|Introducing the World Famous Bananaman|
|Moments of Hilarity|
Ray Comfort (born December 5, 1949, also known as the "Banana Man") is a New Zealand-born Christian evangelical minister, author, liar for Jesus, and video producer. He is perhaps best known for the so-called banana fallacy, in which he claimed that the perfection of the design of the banana is an example of God's hand in creation. Comfort operates his Way of the Master ministry out of Bellflower, Los Angeles, California. He has written dozens of books on the subjects of atheism, creationism, evangelism and salvation.
Ray Comfort was born (again) in New Zealand before coming to America (the New Zealanders politely told him to fuck off). Ray Comfort was a minister at the Calvary Chapel Fellowship, as well as his son-in-law Emeil Zwayne. The Calvary Chapel, founded by Chuck Smith, believes in the Holy Trinity (Father, Son, Holy Ghost) and they believe that the Bible is inerrant. They believe in the Rapture, the time of Tribulation, the Second Coming of Christ, and in Christ’s thousand-year reign as King of the Earth (see Millennialism). Calvary Chapel doesn’t require any seminary training for its pastors – which is a good thing since Ray Comfort has no formal training.
Chuck Smith was a student at Life Bible College, founded by Aimee Semple McPherson- a female Pentecostal preacher, faith healer and outspoken anti-evolutionist. McPherson was sued by the families of people who died after the evangelists told them to ditch the medical care they needed. Aimee McPherson died of a presumed accidental sleeping pill overdose.
Ray Comfort often provides the following biography in his books and websites;
“”Ray Comfort is a best-selling author and co-host (with Kirk Cameron) of the award-winning TV program “Way of the Master.” Comfort was a platform speaker at the American Atheists Inc. Convention and, along with Cameron, debated atheists on ABC's “Nightline.” He is the author of more than 60 books, including The Evidence Bible (a Gold Medallion Award finalist), God Doesn't Believe in Atheists, and The Way of the Master. He and his wife, Sue, live in Southern California, where they have three grown children.
 Media presence
 Way of the Master
Together with actor Kirk Cameron (a.k.a. the inventor of the "Crocoduck"), Comfort produces the Way of the Master series including TV and radio shows as well as internet articles. The masterly way is apparently the art of conversion by laying a massive guilt trip on followers and seekers, exactly like Jesus did (wink wink, nudge nudge),
intellectual argument clever rhetoric plays a much smaller part. It's worth noting that though they frequently pontificate about the nature of God, and the path to morality, neither Comfort nor Cameron has any formal education in theology.
The Comfortable message amounts to:-
- You have broken the Ten Commandments.
- You will go to hell if you die just now.
- You cannot be forgiven unless you do exactly as Ray Comfort tells you.
 Living Waters
Words of Comfort is the man's blog, that’s a really original name. Most of the site's arguments against the theory of evolution and atheism are not worth debunking; he'll just keep coming back with more (or maybe even the same ones). This, however, hasn't stopped many atheists from flocking to the blog for a laugh. Comfort got so many of these readers that for a time he named the site "Atheist Central." He used material posted by atheists on the site to help him write quite a bit of very profitable Godly material, including his book You Can Lead an Atheist to Evidence, but You Can't Make Him Think.
 Beliefs and views
 On morality
Ray Comfort tells his followers to accept increased suffering in this life in order to avoid greater pain after death, you've got to be miserable for Jesus.
|But there is no Biblical precedent for a message of life improvement upon conversion. None. In fact, the Bible says you will have trials, tribulations, temptation, persecution.|
Christians of the Comfort type are made to feel guilty and to fear God's wrath if they glance at another person and think "Isn’t he/she attractive?" According to Comfort (and Jesus himself) looking at another person with lust is equivalent to adultery.
Most modern psychologists disapprove strongly of the "Endless
Love guilt" game. Psychologists have long argued that these feelings of random (but unacted upon) lust, feelings of curious sexuality, or even feelings of desire that are acted upon if no one is hurt (the same feelings that Comfort denounces as filthy and sinful), are natural and involuntary. Trying to suppress those feelings is nearly impossible and can cause psychological harm as can blaming yourself or laying guilt on yourself.
Comfort stooped to his usual tiresome pretzel logic (on the sympathetic forum of WND, of course) in order to explain the shooting spree by James Eagan Holmes in Aurora, Colorado. According to Comfort, it's "the humanistic worldview" that "says that no one is born with a sinful (evil) nature" which makes mass murder "normal", not the fact that Holmes was probably batshit crazy when he perpetrated his crime.
