User talk:Human/Archive12

This is an archive page, last updated 5 January 2012. Please do not make edits to this page.

Archives for this talk page:

<0>, <1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>, <6>, <7>, <8>, <9>, <10>, <11>, <13>, <14>, <15>, <16>, <17>, <18>, <19>, <20>, <21>, <22>, <23>, <24>, <25>, <26>, <27>, <28>, <29>, <30>, <31>, <32>, <33>

, (new)(back)

A nice break from bigotry

Hey, Human, I found a good site: Religious Tolerance.

Not sharing for any real reason, though I find the site refreshing after reading Conservapedia, and even sometimes after RationalWiki. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 15:59, 28 January 2008 (EST)

Hehe, cool, thanks. Yeah, CP gots their militant YECiots, and we gots our share of militant atheists... Personally I like a one hour show that's on Air America Sat from 10-11 and Sundays from 7-8 EST, State of Belief with the Rev. Dr. C. Welton Gaddy. He's hilarious, and obviously religious but very ecumenical. human 18:46, 28 January 2008 (EST)

UR

VERY EFISHUNT ADMIN. HEREZ A COOKIE FUR U. ROTFLMAOKTHXBAI

Gee, thanks abunchofnumbers! human 18:00, 30 January 2008 (EST)

I concur with the above sentiment. Regrettably, I'm all out of cookies. :-( --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 19:14, 30 January 2008 (EST)

You can enable your cookies on your toolbar. Also, socks are nice.--PalMD^{-Did that sound a little harsh?} 19:16, 30 January 2008 (EST)

I would, but as you may recall, User:Interpreted took all my cookies, and then nuked my user page. --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 19:23, 30 January 2008 (EST)

The cookies are yummy and appreciated, but has anyone brought Scotch??? Ah, there it is! human 19:32, 30 January 2008 (EST)

For demonstrating exemplary goatery in the line of duty, NamuH has awarded you a used pre-owned! and slightly stale cookie. Ewwwwwww. Cockroaches ate half of it.

Cookies from socks are so much better than imaginary cookies from imaginary people. -- ^{ni eb}namuħ   19:45, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Thanks everyone! And, abunchofnumbers, I forgot to blush at what I hope was a compliment (Mussolini was supposedly a "VERY EFISHUNT ADMIN." too...) human 19:56, 30 January 2008 (EST)

vast RW conspiracy

Were you seriously offended? Its not like I said "libtard". (that one never gets old!) Locke 23:35, 30 January 2008 (EST)

What? when? where? how? ...link? human 23:38, 30 January 2008 (EST)

What are you talking about? Why did you come say "for that you deserve a block"? Was it because I said you were part of a rat-wiki conspiracy? Locke 23:39, 30 January 2008 (EST)

What are you talking about? I was playing cat and mouse with Bohdan, what were you doing, pinto bean guy?

I am not the pinto bean guy. Locke 23:43, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Well, are you impersonating him? That is naughty and punishable by deaf! human 23:50, 30 January 2008 (EST)

I'm the Pinto Bean Guy. ^He's Bohdan. Pinto's5150 ^Talk 23:45, 30 January 2008 (EST)

No, I am not him either. Locke 23:45, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Ok, sure, next you're going to say that you're User:AKjeldsen. Pinto's5150 ^Talk 23:48, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Or me! So who was that stranger!?!?!?!!?! human 23:50, 30 January 2008 (EST)

• So you didn't block me for calling you a rat? Thats good. Can I get away with calling you a libtard? Locke 23:52, 30 January 2008 (EST)
• Libtard. user talk:Bohdan 23:53, 30 January 2008 (EST)

You can call me anything you want, you asteriskatroid. It won't make you less of an asteriskatroid. You askeriskatroid, you. PS, I might block you for any idiotic random reason I come up with, as long as it is a very short block, and we aren't edit warring over an article! 23:56, 30 January 2008 (EST)

HUMAN IS A LIBTARD! Locke 00:01, 31 January 2008 (EST)

oooooohhh! I'm so scared! human 00:06, 31 January 2008 (EST)

Wait, why was I just promoted? Pinto's5150 ^Talk 00:09, 31 January 2008 (EST)

I dunno... why? Some dumbass made you a burocrat! So I fixed that. No, sorry, that was the "locke" user impersonating you. Who can tell what's what when Mr. Bohdan in in the house? human 00:13, 31 January 2008 (EST)

I'm so confused now. Pinto's5150 ^Talk 00:15, 31 January 2008 (EST)

You want to know why you were "promoted"? Read the header for this discussion. user talk:Bohdan 00:18, 31 January 2008 (EST)

Wait, your head is spinning? Surely not from the last few minutes of constructive editing of this ever-growing, educational web site?!?!?!?! human 00:19, 31 January 2008 (EST)

I was the first, you know. --Stabbythe Misanthrope, essayist 06:49, 31 January 2008 (EST)

So, did anyone check to see if we left any permanent damage to the wiki after last night's chaos? human 11:33, 31 January 2008 (EST)

Templates

Heh! Given you something to do haven't I?! Susan^Purrrrrrr 17:50, 31 January 2008 (EST)

Well, someone is now going to have to enter useful info for all those templates... and not having the empty params in place makes it eleven times harder </whine> And I still question its usefulness. Oh, and can you please make helpnav list things alphabetically? human 17:53, 31 January 2008 (EST)

Usefulness? What sort of criterion is that for including anything? The alpha thing - I've had an idea - back in a while. Susan^Purrrrrrr 18:25, 31 January 2008 (EST)

its just too bad

I am amazed at what this site has become. Quality vandalism doesn't last ten seconds before a hotheaded admin reverts it, then issues a block. Its almost like they think somebody actually cares. Locke 22:38, 2 February 2008 (EST)

(You're blocked, so I can answer) Are you calling Bohdan's vandalism quality? Because most of it is repeating the same joke about x being a sockpuppet of y. Funny the first couple of times, kinda lame by the 314th. Thunderkatz^Ho! 22:57, 2 February 2008 (EST)

Chill out. Nobody cares about this wiki. And yes, the vandalism was quality. But the sock notices, those were legitimate. Locke 23:06, 2 February 2008 (EST)

No, just tiresome and booooorrring. Sock announcements are so "last November". human 23:18, 2 February 2008 (EST)

Your comments didn't make sense until I remembered that Locke = Pintobean and Pintobean = Bohdan 2.0. And I'll fight you if you accuse me of being hotheaded again. Thunderkatz^Ho! 23:29, 2 February 2008 (EST)

I think my brain just melted.--PalMD^{-Did that sound a little harsh?} 23:34, 2 February 2008 (EST)

Brains don't melt. Locke 23:50, 2 February 2008 (EST)

No, Locke = Bohdan; and PintoBean signs as Locke. So Locke should blocked/renamed as a cheap doppelganger attempt. Doc, it's not that hard to keep track of! We are all sockpuppets, after all, of Helena Bonham Carter! human 23:46, 2 February 2008 (EST)

