RationalWiki's 2018 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $3630Goal: $5000

Nag Hammadi library

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Yale Papyrus Fragment from the Nag Hammadi Gnostic Library, Codex III, containing The Dialogue of the Savior.
Light iron-age reading
The Bible
Icon bible.svg
Gabbin' with God
Analysis
Woo
Figures
Warning icon orange.svg This page contains too many unsourced statements and needs to be improved.

Nag Hammadi library could use some help. Please research the article's assertions. Whatever is credible should be sourced, and what is not should be removed.

The Nag Hammadi library (less accurately known as the Gnostic Gospels[Note 1]) are a collection of Coptic[Note 2] Christian and philosophical writings discovered in 1945 near Nag Hammadi, Egypt. The papyrus itself is generally dated to the 3rd or 4th century CE at the time of burial, though each individual codex has different dates of original composition.

The Christianity-based texts are mostly Gnostic in nature, and were likely buried at a time when the Catholic Church (specifically Egyptian Bishop Athanasius) made his decree that non-canonical texts be outlawed. Of the religious writing, the single most critical find was a near-complete copy of the Gospel of Thomas, a set of sayings attributed to Jesus written near the beginning of the Christ-churches (non-Pauline churches) that arose in the 1st century CE.

The texts also contain several non-Christian texts that would have informed Gnostic beliefs, including Plato's Republic and the Greek Hermetica.

Importance[edit]

Besides the simple archaeological thrill of "oooh, something really old," the texts have a profound impact on historical understandings of various branches of Christianity that would be destroyed by the singular Roman Empire's version, the Catholic Church. The texts, along with the inclusion of the Greek works, show how important and fully-developed Gnostic ideas were in early Christianity. The texts show a developing scheme of "high philosophy" about the world around, emphasis on the individual, and a new tradition of questioning everything — something unacceptable to the Pauline tradition that depended upon dogma and unquestioning acceptance of authoritative interpretations. A literal take of the texts suggests that Jesus himself was philosophically far closer to the Greeks and the developing Jewish Gnosticism than to the Jewish authoritarianism of Paul.

The wonders of Barbelo[edit]

The late Christopher Hitchens dedicates a segment of his book God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything to exploring the fascinating implications of the Nag Hammadi texts, writing (in 2007):[1]

Sixty years ago, at Nag Hammadi in Egypt, a trove of neglected "Gospels" was discovered near a very ancient Coptic Christian site. These scrolls were of the same period and provenance as many of the subsequently canonical and "authorized" Gospels, and have long gone under the collective name of "Gnostic." This was the title given them by a certain IrenaeusWikipedia's W.svg, an early church father who placed them under a ban as heretical.

They include the "Gospels" or narratives of marginal but significant figures in the accepted "New" Testament, such as "Doubting ThomasWikipedia's W.svg" and Mary Magdalene. They now also include the Gospel of Judas, known for centuries to have existed but now brought to light and published by the National Geographic Society in the spring of 2006. The book is chiefly spiritualist drivel, as one might expect, but it offers a version of "events" that is fractionally more credible than the official account. For one thing, it maintains as do its partner texts that the supposed God of the "Old" Testament is the one to be avoided, a ghastly emanation from sick minds. (This makes it easy to see why it was so firmly banned and denounced: Orthodox Christianity is nothing if it is not a vindication and completion of that evil story.)

Judas attends the final Passover meal, as usual, but departs from the customary script. When Jesus appears to pity his other disciples for knowing so little about what is at stake, his rogue follower boldly says that he believes he knows what the difficulty is. "I know who you are and where you have come from," he tells the leader. "You are from the immortal realm of Barbelo." This "Barbelo" is not a God but a heavenly destination, a motherland beyond the stars. Jesus comes from this celestial realm, but is not the son of any Mosaic God. Instead, he is an avatar of SethWikipedia's W.svg, the third and little-known son of Adam. He is the one who will show the Sethians the way home. Recognizing that Judas is at least a minor adept of this cult, Jesus takes him to one side and awards him the special mission of helping him shed his fleshly form and thus return heavenward. He also promises to show him the stars that will enable Judas to follow on.

Deranged science fiction though this is, it makes infinitely more sense than the everlasting curse placed on Judas for doing what somebody had to do, in this otherwise pedantically arranged chronicle of a death foretold. It also makes infinitely more sense than blaming the Jews for all eternity. For a long time, there was incandescent debate over which of the "Gospels" should be regarded as divinely inspired. Some argued for these and some for others, and many a life was horribly lost on the proposition. Nobody dared say that they were all man-inscribed long after the supposed drama was over, and the "Revelation" of Saint John seems to have squeezed into the canon because of its author'sWikipedia's W.svg (rather ordinary) name.