 On science
One of his most common arguments about the world as we know it goes directly against science and observable reality. Comfort believes the "Word of God" is literal truth, so, like virtually every YEC, he tells people to deny any science that says otherwise. Comfort is a Young Earth creationist, stating categorically, "there is no such thing as evolution". Interestingly, for a YEC, he is totally evasive about the age of the Earth and threatens to block users from his site for asking.  Even when it was pointed out to Comfort during a debate with the Atheist Experience that modern day medicine depends on the theory of evolution, (eg. creating more effective vaccines), Comfort will say it does not matter. God's word is God's Word. In other words, he's a complete idiot. Alternatively he's an effective salesman who knows how to get the faithful to fork out money buying his products and supporting his
comfortable lifestyle Godly ministry.
 Russia will attack Israel
Ray Comfort firmly believes that the Bible (particularly Ezekiel 38) prophesies that Russia will attack Israel at the end times (or “the latter days”). Ray Comfort interprets the reference the “Prince of Rosh” in Ezekiel 38 as Russia (using Smith’s Bible Dictionary, p. 584 as proof). Ray Comfort says the Bible prophesies that Russia will combine with Iran, Libya (in Hebrew called “Put”), and "communistic" Ethiopia (in Hebrew called “Cush”) and attack Israel. Comfort claims, "This will take place after an Israeli peace initiative has been successful. The Bible even gives the Russian reasoning for and the direction of the attack, as well as the location of the battle (Armageddon—Revelation 16:16)."
 End of Days
Apart from Russia attacking Israel, Ray Comfort believes that the end of times as predicted in the Bible is coming. And when it comes, he will be free from punishment and enter Heaven. Comfort compares himself to a man at court, where the judge asks to see evidence of his sin, where his lawyer gets up and says "there is no evidence of his sin. Jesus washed it all away." Comfort says the signs reveal the coming end of days, which are; (you can listen to Ray list them off here)
- There will be false Christs and many false prophets who will deceive many. False Bible teachers will have many followers, be money-hungry, and slander the Christian faith.
- There will be blasphemy; cold-heartedness; intemperance; brutality; rebellious youth; hatred of those who stand up for righteousness; ungodliness; pleasureseeking; much hypocrisy (even within the Christian church).
- Wars and rumors of wars; Nation rising against nation and intimidate each other; people will be fearful of the future and people will cry for peace
- Famines, disease (pestilence) and increase in cancer, heart attacks, and there will be earthquakes in various places
- Lawlessness (forsaking of the Ten Commandments)
- The gospel will be preached in all the world.
- Knowledge and science will be greatly increased.
- Signs from heaven (in the sun (sunspots?), moon, and stars) and the sun shall "darken" (which could be that dark smokes block all sunlight)
- Persecution against Christians in all nations
- Men’s hearts will fail them for fear of the future; humanity will be selfish, materialistic, arrogant, proud.
- Homosexuality will increase. The institution of marriage will be forsaken.
- Increase in occult activity (astrology, horoscopes, Satanism and perhaps Halloween) as well as an increase in cults.
- Vegetarianism will increase
- Men will scoff at the "fact" that God once flooded with earth (as well as Noah). Their motivation for hating the truth will be their love of lust. Comfort says "The Scriptures tell us that they make one big mistake. Their understanding of God is erroneous. They don’t understand that God’s time frame is not the same as ours. They think (in their ignorance) that God’s continued silence means that He doesn’t see their sins. In truth, He is merely holding back His wrath, waiting for them to repent and escape the damnation of hell. Jesus warned that the sign to look for was the repossession of Jerusalem by the Jews. That happened in 1967, after 2,000 years, bringing into culmination all the signs of the times. (These are combined from Matthew 24; Mark 13; Luke 21; 1 Timothy 4; and 2 Timothy 3.)"
When people say that these things have always happened, Ray Comfort jumps on them saying "What you said is is exactly what the Bible said you would say, therefore you prove the Bible yet again!"
 Animal cruelty
Ray claims to have run over his dog while riding his bike because his dog refused to follow his warnings about running in front of his bike.
 On cancer
Other gems included in this book include:
- "You should never consult a doctor or go to a hospital for treatment, because you would be interfering with the work of God in your life".
