User talk:Human/Archive7

This is an archive page, last updated 14 April 2010. Please do not make edits to this page.

Archives for this talk page:

<0>, <1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>, <6>, <8>, <9>, <10>, <11>, <12>, <13>, <14>, <15>, <16>, <17>, <18>, <19>, <20>, <21>, <22>, <23>, <24>, <25>, <26>, <27>, <28>, <29>, <30>, <31>, <32>, <33>

, (new)(back)

The mysteries of the Wanted Pages get even weirder

First, sorry about the abrupt cut off but until I can afford a real phone...anyway, I have explored the mysteries the fun:37 wanted pages thing way more deeply than most people would dare! And it is a strange thing, it seems that certain pages are "stuck" in wanted pages no matter what. It still reports 3 links even though I removed them all, and new links are not added to the "Wanted pages" query. So as I said, a strange thing points to an even deeper problem. I will keep exploring I guess unless someone else has a bright idea. tmtoulouse ^heckle 19:30, 22 August 2007 (CDT)

FYI

You at one point wanted a way to see what pages you created. With dynamic pages installed its fairly easy now to get a "real time" update. You can see an example at User:Tmtoulouse/myfault. tmtoulouse ^heckle 00:36, 23 August 2007 (CDT)

I put mine at User:Human/myfault. Kewl! human^{be in} 19:02, 24 August 2007 (CDT)

Here is my thought, with the dynamic page link we can set up a page to display anything "real time." If we ever get around to getting everything categorized into "best of rationalwiki" I can re do the contents page so that it displays our "best of" automatically, so that when a new article gets added to the category it automatically gets placed in the table of contents. Automated is good I think, but what do you think? tmtoulouse ^heckle 15:28, 23 August 2007 (CDT)

Have you thought much about my idea for a dynamic TOC? tmtoulouse ^heckle 16:10, 24 August 2007 (CDT)

Yes, a bit, and now that I see how DPL works, I should have a report ready for you by this evening ;) human^{be in} 16:17, 24 August 2007 (CDT)

Bonus RW XP points if you work in goats. tmtoulouse ^heckle 16:21, 24 August 2007 (CDT)

You guys are machines today! Kudos! Sterile^{blah, blah, blah} 16:38, 24 August 2007 (CDT)

Outrage

I demand that you re-block yourself with an "Appropriate" block time. Locke ^{Always Watching......} 21:56, 26 August 2007 (CDT)

Oh, I fully intend to. I just had some brilliant commentary to save, and being blocked was inconvenient. human^{be in} 21:58, 26 August 2007 (CDT)

Just to say...

For some reason, [this edit] had me laughing out loud. Nice work. ^{— Unsigned, by: PFoster / talk / contribs}

Thanks, but wasn't I just magnifying your joke? I almost removed the "numero uno", and then the fact that it is Spanish hit me and I ran with it. So I got me some chuckles from your edit, too. Glad to provide some of your daily lulz requirement, at least. Thanks! human^{be in} 22:34, 27 August 2007 (CDT)

question

Where is this russian lottery ticket? If you yourself could email it, that would be good. Or I could link you to a good translator web-site. Bohdan 22:35, 27 August 2007 (CDT)

Oh, sorry I didn't keep you up to date on that. I emailed the guy offering your skillz (asked him to email me the scanned images), and I haven't heard back. So maybe he got help elsewhere. The trouble with a trans. site would be that this is an "image", one way or another, not "text" that could be entered. So it would be brutal work for someone not familiar with the works of St. Cyril. If he does send me the images, I'll just post them here for you to take a look at. Thanks for remembering! human^{be in} 22:46, 27 August 2007 (CDT)

I'll be waiting to hear. I found that this site: [1] is very helpful. It translates so many languages, including russian, to and from English. Bohdan 22:52, 27 August 2007 (CDT)

When bestiality meets pedophilia...

ɧєɭıסş^{-get sunburn!} 23:37, 27 August 2007 (CDT)

Amazing!

