Conservapedia talk:What is going on at CP?/Archive345

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an archive page, last updated 10 March 2022. Please do not make edits to this page.
Archives for this talk page:
<1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>, <6>, <7>, <8>, <9>, <10>, <11>, <12>, <13>, <14>, <15>, <16>, <17>, <18>, <19>, <20>, <21>, <22>, <23>, <24>, <25>, <26>, <27>, <28>, <29>, <30>, <31>, <32>, <33>, <34>, <35>, <36>, <37>, <38>, <39>, <40>, <41>, <42>, <43>, <44>, <45>, <46>, <47>, <48>, <49>, <50>, <51>, <52>, <53>, <54>, <55>, <56>, <57>, <58>, <59>, <60>, <61>, <62>, <63>, <64>, <65>, <66>, <67>, <68>, <69>, <70>, <71>, <72>, <73>, <74>, <75>, <76>, <77>, <78>, <79>, <80>, <81>, <82>, <83>, <84>, <85>, <86>, <87>, <88>, <89>, <90>, <91>, <92>, <93>, <94>, <95>, <96>, <97>, <98>, <99>, <100>, <101>, <102>, <103>, <104>, <105>, <106>, <107>, <108>, <109>, <110>, <111>, <112>, <113>, <114>, <115>, <116>, <117>, <118>, <119>, <120>, <121>, <122>, <123>, <124>, <125>, <126>, <127>, <128>, <129>, <130>, <131>, <132>, <133>, <134>, <135>, <136>, <137>, <138>, <139>, <140>, <141>, <142>, <143>, <144>, <145>, <146>, <147>, <148>, <149>, <150>, <151>, <152>, <153>, <154>, <155>, <156>, <157>, <158>, <159>, <160>, <161>, <162>, <163>, <164>, <165>, <166>, <167>, <168>, <169>, <170>, <171>, <172>, <173>, <174>, <175>, <176>, <177>, <178>, <179>, <180>, <181>, <182>, <183>, <184>, <185>, <186>, <187>, <188>, <189>, <190>, <191>, <192>, <193>, <194>, <195>, <196>, <197>, <198>, <199>, <200>, <201>, <202>, <203>, <204>, <205>, <206>, <207>, <208>, <209>, <210>, <211>, <212>, <213>, <214>, <215>, <216>, <217>, <218>, <219>, <220>, <221>, <222>, <223>, <224>, <225>, <226>, <227>, <228>, <229>, <230>, <231>, <232>, <233>, <234>, <235>, <236>, <237>, <238>, <239>, <240>, <241>, <242>, <243>, <244>, <245>, <246>, <247>, <248>, <249>, <250>, <251>, <252>, <253>, <254>, <255>, <256>, <257>, <258>, <259>, <260>, <261>, <262>, <263>, <264>, <265>, <266>, <267>, <268>, <269>, <270>, <271>, <272>, <273>, <274>, <275>, <276>, <277>, <278>, <279>, <280>, <281>, <282>, <283>, <284>, <285>, <286>, <287>, <288>, <289>, <290>, <291>, <292>, <293>, <294>, <295>, <296>, <297>, <298>, <299>, <300>, <301>, <302>, <303>, <304>, <305>, <306>, <307>, <308>, <309>, <310>, <311>, <312>, <313>, <314>, <315>, <316>, <317>, <318>, <319>, <320>, <321>, <322>, <323>, <324>, <325>, <326>, <327>, <328>, <329>, <330>, <331>, <332>, <333>, <334>, <335>, <336>, <337>, <338>, <339>, <340>, <341>, <342>, <343>, <344>, <346>
, (new)(back)

Assfly's half-assed running of Assfly's dumbass hate-blog of asses (try saying that 5 times faster)[edit]

Is sowing doubt about how good he is at doing so. --Goatspeed. Goat bless America🇺🇸CircularREmail2.gifasoning🇺🇸🇺🇸-->Steal my ideas 06:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

