Bronze-level article

Emil Kirkegaard

From RationalWiki
(Redirected from Emil O. W. Kirkegaard)
Jump to: navigation, search
Emil Kirkegaard
The colorful pseudoscience
Icon race.svg
Hating thy neighbour
Divide and conquer
Frogs and swastikas
Icon altright.svg
Hitler wannabes
Rebuilding racism
For the love of Goat, do not confuse him with philosopher Søren Kierkegaard.
... a secret conference on “intelligence”, featuring notorious speakers including in previous years white supremacists and a weird far-right paedophilia apologist called Emil.
—Stewart Lee, The Guardian
Kirkegaard. He’s one of those anti-semitic ‘white genocide’ lunatics, but that’s not even the worst part of his character: he has a way to justify raping children.
PZ Myers[1]

Emil Ole William Kirkegaard (online aliases: Deleet,[2] Deleetdk,[3] EmilOWK) is a Danish paedophilia apologist whose defence of child-rape was exposed by mainstream news sources in January 2018.[4][5][6][7] Aside from his controversial writings on paedophilia, Kirkegaard has been involved in other controversies such as releasing semi-private data of 70,000 OKCupid users without permission, including their personal sexual preferences,[8] widely considered "without a doubt one of the most grossly unprofessional, unethical and reprehensible data releases".[9] His writings on race and intelligence[10] have also caused controversy and because peer-reviewed journals refuse to publish his work, he set up his own pseudojournals.[11]

Since 2014 Kirkegaard has attended the London Conference on Intelligence at University College London (UCL) with far-right individuals to deliver pseudoscientific lectures on controversial IQ-related subjects, including eugenics, hereditarianism and race.[12][13][14][15]

Kirkegaard denies and attacks anyone who points out he is alt-right and/or a white nationalist since he knows those things discredit his writings on race and intelligence; he self-describes himself alt-center, a term similarly adopted by Anatoly Karlin and several other crypto-fascist bloggers.

The Southern Poverty Law Center monitors Emil Kirkegaard as part of their online hate watch.[16]

He is permanently blocked from editing Wikipedia,[17] having misused the wiki to spread his racist nonsense. He has since whined about Wikipedia deleting his pseudoscientific writings on race.[18]

Like neo-Nazi incels, while obsessing about white birth/fertility rates and telling white people to have more children,[19][20][21] Kirkegaard has none of his own despite being 30 years old. For this reason there's a parody article about him on Encyclopaedia Dramatica, mocking him as a secret-antinatalist.[22]


Kirkegaard describes himself as a “self-taught” geneticist who has previously defended child rape, and appeared on the far-right webshow Reality Calls to discuss the “future of eugenics.”
—Ben van der Merwe[23]

Kirkegaard was born in Denmark in 1989,[24] but in 2018 moved to the US. A pseudointellectual he has described himself as a "polymath", "scientist", "geneticist", "philosopher" and "psychologist",[25][26] when he isn't any of these things and his only qualification is a BA Linguistics from Aarhus University.

He's been a member of three Danish political parties: PiratpartietWikipedia's W.svg (Pirate Party) 2012–2014, Internetpartiet (Internet Party), 2015 and Technologipartiet (Technology Party) 2016–present; he co-founded the latter and describes it as a think-tank.[27] In 2014 he co-founded OpenPsych with Davide Piffer.



Kirkegaard is a self-described eugenicist who claims "Western civilisation" (an euphemism for white people) will die out unless there are eugenics breeding programmes:

DysgenicsWikipedia's W.svg is real. Eugenics or Western civilization dies. Choose wisely.[28]

One of these breeding programmes Kirkegaard supports is governments should pay white females (with high IQs) to have more children. For this reason like the eugenicists Michael A. Woodley of Menie and Edward Dutton, Kirkegaard is opposed to feminism and women's rights in general because smarter females in the West nowadays tend to pursue careers, rather than stay at home having many babies. Kirkegaard is therefore critical of voluntary childlessness, but this has caused him to be ridiculed since he has no children of his own.