I asked tmtoulouse little magic 8 ball if you were really a conservative and it said "without a doubt"!!! Bohdan 23:42, 27 August 2007 (CDT)

Funny.... same with you and liberal.... Locke ^{Always Watching......} 00:06, 28 August 2007 (CDT)

Orphaned pages

Interesting problem with the "Divine Retribution" page. It opens ok. However I put a link to it on the "Gods Love" page and the link comes up red, and suggests that the page does not yet exist. If I try to edit the D R page it comes up blank and says this is a new page??? Hints?--Remarcsd 18:52, 28 August 2007 (CDT)

It was recently moved, and the resulting redirect was deleted. I changed the link on "God's Love" to the new location. It's possible that, when you first opened DR, you got a cached version or accessed it just before the move+delete. --Sid 18:55, 28 August 2007 (CDT)

Great work on the orphans, Remarcsd. I sometimes look at that list and it just makes my head hurt, but you've been managing to shoehorn decent links in all over the place. One thing to keep in mind - sometimes an orphan doesn't really belong here. If you do run into any that are pointless, better to leave a note on their talk page nicely asking "why is this on the site, should we delete it (or move it to ACD?". Again, though, you've been doing some serious housekeeping grunt work! human^{be in} 19:20, 28 August 2007 (CDT)

Orphans list is basically finished. Only three left at time of writing, and two I suggest be deleted, not sure what to do with UNTITLED. Apologies for my attempt at humour(tm) wrt Anne Coulter. I have found another home for the article in question.--Remarcsd 00:18, 30 August 2007 (CDT)

UNTITLED needs to remain there untouched, its part of the back bone for several extensions we have on the site. An annoying but necessary evil for the time. tmtoulouse ^heckle 00:20, 30 August 2007 (CDT)

Alien

Yo how do I change my signature? ^{— Unsigned, by: Alien / talk / contribs}

See RationalWiki:Help (thank you User:SusanG!!!) Also, please put talk page comments at the bottom - the "+" tab up top is the best way to make a new one. And, welcome, uh, to Earth? Hope you like our corn and, er, atomic BOMZ!!!! Oh, shoot, I think I pissed off the alien.... human^{be in} 23:14, 28 August 2007 (CDT)

Oh, and until you make it cool, and after, please use four tildes (~~~~) any time you join in on a talk page, k? It makes an automatic sig/time/date stamp that helps everybody keep track of hoo iz hoo. human^{be in} 23:17, 28 August 2007 (CDT)

Copy edits?

I think my methodological naturalism article might make a good entry into best of RW science bringing 3 articles into that, but it needs copy editing, you up for it? tmtoulouse ^heckle 20:22, 29 August 2007 (CDT)

P.S. what are you some other amusement articles I might have missed that might qualify? tmtoulouse ^heckle 20:23, 29 August 2007 (CDT)

I'll take a crack at it. Well, I asked for ACD to be linked as if it were a cat. Recipe: is another good one - the whole namespace, basically. Should we have a "Best of amusement" cat so it can be used on our funny stuff? Can it be done in a way that hacks off the ACD or Recipe prefix when they turn up on the main page? human^{be in} 20:27, 29 August 2007 (CDT)

Amusement now links to ACD article namespace, there is a "best of amusement" category and yes the namespace is whacked off when its displayed on the main page. tmtoulouse ^heckle 20:28, 29 August 2007 (CDT)

OK, awesome. Since we have the cat, let's link to it as the "portal", since anything anywhere can be included by having it judged "BOA". Right? Maybe we should have a noticeboard mention of all this best of stuff, and even start a gold rush by those interested in rating our lulzy pieces. Sweeeet, this new TOC was a really good idea! human^{be in} 20:31, 29 August 2007 (CDT)

Copyeditng done, I think I did ok. Yo, check it out, bitch. I also chucked another pi dollars our way, to mess with your thermometer graphic thingie! human^{be in} 02:33, 30 August 2007 (CDT)

thanks

I have been waiting all day for that. Bohdan

Sorry about that, I really have to remember to undo my splendid long blocks sooner. How come you didn't email someone or use one of your zombie clones to get unblocked? human^{be in} 18:10, 30 August 2007 (CDT)

Well, its possible I logged on the moment you unblocked me and was just being sarcastic, but thats so unlike me. Bohdan

seriously

What kind of sick-minded person removes another users asterisks? Bohdan67

The same kind of person that would remove a malignant tumor. tmtoulouse ^heckle 01:31, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

