RationalWiki's 2020 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2120Goal: $3500
Bronze-level article


From RationalWiki
(Redirected from Hindu nationalist)
Jump to: navigation, search
Thank my various Gods!
Icon om.svg

Hindutva (which can be literally translated into English as "Hinduness"[note 1]) is a word coined by Vinayak Damodar Savarkar in his 1923 pamphlet entitled Hindutva: Who is a Hindu? It forms the basis of the Hindu nationalist movement in India. Hindu nationalism is an ethno-religious nationalist movement that aims to eliminate the secular foundation of India's constitution and turn India into a Hindu State (Hindu Rashtra).

The Hindu nationalist movement, though primarily concentrated in India, has global presence and a section of the Indian diaspora living in the Europe and North America fund Hindutva groups in those countries, as well as in India.

What is Hindutva?[edit]

Savarkar, the founder of the Hindutva notion, was an admirer of Mussolini's Italian fascism and Hitler's Nazism. Savarkar said about Nazism and fascism,

Surely Hitler knows better than Pandit Nehru (refers to Jawaharlal NehruWikipedia, the first prime minister of India) does what suits Germany best. The very fact that Germany or Italy has so wonderfully recovered and grown so powerful as never before at the touch of Nazi or Fascist magical wand is enough to prove that those political ‘isms’ were the most congenial tonics their health demanded.[1]

As per Savarkar, who defined Hindutva or Hinduness as an ethnic and political identity, a Hindu is a person whose ancestors lived in a land he called Akhand BharatWikipedia or Greater India (literally translated into English as Undivided India, which consists of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh). To him, it was the land where their religion originated. Here religion means all religions that originated in the Indian subcontinent, i.e. Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism.

The three essentials of Hindutva ideology are common nation (rashtra in Hindi), common race (jati in Hindi) and common culture/civilisation (sanskriti in Hindi).[2] So Hindutva is similar to ideologies like pan-Islamism and is antithetical to multiculturalism. Some academics have described Hindutva as a far-right-wing ideology.[3]

There are contradictory statements and views among people associated with the Hindu nationalist movement regarding the question of irreligion and atheism. Y. Sudershan Rao, who was appointed the head of the Indian Council of Historical ResearchWikipedia (ICHR) after the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) formed government in 2014, tries to explain the meaning of "Hindu" arguing, "Hindu in ancient times was a name given to people who were living to the east of the Indus riverWikipedia up to KanyakumariWikipedia. Hindus were religious, nonreligious and irreligious. As a historian, I look at it that way."[4] This argument includes irreligious people as Hindu, if Hindu is defined as an ethnic identity. On the other hand, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the largest Hindu nationalist organization in India, constructs the idea of an "ideal Hindu family". According to a leader of the organization, "We also want people to see to it that their households look like proper Hindu homes: a tulsi plant, images of Hindu gods, the gayatri mantraWikipedia, etc. should ideally be physically there."[5] This idea of an "ideal Hindu family" obviously excludes atheists, contradicting the view that irreligion comes within the Hindutva fold.

Hindutva in practice[edit]

Hindutva advocates are accused of suppressing freedom of speech and freedom of expression by banning books, films and other cultural media which they don't like, rejecting the idea of freedom of choice and instigating mob violence. In India, an umbrella organization called the Sangh Parivar champions the ideology of Hindutva. The Sangh comprises organizations such as the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (World Hindu Council) and others.