Almost. You're all actually brains in jars in my lab. I keep the jar juice just the right temperature to avoid any melting unpleasantness. --Helena Bonham Carter 00:01, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Why should Locke be blocked/renamed? How about making Pintobean sign with what his account is? Locke 23:50, 2 February 2008 (EST)

Brains don't melt, eh? Who's the doctor here?? Next you're gonna tell me that UFO's aren't real.--PalMD^{-Did that sound a little harsh?} 23:52, 2 February 2008 (EST)

Whens the last time you saw a brain melt? Locke 23:54, 2 February 2008 (EST)

• I am not Locke. Are you getting paranoid Human? user talk:Bohdan 23:53, 2 February 2008 (EST)

lol Locke 23:54, 2 February 2008 (EST)

Not at all (are we all colon-impaired tonight?). But, if there was any housekeeping to be done, "Locke" should be renamed and the pinto bean guy should be renamed Locka, as he has bin signing for oh-so-long. It just didn't occur to him that some scum sucking slug would try to doppelgang him. human 23:57, 2 February 2008 (EST)

Are you saying that you have been doppleganging him? Shame! Locke 23:58, 2 February 2008 (EST)

Are you sure Locke is Bohdan? Because I always assumed that Locke was run by some random, unoriginal moron. -- ^{ni eb}namuħ   00:05, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Are you saying I am run by Radioactive afikomen? Locke 00:21, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Silly. Radioactive afikomen is a well-organized, highly original moron. So he clearly cannot be Bohdan. -- ^{ni eb}namuħ   00:26, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Ames isn't all that original, but is he a moron? He is a lawyer, does that count? Locke 00:29, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Nah. Lawyers fall under "bastards and scumbags". Being a moron costs extra. -- ^{ni eb}namuħ   00:32, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Maybe Linus? PalMD? Wait I know... TMTOULOUSE! Locke 00:37, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Maybe Elassint? I mean, Locke is sort of an aggressive loony, and that's Elassint all over. -- ^{ni eb}namuħ   03:04, 3 February 2008 (EST)

But was he a moron? Locke 20:24, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Oh dear god. A Pinto copycat is arguing with a Human copycat over who runs the Bohdan sock (which, incidentally, is the Pinto copycat). My brain's not melting, it's just liquefying. Thunderkatz^Ho! 10:24, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Now we have to figure out which sock is run by you... Locke 20:22, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Me. Bohdan

Lame. Locke 20:41, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Yeah, because I totally expected people to fall for it. Thunderkatz^Ho! 20:43, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Gee, cool down. We can't all be normal. Some people just have to be idiots. Locke 20:44, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Cool down? Cool down!?! I object to this sheer and utter... utter... something or other. Screw it. I surrender to your superior insulting skills. Now let me go cry in a corner (if I can find one (darn circular rooms)). Thunderkatz^Ho! 20:48, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Thank you. I appreciate it. Loser. Locke 20:50, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Wait, you were involved with this, right? You have earned... some respect. Locke 20:53, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Heh. Thundie reminds me of a regional joke told back east about Newfoundlanders, told as a pair. Q How do you confuse a Newfie? A Put him in a round room and tell him to pee in the corner. Q2 How does a Newfie confuse you? A2 When he comes out and tells you he did it. --Kels 22:18, 3 February 2008 (EST)

I think my brain just vaporized. Pinto's5150 ^Talk 22:19, 3 February 2008 (EST)

I don't care about football

But the half time show friggin' rocked. And the Giants just took the lead. It's a pretty good game, as these things go. If either team wins, they deseve it. Useless "who-cares" commentary by... human 21:16, 3 February 2008 (EST)

The commercials have been incredibly disappointing so far, with maybe 2 or 3 exceptions. 21:21, 3 February 2008 (EST) 21:20, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Commercials? I read the paper and do my sudoku. As I said, Petty pwned, totally. Whether Manning or Brady will, (eh, who cares), well that makes it a game. I like the close, low score, so far. human 21:32, 3 February 2008 (EST)

I don't care about sports. Or any sort of quasi-tribalistic activities. Which might explain why I have no friends. :-( -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 21:54, 3 February 2008 (EST)

I despise most sports. Well, perhaps not despise, specifically, but lack interest to a great degree, although I do despise American football, no offense to anyone intended. Do you know how physically damaging the sport is? Concussions galore. --Linus^{(plot evil tech)}, 03:14, 4 February 2008

And how emotionally damaging for sports-hating nerds it is? :-( -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 22:16, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Quite a bit, sometimes. --Linus^{(plot evil tech)} 22:31, 3 February 2008 (EST)

There was a football game today? --Kels 22:16, 3 February 2008 (EST)

My sentiments exactly. By the way, was it supposed to be an important one? -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 22:21, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Hmmm...how to put this in terms that self-described nerds might understand...well, picture the biggest dungeons and dragons game of the year. Or, imagine you just got the most brand new, coolest pocket protector! Something on that level might be comparable. :-) --BillOhannity^godvelocity. 22:34, 3 February 2008 (EST)

I didn't know about it until yesterday, or perhaps Friday, and then only because I was reading the paper. --Linus^{(plot evil tech)} 22:31, 3 February 2008 (EST)

I know nothing of this "Dungeons & Dragons" of which you speak. The extent of my nerdiness is ...RationalWiki and Uncyclopedia. But then, I never claimed to be perfect. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 22:40, 3 February 2008 (EST)

You want to know nerdiness? AmesG was level 72 Beastmaster before he sold his account on ebay. Locke 22:43, 3 February 2008 (EST)

I agree with you. Ebay is definitely the nerdiest thing ever invented. :-) -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 22:47, 3 February 2008 (EST)

I forgot to watch the end, since the "football" was such a letdown after the rockin' show at half time. Who won? human 13:16, 4 February 2008 (EST)

request

Hello Human,

I want you to rename this account to Oscar.

Thank you,

- user talk:Bohdan 21:56, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Rename your account to Oscar or his account to Oscar? -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 22:03, 3 February 2008 (EST)

…Ah. That's what that meant. --Linus^{(plot evil tech)} 22:15, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Please, rename my account to Oscar. user talk:Bohdan 22:33, 3 February 2008 (EST)

It is kind of entertaining to watch Linus go back and forth renaming things. :-) -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 22:36, 3 February 2008 (EST)

I'm a bit entertained by it myself… --Linus^{(plot evil tech)} 23:01, 3 February 2008 (EST)

So, Bohdan, you wish to be renamed as "Oscar"? human 00:10, 4 February 2008 (EST)

Its already been done, junior. user talk:Oscar 00:15, 4 February 2008 (EST)

• Hey, Junior, please remove my name from the blocklog. Replace it with your name, or AmesG or something. Thanks in advance, user talk:Oscar 15:37, 4 February 2008 (EST)

Why? Are you turning over a new (fig) leaf? Bad case of 'sterisks you got there, Mr. Grouch, by the way. Hope it heals up soon! human 15:56, 4 February 2008 (EST)