Or cleanse your colons with a dirty rope. Bohdan3 01:32, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

Seriously 2

The whole signature-zombie thing is yesterday's news. Bohdan37

Well, you know, a boy has to have a hobby. And your sigs are mine. For the time being. And maybe a few more days. Then I'll get bored and stop. I know I am only entertaining myself, anyway. maybe I just like prime numbers? Bohdan71

Global flood

By the way, I think your words of wit and wisdom are awaited at the bottom ofTalk:Global flood. :-)--Bob_M (talk) 14:12, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

i bin dun tiped a bunch of stuph there. dunno 'bout no wid or witsom tho. tanks 4 the heds up! human^{be in} 16:22, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

DFTT? S^G 19:19, 7 September 2007 (CDT)

Someone has a real computer!!! Are you home with power and broadband at last? Or just at a public machine? Anyway, I have no idea what DFTT means... If I archive before you reply I'll copy this to your talk page. human^{be in} 19:45, 7 September 2007 (CDT)

What billy goats don't want to do! S^G 20:01, 7 September 2007 (CDT)

Uh, Do Fucking Trash Talk?>??///>/././//??;/"/"/???? human^{be in} 21:15, 7 September 2007 (CDT)

Got it, thank to your dyslexicon entry! You could have linked to it... Yeah, he/it probably is, but we let people have a long, very long leash here. Engage the troll, talk to the vandal, they get bored and go away. I know, your style is Kil the vandal, Cill the troll! It's ok, it takes many wiewpoints to make a mobocracy work. human^{be in} 21:19, 7 September 2007 (CDT)

Yes, I'm afraid my deep seated tolerance for absolute raving lunacy shines out in everything I write. S^G 07:02, 8 September 2007 (CDT)

I was under the impression that it took torches and pitchforks. Locke ^{Always Watching......} 21:23, 7 September 2007 (CDT)

Don't forget scorching and salting the earth. Hey, we have a new whipping boi, if you haven't noticed. A "one article focus" wonder. As Susan said (oh shit, I just did) DNFTT, wait, D't FTT. Shit, DFTT. That was hard. human^{be in} 21:31, 7 September 2007 (CDT)

Warming

Cool... human^{be in} 16:27, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

Warning

You have been making many edits to various articles that a least one other RationalWiki user is unhappy with.

It may or may not be felt that your edits constitute unfunny vandalism.

Please stop.

Please do not make further edits to article pages until the matter has been resolved. You can discuss this here on your talk page.

If you persist in making similar edits to article pages or edits that are felt to be perverted, you may be blocked under the willful gaze of Bohdan the Prime Zombie Clone.

Duly noted and ignored, darling. human^{be in} 16:29, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

PNAO

Hey, human, I want to write an intro for this article, and I noticed you had commented on the talk page. How much do you know about the article? It wasn't created by Andy, but apparently originated at this site, and was added to CP later. I know Andy later defended it, saying it was a joke and a parody, but I'm convinced that was just his way of trying to turn an embarrassing article that had remained unnoticed or months into a joke on liberals. His only claim that it was a joke on liberalism seems to be the reference to it being endangered, which hardly makes much sense. Do you have any more information? Thanks. DickTurpis 16:44, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

Well, I only "know" a few things, and can't prove most of them since I don't have a way to look at the records of deleted articles at CP. 1. It was up there a long time. 2. I am almost certain it was posted in one edit, and not by Andy. 3. It was a laughingstock in the "real world". 4. Andy claimed it was parody of dem libruls. 5. No one really believed him, since it wasn't very good. Or, put differently, it was way better than any other parody CP has ever attempted. 6. It has been deleted, probably as "non-encyclopedic". If you could get a friendly CP sysop (maybe Hoji or Bohdan?) to help, they can view the article's history and maybe get you some clear data points. That link you provided certainly seems like it could be a progenitor (and should be added to the PNAO article if it's not there). Also, some 'net research ought to make it easy to put dates on events "outside" CP. The wayback machine would be good, too - ie, if that site existed before CP was started, then it was not written by CP as a "psrodt". Oh yeah, just checked that, it dates to at least 12/10/2003. It ought to be easy to google, I'd almost expect to find someone somewhere gloating that they pwned CP with it. Hope this helps. human^{be in} 19:35, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

HAHAHA!!!