Generally speaking, right-wingers are more moral people. True both for trivial stuff like swearing, but also cheating rates in relationships etc[29]

Kirkegaard holds many controversial to batshit-crazy political views listed on the Technologipartiet website[30] and his blog:[31]

  • Abolish international foreign aid.
  • Decommission the Ministry of Gender Equality in Denmark.
  • Abolish hate speech and gender/race equality laws.
  • Legalise all drugs; Kirkegaard describes himself as a "major proponent of drug legalization",[32] arguing even "cocain[sic] should be sold".[33]
  • Release all criminals imprisoned for drug offences.
  • Remove state subsidies for Anti Doping Denmark.
  • Legalise most extreme forms of pornography possession, including (cartoon) child pornWikipedia's W.svg,[34] arguing "government internet censorship must be prohibited."
  • Legalise prostitution and brothels.
  • Oppose organic food.
  • Oppose positive discrimination and affirmative action.
  • Oppose multiculturalism to avoid "parallel societies".

The Technologipartiet is anti-green, for example it promotes nuclear power, "including experiments with thorium-based versions and fusion when the time comes" and wants to avoid "wasting money on expensive renewable energy". One of its oddest policies is "total abolition of patents"; it also supports state aid for embryo selection and "eugenics biotechnology".

Kirkegaard doesn't detail much on the Technologipartiet website about his views about immigration, only that he thinks there should be "tight" border controls in Denmark. However, on his blog he says he thinks immigrants should require to take "cognitive ability tests".[35] Since he argues non-whites (excluding East-Asians) score low in IQ tests, this equates his immigration policy being more or less white nationalist and on his Twitter he has made more openly extreme statements, for example claiming he wants to ban Islamic immigration because he considers Muslims "self-destructive"[36] and that he supports the anti-Muslim immigration policies of the right-wing populist Sweden Democrats to "save Sweden".[37]

Although Kirkegaard describes himself as alt-center,[38] his political views align with the alt-right and he has been described as a "figure on the radical right fringe".[39] Kirkegaard has tried to make the Technologipartiet seem "radical centrist" and himself politically a "heterodox", but most of Technologipartiet's policies are common views shared by the alt-right and far-right in general e.g. abolishing all hate speech and equality laws, restricting immigration (especially Muslim), opposition to foreign aid and multiculturalism; support for eugenics.


Further evidence he is alt-right, include:

Kirkegaard uploaded this alt-right graphic of Pepe the Frog to Twitter; notice it contains the word "niggers" on the left side.

Kirkegaard is listed as a member of the "All Right Social Network", that also includes white supremacists such as Richard Spencer, Brittany Pettibone, Patrick Little and Angelo John Gage.[66]

Nazi sympathiser[edit]

In 2013 there was a campaign by Danish Antifa to expel Kirkegaard from the PiratpartietWikipedia's W.svg (Pirate Party) after they discovered he had ranted about "low IQ immigrants" on the Piratpartiet internet forum. Furthermore, on his Facebook profile, Kirkegaard posted a photo of himself next to someone performing a Nazi-salute, while smiling, and writing an insensitive comment about being the Führer. Antifa also found evidence that Kirkegaard had tried to defend cooperation of the Piratpartiet with the neo-Nazi Party of the DanesWikipedia's W.svg, founded by Daniel Carlsen; an article appeared on the Project Antifa website describing Kirkegaard as a "Nazi Sympathiser" and attempted to expel him from the Piratpartiet:

Emil Kirkegaard's approach to issues about racism and nazism, you may find only in neo-Nazi groups. At the Pirate Party's forum he writes "If one's immigration consists primarily of low intelligent people, then it will be very, very expensive for the country. And that's exactly what we see in the western countries now." Both Emil Kirkegaard and several other party activists defend cooperation with the Party of the Danes. At the same time, Emil Kirkegaard's Facebook can see a photo where an unknown person is in the background, while Emil Kirkegaard is smiling at the camera. Emil Kirkegaard's comment reads: "The Führer is being hailed/saluted". (English translation of Danish) [67]

Emil Kirkegaard with Nazi saluting friend; Kirkegaard wrote on Facebook he is the Führer.