Your putrefying doppelganger could use a helping hand

Eh, Human, I have a slight problem with the layout on my userpage. On a widescreen moniter, my userpage has the exact look I'm going for. On a standard moniter, my it looks like it was randomly thrown together. Can you come up with a solution that appears more or less the same in each ratio? I'm trying to maximize the blinding obscenity of the page, so I'm trying a solid wall of epileptic sparklies above and below the flashing message. Cheers and fruitcake,  ^{ni eb}namuħ   17:28, 4 February 2008 (EST)

I'll take a look and seee what I can come up with... images don't like to play well together though. First thought - put them all in a table, which will force the width of the display. human 20:34, 4 February 2008 (EST)

It looks like you are shooting for a "box" of that image surrounding the blinking text to me? I would say, use a table, make it three images wide, text a wee bit smaller and in the center cell. I'll whip it up for you, feel free to revert. human 20:40, 4 February 2008 (EST)

Tanks! It doesn't match my vision perfectly, but it's better than anything I could come up with. -- ^{ni eb}namuħ   02:49, 5 February 2008 (EST)

I've, er, expanded upon your original idea. However, I can't get the flashing text in the middle to center (I'm trying to double its font size to fill up all four boxes). There's also this gap in the arrangement that I can't figure out how to fill. Your assistance would be greatly appreciated. -- ^{ni eb}namuħ   03:13, 5 February 2008 (EST)

I fixed it up for you. Two rows of six cells afore and below, the row with the text has a double wide and double tall cell for the text, and the fourth row only hhas four cells since two are taken up by the big cell in row three. human 13:19, 5 February 2008 (EST)

sysop

Hey Junior, make me a sysop. You've made every single moron on this wiki one (including the "sensitive man" user) so make me one now. I want to, you know, help revert vandalism and the such. If you choose not to, I want the reason why. And please, other worthless morons, don't respond to this. Only the user:Human moron. Thanks in advance, user talk:Oscar 23:07, 4 February 2008 (EST)

I can respond, of course, because I am not a moron. -- ^{ni eb}namuħ   02:50, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Well Junior? Am I going to be made a sysop? And no, if you actually read what was written, you were described as a moron also. user talk:Oscar 11:28, 5 February 2008 (EST)

I just noticed that that wasn't you, rather your sock. He is a moron also. user talk:Oscar 11:28, 5 February 2008 (EST)

I resent that. I put a lot of effort into that sock, and it grates on me that others get credited for it. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 15:55, 5 February 2008 (EST)

"I want to, you know, help revert vandalism and the such." - any user can do so with the "rollback" button. Did you also want to block wandals and vital trusted editors? Are you a liberal in deceit? Are you in violation of our 99/1 rule? I'll bet that with 95% certainty you are against players in school, since most deceivers are! Please stop with the edit, edit, edit and make constructive contributions to this project's valuable talk pages! Goatspeed, human 13:23, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Dearest Junior, make me a sysop and bureaucrat now. Every n00b is made sysop. Morons are make bureaucrats. Why can't I, user #49, be one? Is it pure hatred? Disdain for free-thinkers? user talk:Oscar 13:32, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Look, if you just block Tmtoulouse forever, I will stop asking. user talk:Oscar 13:40, 5 February 2008 (EST)

"Forever" is not a recognized block time, and neither is e to the i pi. So I settled for "infinite". What about all his socks? Like you? human 13:45, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Leave his socks, except the ones I ask you to block (like AmesG, Human, ect). user talk:Oscar 13:46, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Pseudo-response

Actually the Sensitive Man thing was my doing, and it was a mistake (Read, I meant to un-do it). On a separate note, I never did get a reason for my being promoted to sysop from crat. Pinto's5150 ^Talk 23:28, 4 February 2008 (EST)

Pinto, I know you are a moron, I really do. But why did you respond when I specifically asked you not to? user talk:Oscar 23:32, 4 February 2008 (EST)

Because you Specifically asked me not to. Fine I'll move it. Pinto's5150 ^Talk 23:35, 4 February 2008 (EST)

Thanks, and again, I am not trying to say that you aren't a moron. You've earned that distinction with all your hard work. user talk:Oscar 23:37, 4 February 2008 (EST)

Thanks, you have no idea how much that means to me. Pinto's5150 ^Talk 23:38, 4 February 2008 (EST)

Your welcome, I'm always glad to uplift the more unfortunate among us... user talk:Oscar 23:49, 4 February 2008 (EST)

I'm glad to notice that this conversation does not require my participation.. human 02:14, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Be an infant if you must. user talk:Oscar 16:20, 5 February 2008 (EST)

What did you expect. Locke 16:26, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Am I ever going to get a reply? Pinto's5150 ^Talk 18:40, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Yes. Keep waiting. Locke 18:43, 5 February 2008 (EST)

AND YOUR LITTLE DOG TOOO!!!!Phallus of Satan 18:41, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Oh, wait, somewhere in there you asked me a question. I can't remember - did I leave a comment that shows up in the user rights log? human 18:55, 5 February 2008 (EST)

No, you did not. You just took it away and you never told him why. I believe an "old prune" or "libtard" is needed... Locke 18:58, 5 February 2008 (EST)

• 22:06, 30 January 2008 Human (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Pinto's5150 from checkuser to checkuser, sysop (ok, that's enough)
• 22:05, 30 January 2008 Human (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Pinto's5150 from bureaucrat, checkuser, sysop to checkuser (howdoyalike that!)

That's all there was. And did we ever reach a consensus on Locke being Oscar? Pinto's5150 ^Talk 19:00, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Hmm, looks like sockpuppet vandalism to me. I might have done it if you had done something risky like making Bohdan a sysop for too long. Gotta keep that grouch on a short leash... As far as user:Locke, I think it/he should be deleted & you renamed (or at least, you get the keys to the account). I think it crosses the confusion line a little too far. And I have no idea who runs user:Locke, it could be any of the two or three actual editors on RW. So am I supposed to make you a 'crat again? Have you been good? human 19:11, 5 February 2008 (EST)

I agree on nuking Locke, I'll just take the keys though, renaming now would cause even more confusion. As for the crat thing, it makes no real difference, I just wondered why. Pinto's5150 ^Talk 19:14, 5 February 2008 (EST)

What sort of lunatic are you? Block me because Pinto's5150 refuses to sign with his own username? That is the stupidest, most idiotic plan ever. Locke 19:15, 5 February 2008 (EST)

• If you block/rename this account, you are violating your own rules regarding sockpuppets and usernames. The slide into fascism has started. Your no better than what you claim conservapedia is. Locke 19:16, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Yep, definitely Bohdan. Eh, let him live perhaps? Pinto's5150 ^Talk 19:18, 5 February 2008 (EST)

How do you know that? I could be any single editor or lurker who has followed this sites slide from anarchy into fascism (don't deny it, you know its hapening). Locke 19:20, 5 February 2008 (EST)