Your little plan backfired! Now have you learned your lesson about faking signatures? Bohdan

"Human", you are so pwned... Bohdan17 22:43, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

He has no idea what he is in for. Oh, the pain! Bohdan37 22:55, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

I'm not sure we should mess with this "Human" thing. He seems to weild awesome powers? Bohdan73 22:57, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

Who are you freaks, and why are you obsessed with me? human^{be in} 23:28, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

Your the only person who has ever used the word "powerz". STOP MAKING SOCKS OF ME! Haven't I made enough honest socks already? Bohdan3 23:29, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

Damn clones are creepy.... Bohdan53 23:31, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

Sorry

It's out of my system now.--Offeep 23:24, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

So you would like to promoted back to normal editor? Thy wish is my command, and I hope you enjoyed the peek into "extra button world" human^{be in} 23:26, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

No, no, sysop is good. As my granny said, "You can't abuse power you don't have."--Offeep 23:27, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

Then again you're the boss.

No, if you think you can handle the awesome powerz, I'm cool with it. I'll go fix that. Again. PS, is your granny single? human^{be in} 23:29, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

Demotions

I really think that normal users should not randomly be demoted to adminship. If an sysop knows what he/she is doing immense disruption can be effected in even a few minutes. The random demotion might also seem to spite users who go through the normal channels to procure sysop.(RationalWiki:Requests for Sysop) - Icewedge 23:43, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

Ha! Who listens to those?--Offeep 23:46, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

I absolutely agree (with what, I'm not sure). PS, have you noticed that although you are scrupulously accurate as a coder, you are functionally illiterate in the defunct programming language known as "English"? Just sayin', is all. human^{be in} 23:48, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

Human, could you please not alter my comments. As to my grammar; I admit that I suck every imaginable variety of balls at such things. - Icewedge 00:00, 1 September 2007 (CDT)

Sorry, I read it without the "not" so I wandalized it so. As far as your grammar/spelling, I still find it hilarious that you such an 4337 haxor, which requires complete attention to syntax and such, and yet you play fast and loose with the old-fashioned "typed words". C'est la vie, I suppose. PS, are you bothered that, at least for now, M. Offeep has the extreme powerz? human^{be in} 00:31, 1 September 2007 (CDT)

I haven't seen the background to this demotion, but I find it a bit surprising as well.--Bob_M (talk) 04:39, 1 September 2007 (CDT)

I can't justify it (hell, I can hardly remember it), so I will undo the demotion if the mob requests, or, of course, if Offeep abuses or doesn't use the janitorial powerz. human^{be in} 15:54, 1 September 2007 (CDT)

Boring?

I don't get it. Where is the usual late night crowd? Bohdan 02:18, 1 September 2007 (CDT)

I don't know, I'm here, and ready to wandalize!!!! Bohdan37 02:26, 1 September 2007 (CDT)

Oh shit, there's more than one of you? Horrors!!! human^{be in} 02:27, 1 September 2007 (CDT)

Where's the pinto bean? Tmtoulouse? That other guy? O wait, there was no other guy. Bohdan

I dunno, maybe he got rearended --- Bang!!!! Oops. Or, maybe he just got busy? Lucky him, or it... human^{be in} 03:21, 1 September 2007 (CDT)

Aww

I was just having some fun. Would you at least block wikinterpreter from me? Bohdan

At the expense of a few innocents, yes. For how long? I'm thinking pi seconds? human^{be in} 23:56, 1 September 2007 (CDT)

have you learned your lesson yet about making me a sysop?

