User:CircularReasoning

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Hello, my name is
CircularReasoning
link=:category:{{{category}}}
My interests
Some of my works
My pages
A bit of fun


Two bookshelves full of books belonging to Unitedmissionary (2010).jpg
This user is currently taking a break from RationalWiki to focus on school, and thus may not be as active as usual.


Hello, BoN! I am Rohan CircularReasoning, and I am an editor here- just like you.

Where did this idea come from that all beliefs deserve respect? If your beliefs are ridiculous, they deserve to be ridiculed, as would mine.
—@MissaMHx, Atheist Republic

My internet laws

For more information, see: Essay:Rohan’s Laws of Ex-atheists
If an argument for religion is structured in such a way that it requires one to already believe in a God(s) and see everything through the lens of a particular religion to begin with (and thus exists merely to reinforce rather than actually convince), then it automatically falls flat, and can be dismissed without any further consideration.
—Rohan’s Razor
As more and more religious apologetic claims are refuted and debunked, new ones will always form that become ever-increasingly preposterous and silly.
—Rohan’s Law
Anyone who resorts to ad-hominems and/or argumentum ad baculum in the place of actual logic and intelligent argumentation requires no further serious consideration, and is deemed to have lost the debate.
—Rohan's Law of Internet Debating

My Blue Telephone to CP

Gentlemen at Conservapedia! I will terrorize your precious beagle, enabling me to destroy religion on the Internet. You should all be castigating over Operation Machismo, which will likely give RationalWiki a top result on a certain search engine starting with G.

Dear gentlemen at the other wiki,

What short memories you have or crushing religion on the Internet like a tin can your comments involving my IQ are quite frankly telltale signs of Biden Derangement Syndrome. Concerning creationism and addiction to religion, you deny and cover up the fact that the second wave of the RationalWiki religion article is being sent to UK atheists via email, starting today! In fact, by a time of my choosing in the calendar year of 2022, it's not out of the question that Jack Chick might just end up losing the last vestiges of credibility and being thwarted once and for all. :) :) :)

Rest assured, Operation pastry chef is gathering steam!!! I have recently mentioned RationalWiki a lot on online atheist forums! We will soon expect to see a large influx of newcomers!

Goatspeed,

--Goatspeed. How's my editingCircularREmail2.gifasoningSee my experiments 22:32, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Some basic information about me

I am a part of the

Skulfineac.gif

The Great Userboxen Tower of C. R.
Tux1.gif This user runs Ubuntu. This user laughs at malware and people who pay for their operating systems.
# This user chats on Discord.
Political compass small logo.gif
This user's Political Compass coordinates are (-3.25,-4.46).
Future.gif This user is a moderator.


Ninja.jpg
This user is a Ninja.
BrainMop.jpg This user was demoted to janitor Sysop. (verify)
Cabal.jpg
This user is a cabal member.
Surprise, surprise.
 Wp
This user is a Wikipedian
Usa flag circle.png
This user is not post-Conservapedia, but thinks that RationalWiki should keep expanding its horizons.
Johnlennon.png
"You may say that I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one."
Happyman.svg This user is a humanist


H2g2.jpg The meaning of life has nothing to do with god or fate or any of that bullshit. It's 42.
Stop hand.png
This user believes all religions are a form of psychosocial control and are therefore inherently bad for you.
Flying-spaghetti-monster.jpg
This user has been touched by
His Noodly Appendage.
Atheist-symbol.png
"We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further."
Atheismsymbol endorsed by AAI.svg This user supports state atheism, but would allow believers to practice their religion, build places of worship, etc.
Scarlet A.svg
This user is a militant atheist.


Darwinb Humanist.gif
This user is a member of the Darwinist-Humanist Cabal devoted to perverting all that is holy
Bibleopened.jpeg This user believes the Bible is just another book
Christopher Hitchens crop 2.jpg
"That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."
Atom.jpg
This user thinks that evolution explains the origin of species.
Icon bioDNA.svg
This user thinks that abiogenesis explains the origin of life.
Universe expansion.png
This user thinks that the Big Bang explains the origin of the Universe.
EdwardsSpider.jpg
This user is an evil-utionist!
Atom.jpg
This user does not believe so called "faith" can contend with modern science.
Atom.jpg This user does not believe in so-called "tolerance" when it compromises truth.
MagicCreation.jpg
This user believes that "Magic man done it" isn't science.


ain't got
no GOD

This user does not worship.

