the-right-letters style doesn't quite look right for short words. ~ Jellyfish! (TalkContribsLogs) 20:33, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
I must agree. My jumping on the bandwagon might not be good for Trashionalwiki. I'z just playing' K? ħψɱAnarchy dd00dd.pngUser talk:Human 23:38, 22 May 2008 (EDT)

While you're making bureaucrats...[edit]


~ Jellyfish! (TalkContribsLogs) 00:04, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

Nope, sorry, not yet. Please to dwell in your lovely sysopric!!!
To be honest, I don't want to be a bureaucrat. I just think it's funny when eccentric members of the community demand to be promoted to obscene heights -- like TK and Shabby for example. But you know who should be a crat? That Radioactive guy. Yup. ~ Jellyfish! (TalkContribsLogs) 00:10, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

To be fair, Susan was practically RW 1.0... she probably should've been a bureacrat a while ago anyway. Besides, if you make too many of'em, we're going to need a whole new level of janitoring to demote/promote people to! UchihaKATON!

Not yet. He has a history of not being "on mission", but loving teh RW to play in (and improve?). And anyway, Jellyguts, we all know you ARE radioactive stale crackers, anyway! ħψɱAnarchy dd00dd.pngUser talk:Human 00:15, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
Yes, that's right. Shifty.gif This whole thing was a cunning ruse to suggest him myself as a crat. Mwahaha! But seriously, I hope RA is wise enough not to waste his time with that kind of thing right now -- he's got important things to concentrate on in Realityville, so I hear. ~ Jellyfish! (TalkContribsLogs) 00:20, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
Today, RationalWikiWiki, tomorrow, RationalWiki! Mwahahahahahaha! Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 01:54, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
Hans, today Ratwikiwikiwkim tomorrow, Rwikiwiwiwiwkiwikwiifikkiwikdfieijf9ei~!!!~!!@@!@!#!!!!!!! Hahahaha! ħψɱAnarchy dd00dd.pngUser talk:Human 02:22, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
Oh, the vicious chain of wikis—will it ever end? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 03:14, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

Natural selection[edit]

How about getting the article on Natural selection to featured standard? Proxima Centauri 16:04, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

You mean what we called a "cover story", right? Yes, we should work on that. I suppose the thing to do would be to try to get a number of editors to improve and edit it so it's ready? Also, someone should start a section on its talk page called "Cover story" to discuss its readiness, if there isn't one already. ħψɱAnarchy dd00dd.pngUser talk:Human 15:08, 24 May 2008 (EDT)

Wiki bots[edit]

I wrote a message to the site admin but he does not appear to be very active. What is the policy about regular users writing bots to run on this wiki? BTM 18:24, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

Don't think we have a policy. What's the bots you've got in mind? SusanG  ContribsTalk 18:32, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
Ditto @ Susan. Just don't break the wiki and we probably won't get mad. But discussion with others of what you want them to do might be a wise course? ħψɱAnarchy dd00dd.pngUser talk:Human 23:06, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
I second Human and Susan. As long as I don't get spammed with, "The image you uploaded does not have a fair use justification. It will be deleted in thirty seconds," (Wikipedians will know what I'm talking about) I have no problem with bots. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:11, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
It takes about two minutes to outline a fair use justification, Radioactive Afikomen. Betacommand 23:15, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
Nooo! It followed me here! Run—get away while you still can! Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 02:02, 24 May 2008 (EDT)

brief holydaze for me[edit]

I'll be flying down to NC tomorrow for my parents' 50th wedding anniversary party, and I only know how to get on teh innertubes on this machine (honestly!) so I probably won't be around 'til sometime Juno 2ish. Pleez too nut brake teh wiik whilz A'im gonn, ktxbai :) ħumanUser talk:Human 17:52, 28 May 2008 (EDT)

Kiss kiss Bye Bye Have a good time. SusanG  ContribsTalk 17:56, 28 May 2008 (EDT)
Thanks, you be better and home by the time I return! ħumanUser talk:Human 17:58, 28 May 2008 (EDT)
I better now tx - home Friday. SusanG  ContribsTalk 18:00, 28 May 2008 (EDT)
Oh good! Tummy ache? ħumanUser talk:Human 19:31, 28 May 2008 (EDT)
Yup! SusanG  ContribsTalk


dude, why'd you do me like that?PFoster 10:55, 29 May 2008 (EDT)

Huh? ħumanUser talk:Human 01:56, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
Hmmm, you meant my rollback, I guess. I have no idea why ;) I rolled it back to your last version. ħumanUser talk:Human 14:15, 3 June 2008 (EDT)