In response to the neo-Nazi or Nazi sympathiser allegation, Kirkegaard has claimed the photo of the Nazi salute was a "joke".Do You Believe That?

Paedophilia blog-post[edit]

Emil Kirkegaard, who has written supportively of paedophiles being allowed to have ‘sex with a sleeping child’.
—Sophia Siddiqui, Institute of Race Relations
Disturbingly, the conference also featured an organiser who has argued in favour of raping children. Emil Kirkegaard, a blogger who has written about the defects of miscegenation (race-mixing) and explored the idea of a Jewish conspiracy, has claimed that “having sex with a sleeping child without them knowing it” could be a potential “compromise” for paedophiles.
—Student Rights, Tackling Extremism on Campuses[68]

Kirkegaard is most infamous for a blog post he wrote about paedophilia in September 2012:[69]

Falkvinge recently ran an article about the legalization of child porn possession. Either very foolish or very brave, perhaps both. Surely some reporters will pick up on this sooner or later and run headlines like “Pirates want to legalize child porn”, which even if true will damage the media image of the Pirate Parties. However, there is no way around this if one wants to discuss censorship and freedom of information. There is a reason why online censorship started with child porn, and ofc, the copyright people are happy about it.

I suggest that people read the comments as well, i also made some comments there as well.

Consider also reading this article which is making the basic point: if sexual orientation is something one is born with (it is), then the preference for children is as well. So, no law can make people become not pedofiles. Sad situation. Now comes the saddest part: Suppose one is born a pedofile. What to do? If one is a moral being, then one will avoid actually raping children. One can have sex with some rather young ones (say, any consenting child in puberty) without any moral problems, especially when one is young oneself.

For the rest, one is left to masturbate to porn, perhaps child porn (animated or not), and regular porn. That sucks, and there is nothing to do about it. Perhaps a compromise is having sex with a sleeping child without them knowing it (so, using sleeping medicine). If they dont notice it is difficult to see how they cud be harmed, even if it is rape. One must distinguish between rape becus the other was disconsenting (wanting to not have sex), and rape becus the other is not consenting, but not disconseting either (so, unaware of the action becus of sleep or coma or something like that). There is also the possibility of bodily harm that will be there after the person wakes up. This is especially the case with small children since their bodily openings are not large enuf for a regular sized male penis. To avoid this one shud not penetrate.

Oh, and perhaps the best solution to one who is exclusively aroused by very young children: castration, either medical or fysical. This will help reduce libido.

Kirkegaard's post is most sickening and creepy for suggesting a "compromise" for paedophiles is to drug children to get them asleep and rape them because they won't feel being sexually molested. Another disturbing part of the post is Kirkegaard's claim adults can have sex with any "consenting child in puberty without any moral problems" when this is illegal; puberty begins on average 10-11 in girls, 12 in boys and age of consent is not that low in any country. For these two reasons, he has been described as a "paedophilia-apologist".[70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83]

In April 2017, Kirkegaard updated his blog post, claiming what he wrote has been taken out of context by SJWs.[84] He finally updated it again in January 2018, writing: "The blogpost is a thought experiment. It describes hypothetical scenarios and courses of action, not any actions endorsed or recommended by me either then or now."[85] In July 2018, Kirkegaard suspiciously deleted the post from his website (the last available screenshot is dated 14 April[86]) and now claims to be suing people for libel who call him a "paedophilia apologist".

