George Orwell

Not watching you.

Keep calm and carry on?

How an Empire ends U.K. Politics

God Save the King?

Islamic Party of Britain British National Party Respect Party White Commonwealth Section 28 Diane Abbott Ian Paisley Douglas Carswell Theresa May 1984-85 miners' strike British Freedom Party 1997 United Kingdom general election 2005 United Kingdom general election v - t - e

“”Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic Socialism, as I understand it.

—"Why I Write" (1946)

Eric Arthur Blair, better known by the pseudonym George Orwell, (1903–1950) was a British journalist, political campaigner and author who is best remembered now for his two anti-authoritarian works — Animal Farm (1945) and Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949), helped along by the fact that these have become mainstays for school reading lists in the Anglosphere. Thus, lines like 'Big Brother is watching you' from 1984 and 'Some animals are more equal than others' from Animal Farm have entered the English lexicon. As such, Orwell has become one of those figures, like Adam Smith and Ronald Reagan, whom people invoke when they want to win an argument without any effort.

He is also remembered as an essayist on politics, sociology, and literature. His 'I tell it as I see it' journalism/memoir style is most obvious in Down and Out in Paris and London (1933) and made him one of the grandfathers of both pop-culture sociology and 'Gonzo Journalism' — influencing people such as Louis Theroux and Hunter S. Thompson.

Politics

It might be that this 'small reference pool' which leads some conservatives to try to claim Orwell as 'one of their own'; but this simply ignores all the other 'Orwells' — the anti-imperialist, the anti-poverty agitator, the POUM militiaman fighting against fascist General Franco in the Spanish Civil War, the member of the Independent Labour Party, editor at the left-wing Tribune magazine or the trenchant critic of capitalism. The truth is simple enough; that while Orwell never toed any 'party line' he was consciously an advocate of democratic socialism by 1936 and was generally supportive of the Attlee Labour Government after the Second World War. And as Orwell was a person who wrote many articles and essays on political subjects, he said these things outright.

Some cleverer advocates side-step this by stating that Orwell was a social conservative and conventionally 'bohemian'; that like his character 'Ravelston' in Keep The Aspidistra Flying (1936), Orwell might show his disdain for 'convention' by turning up to parties and events in shabby tweed and minus a hat, but he was merely showing his disdain in a conventional manner — a modern parallel could be of an male office worker deliberately snubbing the traditional 'suit/tie/brogues' uniform and doing 'chinos/turtleneck/loafers' instead. In that he was 'conservative where it counted'; he was conventionally married, held traditional views on women's roles, desired children etc. Others go even further; calling him a 'Tory by temperament', based on the shaky argument (that Orwell himself noted) that it's assumed that any person who has an appreciation for tradition, a fondness for 'the past' and rural pursuits, a sense of aesthetic taste, finding value in 'cultural Christianity' or being patriotic would be instantly at odds with being a supporter of socialism. After all, what other situations would one find a British Conservative Prime Minister referencing Orwell in a speech?

More convincingly, Orwell's works are littered with examples of dislike or even outright hostility to then-fashionable causes with the progressive left; latter chapters of The Road To Wigan Pier (1937) has him complaining about the 'crank magnetism' in left-wing parties — and his list is both large and now somewhat dated, including (but not limited to) vegetarians, teetotalers, feminists, yoga practitioners, sex-positivity advocates, proponents of alternative medicine and similar. It doesn't take the most active imagination to visualise an Orwell today sneering against 'transgender fanatics', 'militant vegans' or 'creeping Jesus social justice campaigners' — right up to the point that one recalls that he was a staunch anti-imperialist and a 'fair in his day' anti-racist; two of the most proto-woke causes of his era. Which is perhaps the most important thing to remember; Orwell was a man born and raised in an England before and during the First World War; a land where women's suffrage has not yet been won, eugenics and scientific racism was mainstream, colonialism was held to be a beneficial setup for the 'natives', rigid social class was believed to be 'natural' and a strong sexual prudishness was 'Christian'. An inhabitant forged in that most alien of lands — the past.