As long as his user name doesn't cause you any real problems, and others have a vague chance of being able to tell the two of you apart, fine. By the way, anyone could have copied and pasted that response in an attempt to frame Boschardoan. human 19:21, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Yeah, so long as the sigs stay different, people should have a chance to tell us apart. And about the C&P thing, yea, I guess you're right. Pinto's5150 ^Talk 19:23, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Please, stop this crazy showtrial. I am not Bohdan. Locke 19:26, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Junior, this Locke account is not me, though I am amused and a little flattered. Oscar 19:32, 5 February 2008 (EST)

His work here and his tactics are amazing. Oscar 19:32, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Just block us all with, oh, say, a three day block and sort this thing out later. Locke 19:44, 5 February 2008

Let's pretend I did that just slightly over three days ago. Pi days later... Now, where were we? human 21:28, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Human, Locke is definitely Oscar. Or haven't you noticed that Locke rarely appears unless Oscar is somehow involved? A comparison between Oscar's interactions and Locke's editing patterns is all it takes to confirm this. Examples: Locke's first edit off his own talkpage is to ask Godless Liberal about a picture that only Bohdan cares about or remembers; Locke's second edit off his own talkpage is to back up Bohdan in supporting TK; Locke responds to AmesG's post on Bohdan's talk page in barely a minute; Locke addresses himself in the third person and admits "this is Bohdan"; Locke spends another post spent arguing with those who banned TK (note that Bohdan is the only user here with both the motive (one of the few to vouch for TK) and the character to make a sockpuppet to bolster his arguments; Locke spends an assload of of time doing nothing but reverting others' edits to Oscar's userpage; and Locke responds, but not Oscar, after I lock Oscar's userpage and talkpage. Even their style of wandalism is identical. One must conclude that Oscar is the person behind Locke. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 22:01, 5 February 2008 (EST)

WOW! Here we are discussing this sites descent into fascism, and along you come with a carefully documented secret dossier on me. Your paranoia is laughable. Nevertheless, all this is based on pure speculation. But it is certainly revealing of you, and this site you are trying to destroy. Locke 22:22, 5 February 2008 (EST)

You are at least as ignorant as Oscar. Allow me to elucidate: one of the defining traits of fascism is the glorification of violence and war, as well as rapid anti-intellectualism. I don't see any of that happening here. Secondly, "secret dossier" implies, well, secret. All users' contributions here are a matter of public record. It is not a "carefully documented dossier" because I didn't compile it until I wrote the post. And compiling evidence is also standard procedure when making any sort of hypothesis—it's called "research", Locke. You should try it some time. Citing specific, observable examples in order to back up my argument is also the ethical thing to do, otherwise it would be a baseless accusation (and the examples are provided specifically in order to demonstrate that it is not baseless).

You also clearly have no idea what paranoia actually means.

1. A psychotic disorder characterized by delusions of persecution with or without grandeur, often strenuously defended with apparent logic and reason.
2. Extreme, irrational distrust of others. (American Heritage Dictionary)

I entertain no delusions that you are "persecuting" me. And what, exactly, makes my hypothesis extreme or irrational? Do provide evidence, Locke. Or are you just making shit up, like TK and Aschlafly? -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:18, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Good grief. Someone needs to take a break from wiki editing. Take a few days off, and try to develope a sense of humor. Locke 23:39, 5 February 2008 (EST)

How was I supposed to know you were being facetious? You left no smiley. :-) -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:42, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Funny. You RA didn't start becoming really active until after a certain conspiracy minded sysop over to CP went missing. Coincidence? -+- Warren Terra 22:10, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Even funnier, I didn't become really active until a certain user slowed down at Uncyclopedia. But I think it could be coincidence. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 22:16, 5 February 2008 (EST)

This conversation is about to go badly downhill, inevitably ending in comparisons to Hitler, and hurt feelings all around. Stop now. Step away from the keyboard. Go pet a jerboa, or milk a goat.

Hey, no one tapped out, let the fight discussion continue! I haven't hosted this much fun on my talk page in weeks! human 02:14, 6 February 2008 (EST)

Term of endearment

Human (Talk | contribs) (Undo revision 119543 by NamuH (Talk) lack of cap was intentional, dear.)

"Dear"? -- ^{ni eb}namuħ   22:15, 6 February 2008 (EST)

Sweetie :) human 23:55, 6 February 2008 (EST)

Morons :( Locke 23:57, 6 February 2008 (EST)

Darling baby bunker buggy boo! -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 00:01, 7 February 2008 (EST)

Ooh, Locke, would you like to rub my falafel? human 00:04, 7 February 2008 (EST)

And knead my fruitcake? -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 00:08, 7 February 2008 (EST)

Who are you people, and why do you edit my blog when you've been drinking? Ooh, don't touch me there. Wait, on second thoughts... I may need my dough, but I prefer for you to knead my dough! human 00:10, 7 February 2008 (EST)

Bad boy, Human, you're a naughty boy. But the American people already know that Human is a bad boy; a naughty boy. I'm speaking out for the people who, in the majority, think Human is probably even a nasty, bad, naughty boy.- former Sen. Larry Craig, about this thread -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 00:18, 7 February 2008 (EST)

Ew, I've been "wide-stanced!" I must go shower, now... human 01:25, 7 February 2008 (EST)

THAT'S QUITE ENOUGH! I'll get my whip if there's any more of that DIRTY talk. Susan^Miouw 05:52, 7 February 2008 (EST)

Block

Yum!

Why was I blocked? For reverting your rant? Locke 23:43, 7 February 2008 (EST)

For deleting content from a talk page. human 00:03, 8 February 2008 (EST)

I deleted a rant. You wouldn't have blocked AmesG for deleting a hateful rant like that aimed at you. Just pointing out a little double standard, that's all. Locke 00:12, 8 February 2008 (EST)

Besides, you say above "I pledge to only block users if they ask for it, or insert unfunny vandalism." I didn't insert anything, not did I ask for it. You just violated your own pledge. Locke 00:14, 8 February 2008 (EST)

I wouldn't have? A hateful rant aimed at me? I think I have never interfered with RW editors general, and especially your, hatred of me, and expressions of such feelings. Your "insertion" was inserting "" in place of things another user typed. You asked for it. Also, the "rant" in question called out a CP sysop for fairly egregious behaviour. And further, it was for what, about an hour? You're back and havin' fun and goat pilaf already! human 00:22, 8 February 2008 (EST)

IRC

Why aren't you on the irc with us? You make the internet not suck for me! -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 00:02, 9 February 2008 (EST)

My attempt seemed to be epic phail, I need someone to hand-hold me through the process. I downloaded the prostitute application and ran it, but it told me I was a monkey and that I should keep typing. human 00:25, 9 February 2008 (EST)

PS, thanks :) human 00:26, 9 February 2008 (EST)

houseplant happens, douchebag.--PalMD^{-Did that sound a little harsh?} 00:35, 9 February 2008 (EST)

Thanks. Fuck off and your stupid

"advice" helps a lot.  Not. Fuck off, douchebag, this instant. human 00:39, 9 February 2008 (EST)