Son, its time to stop playing with your friends on this wiki. Your mother wants you home, NOW! She is making leek soup and a Welsh cake for dinner. Hubert Powell 19:54, 29 May 2008 (EDT)

Don't forget the laver bread! SusanG  ContribsTalk 19:59, 29 May 2008 (EDT)
Can he keep playing a bit longer Mr. Powell? NightFlareSpeak, mortal 20:05, 29 May 2008 (EDT)
Hubert, where do you think I have been the last three days? In NC, celebrating mum and dad's 50th wedding anniversary, eating Welsh cakes (you sound like you don't know what they are) and leeking all over the place! ħumanUser talk:Human 01:58, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
Well, I'm on a diet so only one Welsh cake for me. Hubert Powell 22:07, 2 June 2008 (EDT)


Your mother wants you to come in now. Stop playing games with your friends. Its past your bedtime. Hubert Powell 23:42, 1 June 2008 (EDT)


Watch out for the Penguins!!!

You're welcome SirChuckBWhatever happened to Skip It? 00:58, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Oh noes! I hope you added that valuable, sure-to-be-heavily-used template to our template list thingie! ħumanUser talk:Human 02:00, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
I didn't... I didn;t think anyone else would wanna use it... but I will be happy to add. SirChuckBWhatever happened to Skip It? 03:11, 2 June 2008 (EDT)


Go to your room. Hubert Powell 14:32, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

And no internet. Hubert Powell 14:33, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Noooo, Mister Powell! He has to help us beta test our blog host! --λινυσ() 15:39, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Don't make me hit you with my cane. Hubert Powell 21:31, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Greetings Mister Powell, me and your son go way back. What was Human like as a child? SHahB 21:38, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
Hew was a little bit on the psychotic side. Then in college he regained his senses (at the time he became a neocon. I wonder if that made a difference?), but then he just plummeted. Hubert Powell 21:41, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Lyra never sleeps. Lyra Belaqua 00:57, 3 June 2008 (EDT)

Sounds unhealthy. A stable sleep pattern is very important to your health. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 05:14, 3 June 2008 (EDT) Oh, look who's talking...
A German imperialist and a pseudoscientist? SHahB 19:02, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
The two go surprisingly well together. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 14:04, 4 June 2008 (EDT)

Your golks[edit]

I heard you were visiting your golks last week. How were they? SHahB 13:55, 4 June 2008 (EDT)

They were/are very well, thank you. And the 50th anniversary party went off perfectly, a splendid time was enjoyed by all present. ħumanUser talk:Human 15:25, 4 June 2008 (EDT)
Thats good. I'm only a little offended that I wasn't invited. SHahB 15:36, 4 June 2008 (EDT)
Well, that's probably because you hadn't ever met my golks before. In attendance were 50 or so of their friends (fossil + tennis, mostly), their three spawn, my sister's husband and a good friend of mine they had met on a previous visit to my palace. So don't feel slighted, please. ħumanUser talk:Human 16:32, 4 June 2008 (EDT)
I still feel slighted. I have known you for over a year. Relay my disappointment, please. And who the heck is User:Hubert Powell? I thought that was your padre? SHahB 17:09, 4 June 2008 (EDT)
Well, for one, you missed the "criterion" - you have never met my parents. Maybe someday? We're all planning another such gathering in 50 years! And the "Hubert" is obviously a Bohdan sock (remember that guy?). He cares not to do the research and figure out mis pepres' real name. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:16, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
PS, yes, we have known each other for over a year. You and your quirky self have been a pet project of mine - dealing with you on CP, and then here. Feel yourself mildly blessed (or at least rained upon) that I will continue to defend you against those who just see you as a pest (not that you have been, lately - just funny, and a master debater). It's been a long time, my friend. When we have the First Barely Annual RationalWiki Convention, I hope to meet you. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:58, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
Also please note that it apparently outside of your power, as a CP sysop, to even unblock my IP address at CP. In fact, you blocked the only puppet I ever created there (in your honor). Is there any honor among thieves??? ħumanUser talk:Human 04:06, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
  • Yes, I have long considered you my rationalwiki defense attorney (I am still waiting for Ames to graduate), and I must thank you for that. You make it sound as if your patience is waning? If I ever do start to "pester", tell me. Rationalwiki has certainly greatly changed since last May. The idea of a "resident vandal" going aroung "pwning" seems no longer even possible. I try not to get involved with the disputes here. Have you noticed? I never enter arguments I don't start. Anyway, extend my best wishes to your golks. SHahB 11:55, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