What Hindu nationalists say about genocide and eugenics[edit]


In 2015, the vice-president of the Hindutva organization All India Hindu Assembly (Akhil Bharatiya Hindu MahasabhaWikipedia or ABHM in Hindi) Sadhvi Deva Thakur said that the population growth of Muslims and Christians in India need to be controlled by forcibly sterilizing them.[6][7]

The population of Muslims and Christians is growing day by day. To rein in this, CentreWikipedia will have to impose emergencyWikipedia, and Muslims and Christians will have to be forced to undergo sterilisation so that they can't increase their numbers
—Sadhvi Deva Thakur[6]


In 2015, Sadhvi Deva Thakur also urged Hindus to have more children to increase their population.[6] BJP MP (member of parliament) Sakshi Maharaj said that every Hindu woman must have four children.[8][9]

The time has come when a Hindu woman must produce at least four children in order to protect Hindu religion.
—Sakshi Maharaj, BJP MP

After this remark, another BJP politician suggested that Hindu women should have five children.[10]

Manipulating public education[edit]

Hindutva writer Dinanath Batra,Wikipedia who runs an organization euphemistically named Shiksha Bachao Andolan (Save Education Movement)[note 2], believes religious education should be an integral part of school curriculum.[11]

What we need in India is value-based education, education that will build character. We can’t do that without religion, so religious studies[note 3] must become a part of school curriculum.
—Dinanath Batra[11]

Batra has written some school textbooks which are taught in the Indian state of GujaratWikipedia, where the Hindu nationalist BJP forms government. If one explores these in depth, what is written in his books are bound to give laughs as well as shock to any educated sane person. An example of blatant racism and horrible misinformation is given below:[12][13]

Once Dr RadhakrishnanWikipedia[note 4] went for a dinner. There was a Briton at the event who said, "We are very dear to God." Radhakrishnan laughed and told the gathering, "Friends, one day God felt like making rotisWikipedia[note 5]. When he was cooking the rotis, the first one was cooked less and the English were born. The second one stayed longer on the fire and the NegroesWikipedia were born. Alert after His first two mistakes, when God went on to cook the third roti, it came out just right and as a result IndiansWikipedia were born."
—schoolbook written by Dinanath Batra[12][13]

The above passage endorses classification of people based on skin color. It claims that Indian people are "just right" while people with lighter or darker skin color are the result of something going wrong.

Another blatant example of racism from his book is where people with darker skin color are depicted as violent criminals:

The aircraft was flying thousands of feet high in the sky. A very strongly built negro reached the rear door and tried to open it. The air-hostesses tried to stop him but the strongly built negro pushed the soft-bodied hostesses to the floor and shouted, 'Nobody dare move a step ahead'. An Indian grabbed the negro and he could not escape. The pilot and the Indian together thrashed the negro and tied him up with a rope. Like a tied buffalo, he frantically tried to escape but could not. The plane landed safely in Chicago. The negro was a serious criminal in the Chicago records and this brave Indian was an employee of Air India.Wikipedia
—schoolbook written by Dinanath Batra[12]



The Sangh Parivar and Hindutva advocates in general also indulge in a lot of pseudoscientific claims. For example, it is not uncommon to find Hindutva proponents claiming that the discoveries of modern science are actually re-discoveries of what had been found ages ago by the ancient Hindu saints. Also, they tend to justify things like Ayurveda using pseudoscientific blabber.

Vedic Science is a concept used by Hindutva advocates to denote to the scientific tradition of ancient India.[note 6] Astrologer Gayatri Devi Vasudev writing for The Organiser, a publication of the Hindutva organization the RSS, claimed that the distinction of science and pseudoscience (or protoscience) is Eurocentric and inapplicable to Vedic Science:

Western scientific thought draws on the traditions of Greek rationalist thinking according to which only what is within the purview of the five senses is taken cognisance of. Scientific methods follow some kind of closed scientific reasoning which insulates itself against facts that its methods cannot account for. How else can they [scientists] dare dismiss Jyotisha (astrology) which sees a level of existence beyond the purview of the five senses?
—Vasudev 2001[14]

Hindutva advocates even go as far to claim that religion and science is identical in India:

The idea of 'contradiction' is an imported one from the West in recent times by the Western-educated, since 'Modern Science' arbitrarily imagines that it only has the true knowledge and its methods are the only methods to gain knowledge, smacking of Semitic dogmatism in religion.
—Mukhyananda 1997:94[15]