But as Jorge Luis BorgesWikipedia's W.svg put it, had the Alexandrian Gnostics won the day, some later Dante would have drawn us a hypnotically beautiful word-picture of the wonders of "Barbelo." This concept I might choose to call "the Borges shale":[Note 3] the verve and imagination needed to visualize a cross-section of evolutionary branches and bushes, with the extraordinary but real possibility that a different stem or line (or tune or poem) had predominated in the labyrinth. Great ceilings and steeples and hymns, he might have added, would have consecrated it, and skilled torturers would have worked for days on those who doubted the truth of Barbelo: beginning with the fingernails and working their way ingeniously toward the testicles, the vagina, the eyes, and the viscera. Non-belief in Barbelo would, correspondingly, have been an unfailing sign that one had no morals at all.

Reception by modern Christians[edit]

Given the gnostic nature of the texts, which suggest that Jesus was fully human and not necessarily the Son of God in a way other than how every human is, that it is the connection to God and not a single book, pope, or church that will get you to heaven, and the very, very heretical idea that one should actually think and question things, some modern Christians have been quick to dismiss the books as "heresy."[citation needed] Even when it comes to the Gospel of Thomas, a work that some scholars suggest is as authentic about Jesus' words as Mark (the earliest of the Synoptic Gospels), they[Who?] will say it is just heresy and should not be read by anyone easily turned from the Truth.

Few, if any, American Christians are even aware of the texts, or they confuse them with the Dead Sea scrolls.[Note 4] However, an interesting turn in the world of creationists has now seen the Dead Sea and Nag Hammadi texts referenced as some kind of "proof" of Jesus, in response to skeptics' question "what evidence is there that is not Biblical?". Yet at the same time, they will say they are not in any way the authentic words of Jesus. It must be nice to have your cake and eat it too.

Partial list of codices found at Nag Hammadi[edit]

Where on Earth is Nag Hammadi?
  • Codex I (also known as The Jung Foundation Codex):
    • The Prayer of the Apostle Paul
    • The Apocryphon of James (also known as the Secret Book of James)
    • The Gospel of Truth
    • The Treatise on the Resurrection
    • The Tripartite Tractate
  • Codex II:
    • The Apocryphon of John
    • The Gospel of Thomas
    • The Gospel of Philip
    • The Hypostasis of the Archons
    • On the Origin of the World
    • The Exegesis on the Soul
    • The Book of Thomas the Contender
  • Codex III:
    • The Apocryphon of John
    • The Gospel of the Egyptians
    • Eugnostos the Blessed
    • The Sophia of Jesus Christ
    • The Dialogue of the Saviour
  • Codex IV:
    • The Apocryphon of John
    • The Gospel of the Egyptians
  • Codex V:
    • Eugnostos the Blessed
    • The Apocalypse of Paul
    • The First Apocalypse of James
    • The Second Apocalypse of James
    • The Apocalypse of Adam
  • Codex VI:
    • The Acts of Peter and the Twelve Apostles
    • The Thunder, Perfect Mind
    • Authoritative Teaching
    • The Concept of Our Great Power
    • Plato's Republic — The original is not gnostic, but the Nag Hammadi library version is heavily modified with then-current gnostic concepts.
    • The Discourse on the Eighth and Ninth — a Hermetic treatise
    • The Prayer of Thanksgiving (with a hand-written note) — a Hermetic prayer
    • Asclepius 21-29 — another Hermetic treatise
  • Codex VII:
    • The Paraphrase of Shem
    • The Second Treatise of the Great Seth
    • Gnostic Apocalypse of Peter
    • The Teachings of Silvanus
    • The Three Steles of Seth
  • Codex VIII:
    • Zostrianos
    • The Letter of Peter to Philip
  • Codex IX:
    • Melchizedek
    • The Thought of Norea
    • The Testimony of Truth
  • Codex X:
    • Marsanes
  • Codex XI:
    • The Interpretation of Knowledge
    • A Valentinian Exposition, On the Anointing, On Baptism (A and B) and On the Eucharist (A and B)
    • Allogenes
    • Hypsiphrone
  • Codex XII
    • The Sentences of Sextus
    • The Gospel of Truth
    • Fragments
  • Codex XIII:
    • Trimorphic Protennoia
    • On the Origin of the World

External links[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. The Gnostic GospelsWikipedia's W.svg being named after Elaine Pagels'Wikipedia's W.svg 1979 book of the same name, The Gnostic Gospels.
  2. Coptic is the last stage of Egyptian, written with Greek letters instead of hieroglyphs or demotic glyphs.
  3. A clever pun by Hitchens, referencing the Burgess ShaleWikipedia's W.svg.
  4. One RationalWikian's own work in and around churches, teaching this material to students and Sunday School classes.

References[edit]

  1. Page 40.