Works

In a creative lifespan of eighteen years (1931-1949), Orwell produced six novels, three non-fiction books, at least fifty 'standalone' essays, over a hundred pieces of 'serious' journalism (such as his London Letters and As I Please, several hundred shorter pieces (such as book reviews), and an unknown number of radio scripts for the BBC Eastern Service during the Second World War. Works missional to RationalWiki are described below.

Down and Out in Paris and London (1933)

“”It is curious how people take it for granted that they have a right to preach at you and pray over you as soon as your income falls below a certain level.

—Down and Out in Paris and London

Orwell's first major work focused on poverty; as experienced in the two named cities — at this point the capitals of the third-largest and largest empires in the world. A mix of memoir, anecdote, travelogue, psycho-sociological musings and exposé; covering both the 'Down' (the lives of the wage-slave on the margins of society) and 'Out' (the existences of the truly destitute, such as the homeless). While generally believed to be a true account, there is debate to how accurate the account is, from the ordering of the events to the existence of the characters. Orwell himself admitted later in The Road to Wigan Pier that 'nearly all the incidents described there actually happened, though they have been re-arranged' and in the French introduction that the individual characters within were 'intended more as representative types' — leading to the inference that they did not in fact exist as persons, or at least were composite characters.

The Road to Wigan Pier (1937)

Front cover of a later edition of the book

“”It is only when you meet someone of a different culture from yourself that you begin to realise what your own beliefs really are.

—The Road to Wigan Pier

Orwell reprises his role as an chronicler of poverty at the behest of his publisher; this time of the working-class in the North of England (at this point suffering from severe unemployment due to the Great Depression). This time, he was more systematic; the first part of this book is a fairly straight sociological study (mainly based on participant observation and in-depth interviews) with the occasional bit of secondary evidence thrown in (such as newspaper reports) while the second part is more akin to a series of tangentially-connected essays (including but not limited to) 'supplementary material' for Down and Out, autobiographical sketches, the mismatch between 'societal value' and 'pay/conditions' for many key workers, the obsession of the Communists worshipping the Soviet Union and left-wing movements having a tendency to contain too many middle-class 'cranks' and to be obsessed with technocratic solutions and dialectical materialism in particular. The numbers of 'pissed off' people included the very instigator of the work, who ended up shoving in a 'dissociation' forward which he questioned the second part and later on, re-printed Wigan minus it entirely.

The Lion and the Unicorn: Socialism and the English Genius (1941)

“”England is the most class-ridden country under the sun. It is a land of snobbery and privilege, ruled by largely the old and silly.

—The Lion and the Unicorn

Standing at 23,000 words, it is either the longest essay Orwell wrote, a series of three related essays or a short work of nonfiction which continues some of the themes he earlier touched on in Wigan as well his thoughts on the ongoing Second World War. Amongst other things, it is the clearest 'Orwell Manifesto' he produced (a kind of 'democratic socialism with British characteristics'), along with a indictment of both British ruling class and people for not spotting the threat of fascism until it was very nearly too late and that the whole British Empire had stagnated for a decade due to political inertia, complacency and incompetence.

Perhaps backing up his main claim that 'England will always be England' is his bio-socio-psychological sketch of 'the English' themselves; tendencies which can be spotted in the modern English themselves during events such as the whole Brexit fiasco, which makes it more of simple historical interest (it was from this work that John Major quoted from in 1993).

Notes on Nationalism (1945)

See the main article on this topic: Nationalism

“”All nationalists have the power of not seeing resemblances between similar sets of facts… Actions are held to be good or bad, not on their own merits, but according to who does them.

