There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
| Light iron-age reading|
|Gabbin' with God|
|—Kevin D. Vogts on bibliolatry vs. orthodoxy|
The practice of bibliolatry received a boost in the Reformation when proto-Protestants emphasized the doctrine of sola scriptura. Such high regard for books came in the wake of the Renaissance with its respect for old texts, and not so long after medieval times when literacy was uncommon, books were rare, and the written word represented Strong Magic.
The term is used exclusively as a pejorative, and is mainly used against fundamentalists who interpret the Bible very literally, or put such great stock by it as to make the appearance of upholding the Bible for the Bible's own sake rather than because they believe it was dictated by God. In other words, the accusation of bibliolatry is to directly imply that the accused essentially worships the Bible, itself, as or in place of God, thus, using the Bible as a graven idol.
In 2000, the Southern Baptist Convention removed language from their creed, the Baptist Faith and Message, that had established God as the "exegetical standard" for interpreting the Bible. They also went on a witch-hunt, purging seminary teachers and brass who suggested that advances in history and archaeology could lead people to a better understanding of the Bible. These actions drew charges of bibliolatry, and SBC vice president A. William Merrell, in a colossal snit, accused those making the charges of political motivations and heresy.
- Answers in Genesis and Creation Ministries International
- Their statement of faith cites the Bible, rather than God, as the "ultimate authority" on everything taught in the Bible.
- Eric Hovind and his posse at Creationtoday
- Their statement of faith again cites the Bible, rather than God, as the "final authority".
- Jack Chick
- Statement of faith has the following passage: "We consider this [the King James] version our final and absolute authority, above and beyond all other authorities on earth." So not only they are King James Only but King James As Final Authority as well (somehow the original manuscripts in Hebrew/Greek/Aramaic are not final).
- Genesis Park
Examples of careful enough wording not to count as bibliolaters
- Institute for Creation Research's tenets has this:
- "Its unique, plenary, verbal inspiration guarantees that these writings, as originally and miraculously given, are infallible and completely authoritative on all matters with which they deal, free from error of any sort, scientific and historical as well as moral and theological." Notice "infallible and completely authoritative" leaves room open for God to change it whereas "ultimate authority" or "final authority" does not.
- Discovery Institute
- Got Questions
- We believe the Bible, comprised of the Old and New Testaments, to be the inspired, infallible, and authoritative Word of God (Matthew 5:18; 2 Timothy 3:16-17). In faith we hold the Bible to be inerrant in the original writings, God-breathed, and the complete and final authority for faith and practice (2 Timothy 3:16-17). While still using the individual writing styles of the human authors, the Holy Spirit perfectly guided them to ensure they wrote precisely what He wanted written, without error or omission (2 Peter 1:21).
- sola scriptura
- Baptist 2 Baptist: Bibliolatry — A Fraudulent Accusation
- http://www.gotquestions.org/bibliolatry.html They have an article on bibliolatry... And use a different meaning from ours.