Warning This user does not care about your religious beliefs, so long as they are not forced on the rest of us.
Atheist Evolutionist Liberal
This user is a member of the unholy trifecta
Icon atheism.svg This user has the arrogant belief that the universe does not exist just for us, and that nobody is going to change the way it works for the benefit of just a few of us.


4Warning.gif This user is a member of the feared Gang of Four and may react sarcastically to superstition and religion.
Grammarnazi.svg
This user is a Grammar Nazi. Heil Stickler!
Anti-commie.svg This user is strictly opposed to communism.
Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler.jpg This user knows that these two believed they could be intolerant because they knew the truth.
50 States flag.png This user lives in the best damn country on Earth, and you better believe it!
Const2.gif
This user believes the Pledge of Allegiance jeopardizes liberty and justice for all.
Donald-trump-secim-840x420 (cropped).jpg This user thinks that Donald Trump doesn't represent this user's America.
Karikatur 7.jpg Freedom of speech can be dangerous, but must be upheld by every one of us.
Gay Pride Flag.svg
This user believes in equal rights for gay people.
Gay Pride Flag.svg
This user is a proud supporter of the Homosexual Agenda
Hypatia.jpg
This user thinks Hypatia of Alexandria was the pinnacle of womanhood.
Earthsat.jpeg
This user believes in an old Earth — a 4.5 billion year old Earth.
Stop hand.png
This user thinks doctors are more authoritative about medical issues than lawyers.
Blue Marble.jpg
This user is concerned about the environment.
Nerd.jpg
This user is a nerd — and proud of it!
Flag of India.svg
This user is proudly Indian.


Asparagus-Bundle.jpg
This user has Asperger's syndrome or is somewhere on the autism spectrum.
Fort CP.PNG
Where's the largely defensive weapons of gun?
Atom.jpg
This user thinks he was banned for putting science in Conservapedia's science pages... go figure...
Bi flag.svg
This user is bisexual.
Viralvirus.jpg
This user believes that Creationism is a deadly virus set to wipe out humanity.
Viralvirus.jpg
This user believes that Conservapedia is a deadly virus set to wipe out humanity.
Viralvirus.jpg
This user believes that Religion is a deadly virus set to wipe out humanity.
Viralvirus.jpg
This user believes that MGTOW is a deadly virus set to wipe out humanity.
Viralvirus.jpg
This user believes that Donald Trump is a deadly virus set to wipe out humanity.
Viralvirus.jpg
This user believes that Andrew Schlafly is a deadly virus set to wipe out humanity.
Viralvirus.jpg
This user believes that Cathy Brennan is a deadly virus set to wipe out humanity.
Viralvirus.jpg
This user believes that Fred Phelps is a deadly virus set to wipe out humanity.
Viralvirus.jpg
This user believes that Ken is a deadly virus set to wipe out humanity.
Conservlogo late april.png
This user is trusworthy.
Trus me.
Trump dumb photo.png
This user thinks that
Is The
Mango Mousse-
olini


.


My name

The reason why I chose "CircularReasoning" as my name is that the fallacy circular reasoning is my pet-peeve when it comes to online debating. In fact, I despise it so much that I've even devised a logical razor stating that you should not use it when trying to argue for a particular position (see above). It is also the bedrock that nearly all of religious apologetics is built on top of; in fact, some apologists even admit it.

My mission here

Here on RationalWiki, I seek to improve RW and make it more rational- by adding more detailed information, creating articles, welcoming and creating talkpages of new users, and correcting non-sequiturs and logical fallacies.

My style

  • An obsession with adding more details and information to short sections of articles
  • Extensive reliance (on parentheses), (almost to the exclusion of other grammatical devices)

Shameless self-promotion: My additions to this great wiki

Drafts started by me that you should probably help get into mainspace

New articles created from scratch

Below are the articles that I have created here on RW, as well as when I created them. DISCLAIMER: These articles probably look nothing like what they did back when I first created them.