- There is absolutely no point in being healed in our bodies, then dying in our sins and spending an eternity in hell. It would be better to die of cancer and go to heaven because of that cancer, than to live in perfect health and end up in hell.
- Therefore you should never take medicine to relieve pain. You should never consult a doctor or go to a hospital for treatment, because you would be interfering with the work of God in your life. If Cancer is the chastening tool of God, then doctors who are fighting cancer are fighting against the work of God. If a preacher or a Christian believes the sickness is a means of chastening, then he should never pray for relief from the sickness, but rather pray that the cancer will continue to grow until the chastening is completed.
- If doctors were asked to diagnose that woman's case, not one spine specialist in the world would say "Satan has bound her". Doctors would call it arthritis of the spine, or vertebrae out of place, or some other medical term, and they would be right as far as medical terms are concerned. But if you get to the real source of the trouble you will discover that source is Satan.
“”Here is my response: In the book, I am arguing for cancer patients to seek medical treatment, and not to mistakenly believe that God gave them cancer as some sort of punishment/lesson, because if God had done that, then they shouldn't seek treatment until He has finished teaching them their "lesson." You and other atheists have numerous times attempted to make it look as though I'm saying the opposite, by taking it out of context. Any quote that begins with "Therefore" should be a clue that it is quote-mined.
So cancer is just God teaching you a lesson. And Comfort complaining about quote mining detonated irony meters across the globe.
 On child beating
In his Cults, Sects and Questions published around 1979, Comfort praises the beating of children to promote discipline, stating that an unbeaten child is no better than a "bastard", and that withholding the rod "is to put your child in the hand of Satan and co-operate with him in sending your child to hell!". In the same book, he describes how he regularly "canes" his children, and how his own mother would "turn grey" if she knew how he treated her grandchildren.
 The environment
Comfort seems to subscribe to the view, popular among fundies, that since everything will be destroyed and "made anew" in the End Times, environmental destruction is not a bad thing:
“”The reason atheists and skeptics get so upset when I say it’s good to cut down trees is that this world is all they have. If it gets completely wrecked, it’s all over for them. That’s what they believe . . . that life then ends. That’s unless Mother Nature or Father Evolution (whoever they believe made everything) makes some more trees, etc. Of course if it has to start all over again, they have to wait for around 4.5 billion years. That’s what they believe, and I guess that’s a little too long for them to wait. So they get antsy when Christians are a little flippant about creation. But we can’t help it. We don’t value creation as though our life depends on it. That’s because we know and trust Him who made all things, and if humanity wrecks this earth, we have His immutable promise that He is going to make all things new.
|—"A blogger's confession"|
But don't worry - according to the same blog post, he likes trees.
 On school shootings
 Views on Christianity
Comfort believes that once someone is born-again, God forgives them for all their sins: "[O]nce and for all and the moment you trust in him [Jesus Christ], you are completely justified and made right with God, you are made perfect by God's grace. That has nothing to do with living a good life, pleasing God because you can't because you a lying, thieving, adulterer at heart. The only thing you can do is repent and trust in him. The minute you do, in a heartbeat God justifies you. God cleanses you of your sin and you are born again. God gives you a new heart with a new set of desires and you know you are going to escape death and damnation." Other Christians disagree with this. He admits that any person can be saved and cleansed of sin the second they repent, making Christianity a get-out-of-jail-free card. Comfort believes that the Bible says that we are saved by grace alone,[wp] and not by works. Some Christians condemn him for that..
At other times, Comfort puts a serious emphasis on repentance. If you don't manage to stop sinning and to do good works, (like evangelizing and bringing Ray Comfort's message to other people) your conversion may be a false conversion and you will go to hell after all.
|Merely being sorry for your sins, or confessing them to God won't help you. You must turn from sin (repent)...|
A different group of Christians condemn him for that, but his followers apparently overlook the contradiction.
 Religious arguments
“”I don't have to prove anything to you. I would never be so foolish myself as to put God to the test. - Ray Comfort in response to atheist James D. Franz, Intelligent Design vs. Evolution - Letters to an Atheist page 12.
 'Common sense' proof of a god
Comfort believes that God can be scientifically proven. Comfort clearly doesn't know much about science. His argument is that "common sense" "proves" God; he then implies this is "science."