To date Kirkegaard has never offered an apology for his post, instead still arguing he thinks there will be no harm caused to children, if they are raped, when drugged and asleep:

My remark was simply that if you have sex with someone [children] while they are asleep and somehow don’t wake up from it and they never discover it later somehow, it is not likely for there to be any causal effects on mental health. How would there be?[87]

OkCupid doxing[edit]

In 2016, Kirkegaard published the data of nearly 70,000 OkCupid users, as a study in one of his own pseudojournals.[88][89]

Kirkegaard claims he was publishing already public information, but this is disputed by others who argue the information was "semi-private":

Moreover, it remains unclear whether the OkCupid profiles scraped by Kirkegaard’s team really were publicly accessible. Their paper reveals that initially they designed a bot to scrape profile data, but that this first method was dropped because it was “a decidedly non-random approach to find users to scrape because it selected users that were suggested to the profile the bot was using.” This implies that the researchers created an OkCupid profile from which to access the data and run the scraping bot. Since OkCupid users have the option to restrict the visibility of their profiles to logged-in users only, it is likely the researchers collected—and subsequently released—profiles that were intended to not be publicly viewable. The final methodology used to access the data is not fully explained in the article, and the question of whether the researchers respected the privacy intentions of 70,000 people who used OkCupid remains unanswered.[90]


Kirkegaard openly identifies as a sexist:

Sexism is true. Stop thinking in isms. Think in numbers.
Sexual access to women is the ultimate arbiter of male status.

Islamophobia and racism[edit]

He has made a number of Islamophobic comments, such as "Muslims are terrible immigrants to get", [93] Muslim immigration is "self-destruction"[94], "Mohammad was a paedophile" and [95][96] "the more Muslims in a country, the more extreme they become"[97] while using the #swedistan hashtag on Twitter.[98] We've also compiled his racist tweets below.


If you are referring to Emil Kirkegaard - He is not a scientist!
—Aarhus University[111]

Race and intelligence[edit]

See the main article on this topic: race and intelligence
Users who fall into this category include racialist academics and members of the human biodiversity, or HBD, blogging community. Often these are single-purpose accounts that exclusively edit on topics like race and intelligence, racial classification and bios of related researchers, like Linda Gottfredson or Helmuth Nyborg. Some have direct ties with racist journals or organizations, like Mankind Quarterly editor Gerhard Meisenberg. Emil Kirkegaard, who edits frequently under the username Deleet, is a research fellow at Richard Lynn’s Ulster Institute for Social research and the co-founder of the online pseudojournal OpenPsych.
Southern Poverty Law Center[112]
...his approach is the opposite of a scientific approach: he twists the numbers in all directions until he reaches a result that confirms his bias, namely that Muslim migrants are genetically less intelligent and commit more crimes
Le temps, discussing Kirkegaard's pseudoscience

Kirkegaard identifies as a proponent of HBD,[113] i.e. racialism and has described himself as a "race realist",[114] a term coined by J. Philippe RushtonWikipedia's W.svg that is adopted by white nationalists like David Duke. His website contains posts on race and eugenics.[115][116][117] Against the scientific consensus race is not an accurate way to describe or analyse human biological variation, Kirkegaard erroneously argues human races are valid biological constructs (as "genetic clusters") and makes PRATTs such as quoting Lewontin's Fallacy:

I think one can just read the various existing defenses of race realism if one is curious. The page you link to is well-sourced but an exercise in semantics and irrelevance. E.g. section Genetic evidence: Race does not predict human variation well presents results irrelevant to the title, it is well accepted that most variation is within the major racial groups. It does not follow from this that the between group variation is unimportant. Indeed, even very small differences can make a large difference, as people with mutations in e.g. SRY can report. It does not matter so much to me whether these groups are called races, genetic clusters, biogeographical ancestry or whatever (the most common euphemism in medical genetics).[118]

Kirkegaard doesn't just argue for human races, but maintains there is a racial hierarchy with different "tiers" of races based on average intelligence, for example he considers Indians to be a "lower tier".[119] He argues mean group differences in intelligence is mostly the result of genetic factors, for example writing "The hereditarian hypothesis is almost certainly true.[120] In fact, he has gone as far as arguing "100% genetic for the USA black white gap".[121] Nonsurprisingly, no peer-reviewed science journals would publish this pseudoscience and so Kirkegaard was left submitting a paper to the Mankind Quarterly.[122] On his website, Kirkegaard recommends outdated racialist literature such as John Baker's Race (1974) and in 2015 positively reviewed the far-right Metapedia article on race and intelligence.[123][124] He alleges a left-wing bias in academia that downplays heritability of race and IQ.[125]