Wow. It does exist.[edit]

I think I've fixed my sig, for the time being. I hope to find some way of making it really work... but later. Thanks very much for ur help. Jellyfish!Fish can wish 17:40, 4 June 2008 (EDT)

Yes, simply avoiding the nested "choose" tags "fixes" it. You're welcome, sorry we couldn't make it "really" work. ħumanUser talk:Human 17:42, 4 June 2008 (EDT)


Jellyfish!Fish can wish 20:23, 4 June 2008 (EDT)

Yes, it works wonderfully. Seamless, oil-free, renewable, low fat, and ready-to-wear! ħumanUser talk:Human 20:31, 4 June 2008 (EDT)
No, that was a followup to my "it's nice to get messages" comment on my talk. Hah! </smug> Jellyfish!Fish can wish 20:33, 4 June 2008 (EDT)
How can you deduce from what I wrote that that wasn't what I was referring to? ħumanUser talk:Human 20:34, 4 June 2008 (EDT)
Nice try, "Human", if that is your real species. You were clearly talking about my signature, so don't engage in deceit here. This is not the National Enquirer of the internet! Jellyfish!Fish can wish 20:37, 4 June 2008 (EDT)

Your edit[edit]

Thank you for improving my vandalism to another user's userpage. SHahB 01:10, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

You're quite welcome. It just needed... more... Danebell! ħumanUser talk:Human 01:11, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
Very funny. Why must you make fun of my Danishness? Have I ever insulted your Welsh heritage? I think not! SHahB 01:13, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
On many occasions, of course. And that was an insult? I must go play my gloomy Seebach records whilst reading Kierkegaard now... ħumanUser talk:Human 01:15, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
Seebach is not "gloomy". Take it back. Or else. SHahB 01:17, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
Bah, danes. Pinto's5150 Talk 01:47, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
Bah, resident morons. SHahB 01:51, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
Seebach is the quintessential gloomy Dane. Just listen the other tracks on his album! ħumanUser talk:Human 03:13, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

Thank You[edit]

thanks for the Penguin image thing.... It's much better for a user box... However, I'm blocking your for Pi seconds for invading another user's castle.... Take that. SirChuckBWhatever happened to Skip It? 17:08, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

Heh, you're welcome, and thanks ;) ħumanUser talk:Human 17:09, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
Yeah seriously, it looks a lot better now...I really should just plunk down the cash and buy Photoshop... but I've been too busy coming up with excuses not to SirChuckBWhatever happened to Skip It? 17:13, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
How about an old copy of Paint Shop Pro? I use version six, and I've seen slightly later versions (7,8,9...) for sale on the web in the $15-30 price range. It's a good, versatile program, no Photoshop, but who needs most of what PS can do anyway? PSP can handle layers in its native format (.psp), and the built-in animation shop allows creation and editing of animated .gifs. ħumanUser talk:Human 18:49, 5 June 2008 (EDT)


I think we've now established that unblocking Jezuz's old accounts is stupid. That is all. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 18:30, 6 June 2008 (EDT)

Why, did it come back and cause more problems? There's really no point to long term blocks of vandals, it won;t really stop them if they are even slightly determined. Did I miss a discussion somewhere, where "we've now established" was worked out? ħumanUser talk:Human 20:32, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
No, he just happened to ressurect a couple of his older accounts recently. Letting him straight back in can't be the best thing to do in this circumstance. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 20:35, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
Personally, if it was up to me I wouldn't block him at all. He will just keep making more accounts, we can revert his vandalism quicker than he can do it. Let him keep his account and just revert. tmtoulouse provoke 20:40, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
Reverting without blocking puts the constructive editors of the site under needless strain. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 20:46, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
I have been watching vandalism for a long time, the time the vandal spends vandalizing is about equal if you block or not. Blocking just leads to the creation of more IDs to keep track of. tmtoulouse provoke 20:51, 6 June 2008 (EDT)


Before an "accusation," I'm not really clear on what "wikilawyering" is, could you please clarify? ;) Lyra § talk 23:58, 6 June 2008 (EDT)