—Notes on Nationalism

At the other end of this brutal war, and with the horrors of The Holocaust now visible to all Orwell returns to the topic of patriotism - or more correctly, the unthinking, patently partisan variant (which he terms 'nationalism') which ignores scientific facts, logical arguments or simple common sense to produce a warped vision of reality. In a world of fake news, identity politics and 'feels over facts', this is more relevant than ever - even more so than you'd think, as Orwell also talks about 'transferred nationalism' which fits perfectly groups like the Religious Right and MAGA. These tendencies were put more succinctly by professional 'gob on a stick' James O'Brian as 'the footballification of politics', in which the only thing which matters is 'winning' or 'losing', which explains the more stupid end of the 'owning the libs!' mentality which involves the torching of stuff which hurts target, perpetrator and bystanders indiscriminately.

Animal Farm (1945)

See the main article on this topic: Animal Farm

All pigs are Stalinist, but some pigs are more Stalinist than others...

“”The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.

—Animal Farm

Having experienced both informal censorship and a general disinclination of the wider public to read outright political tracts with his Homage To Catalonia (on the Spanish Civil War) a decade previous, Orwell decided to 'spill the beans' on the history of the Russian Revolution and the rise of Joseph Stalin by using the 'beast tale' format (used by Aesop's fables) and writing it as a satire to effectively smuggle in political debates under the nose of the readers (used by Gulliver's Travels). Half a million English-language copies printed in four years, enough white fivers to allow Orwell to retire from 'hack work' and making him a household name rather proved his experiment was a success.

Politics and the English Language (1946)

“”The great enemy of clear language is insincerity. When there is a gap between one's real and one's declared aims, one turns as it were instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish spurting out ink.

—Politics and the English Language

Perhaps the most preachy of Orwell's essays; in which he criticised (then) current political writing for their 'pretentious' use of jargon and foreign terms to infer greater weight, a lazy resorting to clichés and stale metaphors to slap together content quickly, the addition of 'meaningless words' to bamboozle the reader and lastly, the habitual hiding behind euphemisms to avoid being truthful. He also notes that this has spread into other realms of human life; for example he states that 'in literary criticism it is normal to come across long passages which are almost completely lacking in meaning'. In this current world, anyone who has experience of government, academia or business knows that these flaws are more prevalent than ever – from turgid academics to buzzword laden business leaders, via the dogwhistling politician or unintelligible encyclopedia entry.

His theory as to the why such things have arisen are threefold; that while some people have deliberately used this style in an attempt to deceive the audience (or at least allow them some 'plausible deniability' by for example, claiming to have taken the code at face value) others have adopted this style because they believe (or have been taught) that this is the 'correct' manner to communicate – for example, in academia. His last option is the most simple; that a lot of it is mere filler, used to disguise the fact they have nothing to say at all (or worse, they are unaware of the fact they have nothing to say).

Part of his remedy – his 'Six Rules' for writing – are still cited today to help the production of clear, concise writing, which is something much more vital in a world of social media.

Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949)

The future…

See the main article on this topic: Nineteen Eighty-Four

“”If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever.

—O'Brien, Nineteen Eighty-Four

Nineteen-Eighty Four is a dystopian novel set in the year 1984. It was intended as a satire/cautionary tale of what a future totalitarian state burdened by a unwinnable 'forever war' could look like, though the existence of North Korea shows Orwell was at least correct on the theoretical possibility of such a society arising/sustaining itself.

The main character, 'Winston Smith' is a middle-class, middle-aged Everyman; who dislikes his life even though he lacks either 'points of reference' or an imagination that things could be different, attempting to retain his individuality and spirit against the monolithic 'Party' which demanded everything. One of the most famous novels of the last century and one which assured Orwell of immortality, even though the production of it undoubtedly drove him into an earlier grave (as he delayed getting treatment for his tuberculosis until he had finished it). The coiner of many a line, such as 'Big Brother', 'thoughtcrime' and 'doublespeak' and leading the term 'Orwellian' becoming associated with authoritarianism ways of thought and in particular, totalitarian systems (though Isaac Asimov read it as being about Communism alone, apparently).

Criticism

Despite (or because of) his importance to the left and democratic socialism Orwell has been accused of several things over the decades; assisted by the fact that being dead meant he could neither answer back or (even better) sue anyone for libel. Due to his popularity (and presence on Anglopshere school reading lists), it can also be fairly safely assumed that a lot of the wider public know at least of him, which means he's fair game for the production of evergreen 'filler content' which can kept in reserve for slow news days. Some of these accusations have merit, others don't; some do impinge on the relationship we have with Orwell the writer, others don't.