Comfort begins with the question, "how do you know there is a god?" Comfort replies that one knows who God is (and therefore, one supposes, knows there is a god, in some back-first logic handstands) the way one knows a spouse; that is, personal experience. You feel the love you have for your spouse or child, and you feel the love you have for God. Your spouse or child exist, therefore, God exists. Otherwise (one again supposes), why would you love Him?
Also, so many people say they know God, and talk of their love and experience of Him. Clearly, that is overwhelming evidence for God's existence.Do You Believe That?
 Are you a good person?
Perhaps, his most popular argument of all, the are you a good person? tactic. Hardly a program, book, or interview goes by where Ray Comfort does not use this argument. It is also presented in practically every gospel tract printed and distributed by Way of the Master.
Basically, the argument uses the Ten Commandments as a model for discovering sin. Comfort asks you if you have ever lied, stolen, committed adultery in your heart by looking with lust, or taken God's name in vain. If a person admits to any of these, Comfort jumps in and declares this is why that person should turn to Jesus. Of course this argument is a perfect example of begging the question, The argument needs God, to prove God.
 The parachute argument
The parachute argument is basically a reworking of Pascal's Wager. The premise is basically that there are lots and lots of good things out there, like famous art, money, a new iPad... but when push comes to shove, only some things can actually save you. If you were on a plane that was crashing, and you were handed a Mona Lisa, you would cast it aside - it's nice, but not when your life is on the line. The same applies with cash, or a new car. But if someone hands you a parachute you take it, because it will save you. God is the parachute. We're not sure why we are supposed to believe this, much less know it, but Comfort says it's true, so it must be.
 Make a rose for me
In his "faith-shaking" documentary "Evolution vs. God," Comfort asks skeptics to whip up a rose from nothing. According to his argument, if the rose is not intelligently designed, anyone should be able to make it. Rationally, this is only proof that roses are not intelligently designed, since an intelligent mind would be able to make one.
 Criticism of evolution
“”As blood began to evolve, it couldn't get around the body, so he evolved a heart to pump it around. The heart would take a long time to evolve, and it also needed a complex system of blood vessels to evolve. So survival was impossible for the first pre-human primitive life form. But that doesn’t matter to an atheist. It just happened. Evolution-did-it."
Ray Comfort strongly opposes the theory of evolution. Like most people who do not know or understand science, he argues against science by the playground tested method of 'name calling': "fairy tale for grown ups; a farce; intellectual-free zone; bogus science". A large portion of his objections against evolution are argued for the "common man", and are non-scientific, including argument from ignorance, god of the gaps and argument from incredulity.
It is evidently clear Comfort knows little about science:
- He has no specific education in science much less biology.
- He compared "evolution" to Cinderella's pumpkin turning into a chariot.
- He intermingles the theory of Big Bang and abiogenesis with evolution; freely interchanging all three terms (or ideas, abiogenesis is a hard word for Creationists to say).
- He constantly pipes up the old one liner: "there are no transitional fossils" and slips in the old "kind" argument.
- In his documentary "Noah," he seems to think that if the water came from space (as "evolutionists" believe), so did all the fishes. He also counts dolphins as fishes.
"Kind," in creationist jargon, generally refers these days to groups larger than a species but still thought to be related by common descent, such as entire genera or families (e.g. the "cat kind"). There are "species-to-species" transitions in the fossil record (e.g. Stephen Gould described a sequence of transitional fossils between two species of the snail genus Cerion), but presumably if you bothered to consider that rather than simply regurgitate your standard list of slogans, you dismiss this example as "they're still snails" (which of course is on some other creationist's list of standard slogans). Since "kind" is undefined, it's difficult to find a good example of a "kind-to-kind" transitional series....The fault isn’t with the definition of the word "kind." It hasn't changed in the slightest. One more time; here’s the definition: dog-kind, cat-kind, horse-kind, snail-kind, human-kind, etc. The atheist's difficulty is with the so-called evidence for evolution. There isn't any."