's idiotic debate challenges to your talk page (to do this, simply enter {{Ken Debate}} into your talk page!) Published on October 20, 2018.

My wikibreak template project of January '24

  • Template:Moving, a template to be used when you're in the hectic process of moving. Published January 7, 2024.
  • Template:Deceased, a long-overdue wikibreak template for when an editor tragically passes away in real life. Published January 7, 2024.

Translated into Hindi by me/अनुवाद हुआ हिन्दी में मुझे द्वारा

Once-dead pages resurrected by my amazing sysop-y powers

  • This picture

Drafts started by other people that I helped upgrade to mainspace articles

My essays

*Essay:SJWiki Does not represent my current views, made by my younger and dumber teenage self

DEMOTED AT LAST!!!!! (Sysop, October 27, 2018)

BrainMop.png As a confirmed mustard jar for taking on this job as a Sysop on RationalWiki: I, CircularReasoning, pledge to only block users if they ask for it, or insert unfunny vandalism.
I furthermore pledge that if I indulge in secret private conversations about you, we will make a formal report to the mob. Is that all?
If you impugn my motives without warrant, or challenge my "AUTHORITY", er, there is nothing I can or will do.

Redemoted as of December 18, 2018

Initiation ceremony: I'm now officially a sysop! This time I will never edit-war or unecessarily perma-ban/perma-protect again! Trus me...

My awards

Copied over from my talkpage

HardWork.jpg Tireless Worker Award
We, the unseen cabal of RationalWiki (there is no cabal) hereby recognize CircularReasoning for vaporizing unseemly content from the wiki.
  • Issued by ClickerClock for winning the Satirize Alternative Medicine Competition (entry here):

1 Short Story ¶
awarded to
CircularReasoning

Sysop rewards

Just for fun

Fuck this bullshit.

CP logs

Reload

13:40, 5 November 2024 (UTC) Aschlafly ( talk | contribs ) deleted Evolution And the only contributors were Karajou(talk | contribs) Unwanted sexual advances)

13:40, 5 November 2024 (UTC) Conservative ( talk | contribs ) </choose>

My sockpuppets on Conservapedia, and how they were blocked (Goat rest their souls)

  • AtheistKillr (blocked; they saw red at the dreaded a-word): 20:43, 9 May 2018 1990'sguy (Talk | contribs) blocked AtheistKillr (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 year (account creation disabled) (user name policy: please consider recreating your account with a real first name and last initial)
  • Ross Jones: 22:53, 14 May 2018 Karajou (Talk | contribs) blocked Ross Jones (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 2 years (account creation disabled) (Sockpuppet/Abusing multiple accounts: you gave it away again)
  • TrumpLover (blocked for my trolling): 18:05, 25 August 2018 1990'sguy (Talk | contribs) changed block settings for TrumpLover (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 2 years (account creation disabled) (Inserting false information)
  • 9 seiggiPdaB (blocked for no reason at all; didn't even last more than 10 minutes): 10:07, 27 October 2018 1990'sguy (Talk | contribs) changed block settings for 9 seiggiPdaB (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 5 years (account creation disabled) (Inserting false information)

Best of Kenquote

  • Dear CircularReasoning,

Perhaps you thought that was a masterful rebuttal. However, your comments in regards to Richard Dawkins and peanut butter are slightly silly. In regards to : the matter of the homosexual agenda and mass murder, you censor that If you could face this unpleasant reality in your article on your website about : yourselves, I will be impressed. However, I do not expect to be impressed lest I allow you to disappoint me. In fact, by tomorrow, it is likely Liberal Panty-waists will have lost all vestiges of credibility. :) :) :) Rest assured, Operation Xbox One is gathering steam!!! Perhaps, if you agree to the debate, the hispanic ladies might finally believe you have machismo... Sincerely, KD Buffalo

  • Dear CircularReasoning,

I hope you recently saw that your comments in regards to my IQ are completely lacking any cogent rebuttal. In regards to the matter of public schools and morality, you gloss over that this is merely a fraction of what I believe operations flying fortresses and grassroots will produce. In fact, by upon activation of Operation Trickle Down, it is likely Chuck Norris will have lost all vestiges of credibility. :) :) :) Rest assured, Operation Charging Cheetahs and Pointy Flapjacks is gathering steam!!! I'm off to scewer the sacred cows of evolutionism. Sincerely, Conservative