Anti-Catholicism

The Orwell before the Second World War was a fairly strident anti-Catholic, and even afterwards still considered it a malign force (for example, in his Notes on Nationalism he lists it under 'tranferred loyalties'). He clearly considered the Catholic Church of the era to be generally 'opposed to modernity', noted its general 'anti-left' stance and more critically, noted its support for Franco in the Spanish Civil War and its 'accommodations' with both Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany. However, his stance was mainly against the Catholic Church as an organisation, as well as the proponents of what he termed 'political Catholicism' which were often displaying variants of zeal of the convert rather than the everyday believer (which he positively described as "[often] insufficiently under the thumb of their priests").

Antisemitism

Accusations of antisemitism rest on the reading of Orwell's earliest works; mainly Down and Out in Paris and London. These were mainly of a 'casual' nature; that if a negative character appears within who happens to be a Jew (or Orwell assumes to be), he shall mention it. More importantly, the much more virulent antisemitism said by a character ('Boris', the emigré White Russian officer) is not challenged, which gives the impression that Orwell (as the narrator) agreed or at least didn't disagree with the view. On the other hand, it needs to be also noted that there were at least two other disgusting characters within the work who could have ticked the negative Jewish tropes, but were not identified as such.

However, by the outbreak of the Second World War Orwell had at least expurgated his own comments, and by the end of it he was calling out the casual and habitual antisemitism in British society in an essay and in his Tribune editorials. It could be said in the twelve years between Down and Out and 1945, Orwell became 'woke' to the issue. This evolving didn't extend to Zionism; of which he apparently considered to simply be another form of colonialism, tinged with a racial angle. In this current era, whether this counts as 'antisemitism' is strongly related to one's own political position rather than Orwell's.

Factual accuracy

Orwell had from the start been accused of inaccuracies, omissions and on occasion outright fabrications in his work. He 're-arranged' the story in Down and Out In Paris and London (giving the impression it was a solid series of events when in reality they were individual incidents) that he had 'shot the script' for The Road To Wigan Pier (looking for slums, unemployment and despair he clearly found it, ignoring those in decent employ or positive attributes of working-class life) and that he never 'shot an elephant' in Burma. Perhaps the worst offender was the essay 'Such, Such Were the Joys' (on his experiences at prep-school); which was judged 'too libellous' to print in Britain until 1968 and several contemporaries retorted that the narrative was somewhere between 'exaggerated' to 'complete pack of lies' to the point it caused Orwell's literary executor to fall out with Orwell's widow over its inclusion in his Collected Works.

Homophobia

Less evolution occurred with his view on homosexuals. Or perhaps nil evolution. Epithets such as 'nancy' and 'pansy' litter his writings and disparaging remarks towards 'effeminate behaviours' turn up enough to be noted; most obviously in his novel Keep the Aspidistra Flying in which one scene is quite obviously a personal tirade against an effeminate, monied customer who he'd encountered when working in a bookshop. His disgust of 'situational homosexuality' (such as in prison) is also clear; describing an alleged approach in a Casual Ward as an assault and assuring us readers that 'it was common between tramps of long standing', or the surprise he had on meeting a fellow student of his prep school (expelled for early-teen sexual experimentation) and discovering he wasn't ashamed. Some have made the argument that Orwell was in fact in 'closeted denial' towards something which in this period was still firmly illegal. - but Occam's Razor suggests that his homophobia was genuine.

