RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $4200Goal: $6000

Gospel of Barnabas

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Party Like It's 632
Islam
Icon islam.svg
Turning towards Mecca

The Gospel of Barnabas is a text alleged to be an apocryphal "lost gospel" from the first or second century CE. Most indicators seem to point to it being a 16th century CE forgery, although many sources read as if it were much older.[1] Some scholars say it is a rewrite of previously existing writings, changed to suit an Islamic interpretation of Jesus.

Connection with Islam[edit]

It is promoted by some Muslims because it conforms to the Islamic view of Jesus rather than the Christian one, and because it names Muhammad as a prophet later to come. Most serious scholars hold that the book is of 16th century origin in either Italy or Spain.

Although often mentioned in Islamic apologetics, they view it as a Christian writing and do not give it scriptural status.

Despite being theologically more in line with the Islamic view of Jesus it still differs from Islamic teachings on several points, most notably the lack of an alcohol ban or even temperance (of any sort whatsoever).

Size[edit]

The book is a door stopper compared to the four canonical Gospels and consists of 222 chapters — actually longer than the canonical four combined. It appears to be a harmonization of the four Gospels synthesized with Islamic beliefs. Jesus is held to be a prophet but not the son of God, and is said to have escaped crucifixion by being raised into Heaven.[2] It even has Jesus saying specifically that he's "not the Messiah" (but curiously still refers to him as "Christ", which in Greek means… "Messiah").

See also[edit]

External links[edit]

References[edit]

  1. 1500 Year Old Bible Claims Jesus Was Never Crucified
  2. Judas Iscariot was allegedly crucified in place of Jesus.