Hey, where'd everyone go? -- kjm.rt  00:52, 9 February 2008 (EST)

In which Radioactive afikomen holds Human's hand through the process

• Go to www.mirc.com
• Go to "download"
• Download it
• Just go with the standard options while it's setting up. Make sure you have "have icon on desktop" selected (or whatever the actual wording is)
• Note: Just skip those first steps if you have already downloaded the same program.
• Open the program
• Click "Continue" when it asks you to register.
• A little window with stuff for you to fill out should appear.
• Put whatever you want (as long as you put something, otherwise the whole system phail on you) in the "Full Name" box.
• Put in an email address. (yes, you must have something in the box, or teh system phail)
• Put your screenname in as the "Nickname" box (if it's more than one word, use underscores instead of spaces, or no spaces at all. Also, there is a 15 character limit.)
• Put something, anything in the "Alternative Nickname" box.
• In the left-hand side of the little window, under "Category:", select "Servers".
• Scroll up/down to "Freenode", click on it, then click "Select".
• Click "Connect".
• In a moment or two, a new window should automatically appear. In the space it provides you, enter #rationalwiki
• Click "Join"
• Congrats, you're done.

P.S. Hit enter to submit your entry. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:04, 9 February 2008 (EST)

Thank you! human 01:13, 9 February 2008 (EST)

screenshot for help

(pikture gone) raghtchere. human 16:03, 9 February 2008 (EST)

Goto IRC for realtime® help-age.CЯacke® 16:34, 9 February 2008 (EST)

haha human 17:04, 9 February 2008 (EST)

Bible

No, but I ate it!

Have you read it? I'm not sure you know what you're talking about. Would you like to start an article stating that Gulliver's Travels is a snoozefest or the Iliad is a snoozefest? Sure, they're not accurate to history and science, that doesn't mean that they are snoozefests. Let us not sink to the conservative-fascist level and be transgressive. Reginmund 17:59, 9 February 2008 (EST)

Rev. Lovejoy, on The Simpsons, called it a snoozefest. That's good enough for me. --Edgerunner⁷⁶ 18:08, 9 February 2008 (EST)

The Reverend Lovejoy called it a three-thousand page sleeping pill. Yet, it's not even three-thousand pages and its only an opinion. I'm curious of the statute on RationalWiki that says you may be blocked for removing messages to you on your own talk page. Reginmund 18:26, 9 February 2008 (EST)

I posted it on your talk page. human 18:37, 9 February 2008 (EST)

Besides that, thank you for the generous round of transgressive MySpace opinions on the Bible page. Now I'm giving up on RationalWiki. Cheers. Reginmund 18:43, 9 February 2008 (EST)

We'll miss you, do come back. Leaving over one word? Hmmmmm... human 18:47, 9 February 2008 (EST)

Another satisfied customer!!! CЯacke® 18:54, 9 February 2008 (EST)

Damn, TK was right!!! human 19:09, 9 February 2008 (EST)

can i haz block rights?

Rollbacking vandalism is out of fashion. NightFlare^{Speak, mortal} 21:28, 9 February 2008 (EST)

Sure, although it looked to me that Dick Turpis had to fight off the last wave. Demotion proceeding apace. We have some help file somewhere to help acclimate you - clik on help files and look for "new sysop guide" or some such drivel. human 22:14, 9 February 2008 (EST)

Why do these n00bs get to be sysops? Just for reverting some vandalism they were probably behind? DoggedamesP 23:11, 9 February 2008 (EST)

Uh... because you can be a prick sometimes? -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:20, 9 February 2008 (EST)

oh, let's be nice!!! I only demote users I have seen around for a while, and who eventually are the only bastions against an ASSAULT ON THE WIKI omgz!!!!!11!!11!one!!!eleventeen1!!!!

As for "DoggedamesP", you are just a trivial sockpuppet/dopplelganger, and I wasted more time replying than your comments are worth. human 01:44, 10 February 2008 (EST)

Ouch. And no, I am not a sockpuppet/doppleganger. DoggedamesP 20:19, 10 February 2008 (EST)

Well? Don't you have something to say? Maybe an apology? DoggedamesP 14:01, 11 February 2008 (EST)

Yes, you are. I noticed that you accuse Dick Turpis and NightFlare of vandalizing with sockpuppets just to get sysop rights. Projection, anyone? And your insistent dickery has spent any good karma you have. If anything, you should be apologizing to us. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 14:09, 11 February 2008 (EST)

Still no apology for the sockpuppet remark human? DoggedamesP 14:59, 12 February 2008 (EST)

New Holydaze template I made

I just finished making a possible replacement for the current Template:Holydaze. The version I made would replace the moving <noinclude> tags with a more user-friendly template parameter. You can see what I mean at User:assume a=a/holydaze, where I've created the page that would replace Template:Holydaze, along with its documentation. It uses a template subpage, Template:Holydaze/inner, which I already put in place.

The advantage of my version of the template is that it uses a template parameter. The parameter is clearly marked at the top of the template page, allowing it to be switched more easily. Also, direct use of Template:Holydaze/inner on pages other than recentchanges would allow use of different holidays on different pages, something that currently requires cut & paste of the code for that holiday and is not automatically updated if that holiday's message changes.

Another thing I wrote into the template was documentation and messages that encourage people to fill in messages for holidays with no message at the moment. Other than this slight change, it uses the exact same messages as the current version.

Do you think this would be a good replacement for Template:Holydaze? I'd like to get some input on this before making a sudden, undiscussed change to such a widely visible page. assume $a=a$ 12:45, 10 February 2008 (EST)

Yah, don't change it quite yet. Let me look over what you did, certainly making use easier makes sense. But, you know, I think we might be able to make it automatic with a date parser function (kind of, if month=2 and if day=14 then [valentine's day]). Like how template:nextPrim works? Just a thought. Now let me go look more closely at your new version. human 14:53, 10 February 2008 (EST)

Never even thought of making it automatic... that's a really good idea! assume $a=a$

Not to butt in, but I've been thinking about it too--I'm a bit busy at the moment; maybe later in week.... Sterile^xx 17:15, 10 February 2008 (EST)

It's not butting in at all, the more heads we have thinking of ways to make it easy the better! human 18:41, 10 February 2008 (EST)

Ha! me too - automating that is! using something like #ifexpr (startdate <= (now) and finishdate >= (now))| ... etc easy in C but ... Susan^Miouw 21:14, 10 February 2008 (EST)

I knew it wouldn't be long before you would turn up to help us build our new toy! It would be awesome to have it all on one page, with obvious and easy to edit "banners" and dates. because, of course, some holydaze are moveable feasts... human 21:23, 10 February 2008 (EST)

Start: table, 1 col= start date (allows for things lasting mor than 1 day); 2 col = banner; 3 col = finish date. Pick appropriate day(s) for display. (that's the tricky bit) Susan^Miouw 21:37, 10 February 2008 (EST)