Comfort is also known for deliberate quote-mining, with many instances able to prove it. In his book Evolution: A Fairy Tale for Grownups, he openly admitted in the Introduction that he knew he was quote-mining but went ahead anyway because lying for Jesus is justifiable. Comfort repeats the old and refuted creationist quote mines, perhaps the one constantly reused: Charles Darwin on the eye. Ray Comfort is a big fan of the argument from design, and loves to talk about how amazing the human eyes is and does not accept that the eye evolved. Comfort does not even accept that the human eye has a blind spot. "I don’t have a blind spot in my eye. Both of them see very well and I am thankful for the 137million light sensitive cells that make sight possible. Do you have a blind spot in your eye? If you do, I suggest that you see an optician and see if he can either fix it, or get you another eye." Unfortunately for him, we all do have a blind spot. Click here to see an exercise for you to see for yourself where the blind spot is.
Comfort has built an extensive list of ridiculous arguments on his own. At the top of Comfort's ridiculous arguments against evolution is the banana. Another favorite of his is trying to disprove evolution with mating seasons. He used the dog as an example on Pat Robertson's show: there is a big bang, life forms, and after millions of years a dog evolves. It is the first dog. He has got legs, tail, teeth, eyes - and it's good he has good he has eyes because he has to look for a female, he has been blind for millions of years but now he can see. He has got to find a female. She has got to be evolved at the right place at the right time with all the reproductive organs and a desire to mate. Because without a female, he is a dead dog. Is that how Darwin described it? Is that how any evolutionary scientist ever described it? Absolutely not. What Comfort fails to understand to this day is that animals certainly do not live for millions of years and then suddenly grow features along with a mate that comes from nowhere. There was no first dog, there were carnivores, males and females able to reproduce together and gradually over millions of years evolving to become more dog like. And yet Comfort is perfectly fine to believe that the wives of Cain and Seth just appeared out of nowhere and certain biblical figures (like Adam and Noah) lived for several hundred to thousands of years.
 Favorite creationist arguments
 First and foremost, the banana
Ray Comfort sets out to prove that God designed bananas, in reality human plant breeders "designed" bananas. The wild bananas do not have the design features that Comfort points to in cultivated bananas and neither do some other fruits like pineapples and coconuts.
However, he's now expanded his fruity teleological article to other varieties, which makes you wonder how he's going to handle explaining away supposed freaks of nature like the durian (God's own tasty little stink bomb) or the Fuzzy Kiwifruit.
 Creation requires a creator
Here, Comfort's argument is structured as "A painting had a painter, a watch had a watchmaker, therefore creation must have a creator." What Comfort is doing here is simply asserting and assuming that we live in a creation without any verification or justification. His only and best response to this is "common sense." Common sense may suggest there is something inherently implausible about a loving God who allows hell and that’s just one example where Christianity goes against common sense. It looks like common sense applied only in ways that Ray Comfort likes and common sense should be disregarded whenever Comfort and/or other fundamentalist Christians dislike the conclusions. Not to mention, the logic fails when you ask certain questions; like if everything requires a creator, who created God?
While the laws of physics states that matter cannot be created, Comfort continues to assert that matter must be the result of divine creation. After all his faith demands that his God must be responsible. Comfort goes a bit further into absurdity by reasoning since the smartest person in the world cannot make anything from nothing, then God must have been responsible for creating everything. Basically, since we cannot demonstrate that matter can come from nothing, then Comfort says God made it magically out of thin air. And it has to be the god of the bible, not any other god or gods.
 Notable debates
Ray Comfort is quite the attention seeker. Apart from the constant street preaching in Los Angeles and confronting hundreds of laymen in public areas, Ray Comfort has challenged Richard Dawkins, Eugenie Scott, and Bill Maher to debate the theory of evolution and intelligent design.
Ray Comfort is not interested in any intellectual debates; rather, he is more interested in a large audience (the bigger, the better). However, his tactics and methods of getting a debate are rather immature and despicable. For instance, once Ray Comfort debates someone, he announces he is somehow on a equal intellectual playing field as scientists like Prof. Dawkins (even though Ray Comfort does not have any degree of any kind). However, whoever Ray Comfort challenges (and often offers thousands of dollars for the person's time) but declines or ignores the offer, Comfort replies in a rather immature whining manner by taunting them and calling them scared. Ray Comfort twists disinterest into fear. For instance, when Comfort challenged Bill Maher, Ray Comfort made the following comment;
“”“I am beginning to suspect that some men may have evolved from chickens, or at least that’s the impression I get when it comes to evolutionists standing up for their convictions,” notes Comfort. “Mr. Maher can choose the place of the debate. I don’t mind if he has it in front of his audience. He can bill it as ‘Another simple-minded Christian being thrown to the lions.’"
