2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $1675.86Goal: $10000
Information icon.svg At the chicken coop, we are currently voting on a change to the blocking policy to clarify when offsite behavior such as harassment and brigading can get someone banned from RW. A reminder that you need at least 75 edits and to have had an account for at least 3 months to vote.

Appeal to flattery

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Cogito ergo sum
Logic and rhetoric
Icon logic.svg
Key articles
General logic
Bad logic
L'Oreal. Because you're worth it.
—One of the most well-known appeals to flattery in advertising.[1]

An appeal to flattery is a logical fallacy that occurs when a debater tries to compliment people into an opinion.

The fallacy is an emotional appeal and an informal fallacy.

Alternate names[edit]

  • appeal to vanity
  • argumentum ad vanitatem
  • apple polishing
  • sucking up

Form[edit]

The argument takes this form:

  • Person A tells a premise that person B doesn't like.
  • To make person B more favorable towards this premise, person A attempts to flatter them by telling they are intelligent/attractive/otherwise desirable.
  • If person B falls for this, they agree with A.

Explanation[edit]

Someone toadies someone else in order to appeal to them and make them more favorable towards a premise that they would not like otherwise. This kind of argumentation makes use of the Dunning-Kruger effect among other things if used successfully. It is virtually always fallacious, because it never looks into facts, but only exploits the basic human need for appreciation.

Examples[edit]

External links[edit]