I see nobs has decided to make a play to be the new TK. I'm sure that's going to work out well, given they didn't even want him in the super secret chat rooms. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 13:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
It can't be long until LT gets blocked for disrespecting CP's glorious leader. Spud (talk) 15:21, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Just gotta say, I don’t normally get involved with Conservapedia stuff, but “neutrality is by default leftist”, is. Certainly a thing that someone said. 💝 ASELAಮಾತು 💝 04:20, 2 February 2021 (UTC)


Certain sections of the US believe in 'birtherism' and 'Biden's win is a fake.' What would the equivalent term to Sedevacantism be? Anna Livia (talk) 12:54, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

I would call Trump death cult members schismatics. Politico is calling Trump the Anti-Pope of Mar a Lago. Nutty Roux (talk) 15:35, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Which prefix could we use instead of sede- ? Praese- ? Praesi - ? Go on, Anna, get it in first and I'll back you up for inclusion in the OED. LondonGrump (talk) 16:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The Latin for 'empty white house' is 'Domus Alba inanis' - so something involving 'inanity' would be apt (if bad Latin) Anna Livia (talk) 17:15, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Not worth a section, but CP's SSL cert has expired. Who installs a 3-month cert? Whoover (talk) 01:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Anaxevacantism! Put that on a triple-word score, you'll make some enemies out of friends. Semipenultimate (talk) 17:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

I had to look that up and I still haven't got the foggiest... LondonGrump (talk) 01:13, 2 February 2021 (UTC)


Why are so many of the news entries downvoted heavily? Is there some kind of system or reasoning I'm missing? (talk) 20:22, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

In the long ago, trolls came and dug out them furrows you see in the ground. Why? Maybe just to see if they could do it. Since then, ain't nobody seen fit to fill 'em up. Semipenultimate (talk) 20:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
I did it with a script as a proof of concept bc it's very easy to obtain a new IP address every few seconds on Verizon. If I had the energy, I'd be downvoting Circular Reasoning more than anyone's. They're the worst!!!1eleventy1!! Nutty Roux (talk) 13:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Nobs pisses on Karajou's toes AGAIN.[edit]

Why on earth does nobs think this is going to end any way other than the last time he picked a fight with anger bear? Despite nobs unblocking himself moments later this is only going to end in one way. And congratulations to whoever is running Northwest. Excellent long game you've been playing there. Oldusgitus (talk) 17:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm now getting 504 errors so it seems they've fucked the site again. Oldusgitus (talk) 17:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

The reason for the certificate lapse[edit]

Were they expecting the last-Trump/apocalypse/the Rapture in which Heaven comes to Earth and Trump is restored to office/end-time-collapse of the tubes (thusly no reason to renew past January 20)? Or they misunderstood the HMRC extending the tax return deadline extension. Anna Livia (talk) 17:35, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Trump's second coming will arrive in 2024.
One has to be willfully blind to not see the signs of the times now. There will be wars and rumors of wars. Biden will further empower Iran and get the USA in another endless conflict where American blood is spilt in the sand. Biden (the evil one) is distancing himself from Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu. Biden is against much of Christian/traditional/conservative morality. And Biden's economic policies will increase poverty and hunger in the USA. Obama was just a foreshadowing of the total depravity of Bidenism.
Darkness must increase for awhile before Trump's second coming in 2024.
Trump's second glorious presidential election victory in 2024 will be the capstone of Trumpism. USA! USA! USA!Coffeedrinker2 (talk) 18:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Can I have your drugs? ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 18:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Rapture mythos that replaces God and Jesus with the golden calfWikipedia of Donald Trump is quite revealing, isn't it? At any rate, doesn't "conservative" shit post culture already believes a lot of "Jews rule the world" / (((Soros!!))) / (((Rothschild!!))) / etc. conspiracy bullshit, right? You pro-Israel rapture bullshit folks should be happy. PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 19:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
You can't win, Darth Biden and his supporters. If you try to strike Trump down, he shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
Already, Trump and right-wingers are contemplating building their own social media platform.[1]
Thus saith St. Andy: "As Isaac Newton foretold, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction."Coffeedrinker2 (talk) 00:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

TerryH's Texit fanfic[edit]

Kinda a fun read, honestly. I wonder how long it takes him to type it out one-handed?--Martin Arrowsmith (talk) 18:44, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