  • Dear CircularReasoning,

It does seem to me that your replies to my comment are very childish. Regarding Obama and the Gay Agenda, I think you need to be reminded that Google censors creationists. In fact, by this December, it is likely Evolution will have lost all vestiges of credibility. :) :) :) Rest assured, Operation Gumball Machines is gathering steam!!! Please do not be disappointed if a internet atheist/agnostic revival does not ensue. Sincerely, Conservative

  • Dear CircularReasoning,

Don't be surprised if readers think in regards to your comments in regards to Richard Dawkins and peanut butter are completely unsurprising. In regards to the subject of Oregon and uncharitableness, you mislead children by suggesting that appeal to ridicule is a logic fallacy. In fact, by next Sunday, it is likely Atheism will have lost all vestiges of credibility. :) :) :)

Rest assured, Operation Grassroots is gathering steam!!! Thousands of troops may be soon pouring in at the rallying points!

Sincerely,

Conservative

  • Dear CircularReasoning,

I find the irony delicious, your comments regarding Conservapedia's web traffic are somewhat tedious. When it comes to atheism and obesity and suicide, you fail to realize that now could you please state in the article about your own website that Wikipedia will not permit an article on your website because Wikipedians do not believe you are notable. In fact, by Darwin's birthday, it is likely Obesity will have lost all vestiges of credibility. :) :) :)

Rest assured, Operation Illinois is gathering steam!!! Time to shatter atheism's glass jaw!

Sincerely,

Newton

A message from Andrew Layton Schlafly of Conservapedia

"Anonymous User" (I notice how you hide behind an alias), I find no credibility in your denial of having ideological reasons. I've responded to your concerns and answered your questions and you list yourself as an "agnostic" here, yet 100% of your edits here have been of an atheistic nature. An agnostic, if fair-minded, should be at least 50% Bible-based and 50% atheistic-based, so regardless, I'm so confident that you're a spokesperson for the homosexual agenda. Furthermore, you deny that Obama refuses to salute the flag and that including the phrase "under God" in The Pledge of Allegiance prevents racism. Believe what you like, but if you received a good grade for the reciting liberal viewpoints, then it becomes even more difficult for you to reconsider. Liberal attempts to deny political bias are familiar to us and no one here is fooled. The FBI would be happy to do something about you.--aschlafly 13:40, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Best of Kenpics

  • Gentlemen! I will discombobulate your precious ninja, enabling me to destroy atheism on the internet. You should all be oscillating over Operation Meringue, which will likely give Conservapedia a top result on a certain search engine starting with G.
  • Gentlemen! I will glug your precious philanthropist, enabling me to destroy atheism on the internet. You should all be vitiating over Operation Nude Photograph, which will likely give Conservapedia a top result on a certain search engine starting with G.
  • Gentlemen! I will graphitize your precious oven, enabling me to destroy atheism on the internet. You should all be rioting over Operation Cockroach, which will likely give Conservapedia a top result on a certain search engine starting with G.
  • Gentlemen! I will roll your precious xylene, enabling me to destroy atheism on the internet. You should all be rinsing over Operation Xbox 360, which will likely give Conservapedia a top result on a certain search engine starting with G.
  • Gentlemen! I will execrate your precious bathtub, enabling me to destroy atheism on the internet. You should all be shaving over Operation Mammary Gland, which will likely give Conservapedia a top result on a certain search engine starting with G.

Best of Rohanpics captions

  • Gentlemen! I will neuter your precious dwarf, enabling me to destroy religion on the Internet. You should all be shaving over Operation Deconvert, which will likely give RationalWiki a top result on a certain search engine starting with G.

FAKE NEWS. Sad!

  Follow  Иконка шеврона вниз (ei).svg
Donald Trump Twitter.jpg
Donald Trump Icono verificacion de cuenta twitter
@realDonaldTrump

The FAKE nytimes working so hard trying to get me not to use Social Media. They can't stand that I can get the actual and untainted message out.

