RationalWiki's 2018 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2835Goal: $5000

Imprecision fallacy

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Part of the series on
Logic and rhetoric
Icon logic.svg
Key articles
General logic
Bad logic
Merge-arrows.svg An editor believes this article contains duplicate material.
This article may have a content or subject overlap with logical fallacy. The pages could be merged. You can discuss this at RationalWiki:Duplicate articles.

An imprecision fallacy (also an error in sampling) occurs when evidence used is not representative, because it is imprecise in some way.

For example, in an apex fallacy, only the cream of the crop are considered when generalizing to all members of a group; clearly, the top performers are not representative, and so cannot be generalized.

It is an informal fallacy.

Subfallacies[edit]

See the main article on this topic: Logical fallacy#Informal

See also[edit]

External links[edit]