Pseudohistory and pseudoarcheology[edit]

Even before the advent of the Bharatiya Janata Party, there was a pseudoscientific historian named PN Oak, who made numerous ridiculous claims. Among them, was the allegation that the Taj Mahal was a Hindu temple dedicated to Shiva, and that the Patriarch Abraham, was a Brahman (Abraham, Brahman). He also alleged that the Vatican originated as a Vedic priesthood (Vatican, Vatika), when it has been clearly documented that it was a successor to the Papal States, itself a successor to Western Imperium Romanum. (Just because a bunch of words are similar, that does NOT imply common origin. Hell, the fact that Japanese fisherman chant 'Yahweh', does NOT mean that they descended from the lost tribes of Israel). In 2014, after the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) came to power, it appointed Y. Sudershan Rao, a history professor associated with a RSS-affiliated organization, as the head of the Indian Council of Historical ResearchWikipedia (ICHR).[16] Rao believes that material evidence is not necessary to write the history of India. He said during an interview with the Outlook magazine,

Western schools of thought look at material evidence of history. We can’t produce material evidence for everything. India is a continuing civilisation. To look for evidence would mean digging right though the hearts of villages and displacing people. We only have to look at the people to figure out the similarities in their lives and the depiction in the RamayanaWikipedia and the MahabharataWikipedia. For instance, the Ramayana mentions that RamaWikipedia had travelled to Bhad­ra­chalamWikipedia (in Andhra PradeshWikipedia). A look at the people and the fact that his having lived there for a while is in the collective memory of the people cannot be discounted in the search for material evidence. In continuing civilisations such as ours, the writing of history cannot depend only on archaeological evidence. We have to depend on folklore too.
—Y. Sudershan Rao, head of the Indian Council of Historical Researh[17]

However, this statement is fallacious and in good old RationalWiki fashion, we have dissected and responded to it:

Rao's argumentReply
Western schools of thought look at material evidence of history.Historians actually use a method called oral historyWikipedia to record non-material evidence. It deals with collective memory and individual construction of history, so Rao is straw manning here. The difference between oral history and Rao's "method" (if you can call it that) is that the former has a critical approach, whereas Rao simply takes folklore at face value. Rao also sets up a false East/West dilemma, a technique used by fundamentalists in Asia to attack the supposed Euro- and Americentric scientism of "Western" academia and replace it with their preferred brand of pseudoscience.

We can’t produce material evidence for everything. India is a continuing civilisation.See my hands waving! Sorry Rao, as Christopher Hitchens so pithily put it: "What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence." Rao also forgets to explain what "a continuing civilisation" is and why it means we should ditch normal criteria for conducting historical enquiries. Rao seems to be taking a page from the book of paranormal woo peddlers who make all kinds of excuses for why their branch of woo doesn't work when subjected to controlled experiments. Try imagining a Dane, making this same argument and insisting that the tales of Thor and the JörmungandrWikipedia has to be taken as fact(oids), because Denmark is part of "a continuing Norse civilisation". Try again.

To look for evidence would mean digging right though the hearts of villages and displacing people.Argument from adverse consequences. It's also a red herring or possibly an escape hatch bordering on an emotional appeal ("Oh, the poor farmers!" - as if anyone suggests that it's necessary to move in with bulldozers and demolition crews and raze the houses of villagers. Contrast with how we've acquired knowledge of other ancient, but still inhabited, sites, such as Rome, Jerusalem, Jericho or Istanbul).

We only have to look at the people to figure out the similarities in their lives and the depiction in the RamayanaWikipedia and the MahabharataWikipedia.If this seems familiar, it's because it's a Hindu version of the old biblical literalist nugget of "these events were real, hence the entire Bible must be correct!" Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, Rao. Rao is also begging the question, because he uses the fact that folklore occasionally matches written epics which were originally oral epics as evidence that the written version is correct. This is patently absurd because it amounts to using the correspondence between the depiction of Spider-Man in the movies and in the comics as "evidence" that Spider-Man must be real and that the movies are essentially documentaries. It's what we call circular evidence.