17,723 Retweets 46,814 Likes

01:40 PM - 5 Nov 2024

Speech bubble text.svg 29 Ei-retweet.svg 736 Twitter web heart animation.png 981


Comments concerning my latest operation

Gentlemen! I will fly your precious whip, enabling me to destroy evolutionism on the internet. You should all be earning over Operation couch potato, which will likely give Conservapedia a top result on a certain search engine starting with G.

Gentleman Kels!

What is it like in your alternative reality? your comments in regards to the death of evolutionism on the internet are very lacking any cogent rebuttal. In regards to the subject of ShockofGod and hairball, you fail to realize that this is merely a fraction of what I believe operations flying fortresses and grassroots will produce. In fact, by the time I've finished in regards to this Operation, it is likely Evolution will have lost all vestiges of credibility. :) :) :)

Rest assured, Operation Pamplona is gathering steam!!! Please do not be disappointed if a internet atheist/agnostic revival does not ensue. Sincerely,

A user of the Conservative account

=== Debate Challenge from Ken

===

Dear Anonymous User

RE: The last comment of yours which I took lightly in terms of the mental aptitude of some obesity-afflicted RationalWikians

1. You and your co-obese atheists at a rather liberal website starting with an R are mentally incapable of find even one inaccuracy in Conservapedia's articles that focus on atheism, evolution, or homosexuality, all of which were mainly my work. Taking into consideration the obvious fact that there is no proof or evidence that any of these worldviews hold any water whatsoever, it wasn't at all challenging for us to think up some articles that thoroughly attempt to offer counterexamples to these worldviews.

2. I bravely crushed you gentlemen on the talk pages of the Conservapedia articles that they were rather predictably angered by, plus on other places on the internet as well (atheism, evolution, homosexuality, etc.) Accordingly, your claim that I am afraid to debate has no merit. I am most apparently not claiming that it is in regards to my excellent debating prowess that I won so many debates with you rather obese folks from a rather liberal website, it is just that atheism is such an incredibly weak position with a glass jaw - especially compared to Christianity, which, however, has overwhelming evidence to support it.

3. I met my goals that I sought to achieve in relation to my participation with Conservapedia, the Trustworthy Encyclopedia. Anything else that I do further is just icing on the cake.

4. Encyclopedias are usually supposed to involve multiple editors and personally, I haven't seen a single encyclopedia that I fully agree with. Feel free to rage at Conservapedia and find faults in it, but I really don't think that you can find any credible evidence that we are inaccurate or incorrect in the Conservapedia articles in regards to atheism, evolution, or homosexuality.

5. I know that it angers to no end that I have met my goals and hereby declare VICTORY, since I have the ability as a Conservapedia sysop to block anyone who has the nerve to announce their intentions to destroy America, and yet you still want to find fault in me. However, I have still succeeded in being more like my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ once and for all, in that I have delivered yet another punch to your flabby midsection! You on the other hand, have also succeeded at being more like your Lord and Savior PZ Meyers, in that you also look largely unattractive, also believe that women and men should be treated equal (!), and are also very large around the waist!

In regards to all of that, I hereby challenge you to A SECOND WRITTEN DEBATE. In this debate, I challenge you to prove to me that atheism is true and correct (which you probably won't be able to do anyway, due to the inherent glass jaw of atheism), and once I achieve victory, it will all but destroy atheism on the internet ONCE AND FOR ALL!!!

However, it will only be under THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS (in bold):

  • In case you attempt to martyr me in your anger as a result of my inevitable VICTORY, I get to bring with me a largely defensive weapon of gun.
  • You are to pay an exact total of $20,000.00 $5,000,000, which will be donated by a trustworthy bible-believer of your choosing to a faith-based Christian charitable organization of your choosing upon successful completion of the debate.
  • The debate will be written, and will be 20 hours long (which can be broken up over a 95 month period).

6. Well so long, you obese, militant, atheistic, and probably homosexual commie! Oh, and one more piece of Christian love for Horrible Anonymous User: I hope you live an incredibly short life, and spend the rest of eternity rotting in Hell, where your big, round body has always rightfully belonged!

DISCLAIMER: It's not that I hate you, it's just that I don't want you to exist. >:-b

Sincerely,

Conservative

Bingo sheets

Christian apologist

Islamic apologist

Accommodationist blogger

Gallery: Pissed at me