London Conference on Intelligence[edit]

See the main article on this topic: London Conference on Intelligence

Another major organiser of the LCI is Emil Kirkegaard, who has attended all four conferences and even designed the website. Although he refers to himself as a “polymath” and Thompson describes him as a "very bright young guy", Kirkegaard is not an academic. His highest qualification is a Bachelor’s in linguistics. Having dropped out of his Masters degree, instead preferring to be "self-taught in various subjects", Kirkegaard now runs OpenPsych, a platform for non-peer reviewed psychology papers, along with Davide Piffer of Mankind Quarterly. Piffer is a fellow LCI-speaker, and was praised by Richard Lynn as having done "brilliant work identifying the genes responsible for race differences in intelligence."

Authors on OpenPsych include Kevin MacDonald, described by the Southern Poverty Law Centre as “the neo-Nazi movement’s favourite academic”, who praised Anders Breivik as a “serious political thinker with a great many insights and some good practical ideas on strategy.” John Fuerst, a fellow of the UISR, spoke at LCI 2015 and 2016, and frequently collaborates with Kirkegaard on OpenPsych. As well as writing various blogs, which he describes as “race realist”, , he also frequently posts anti-Semitic conspiracy theories on Facebook. When questioned about his popularity on the neo-Nazi forum Stormfront, he stated that he had “no beef against… neo-Nazis."

Kirkegaard’s own personal blog is home to topics such as "Is miscegenation bad for your kids?" and how one could empirically verify a Jewish conspiracy. His Facebook features alt-right promotional videos and once featured a friend’s Nazi salute with the caption "There will be an heir to the Führer."

By far the most disturbing of part of Kirkegaard’s internet presence, however, is a blog-post in which he justifies child rape. He states that a ‘compromise’ with paedophiles could be: “having sex with a sleeping child without them knowing it (so, using sleeping medicine. If they dont notice it is difficult to see how they cud be harmed, even if it is rape. One must distinguish between rape becus the other was disconsenting (wanting to not have sex), and rape becus the other is not consenting, but not disconsenting either.” He qualifies this with a note that “bodily harm” would undermine this justification, and especially “with small children since their bodily openings are not large enuf [sic] for a regular sized male penis. To avoid this one shud [sic] not penetrate.”

Kirkegaard’s reputation as a scientific advocate for neo-Nazism was increased last April [2017] when he appeared on Tara McCarthy’s ‘Reality Calls’ to discuss “the future of eugenics.” McCarthy was banned from YouTube for alleging a Jewish conspiracy to commit “white genocide”, supports deporting naturalized citizens and “killing them if they resist”, and said that she hopes “zero” migrants crossing the Mediterranean “make it alive”.[126]

Ulster Institute for Social Research[edit]

On Facebook,[127] Kirkegaard says he is a research fellow at the Ulster Institute for Social Research. This institute founded by Richard Lynn has received grants from the far-right Pioneer FundWikipedia's W.svg and publishes the racist pseudoscience journal Mankind Quarterly, described as white supremacist by SPLC.[note 2]

Arthur Robert Jensen memorial site[edit]

Kirkegaard is the owner of the Arthur Robert Jensen memorial site dedicated to the white nationalist Arthur Jensen.[128] Kirkegaard tries to portray Jensen as an "objective scientist" who fought against political bias and censorship, when in reality Jensen was politically biased and far-right for example sitting on the Editorial Board of a neo-Nazi journal and was interviewed by Jared Taylor in 1992. Jensen remains most infamous for his controversial writings on race and intelligence and Kirkegaard has described him as his main influence.