And by the way, I have a new RW goal. It used to be to vandalize, but now I want to overthrow you and tmtoulouse. Or at least get you two to block each other. Bohdan 01:27, 2 September 2007 (CDT)

Yeah, it must suck on CP where you iz one!!! As far as me & Timmy too Loose, eh, didn't he block me last night for an hour or so? And didn't I, in the meantime, come up with a new plan, that made you call me a "genius"? Hmm, whaddaya got next? I'd re-sysop you, but your pwnage at that level is cheap. As a user, I try not to "fight" you with any other than "user" powerzzzz. Otherwize, it wouldn't be fair, eh? human^{be in} 01:35, 2 September 2007 (CDT)

Wow, its like you answered in a different language. Bohdan 15:36, 2 September 2007 (CDT)

re:welcome

Its me, idiot! 论坛群发软件论坛

You're still welcome! human^{be in} 20:21, 2 September 2007 (CDT)

Hoo dat?( וִיקִי etc.) Susan Jayne Garlick^talk 20:24, 2 September 2007 (CDT)

just one of my growing number of sockpuppets. Bohdan

Oh - a worm beneath my feet. Susan Jayne Garlick^talk 20:31, 2 September 2007 (CDT)

Thank goodness you are here Human. I was getting very bored waiting for a user to vandalize/troll. Bohdan

Hehe, let's get him blocked!!! What's the plan, oh Clone Master? Bohdan17 00:24, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

First thing first #17. You need to tell me what your log-in password is. Bohdan 00:26, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

It is similar to mine, Clone Master. Bohdan37 00:28, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

I'll need yours also. Bohdan 00:28, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

Hello Master, reporting for duty! How shall we pwn this pathetic, rude, abusive "human" thing? Bohdan73 00:32, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

Why don't you all go pwn tmtoulouse, and then blame it on Human. Bohdan

Where are #2 and #3? We need full force if we are to destroy the fascists! And, can we plan our activities somewhere less smelly than this fascist talk page? Bohdan73 00:36, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

Yes, #3 is especially devious. And, please, let us make haste in our departure from this disgusting meeting place! Bohdan17 00:40, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

Don't we have seekrit meeting place where this awful troll can't follow us? Where is it, Oh Master? Bohdan37 00:42, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

Rude Bastard

[2]

Have a bit of respect, please. This ain't Conservapedia. The Anti-Conservapedia 10:25, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

Gee, tit for tat a bit there with the header? At least I didn't delete it, I decided to turn it into English instead, and respect your desire to add to the site. human^{be in} 19:15, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

The defence of the damned The Anti-Conservapedia 05:41, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

sock puppets

We need to talk about these sock puppets. I will stop making socks if you delete all of your socks of me and my own socks. Bohdan 15:32, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

Why, what's the matter with them? They only work upon your orders (although, like any good soldiers, have been instructed not to obey illegal orders). Granted, to reach them, you have to get me to go wake them up, as, like cats, they sleep about 22 hours a day, and rarely log in of their own volition to see if you have work for them. I'm surprised you haven't cracked their passwords yet, they are intentionally easy to remember. Keep in mind that I am not the only Bohdanpuppetmaster, also. human^{be in} 19:18, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

Who else has one? Bohdan

I don't know, all I know is that the one with the funny "a" and #666 aren't mine. The three I nurture all came on line in rapid succession, and I think were all blocked at one point by you, B2, or some "human2" character. human^{be in} 20:07, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

Block them all. They are disruptive. There should be rules against this. This is getting out of hand. I demand there be only one Bohdan, and one block avoiding Bohdan. Obey my wishes! Bohdan

I support this demand, because this whole situation is getting moderately confusing. --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 03:41, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

"Confuse-a-Cat", brought to you by RW, only one of many services we provide for teh bored web-surfer! human^{be in} 17:19, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

I concur with master! Into the abyss with all of us! Bohdan103 05:45, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

I await you in the Abyss. You will be mine at last.-- Bohdan666 ^PrayToMe 11:35, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

dickhole

How dare you edit my contributions to this site? That's deceit and is evidence of your liberal bias. --Huey gunna getcha 14:04, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

You mean for using naughty words on Bohdan's talk page? He would have if I hadn't... he not like naughty words. human^{be in} 15:34, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

Here's the thing

Half those metaphors (and there are 8 now) were added by RWers. Been trying to keep it on the DL, so they don't get reverted. But I think that cat's out of the bag (to add another). DickTurpis 17:10, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