Can you save me time and google it? And, I am not accusing you of it, although I have noticed a propensity towards application of the word of the rules before the spirit of them, in at least one random place. Also, your actions at that 10 cons. principle article thing were at best evasive and unclear. Please, we try to keep everything plain, clear and simple here - state your case in the discussion, feel free to argue your case with the mob (that's half the fun), but don't ever drift into saying "I think the most recent compromise works" when it was a unilateral move on your part, and is undefined on the talk page. ħumanUser talk:Human 00:56, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
Did someone say wikilaw? SHahB 01:07, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
Hello Shabby! How's that scientist gig working out for you? And, yes, someone did say wikilaw, I understand you are not only an expert, but also reign undefeated at the practice of it? ħumanUser talk:Human 01:09, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
I could wikilawyer you clear out of this series of tubes, Hew. SHahB 01:10, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
It's "Huw", and I'm doing fine with my passage through this series of intestines. If, however, I find myself in need of an excelled, skilled, and undefeated wikilawyer, I would turn to you first, Sir Henry! (and your Butlers) ħumanUser talk:Human 01:13, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
Maybe in Welsh, but in ENGLISH (per WP:UE) its "Hew" or actually more correct is "Hugh". See, that is the type of wikilawyering I am capable of. And the Butlers are all dead. Rabid squirrel accident. Tragic thing. SHahB 01:18, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
Sorry to hear about the skwrls, I was quite fond of them. I think some are nesting in my walls as we speak, in fact. I must obtain some small sidearms to befriedn them with. Phonetically, as one, our three, or you, pronounce my name, it goes "H" - "u" - "w". Makes sense, no? No "G", no random trailing "H" at the end. My name isn't "Huggy" or "Huggghhh", it's just a nice, simple Walish "H-u-w". Maybe in Denamrk, where I understand you "earned" your law degree, they aren't as exacting. After all, how would Tommy Seebach pronounce my name? "Chghewchge", that's how. Simple syllables come difficult to difficult simpletons, in my experience. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:19, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
You, my friend, are clueless. SHahB 20:00, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

Just noticed...[edit]

Looking through the history on my User Page, I noticed you took the time to update my page regarding the Title Change on Birth Control. I wanted to thank you for that, and the excellent debate we are engaged in now. For the purpose of preventing a personal confrontation, might I ask that I move the text we (and Susan) have left from her page to the Debate portal? If not, I would completly understand. Back to the topic, once again, thank you for the title change. Javascap 16:46, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

You're welcome. I didn't mean to intrude, just fixed the link to the page you made. As far as the discussion on Susan's talk page, perhaps you could just move it to the essay talk page, and leave a note behind saying where it went? I'd ask her first though. Also, if you want, start a debate topic on immigration, but let people respond to however you start it rather than quoting them in a place that may be out of context. ħumanUser talk:Human 17:02, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
Oh, don't worry, I don't consider it an intrusion if it is an honest attempt to help out, which it was. It would have been an intrusion if you put in "Hello, my name is Javascap and I am a remorsless racist who hates people who disagree with me". Which I doubt you would do (But there is always the slim chance!). As for the debate, I am getting to work on adding it in... sometime next week (Hey, I'm lazy, and the Pee Review toilet on Uncyclopedia is growing!) Javascap 17:44, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

Hi 2[edit]

I took it to talk. I don't hear any objections...? :) <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 01:21, 8 June 2008 (EDT)

See my main page talk comment... Lyra § talk 01:24, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
How about giving other people a few hours to reply? From my short research, Elaine Morgan is most definitely a quote miner. You might want to appraise yourself of what you are defending. See you at the talk page... ħumanUser talk:Human 03:02, 8 June 2008 (EDT)


I challenge you to an edit war! It is well known that Isaac Asimov was a Roman Catholic! <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 22:20, 8 June 2008 (EDT)