See the main article on this topic: OpenPsych pseudojournals

OpenPsych is a pseudoscience factory-farm, and Noah Carl is its prize hen. He is its second most prolific contributor, a member of the review team and its only Russell Group academic. Half of Carl’s OpenPsych reviews have come from just two people, one of whom, Emil Kirkegaard, has no educational qualifications beyond a Bachelor’s degree in linguistics, according to his own LinkedIn page. Kirkegaard also happens to be the founder of OpenPsych.

Kirkegaard is a maverick when it comes to scientific ethics. In 2016, he and Julius Bjerrekær (OpenPsych’s third most prolific author, behind Kirkegaard and Carl) were responsible for what one social scientist described as “without a doubt one of the most grossly unprofessional, unethical and reprehensible data releases I have ever seen.” The two had leaked the private data of 70,000 OKCupid users, including their personal sexual preferences.[129]

Many of Carl’s articles have been published on the OpenPsych website set up by Kirkegaard to circumvent the peer review system. Its editors and referees are almost all associated with the far-right and often do not even have qualifications in the fields they are responsible for overseeing. Over half of the articles on the site are authored or co-authored by Kirkegaard.

The co-founder of OpenPsych is Davide Piffer—another pseudo-scientific researcher who once claimed to have psychic powers—who is based at the Ulster Institute for Social Research (UISR), established by Richard Lynn. UISR is backed by Lynn’s Pioneer Fund and publishes the equally irreputable Mankind Quarterly, which regularly prints Kirkegaard’s writings. What we have here is a network of right-wing ideologues, who set up what have rightly been called “pseudo journals” through which they publish and “review” one another’s tracts.[130]

Despite Kirkegaard's insistence otherwise,[131][132][133] OpenPsych and its journals are pseudojournals: they do not use traditional peer review and are filled with Kirkegaard's publications. For example OpenPsych show typical signs of a pseudojournal: high percentage of content written by one of the journal's creator, Kirkegaard himself.

As of 13 January 2018:

  • Kirkegaard wrote for 18 out of the 32 papers in Open Differential Psychology[134]
  • Kirkegaard wrote for 1 out of the 7 papers in Open Behavioral Genetics[135]
  • Kirkegaard wrote for 8 out of the 11 papers in Open Quantitative Sociology & Political Science[136]

Kirkegaard was an author for 27 of 50 total papers, or 54%.

According to Kirkegaard, his journals do have peer review:[132]

OpenPsych journals do have peer review. In fact, they have open peer review meaning that literally anyone can see the review of any paper. For instance, look in the post-publication forum for the reviews of all published papers. I think this is a much better and certainly more transparent review than journals ordinarily practice. My status as editor has little impact on this system, since editors do not have rejection powers in these journals. Nor can they select reviewers at whim. Rather all in-house reviewers can review any paper they desire. The role of the editor is mainly to smooth things by asking reviewers whether they have time to review this or that submission.

However, this is an argument by assertion. The aforementioned process falls under the umbrella of open peer review.Wikipedia's W.svg


Kirkegaard has been criticized for inflating his h-index and other citation metrics by heavily citing his own papers. For example, as of February 2019, all 38 citations to his most cited paper were self-citations (i.e. papers authored or co-authored by Kirkegaard himself).[137] Of the 404 Google Scholar citations (as of February 12, 2019) to his papers, 316 of them (78%!) were self-citations. Many of the exceptions are citations to the OkCupid paper he co-authored in 2016, and the citations are typically talking about controversial issues in data science (using the privacy-violating paper as an example).[138]


For more information, see: Stopped clock

While Kirkegaard supports racialist pseudoscience, he nevertheless is against most other pseudosciences, including creationism and climate change denial, writing: "I spent several years debating creationists online (and religious people in general), and now a days occasionally debate climate science deniers."[139]

View on RationalWiki[edit]

Kirkegaard dislikes this page and in 2017 was blocked for trying to whitewash his article, while also harassing and doxing editors.[140] On his own website he has created a blog post that claims to refute "inaccuracies" on this page, however, rather than point out any errors, seeming as none exist, virtually the entire post is based on attacking another editor who he claims has mental illness and is an asexual. Both claims are denied by the editor who filed a legal report with Google to de-index Kirkegaard's blog post for defamation.[141]