That's why we permalink (and why didn't you answer on the WIGO talk page? Or did you do so there, too?). I realize the concern of "protecting" silly stuff anti-CPers added over there, but that's the risk the silly stuff takes. Us noticing it makes it look more, not less, legit. Of course, you kind of outed it above, didn't you? So it should be copied and linked at a "CP parody" file, methinks - especially if it lasted/;asts a while! human^{be in} 17:17, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

It doesn't matter much to me; I was just against it going on "What's going on" or "Best of" because I thought there was a general policy of not putting stuff we added ourselves (otherwise we could add all sorts of crazy stuff: "Look CP says Ann Coulter is the sexiest woman alive!" which sort of defeats the purpose). Protecting it isn't such a big deal, though I'm glad it has lasted for a little while now. I'm happy just to see what happens. DickTurpis 17:26, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

Gotcha, good point. As long as someone cares enough to copy it (and it's history of creation diffs?) to a CP parodies page here eventually. Too priceless to lose in the mists of time... human^{be in} 20:32, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

Policy

Why not adopt wikipedia policy. If a user chooses a name to similar to another users, he should be blocked and asked to choose another [3]. Bohdan

Because we don't use all WP policy, just what seems to fly on here. Considering that you were the first person to create a "usernameX" sock, and no one complained... RW common law is already running against it. Especially considering I have not complained about "human2", which reinforces that others can make "usernameX" besides "username". Now, if you were to propose a policy that special character usernames intended to look exactly like an existing username should be illegal, you might make a case. Either way, you're going to have to go to RW:proposed guidelines, carefully formulate your suggestion and why we need it (including some evidence of disruption or probelms we couldn't handle any other way), and see who chimes in. human^{be in} 17:15, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

Why? This has obviously disrupted me from my productive contributions to this site. I demand that the user with the name that has the special letter "a" be blocked. Creating a userX account can only be done by the user himself when he is trying to avoid a block or the influence a particular vote. UserX accounts should not be allowed either. I offer to delete my human2 account if you delete yours. And my tmtoulouse account. Bohdan 17:18, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

"This has obviously disrupted me from my productive contributions to this site." - I don't know about that, but it sure as hell has disrupted your contributive productions over at that Concyclopedia site that aims to replace Wikipedia. Sounds like a win-win to me! Godspeed!!! human^{be in} 19:33, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

socks

All of the socks are now listed as "enemies". Bohdan 20:23, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

"21:20, 4 September 2007 Bohdan (Talk | contribs) blocked "Nadhob113 (contribs)" with an expiry time of infinite (not my friend)" Aw, come on, I thought I was! I wasn't going to do anything bad to CP - and Andrew Schlafly Himself welcomed me!!! How dare you ban a user Mr. Schlafly welcomed into His hive? human^{be in} 20:29, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

Socks are all enemies. That was you? I thought you had no socks. sounds like liberal deceit Bohdan

I didn't even have time to change my userbox, and it's true again now. Actually, it stayed true, because although I created a login at CP, I didn't do any puppeting with it. Just said "hi" to you and asked what you wanted me to work on. Oh, and thanked Andy for welcoming me. So are all socks your enemies, or just all socks anyone else creates? human^{be in} 20:40, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

All socks of me. Even if I ceated them. Bohdan 20:49, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

friends

With friends like these, who needs ....(the old ones are the good ones) Susan Jayne Garlick^talk 00:43, 5 September 2007 (CDT)

Who was that IP who forged my name on tmt's page, any idea? (75.126.146.18) Susan Jayne Garlick^talk 00:50, 5 September 2007 (CDT)

I dunno, it could be any of 2³² people I know. Not me, though. Or Doc, I think he's 162.something. human^{be in} 02:37, 5 September 2007 (CDT)

Oh yes, like the bureaucrat does not know! Look here: [4] Seems to be the work of Wikinterpreter...sounds like liberal deceit Bohdan

Actually, my IP is 82.44.64.173. The 75.xx.xx.xxx IP was me testing out whether a proxy would provide full anonymity. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי ^{שְׁלֹום!}

Since you're apparently on right now....