How about conditionals that result in "includeonly" tags based on the dates in the table? Or, the dates are on lines just above and below the banner, and are actually generated by the conditional code? (making copying, using them, etc. easier) human 21:48, 10 February 2008 (EST)

Could do it with a seperate page for each holyda - that's how wp do their featured front page article (not as good as ours?). Page name includes date & template call varies with current date. A bit unweildy! Susan^Miouw 22:34, 10 February 2008 (EST)

Yah... I hate "cascading templates" if not necessary. Makes for very opaque functions. Let's make this work out of one page/template, with perhaps external support functions. human 23:16, 10 February 2008 (EST)

Sterile's version

Sillies-- See User:Sterile/sandbox. All that has to be done is to place the different holiday banners between the pipings (|). Sterile^xx 12:10, 13 February 2008 (EST)

Like it. (its wot I said above about 5 edits isn't it) What happens if two holydayz have same date? do they both show? Susan^Miouw

They are nonoverlapping. Here's the list (start date/end date/occasion):

10-Mar 10-Mar Autofire's birthday
13-Mar 17-Mar St.Patrick's Day
18-Mar 22-Mar Vernal equinox
23-Mar 23-Mar Easter
19-Apr 26-Apr Passover
28-Mar 1-Apr April Fool's Day
27-Apr 1-May May Day
4-May 4-May Radioactive afikomen's birthday
11-May 11-May Susan G's birthday
17-Jun 21-Jun Summer Solstice
10-Jul 14-Jul Bastille Day
28-Jul 1-Aug Yorskhire Day
15-Sep 19-Sep Talk Like a Pirate Day
20-Sep 22-Sep Autumnal Equinox
27-Oct 31-Oct Halloween
1-Nov 5-Nov Guy Fawkes Day
7-Nov 11-Nov Armistice Day/Remembrance Day/Veteran's Day
3-Dec 7-Dec Pearl Harbor Day/Human's b-day
21-Dec 23-Dec Hanakah
24-Dec 25-Dec Christmas
26-Dec 26-Dec Boxing Day
27-Dec 31-Dec Kwanzaa
1-Jan 1-Jan New Year's Day
15-Jan 19-Jan MLK
29-Jan 2-Feb Groundhog day
10-Feb 14-Feb St. Valentine's Day
Sterile^xx 12:20, 13 February 2008 (EST)

As I said elsewhere lots of work it's good. Have 237 points for your team. Susan^Miouw 12:26, 13 February 2008 (EST)

Excel does most of the work for me. Sterile^xx 12:34, 13 February 2008 (EST)

Hmmm... can't seem to get <noinclude> etc. to work with the conditionals... Sterile^xx 12:45, 13 February 2008 (EST)

I've had the same trouble - seems as if wikitalk fights wikiparsing. :-) Susan^Miouw 12:52, 13 February 2008 (EST)

Yeah, Sterile, that's what I meant. Although, most of the "greetings" should only run on the day itself (or days, for things like kwaanza). What do people think of using something like Sterile's thing as the main template, but putting the greetings themselves either in one long template or each in their own subtemplate?

So a line from the template would look like this:

{{ #ifexpr: {{ #time: z }} > 304 and {{ #time:z }} < 310 |{{/guyfawkes}}|

Or this:

{{ #ifexpr: {{ #time: z }} > 304 and {{ #time:z }} < 310 |{{/banners#Guy Fawkes Day}}|

That way, at the subpage where the templates are, they will be "visible" while editing/previewing?

Oh, and Sterile, instead of a whole series of nested conditionals, can they be standalone? As in:

...if (date=feb14) then (valentine) if (date=jul14) then (bastille)...

It just makes it easier to edit/adapt, I think. Or do they have to be if/then/else? Just a few random thoughts. human 14:50, 13 February 2008 (EST)

I'll have to look into some more. One easier to modify back version (like you suggested...) led to some awkward spacing. Gotta run. Sterile^xx 18:12, 13 February 2008 (EST)

Yes - after every condidtional on that one there is a carraige return, so they all get used. I'll play with it here. human 19:22, 13 February 2008 (EST)

No funky spaces are coming over, I "noincluded" all the CR's. The template itself still looks funny, of course. human 19:27, 13 February 2008 (EST)

There's a new, unfilling version in my sandbox. Sterile^xx 15:12, 15 February 2008 (EST)

Shock and Awe

Your recent improvments to the "Pascal's Wager" article are undoubtedly(sp?) the finest contribution to this Wiki I have ever seen.... I am amazed that such writing talent agrees to associate with the likes of us lowly nobodies..... SirChuckB^{That is all} 03:35, 11 February 2008 (EST)

He was probably pissed @ the time: he couldn't manage such magnificence sober. Susan^Miouw 03:44, 11 February 2008 (EST)

{{User:NamuH/shock and awe}}

Shock and awe, baby! -- ^{ni eb}namuħ   05:22, 11 February 2008 (EST)

Er, thanks. I have scored over 10,000 concise, informative, edumacational points in my own personal team kontest! human 13:57, 11 February 2008 (EST)

Human, with reluctance I feel compelled to challenge 9,999.5 of those points. I have reviewed your edits and I have found that they are characterized by an inappropriate degree of liberal deceit. Obviously, no points should be awarded for such edits. This is called accountability. I am sure you will agree that a higher degree of accountability will considerably decrease the quality of our site. Naturally, I will defer completely to Heidrun in this matter. Goatspeed. --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 12:25, 13 February 2008 (EST)

That's ok, I got another 20,000 points last night reverting liberal deceit I found inserted in articles all over this sad excuse for a bicyclopedia. Goatspeed! human 14:53, 13 February 2008 (EST)

Is your goat five-speed or ten-speed? -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 14:54, 13 February 2008 (EST)

Sturmey-Archer "three in the hub", baby! human 14:57, 13 February 2008 (EST)

What a cruel and horrible thing to do to my sockpuppet, Human. It's as if his contributions don't matter. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 15:02, 13 February 2008 (EST)

Look! I can steal articles from other sites!

But only the funny ones. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 03:33, 14 February 2008 (EST)

This is my favorite bit: "Libertarianism 'rules' Internet political debate the same way US Communism 'ruled' pamphleteering." -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 03:42, 14 February 2008 (EST)

Hehe... human 13:50, 14 February 2008 (EST)

Thief!