Then just read Kirkegaard's own [RationalWiki] "refutation", which just as well reveals he's an alt righter with a bachelor's degree, publishing (racist) fake science in fake journals with no legitimacy whatsoever.
—@Kalle Leppälä[142]

See also[edit]

External links[edit]


  1. While he claims his support for eugenics "has nothing to do with any racial matters" this is contradicted by comments he has made elsewhere e.g. "DysgenicsWikipedia's W.svg is real. Eugenics or Western civilization dies. Choose wisely" (see here)
  2. According to an article published by The CanaryWikipedia's W.svg: "Between 2002 and 2006, the UISR was bankrolled by the ‘extremist’ Pioneer Fund to the tune of $286,372. And in response to a query by The Canary, Lynn confirmed that the UISR was financed in this way. Lynn, who has been the president of the Pioneer Fund since 2012, told The Canary he could not provide precise figures. But we can. Indeed, the fund’s support of the UISR began as far back as 1971, with grants totalling $609,000 up to 1996. According to the SPLC: "the Pioneer Fund’s original mandate was to pursue ‘race betterment’ by promoting the genetic stock of those ‘deemed to be descended predominantly from white persons’. It’s also claimed that the Pioneer Fund supported several well known white supremacists. These include David Duke (former Grand Wizard, Ku Klux Klan); Richard Spencer (agitator at the Charlottesville action that saw the tragic death of a civil rights protester); and Nick Griffin (former head of the British National Party)."


If a link below does not work: Try the [a w] links to go to and respectively.
  1. Chloroform, consent…they’re both the same thing, right?. Freethought Blogs.
  2. Wikipedia account
  3. Reddit account
  4. UCL launches 'eugenics' probe after it emerges academic held controversial conference for three years on campus. The Telegraph.
  5. University to investigate secret eugenics conference on campus attended by Toby Young. International Business Times.
  6. University investigates ‘racist’ eugenics conference held on campus since 2014. The Metro.
  7. UCL to investigate eugenics conference secretly held on campus. The Guardian.
  10. Dans le laboratoire de la «fake science». Le Temps:

    The scientific version of the alt-right: Since 2010, Emil Kirkegaard uses his skills to analyze all the data he finds online in order to scientifically prove a supposed genetic hierarchy between humans. With Westerners and Asians at the top of the pyramid, Africans and others at the bottom. "It is the scientific version of the alt-right, this ultra-right-wing supremacist American movement," explains Paul-Olivier Dehaye, a mathematician and co-founder of Kirkegaard denies marrying the theses. "I'm just trying to understand the basis of the inequalities between humans, and I do not think they depend solely on their environment or their education".

  11. Editorial: A Response to Criticisms of the OpenPsych Journals DOI: 10.26775/ODP.2018.11.02
  12. UCL conference probed over white supremacist talk. Morning Star.
  13. University College London launches 'eugenics' probe after controversial conference secretly held on campus. The Independent.
  14. Exposed: London’s eugenics conference and its neo-Nazi links. London Student.
  15. University College London under fire over its conferences on ‘eugenics’. The Times.
  16. Wikipedia Wars: Inside the Fight Against Far-Right Editors, Vandals and Sockpuppets
  24. About Me: Emil Kirkegaard
  26. Screenshot (
  27. Technology Party: Background
  32. THC and driving: Causal modeling and statistical controls
  33. Pirate Times: Pirate Policies on Drugs.
  34. On the prohibition of animated child pornography.
  39. Eugenics: White Nationalists Continue To Turn To The False Theory Of Genetic Supremacy.
  40. Twitter. 26 Mar 2018.
  41. Twitter: "The cuck map."
  44. Twitter. 30 March 2018.
  46. It has been noted that on Twitter: "In Emil OW Kirkegaard's self-description: 'hbd' = human biodiversity (euphemism for scientific racism) and his header has photos of Arthur Jensen and Galton".
  49. Reddit (comment)
  51. See this example (screenshot).
  52. "How to bring about more babies".
  54. Screenshot 1 and 2.
  56. Is Miscegenation bad for your kids
  57. According to VDARE:

    Danish blogger and genetics researcher Emil Kirkegaard has brought together all the known studies on the relationship between being mixed-race and mental health. Kirkegaard points out the studies’ findings of elevated levels of suicide, hyper-sexuality, depression, and problem drinking among mixed-race people. [Is miscegenation bad for your kids? by Emil Kirkegaard, Clear Language, Clear Mind, April 1, 2017] He argues that genetic diversity is only good up to a point. Thereafter the alleles are not meant to go together. In extreme cases, you get sterile offspring, such as Ligers.

  58. Emil OW Kirkegaard: IQ And The Future Of Eugenics [a w], YouTube.
  66. All Right Social Network
  67. Nazi sympathizer in Pirate Party. Project Antifa Denmark (screenshot).
  68. Student Rights
  69. The ban on child porn possession.
  70. As well as his involvement in neo-Nazi politics, Kirkegaard has written posts that justify the rape of children.
    —David Barnes, Eugenics: White Nationalists Continue To Turn To The False Theory Of Genetic Supremacy.
  72. Shamed Toby Young attended secret eugenics conference with neo-nazis and pedophiles. RT.
  73. How Toby Young Got Where He Isn't Today. The Guardian.
  74. Support for eugenics never really went away, but this is how it's becoming mainstream again. The Independent.
  77. UCL launches probe into eugenics conference held on campus. Oxford Student.
  78. Secret Eugenics Conference Held on Prominent U.K. University Campus For Years. Complex.
  79. Last Week In Politics. UK Blasting News.
  80. Toby Young spoke alongside Nazi who argues raping unconscious children is fine. Evolve Politics:

    Emil Kirkegaard [...] defended paedophilia suggesting that drugging the child before sex might be a "compromise" as they were unlikely to know it had happened and therefore wouldn’t be harmed. He has also advocated a "frank discussion of paedophilia related issues".

  81. UCL to investigate eugenics conference secretly held on campus. The Viral World.
  87. Talk:Emil O. W. Kirkegaard
  88. OkCupid dataset.
  89. Researchers Caused an Uproar By Publishing Data from 70000 OkCupid users. Fortune.
  90. OkCupid Study Reveals the Perils of Big-Data Science. Wired.
  101. 101.0 101.1
  104. 104.0 104.1 104.2 104.3 104.4
  106. 106.0 106.1
  107. 107.0 107.1 107.2
  112. Wikipedia Wars: Inside the Fight Against Far-Right Editors, Vandals and Sockpuppets
  113. What exactly is Human Biodiversity? – Personal view
  117. Biological races; differences between groups/populations: reading material]
  118. Racialism as Pseudoscience
  123. Review: Race (John Baker).
  124. Review of Metapedia’s Race and Intelligence
  125. Why the race and intelligence question is still not resolved [a w], Clear Language Clear Mind
  127. Emil Kirkegaard. Facebook (screenshot).
  131. Deleetdk comments on On the commentariat here, and why I don't think I can be associated with this community, despite liking the blog. [a w], /r/SlateStarCodex
  132. 132.0 132.1 Criticism of me and my research on SlateStarCodex’s subreddit
  133. Inaccuracies in Rationalwiki’s page about me
  134. Open Differential Psychology (ODP) [a w], Open Psych
  135. Open Behavioral Genetics (OBG) [a w], Open Psych
  136. Open Quantitative Sociology & Political Science (OQSPS) [a w], Open Psych
  137. "It takes a very special kind of person to show off their paper with 38 citations while knowing that every single one of those was a self-citation.", Nicolas Bray, Twitter, January 5, 2019
  138. Emil Kirkegaard's self-citations
  139. User:EmilOWK
  140. See block log