For instance, the Ramayana mentions that RamaWikipedia had travelled to Bhad­ra­chalamWikipedia (in Andhra PradeshWikipedia). A look at the people and the fact that his having lived there for a while is in the collective memory of the people cannot be discounted in the search for material evidence.Here Rao combines the appeal to tradition with an argumentum ad populum. Why would the fact that countless people have believed something for a long time mean it's real? Loads of people believed in the pantheon of the Greco-Roman or ancient Egyptian religions, but practically no one do so now. Why should we accept Rao's myths?

In continuing civilisations such as ours, the writing of history cannot depend only on archaeological evidence. We have to depend on folklore too.And so we return to the hand waving, ad hoc'ing and argument by assertion. Yeah, Rao, keep repeating it and it will magically become a good argument...

Hindutva advocates propagate the pseudolinguistic Indigenous Aryans theory which asserts that the speakers of Indo-European languages are "indigenous" to the Indian subcontinent.

Revisionism of science and technology[edit]

Y. Sudershan Rao claimed that Indians used to fly aircraft, conduct stem cell research and use cosmic weapons 5000 years ago, and believes that the Indian epics the MahabharataWikipedia and the RamayanaWikipedia, which were written two millennia ago, are not fiction, but essentially history books.[note 7] He argues humans did not develop the art of fiction writing until a few centuries ago; hence, the events and things described in these epics must be real.[18]

In the school textbook Tejomay Bharat written by Hindutva writer Dinanath Batra, it is claimed that television was invented in the age of Mahabharata ca. two millennia ago:

We know that television was invented by a priest from Scotland called John Logie Baird in 1926. But we want to take you to an even older DoordarshanWikipedia… Indian rishisWikipedia using their yogWikipedia vidyaWikipedia would attain divya drishti.Wikipedia There is no doubt that the invention of television goes back to this.
—Dinanath Batra[19]

Batra's textbook also claimed that the automobile was first invented in ancient India:

What we know today as the motorcar existed during the Vedic period. It was called aanashva rath.[note 8] Usually a rath (chariot) is pulled by horses but an anashva rath means the one that runs without horses or yantra-rath,[note 9] what is today a motorcar. The Rig Veda refers to this.
—Dinanath Batra[19]

If this kind of “we invented everything” narrative seems familiar, it’s probably because it’s literally the plot of George Orwell’s 1984...

Hindu nationalist phraseology[edit]

  • The phrase "Indian culture" is used to oppose personal choice and justify homophobia.
  • By referring to secular as "sickular", Hindu nationalists don't hide their hostility towards secularism.[20]

Hindutva movement worldwide[edit]

The Hindutva movement is not an Indian-only phenomenon. It is present worldwide, in Europe, North America, Australia, New Zealand, and many other countries. A number of organizations, mostly in the form of non-profits, constitute the movement and a section of the Hindu Indian diaspora in different countries support these organizations. An average supporter of an Hindutva organization may not adhere to the extremist beliefs of these organizations, but they join or support these organizations out of a perceived sense of alienation in a country where Hindus constitute a religious minority.

In the United States, Hindu nationalists take the benefit of the liberal secular atmosphere of the pluralist American society[21] and draw on multiculturalist discourse for their presence, while at the same time they fund cultural and political organizations in India that spread hatred and commit acts of violence against India's religious minorities.[22][23] In Australia, Hindu nationalist organizations legitimise their activities through the rhetoric of liberal multiculturalism. At the same time, just like the American Hindutva organizations, they promote hatred against religious minorities in India.[23]

External links[edit]

Replies to criticism from a Hindu nationalist point of view[edit]

Exposing Hindu nationalists[edit]


Hindu nationalist propaganda in education[edit]

Hindu nationalist pseudo-scholarship[edit]

Hindu nationalism in Europe and North America[edit]

