There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
| Part of the series on|
Logic and rhetoric
A conditional fallacy may or may not be a logical fallacy, conditional on whether or not one of their premises is accepted.
Conditional fallacies are almost always informal fallacies. However, if comparing multiple systems of logic (which would imply different valid and invalid logical structures, and thus different formal fallacies) then it may be possible for a formal fallacy to be conditional.
An informal conditional fallacy follows the form:
P1: X is Y.
P2: Being Y causes something to be true / to be false / etc.
C1: X is true / false / etc.
This is not always fallacious. For example, a good (rational) conditional argument:
- P1: Global warming is agreed to exist by over 95% of climatologists, making it the scientific consensus.
- P2: The scientific consensus is probably true.
- C1: Global warming probably exists.
The problem only occurs when Y is something stupid. For example, a bad (fallacious) argument from authority:
- P1: Creationism is agreed to be true by at least 250 people.
- P2: Some of those 250 people are scientists, and scientists are normally right.
- C1: Creationism is probably true.
- Category:Conditional fallacies
- Logical fallacy
- Formal fallacy
- Informal fallacy
- Fallacious argument style