So basically, Ray Comfort looks like an intellectual "big shot" either way; he is smart enough to debate a qualified scientist OR the scientist is scared of Ray Comfort's arguments. The simple truth is that Ray Comfort is a nobody who uses faulty logic and numerous illogical arguments that have already been refuted a thousand times, so debating him is practically pointless. All he wants is an audience to preach to. Perhaps the biggest audience he ever has was the debate with the Rational Response Squad on Nightline television, where Comfort revealed he could not prove God scientifically and his whole arguments rely on faith and belief.
Scientists like Dawkins and Eugenie Scott do not waste their breath on people like Ray Comfort, a man who has no intention whatsoever of changing his mind or actually acknowledging valid scientific evidence. Ray Comfort's presupposition and blind faith in his religion demand that he believes, regardless of proof, whereas scientists are interested in honest discussions and an honest approach to discovering truth. So instead, Ray Comfort usually debates positive atheists who have a remarkable audience, such as leaders of atheist groups, radio hosts, and vloggers.
 Debate with Ron Barrer at the 2001 Atheist National Convention
On April 2001 in Orlando, Florida at the American Atheists' National Convention, American Atheist national spokesperson Ron Barrier debated Ray Comfort. Within the debate, Comfort used the banana as an argument for design and proof for God.
 Debate with the Rational Response Squad
On May 5, 2007, RRS co-founder Brian Sapient and RRS member Kelly O'Connor participated in a live debate aired on Nightline with Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron. Comfort and Cameron claimed they were able to show the existence of their god without the use of the Bible and faith (spoiler: they were wrong).
 Debate with Thunderf00t
On July 24, 2009, Ray Comfort and YouTuber vlogger Thunderf00t had a recorded debate (eventually they met a second time and had another discussion). There was no moderator or audience, just the two of them sitting down and freely addressing any topic they wished. Afterwards, the debate was posted online (the whole debate is available on Thunderf00t's channel).
 Debate with the Atheist Experience
On 27 March 2011, Ray Comfort was a call-in guest on The Atheist Experience, with hosts Matt Dillahunty (a former Baptist seminarian turned atheist and founder of Iron Chariots) and Russell Glasser. You can check it out here.
 Debate with Matt Dillahunty
On 7 February 2014, Ray Comfort and Matt Dillahunty of The Atheist Experience debated the existence of God on the KKMS.FM radio show On the Way with Ridgeway. Owing to Ray's insistence on preaching rather than actually engaging in debate, Matt avowed after the show never to have anything to do with Comfort ever again. Available here.
 $10,000 challenge
Comfort had a standing $10,000 challenge to anyone who could show him a transitional fossil. However, not just any fossil would do, and Comfort demanded that someone show him a lizard producing a bird, a dog producing a cat or, even stranger, a sheep producing a chicken. The deafening silence to his throwing down of the gauntlet (outside the sound of a million face-palms) only went to prove to Comfort that evolution is false and that transitionals do not exist.
The page that promoted the challenge no longer exists.
Ray Comfort has faced accusations that he copied the work of Stan Guffey without giving credit, see Accusations of plagiarism where plagiarised material is set out. Yes this is the very same guy who likes to frighten people telling them they will go to Hell because they told one or more small lies or stole anything. Even having stolen something small as a child makes somebody a hell-bent thief according to the Comfortable system, yet Comfort stole another man's intellectual property. Comfort knows that was naughty, Comfort said so himself.
Comfort manages to churn out about 5 books a year but they are typically lightweight in both size and intellect, so this is not really much of an achievement. A lot of his "work" is public domain material he has taken from elsewhere, collated and published. For example, his [Some dead guy] Gold: Pure. Refined. books are just collections of that person's writings or speeches.
 Welcome to his F***book page, f***ers
Comfort has a Facebook page, not that anyone would want to spend long periods of time on it (except for a quick game of "bait the fundamentalist and get banned", of course). In typical fashion, he once threatened to ban anyone using the term "bibliophile" even though that word very obviously does not mean what he says it means.
 See also
- Gene Ray — his style is similar to Comfort's, but he manages to make his craziness entertaining
- Kirk Cameron — Comfort's sidekick
- Liars for Jesus
- God Doesn't Believe in Atheists: Proof That the Atheist Doesn't Exist
- Origin of Species (2009) - in which Comfort defecates on historic works just to be an ass.