See also[edit]


  1. Sanskrit -tva is a neuter abstract suffix, hence Hindu-ness in English.
  2. Shiksha (Hindi) means education, Bachao (Hindi) means save, Andolan (Hindi) means movement.
  3. By using the term "religious studies", he does not refer to the secular academic discipline religious studies which analyzes religion from a non-religious point of view. He refers to theology when he uses the term.
  4. Sarvepalli RadhakrishnanWikipedia, the first vice-president of India.
  5. Flat bread made from wholemeal flour and consumed in the Indian subcontinent.
  6. Quite similar to the Hare Krishnas use of the term "Vedic creationism" to give their brand of creationism some ancient Indian patina.
  7. Similar to how some people read the Bible.
  8. Aanashva is a name of a kind of rath, rath is a Hindi word which means chariot.
  9. Yantra is a Hindi word which means machine, hence yeantra-rath means a machine chariot.


  1. http://www.ibtimes.com/hindu-nationalists-historical-links-nazism-fascism-214222
  2. Sharma, Arvind (2002). "On Hindu, Hindustan, Hinduism and Hindutva". Numen 49 (1). 
  3. Les Back and John Solomos (2000), Theories of Race and Racism: A Reader, p.591, ISBN 9780415156714. "It is important to note the marriage between far-right-wing Hindutva ideology and western New Ageism in the works of writers like David Frawley (1994, 1995a, 1995b) who is both a key apologist for the Hindutva movement and the author of various New Age books on Vedic astrology, oracles and yoga."
  4. Ramayan, Mahabharat historical sources, West dubs them myth: Y Sudershan Rao Economic Times
  5. RSS focuses on Hindu family values to unify community Hindustan Times
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Muslims, Christians should be forcibly sterilised: Sadhvi Deva Thakur, India Today
  7. Hindu Mahasabha Leader Sadhvi Deva Thakur Says Muslims, Christians Should Be Forcibly Sterilised, Huffington Post India
  8. Every Hindu woman must produce at least 4 kids: Sakshi Maharaj Times of India
  9. India MP Sakshi Maharaj: Hindus must have more babies BBC
  10. After Sakshi Maharaj’s ‘4 kids’ remark, a BJP leader now asks Hindu women to bear five children Indian Express
  11. 11.0 11.1 India’s new school textbooks favor Hindu nationalist themes, making minorities uneasy Washington Post
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 What the government of Gujarat is encouraging children to read is dismaying Quartz
  13. 13.0 13.1 Top Indian educationalist accused of racism over portrayal of criminal 'negroes' The Telegraph
  14. Vasudev, Gayatri Devi. 2001. Vedic astrology and pseudo-scientific criticism, The Organiser (an English-language publication of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh), reprinted in The Astrological Magazine, cited after Sokal (2006:38)
  15. Mukhyananda, Swami. 1997. Vedanta in the Context of Modern Science: A (Comparative Study. Mumbai [Bombay]: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan.
  16. Ancient India had aeroplanes, nuclear weapons, says chief of India's premier history body India Today
  17. ‘Ramayana, Mahabharata Are True Accounts Of The Period...Not Myths’ Outlook
  18. Fears grow in India about Hindu 'Modi-fication' of education, Reuters
  19. 19.0 19.1 Science lesson from Gujarat: Stem cells in Mahabharata, cars in Veda Indian Express
  20. 'Mota maal' to 'Sickular': 10 ridiculously viral terms that drive Indian social media CNN IBN
  21. Hindutva Bigotry in America
  22. Kamat, Sangeetha and Biju Matthews (2003), 'Mapping political violence in a globalized world: The case of Hindu nationalism', Social Justice, 30:3, pp. 4–16.
  23. 23.0 23.1 Goldie Osuri (2011), 'Transnational Bio/Necropolitics: Hindutva and its Avatars (Australia/India)', Somatechnics. Volume 1, Issue 1, Page 138-160