....could you shut down this Ghawar goofball? He's being a trifle repetitive. ---Gulik 00:58, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

I'm on it, thanks for the tip. Hmm, looks like it needs more than the cursory two hours I gave it to cool off.human^{be in} 01:04, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

He's at it again, this time via his IP address. --Gulik 01:16, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

Did you repair everything before, say, Chuck Norris? Around there I started to run into reversions so I stopped loading the files. Hmm, think I'll search the site for those brilliant lines... human^{be in} 01:21, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

At least he gave us a great word to search for. Sorry I didn't hammer the IP as well. Nice work on cleanup, you and EVDebs!! human^{be in} 01:21, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

He's ba-ack....: 209.62.62.138 --Gulik 01:22, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

I guess I'd better sit here and block every proxy he plays with at recent changes until he gets bored... Can you guys stay on the rollback squad? human^{be in} 01:23, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

I need to get to sleep pretty soon. :-P But I can stay up a bit longer, I suppose. Think it's TK, driven insaner than usual, or just some random dimbulb? --Gulik 01:24, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

I suspect it's just a random dimwit who likes messing on wikis. Anyway, I can reload the recents for a bit and keep the carnage to a minimum anyway. Thanks, but really, don't stay up just for this. human^{be in} 01:27, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

Can we just lock out anon IPs and registration temporarily? EVDebs 01:29, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

Don't know if I know how to lock out he IPs, but I can try. And regging, so they come in that way? Wow, that's rough. Let's see if he tries to get back in, but I appreciate your frustration. human^{be in} 01:31, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

Well, cleaning up this mess is going to be like showering off after towelless sex on the beach -- messes are going to keep popping up for a while. And the reg thing is more precautionary. EVDebs 01:34, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

Sent you pmail, or sending, anyway... human^{be in} 01:35, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

Ugh. This dumbass -- wonder if he was the same one messing around with the color floods yesterday? EVDebs 01:53, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

Stuff that has nothing to do with Human, feel free to enjoy

I dunno... off to look for more Bible slash fanfic, I guess. I hear someone's got some great Apocrypha Judas Maccabeus/Ezra the priest manga they've been working on. EVDebs 01:53, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

Rule 34! The goggles! They do nothing! -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי ^{שְׁלֹום!}

Well, I got a Song of Songs and a pair of sisters in Ezekiel 23 says that the Bible is its own Rule 34 anyway. (Is there a Christian teenage boy in the world who didn't spend some quality time with Oholah and Oholibamah? Betcha there isn't. Unless they were doing the D/J shuffle in 1 and 2 Samuel...) EVDebs 19:02, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

Essay: Conservative Intellectualism

Thanks for your efforts with that "prose." I was going to try to pull it over here, but I was pleasantly surprised to find it already here! I have to admit that I'm a little concerned that people seeing it will think it's serious--that we have the same regard for smart conservative people that Andy has for smart liberal people. I think it might be useful to closely associate it and any offshoots with Andy's original essay to prevent that.--Bayes^update 21:48, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

No problem, I'm as good at ctrl-a, ctrl-c, and ctrl-v as any homskollar at CP! I'm sure with time you could have done better (not that it's bad, of course), but I was intoxicated by the fact that it lived on CP for a while. Heck, when I notice we have a "conservative this or that" article on RW, the first thing I do is make a liberal version for balance. And I'm a member of RobSsCommiez! Well, not kard-karrying, but I know he suspects me! (Because, um, I cast a shadow...)

Anyway, I think the way I presented your work here makes it clear it isn't RW's full rebuttal - that it was the work of a CP editor on CP. And, that it got burned to the ground by TK. human^{be in} 21:57, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

PS, Essay:Liberal Intellectualism Parody is what we're talking about. human^{be in} 21:59, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

Kool, thanks again! How do I sign up for the RobSsCommiez newsletter?--Bayes^update 23:45, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

Just post anything suggesting that Corporate Capitalism isn't the Fifth Gospel of Jesus, and he'll sign you up. --Gulik 00:04, 7 September 2007 (CDT)

Capitalism is a decadent system that enslaves the working class poor of 4/5 of the world's population!--Bayes^update 00:18, 7 September 2007 (CDT)<--Sits back and waits breathlessly for the first issue

That oughtta do it... oh, and shouldn't Hoji's sandbox be moved to the CP: space now? Or does he want to play more in private for a bit? human^{be in} 01:04, 7 September 2007 (CDT)