Thief! I made that specially for Susan and Kels! Oh, surely thou art the Devil incarnate! -- ^{ni eb}namuħ   18:10, 14 February 2008 (EST)

Hey, I changed it! Anyway, didn't you know that there was a full color photocopier in the RW office for all to use? (PS, you know what "GFDL" means?) Hehe... human 18:16, 14 February 2008 (EST)

But you cheapened it. I created it as a gift from me to Susan and Kels. But you stole my thunder and wore the same dress as me to the prom! -- ^{ni eb}namuħ   18:22, 14 February 2008 (EST)

How on earth does my love for you and myself cheapen your love for Susan and Kels? Surely there's enough love in the universe to go around? human 18:30, 14 February 2008 (EST)

The de-regulation of the Love Exchange has raised prices. I hear he had to save up for months to buy his share. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 18:37, 14 February 2008 (EST)

What is much, much worse is that both of you seem to have forgotten our third regular female editor. For shame, gentlemen. For shame. :shakes head: --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 18:57, 14 February 2008 (EST)

OK, I fixed that. human 19:11, 14 February 2008 (EST)

Ha, ha. Very funny. --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 19:12, 14 February 2008 (EST)

I don't know Eira that well. -- ^{ni eb}namuħ   20:32, 14 February 2008 (EST)

Human@CP

So, were you human at CP there above me in Scientific Revolutions? PoorEd 14:04, 15 February 2008 (EST)

Yes, that was me. That was why I didn't switch to my "real name" on RW, since everyone already knew me as human. It would have been too confusing. You should check out my work on the building trades and classical music sometime ;) human 14:16, 15 February 2008 (EST)

We were there at the same time. Cool. My favorite contributions were adding mercy and forgiveness as characterisics of Christianity (that's right, surprise, they only had sin and punishment), a few juicy quotes that are still on Coulter's page, Rush Limbaugh's oxycontin addiction (still there) and adding a reason for dropping the atomic bomb on Harry Truman's page that RobS didn't know about and got him running about shouting "Disinformation!" until I added a citation from the Friends' web site. Anyway, nice to run into you again. PoorEd 14:30, 15 February 2008 (EST)

Cool - what was your user name there? Surely not PoorEd, that would never have flown. Were you axed in the night of the blunt knives? Were you around for RW 1.0? human 14:34, 15 February 2008 (EST)

NitramNos. My demise is recorded on my user page here I committed suicide by RobS when I got tired of the whole charade. I chose my present username on a whim and because I always was amused by EdPoor's username. Oh, and no, I didn't become involved in RW until recently. Too bad, I would have enjoyed it even more back then. PoorEd 14:37, 15 February 2008 (EST)

Ah, I remember you. Nice to meet you again :) "Suicide by RobS", ROFL. Yah, RW 1.0 was like a bunch of people who work together and hate their jobs meeting at a bar after work blowing off steam. RW 2.1's big job now is learning to accomodate as well as possible newer editors who don't align with the groupthink that CP created among the "original" and early editors. In other words, to foster the sort of discussions we wanted to have at CP when we were allowed to play there. human 14:44, 15 February 2008 (EST)

There is no record anymore of NitramNos overthere, or I can't find it. Pity. PoorEd, have you already read the Conservapedia Timeline article, along with the Night of the blunt knives one? Human was one of the building blocks of CP, along with many RW editors (me not included). Editor at CP^{Bring TK back} 14:42, 15 February 2008 (EST)

http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ann_Coulter&diff=174883&oldid=174881 human 14:46, 15 February 2008 (EST)

Thanks' I'm stupid. So PoorEd was in CP quite early. And good edits! Editor at CP^{Bring TK back} 14:51, 15 February 2008 (EST)

Thanks. You'll also find me in the history of such articles as Geology, Rush Limbaugh, and Noah's Ark, along with some feeble protests in Talk: Censorship and Geocentric. I'll cehck out the timeline. PoorEd 14:58, 15 February 2008 (EST)

"Human was one of the building blocks of CP" - really? Not sure what you mean there... human 15:13, 15 February 2008 (EST)

Just defaming. No, really: back in those times, many came to CP having read about it in blogs etc. But if CP only were an Andy + his cohort project, it would have been forgotten soon - as it would now, if there were no RW. What made it flourish (?) and attracted new editors, me included, was the unique combination of crazy editors in good faith, more or less subtle vandals, and "liberals" genuinely wanting to improve the site (many editors falling in both the last two categories). Without you and the rest of RW 1.0 with your tireless contributions and discussions with Andy and co., CP would not be what it is. Editor at CP^{Bring TK back} 15:20, 15 February 2008 (EST)

I heard about it on NPR and loved the idea that you could just jump right in and start editing anything you wanted. I enjoyed clicking on "random page" and adding to any article where I seemed to know more than the original contributor. And it was liberating not to have to look up a citation for things I already knew to be true. When I discovered the depth of conservative bias my focus changed to finding subtle ways to introduce truth into some of the more controversial subjects, with mixed success. PoorEd 15:29, 15 February 2008 (EST)

I'm not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing.--PalMD^{-Did that sound a little harsh?} 15:30, 15 February 2008 (EST)

<-- Well, I appreciate the credit, but I mostly lurked and made small talk page comments until I realized that the citations requirement was completely ignored. Then I started writing innocent articles and perhaps arguing more (see the link above). It was people like Doc and Trent, to name two, who really went to town on the scientific idiocy CP was promulgating. human 15:35, 15 February 2008 (EST)

Well, for me every single RW 1.0 member is a hero, idol and role model. Well not really, but you get the point. Editor at CP^{Bring TK back} 15:37, 15 February 2008 (EST)

Hehe, thanks :) human 15:43, 15 February 2008 (EST)

sig help

i set up a page for my sig, and tried internal link in my preferences, and that doesnt work. How do you do it?User:PalMD/sig 23:20, 15 February 2008 (EST)

first suggestion, go to "help" and ubercool, sig stuff. I think it might help? I hope so. I'll dig into what you've got shortly, though some is opaque, as part of your prefs.

you thinkin' of ading random ad homs to every signing? Hehe. human 23:22, 15 February 2008 (EST)

Thanks for sending me to Help...I think Im getting there.PalMD ^{--You don't know harsh!} 23:27, 15 February 2008 (EST)

YW, Susan did an amazing job of pulling those files together. As a small wiki, we may have the best help files on the tubes! OK, she made me write the sig thing after I tried to explain it to someone... but I thought you already had the sig thing worked out? Wow. I am eating raw graham crackers for the first time in 30 years. Thank advertising and sentimentality. human 23:30, 15 February 2008 (EST)

I just ate raw graham crackers for the first time in... two hours! I love graham crackers! -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:36, 15 February 2008 (EST)

How did you know mine first name is Graham? CЯacke®

Just a hunch. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 02:18, 16 February 2008 (EST)

Its one of the few foods widely available in the hospital.--PalMD ^{--You don't know harsh!} 23:39, 15 February 2008 (EST)

Well, at least they're yummy. Usedta eat them while babysitting at, like the age of 14... yum! Sorry for your predicament - they should have nachos, as well!!!! human 23:47, 15 February 2008 (EST)

...You were young once? : ) -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 02:08, 16 February 2008 (EST)

Once or twice, yes. human 10:34, 16 February 2008 (EST)

Name

So, how is Huw Powell pronounced? -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 06:03, 16 February 2008 (EST)

Exactly how it is spelled ;) H-yoo-w (light on the w) Pow'-ull. Well, almost exactly. Like if Hugh Grant married Colin Powell and adopted his the last name. human 10:33, 16 February 2008 (EST)

sVT amsalP

?tnaw uoy od ynam woH !melborp oN Gnusmas 11:07, 16 February 2008 (EST)