Misogyny

See the main article on this topic: Misogyny

This hatred of homosexuals didn't extend to lesbians, mainly on the basis that Orwell didn't appear to notice their existence. Nor any woman, really (at least not in a manner he would notice a man). It can be argued that most of his works are in a place of mild, casual misogyny; the main female characters, for example are fairly flat who mainly exist for the purpose of the male main character to react to; be it the 'middle-aged nag' (Hilda, Coming Up For Air), the 'kind loyal girlfriend' (Rosemary, Keep the Aspidistra Flying) the 'young shallow snob' (Elizabeth, Burmese Days) or the 'dull drudge' (Dorothy, A Clergyman's Daughter) — the last one managing to achieve this while being the main character. Even the most well-rounded character, that of Julia in Ninteen-Eighty Four — is fairly flat; she is a superficially-good 'bad girl', but there are more lines about her physical appearance than what she is actually thinking. Tellingly, it is Winston, not Julia who is the instigator of their fall (though it may simply be that Oceania didn't regard her 'fleshy' Sexcrime and black-market dealings as a threat, but did regard his 'Thoughtcrime' as such).

The accusations of 'misogyny' extended to Orwell the man; the consensus is he was a bit of a horny goat. In fact, most of surviving evidence shows that if you'd been a remotely attractive female within his orbit he'd have tried to bed you (marital status being irrelevant), if applicable propose to marry you and if rebuffed, have no shame. Other, much stickier mud is flung at him; that he was a frequent visitor to prostitutes (at least when younger), that he was an overbearing, selfish tyrant who treated his first wife like crap and pursued women who were not interested — for example, alleged in the biography Eric & Us. It is difficult to refute the view that a man who in their private life appeared to treat women as either maids, nurses or sex objects probably didn't have a very high view of the female sex in general.

State Informer

See the main article on this topic: Red-baiting

In 1949, Orwell produced and handed over a list of people he suspected of either being communists or fellow travellers to an official at the Information Research Department (IRD), a sub-section of the British Foreign Office which was tasked to produce propaganda to aim against the Eastern Bloc. When this finally came to light in 2003 the reactions were mixed; some saw it as a betrayal from a man who himself had been under surveillance by the British state for years, while others wrote it off as the ravings of a dying man.

The truth shall never truly be known, but it could be argued that it was a simply an 'exchange of information' with a friend of persons Orwell believed would be unsuitable to employ at the IRD, perhaps with a hope that if he did it, said list would be a damn sight more accurate than the 'obtuse Special Branch officer' who stated Orwell was a communist partly on the strength of his 'bohemian attire'. Though if such actions were done to keep the existence of the IRD secret from the Soviets, it was fairly pointless a task, as the Cambridge Five spy Guy Burgess had worked for it a year previously.

See also

• Margaret Atwood — writer of the dystopia The Handmaid's Tale.
• Ray Bradbury — writer of the dystopia Fahrenheit 451.
• British Empire / Imperialism - Officer within, then first 'enemy'.
• Censorship
• Cognitive dissonance
• Cold War - Orwell's final years overlapped with the opening moves of it.
• Communism / Stalinism - Orwell's final 'enemy'.
• Fascism / Nazism — His second 'enemy'.
• Christopher Hitchens — Wrote a book on Orwell
• Aldous Huxley — writer of the dystopia Brave New World.
• Juche — How to construct a nation using Nineteen-Eighty Four as a blueprint.
• Sinclair Lewis — writer of the dytopia It Can't Happen Here.
• Jack London — writer of the dystopia The Iron Heel and a chronicler of poverty in The People of the Abyss. One of Orwell's 'mentors', so to speak.
• Nationalism — Not exactly an 'enemy', but something Orwell wasn't a fan of.
• Post-truth — Nothing new under the sun?
• Ayn Rand — writer of the dystopia Atlas Shrugged. Could be described in many ways as the inverted mirror of Orwell. And a technically worse writer.
• Second World War — The most important event in Orwell's adult life, professionally, politically and personally.
• Spanish Civil War — Perhaps the single pivotal event in Orwell's adult life.
• H.G. Wells — writer of the dystopia The Sleeper Awakes and much more; Orwell's 'literary hero', which developed into a feud.

External links

• The Orwell Foundation - Official 'tender of the flame', so to speak.
• George Orwell.org - Most complete (and well-organised) collection of his works.