{yawn}... Perhaps Mr. Shabby would be up for some, er, "quality" debate? Go ring his bell at CP and see if his mother will let him out to play? ħumanUser talk:Human 22:24, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
Go watch "Jellyfish" on Animal Planet and get to know your invertebrate cousins better! ħumanUser talk:Human 22:51, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
I already know all about jellyfish, silly Human. At the moment I am spying on Clownfish You heard nothing. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 22:53, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
Jellyfish don't spy, they mostly drift... and clownfish do just fine playing in their anemone tentacles. I have had pets of all three ;) ħumanUser talk:Human 23:02, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
You forced my innocent jellyfish brethren to share a homestead with Clownfish??? You monster! Know you not of the Clownfish Agenda?
All three? <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 23:06, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
Yes, but not in the same tanks, silly. That would not work. Jellyfish are fragile, and incredibly stupid, and require very special treatment. ħumanUser talk:Human 23:36, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
Have you not heard of the Box Jelly? Lyra § talk 23:40, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
They may be "more evolved" (actually, we are all evolved exactly the same amount at any given time), but they are still travelers upon the currents, and sadly deficient in the largely silly weapon of cerebral cortex. ħumanUser talk:Human 23:53, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
You take that back, monkey-man :P <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 00:08, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Bones. ħumanUser talk:Human 00:17, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
What I lack in bones, I make up for in accurate knowledge of Syd Barrett's vital signs. Pwned. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 00:21, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
I didn't say he was dead. Eyes. ħumanUser talk:Human 00:28, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
The aforementioned Box Jellyfish has eyes. That's my contribution to this conversation. Lyra § talk 00:40, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Thanks, I always get my medusae mixed up! ħumanUser talk:Human 00:43, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Box Jellyfish are disowned from the jellyfish Kingdom. They work for the Clownfish. No joke. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 00:47, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
That was your error. Tentacles. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 00:33, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
When did he croak? I still have to fill out this sandbox, mostly with largely defensive weapons of stewed tentacles and deep-fried andromedae. You help is largely expected and hoped for. Ears. ħumanUser talk:Human 00:38, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Knees. ħumanUser talk:Human 00:43, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
You edit conflicted me for that?!?
Helping is for my associates. Syd Barrett died almost two years ago now -- in July 2006 according to Wikipedia. Ears to you too. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 00:47, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Helping is endemic to jellyfish, which cannot survive without cooperation. Opposable thumbs. ħumanUser talk:Human 00:48, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
I'm a SelFish, as well. I'll see your opposable thumbs and raise you a Mjnosidjg [no equivalent human translation]. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 00:51, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Who's Syd Barrett? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:52, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Founding member of Pink Floyd; possible acid casualty, perhaps just rock retiree. "Wish you were here" (the whole album) is pretty much written for him. ("Shine on, you crazy diamond"...) ħumanUser talk:Human 00:55, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
What's this sandbox thing for, anyway? <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 01:03, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
It might become teh awesome RW article. Whether or not, it certainly keeping a few of you amused it this late hour ;) ħumanUser talk:Human 01:05, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
"Late" Late?! Ha! It's only 10 o'clock my time; the night is still young! Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 01:13, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
You must be on the moon. Spoiler: eleven o'clock isn't much more fun than ten was. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 01:15, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Oregon. Close enough. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 01:16, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
I heard a really weird noise at 1 AM. Could you check that out for me? kthxby <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 01:18, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
It was probably the monster under your bread. Want me to turn on your nightlight for you? : ) Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 01:24, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Instantly my favourite typo. And I can reach it fine, thanks. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 01:26, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
It surely is. Where are you, nuclear testing grounds central? Hehehe @ the invertebrate. ħumanUser talk:Human 01:16, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
No, but my high school was literally across the street from a nuclear test reactor. Plus my town has a titanium plant. If you look at old Cold War-era maps of "likely areas for first strikes by Soviet nuclear attacks", quite a bit of Oregon was included. Nice, no? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 01:24, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Nuclear test reactor? That sounds very amateurish. Did it have a "Caution: atoms" sign? <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 01:26, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
You force me to reminisce... back in the day of the cold war, I lived withing a twenty mile radius of an Air Force base, a nuclear submarine destrcution center (see wp:thresher, I bet it works) and a freaking nuclear power plant. Come the alert, I knew I had eight hours to glass. There was a Clash! song.... I forget the title... ħumanUser talk:Human 01:38, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Eh, sorry Jellyfish, I meant that it was one of those nuclear reactors built for research purposes and not power. It was run by the Department of Energy. You would think having it across the street from us would've made it a conversational gold-mine, but it was fairly inconspicuous, and despite the tall chain-link fence, barbed wire, and signs, it was quite ignorable. I myself was barely aware of it. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 02:52, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
You people and your threat of being destroyed in a nuclear holocaust..... If you take the "Places the Soviet's would have nuked map, I live in a state that wouldn't even make it to the map. (Unless missionaries made it to the Kremlin...... in which case, we would have been at the top of the list) Pinto's5150 Talk 05:42, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Oh hey, I am sure the US was perfectly comfortable defending Europe by letting it get glassed over. Not so much fun when Raygunz was playing swashbuckler, or even before, when the idea of "sacrificing" the Rhineland seemed OK - to people who didn't live there. But, I was within glass range of three serious targets. And I'm sure you were too. But most of the US was not, really. By the way, I have been charitable in interpreting what you wrote. What exactly did you mean??? ħumanUser talk:Human 05:50, 9 June 2008 (EDT)