I think there are about 40-50 of us, scattered over the globe. Not sure how many need to be 115 or 230 volt, so we might need to build a list. human 11:10, 16 February 2008 (EST)

Danke

For the welcome to the Dollhouse. Would you like to join the Special People's Club? --e|m|c ^[TALK] 16:16, 16 February 2008 (EST)

Thanks for the invite. Um, what does it entail? human 16:18, 16 February 2008 (EST)

You get to ride the "special" bus with the other "special" people. : ) -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 16:19, 16 February 2008 (EST)

Oooohhh! human 16:31, 16 February 2008 (EST)

Yes. RA knows quite well. *pets* --e|m|c ^[TALK] 16:32, 16 February 2008 (EST)

EL? Rubbish acronyms! --e|m|c ^[TALK] 17:25, 16 February 2008 (EST)

I couldn't afford the vowels at the time, sorry. So I adapted. human 17:29, 16 February 2008 (EST)

EL? -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 18:23, 16 February 2008 (EST)

External link... human 18:26, 16 February 2008 (EST)

Oh. I see "El" and I think God. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 18:30, 16 February 2008 (EST)

Yah, wehll... human 18:33, 16 February 2008 (EST)

Still cold?

For you (if it works: its a mobile address) Susan^Miouw 15:57, 17 February 2008 (EST)

Above freezing now, supposed to rain tonight. That lake is nice - I live about 3.5 miles from a roundabout where all the local shops are, and that lake (pond) is right on the road. Driving north while the moon is rising over mist can be really purdy. It's called Wheelwright's Pond, by the way. Named for the guy who founded Exeter (NH, not UK). human 16:03, 17 February 2008 (EST)

Block?!?

What? I was already blocked. Are you challenging PalMD's judgment? Shame on you! Bohdan2 20:56, 21 February 2008 (EST)

The image was uploaded by someone else. It was either the geek, or GodlessLiberal. Bohdan2 20:58, 21 February 2008 (EST)

Somehow, I doubt your sincerity. Please return as a higher prime number. human 21:03, 21 February 2008 (EST)

No, I did not upload that image. It was the same guy who did yesterday. Bohdan2 21:04, 21 February 2008 (EST)

And your point is? human 21:05, 21 February 2008 (EST)

The point is that I deserve an award for being clever. I was going to pwn the main page with the old GodlessLiberal picture, which I have used previously and was a smashing success but is now old. Then I saw this picture of a geek, so I used it instead. Thats called "innovation". Bohdan2 21:09, 21 February 2008 (EST)

Sadly, it's also called "so last October". human 21:20, 21 February 2008 (EST)

Ouch. Bohdan2 21:21, 21 February 2008 (EST)

It stings, I know. We also have the same problem: How to keep being funny and not just stupid. human 21:22, 21 February 2008 (EST)

Did you just refer to yourself in the third person? Because that would be pretty funny.DoggedamesP 21:23, 21 February 2008 (EST)

I thought it was the seventh person. human 21:32, 21 February 2008 (EST)

It's going to be nigh impossible to keep Bohdan away, Human, so long as he's interested. --מְתֻרְגְּמָן ^{שְׁלֹום}

I have no interest in keeping Bohdan, Bohdan17, or any others of his or my puppets away! I just don't see the need for a "Bohdan2". Or do I? human 22:00, 21 February 2008 (EST)

I control this wiki. Bohdan2 21:30, 21 February 2008 (EST)

That's TK. --מְתֻרְגְּמָן ^{שְׁלֹום}

ThunderKatz? Well, he does, but does not need to brag of it. I'll thinkz I might need to block me a Bohdanpuppet just for the cheap thrill... human 21:33, 21 February 2008 (EST)

Silly. We all know that wikinterpreter is tk's sock. Bohdan2 21:33, 21 February 2008 (EST)

Yes, there are only three people on the intertubes. Pinto's5150 ^Talk 21:35, 21 February 2008 (EST)

• LMAO, only someone who hated would think something so stupid, eh? --מְתֻרְגְּמָן ^{שְׁלֹום}

And IIIII AM TEH SNDRWW SHHCLAFFLLY! Obey, or fail to be a true conservative! human 21:36, 21 February 2008 (EST)

Pardon me, dear sir, but could I interest you in some shameless self-advertising?

Looky looky! I can write a... dry, boring essay. I'm so proud... -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 13:10, 22 February 2008 (EST)

Stalking

I's stalking you!

Hehe... surely you can get closer than that! human 21:13, 22 February 2008 (EST)

That's what? About 1/2 mile? Susan^Purrrrr 21:24, 22 February 2008 (EST)

More like 1.2 km. human 21:26, 22 February 2008 (EST)

HPV FAQ

Could you set up a side by side template for the HPV faq in the CP namespace, I am not very familiar with said template. Maybe we could answer the FAQ questions with reality based answers? tmtoulouse ^frustrate 12:32, 23 February 2008 (EST)

I'll give it a whack later this afternoon... and I'll pass on the url to you and Doc in case you miss it in RC. human 13:33, 23 February 2008 (EST)

HPV vaccine FAQ rebuttal human 14:41, 23 February 2008 (EST)

Awesome! Thanks! 130.113.218.226 16:59, 23 February 2008 (EST)

My pleasure. I can't wait to see how it turns out. Oh, shoot, I missed the "CP namespace" part. Should I move it, or is it fine where it is? I think even though it's a CP thing, it's not exactly WIGO-trivial, and is so closely related to teh assfly's public persona (lawyer for AAPS, pretend medical expert) it should be in the mainspace, like our autism/vaccine and breast cancer/abortion stuff. human 17:21, 23 February 2008 (EST)

This is too good not to share!

I don't know where to go with this one so I'll give it to you as you seem to be an authority on issues. On the CP page for Senator Carl Levin, it says that he supports the rights of MINERS to get out of state abortions. Can this idiocy be shown somewhere on this site?

http://www.conservapedia.com/Carl_Levin#Social_Issues, "Social Issues" section. ^{— Unsigned, by: Ekulwyo / talk / contribs}

Perhaps. Often things like this just get discussed in Conservapedia talk:What is going on at CP?. I'll go check it out though. Also, please remember to sign your talk page comments with four tildes, like this: ~~~~. That will put a link to your user page and a time/date stamp after your comment. Thanks! human 16:56, 23 February 2008 (EST)

Wow, rampant illiteracy if nothing else! How many errors are there in:

"Levin supports that expansion of embryonic stem cell research and voted no on a mandatory patently notification for miners who wish to get a out of state abortion. A liberal abortion rights group, NARAL, gave him a 100% rating, proving his stance pro-abortion stance. Liven also opposes the federal marriage amendment"? human 16:58, 23 February 2008 (EST)

This was too good to pass up, so I added it to Conservapedia:What_is_going_on_at_CP?. Thanks, Ekulwyo! human 17:48, 23 February 2008 (EST)