- You Can Lead an Atheist to Evidence, but You Can't Make Him Think - our book report on Comfort's "freebies for atheists" program!
- 180, a
"shocking documentary"schlockumentary about abortion
- Keeping Ray, Tod, and Kirk honest... because they don't know how to
- Atheist Central - Ray Comfort's Blog
- Proof that we said too much.
- Uncomfortable Questions for Ray Comfort and Believers in Hell
- Here is how, Ray says, you can know you've got the right god.
- Ray Comfort succeeds Ted Haggard as Most Gay Evangelical
- Very long article about Ray Comfort for readers with plenty of time
- ↑ Comfort claims the "Bananaman" video is a hoax perpetrated by atheists.
- ↑ http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/story?id=1735434&page=3
- ↑ 
- ↑ You Can Lead an Atheist to Evidence, But You Can't Make Him Think, Page 95
- ↑ Matthew 5:27-30
- ↑ http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sex-dawn/201004/sexual-repression-the-malady-considers-itself-the-remedy
- ↑ http://recoveringcultist.blogspot.com/2011/08/sexual-repression.html The case history is from a former Christadelphian but can be generalized to other religious people who try to suppress sex.
- ↑ Ray Comfort Explains Aurora Shootings, Dispatches from the Culture Wars
- ↑ http://www.brianathomas.com/archives/2009/03/02/kirk-camerons-and-ray-comforts-way-of-the-master-series/
- ↑ http://www.wearesmrt.com/wiki/index.php?title=Questions_Ray_Comfort_Won%27t_Answer&oldid=2505#How_old_does_he_think_the_earth_is.3F
- ↑ What do I think of Ray Comfort?
- ↑ Ezekiel 38:16
- ↑ Ezekiel 38:5-8
- ↑ Ezekiel 38:11
- ↑ Ezekiel 38:5-10
- ↑ 2 Peter 2:1-2
- ↑ 2 Peter 3:1-7
- ↑ http://www.onthebox.us/2013/03/words-of-comfort-megaphone.html
- ↑ Wikiquote - More Than Just Comfort: An Answer to Cancer
- ↑ Ray Comfort claims to find a Cure for Cancer.
- ↑ In which Comfort shows he really is a despicable human being
- ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20080402045803/http://raycomfortfood.blogspot.com/2008/03/bloggers-confession.html
- ↑ Connecticut School Shooting... Why???, Way of the Master (just after 3m mark).
- ↑ http://wiki.ironchariots.org/index.php?title=Mormonism_%28Way_of_the_Master%29
- ↑ https://s3.amazonaws.com/Website11/Comfort.htm
- ↑ Hitler, murderers, rapists, or anyone else, can be just as wicked as they want their whole life to their last minute, but that's clearly fine with Comfort.
- ↑ https://s3.amazonaws.com/Website11/Comfort.htm
- ↑ 
- ↑ http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Wolves/ray_comfort.htm
- ↑ http://tinyurl.com/6lsxkcr
- ↑ http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Thunderf00t_debates_Ray_Comfort
- ↑ Iron Chariots definition
- ↑ http://raycomfortfood.blogspot.com/2011/04/genesis-on-trial_27.html
- ↑ Or theology, or reading comprehension, or....
- ↑ http://raycomfortfood.blogspot.com/2011/04/genesis-on-trial_26.html
- ↑ Defender's Guide, page 87
- ↑ http://www.fstdt.com/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=67928&Page=4
- ↑ Elephantine error from Ray Comfort refutes a similar claim over elephants.
- ↑ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJ-DawQKPr8
- ↑ Ray Comfort makes a Fruit Salad, Dispatches From the Culture Wars
- ↑ http://www.wnd.com/2006/05/36099/
- ↑ http://www.intelligentdesignversusevolution.com/arguments.html
- ↑ http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/12/it_couldnt_happen_to_a_sleazie.php
- ↑ http://aigbusted.blogspot.com/2009/11/ray-comfort-plagiarist.html
- ↑ Stealing intellectual property is also theft, see What is intellectual property?.
- ↑ “If you call any other Christian on this page a ‘bibliophile’ I will ban you.” The Daily Dolt
- ↑ And decided to omit a few crucial chapters to make room for his own Hitler-obsessed introduction.
- ↑ http://blog.leagueofreason.co.uk/reason/ray-comfort-is-180-degrees-from-reality/ See here for counter-arguments.