It's not fanfic. It's top level wargaming based on a series of novels. LondonGrump (talk) 09:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Linky? RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 11:40, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Here to start with. Yeah, 'top level' wargaming where fleet movements are detected by fishing boats, intel is hand-delivered, 90 year olds run the gun crews, and one battleship sinks three destroyers, which between them manage to fire only one missile. That kind of 'top level'. Too bad the author's religious sensibilities keep this from being the Abbot/Cruz slashfic it so obviously yearns to be.--Martin Arrowsmith (talk) 20:40, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
"Tut!" I said.
"What did you say?"
"I said 'Tut!'" LondonGrump (talk) 21:18, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
"No one now alive has ever seen a ship like Texas afloat, except for some of her crew. For the Texas is no mere Iowa-class battleship, but a New York-class dreadnought."
Hmm. Texas, a New York class battleship: launched May 1912, overhauled 1926, length 573', displacement 34,000 tons, speed 21 kts, gun range 13 miles. Wisconsin, an Iowa class battleship: launched 1943, overhauled 1986, length 887', displacement 58,000 tons, speed 33 kts, gun range 24 miles. Yeah, math checks out.--Martin Arrowsmith (talk) 05:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Great writing on every level. It shows extensive research, particularly of the novels it's based on, and it's true: not a lot of people still alive would have seen a ship like that. People underrated William Blake too. LondonGrump (talk) 08:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
The USS Texas, provided it could be returned from it's mothballed state and an ammunition supplied secured, both very unlikely, would be a sitting duck to a 100 ton modern missile boat.--Mercian (talk) 16:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Oh look, a shitty pastiche from someone who's read Legacy of the Aldenata and thought 'I could write that!' Ranks up there with LaVoy Finicum's book where he describes the fantasy draw-down scenario between his self-insert and the feds which he ended up having in real life, to deadly consequences. Semipenultimate (talk) 15:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Karajou rips Rob a new one.[edit]

[2]--Mercian (talk) 16:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Wait... so Conservapedia, or Karajou at least, is ok with a privately owned website removing a user who breaks the site's rules, or who causes trouble? /sarcasm. I'm going to assume this logic doesn't apply to Twitter tho.
Also, that blog post is a... thing. Glad to see we're still living, rent-free, in Karajerk's head. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 18:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
My favorites were his reasons for seeing red at the suggestion of CP having a kangaroo court like ours and his usual paranoid persecutory delusions starring us. --Goatspeed. Goat bless America🇺🇸CircularREmail2.gifasoning🇺🇸🇺🇸-->Steal my ideas 01:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm disappointed to learn that we've tried and failed to take over CP. I can book an hour on the space laser if we want to try again. Whoover (talk) 07:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Implementing a kangaroo court would be very unlike CP, as their moderation is renowned for being fair and transparent. They’ve never behaved spitefully or arbitrarily towards users ever! Pizza SLICE.gifChef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 08:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Wait, we're trying to take over CP? Is that what this place is for? Huh, never knew that and I have been here 12 years... AceSimple Maze 21:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Some humor[edit]

RobS and LT blocked.png

UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 23:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Oh my goat they actually banned LT too? LMAO it's like The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street. --Goatspeed. Goat bless America🇺🇸CircularREmail2.gifasoning🇺🇸🇺🇸-->Steal my ideas 07:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
That's the beauty with CP - no matter how dedicated to the cause you are, at some point you will step on one of the sysop's crazy toes, and you're done. It's a shame Creepy Uncle Ed has gone (is he still alive?), because his blocking everybody who disagreed with him dumbing down the maths articles was always fun. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 15:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Too bad we won't know what LT said offsite to get blocked for a year. I do find this as a clue to the puzzle. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 17:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
What would the reasons be behind RobSmith being de-admin-sysoped 'for abuse of power and corruption' (07.59 am today - I presume US time, as GMT equates to 'the wee small hours' over there). Anna Livia (talk) 17:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Come on Rob - this is a chance to explain things you actually know something about. What's the skinny, daddy-O? LondonGrump (talk) 22:30, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
It seems that Karajou blocked RobSmith for a day. In other words, an email dispute is grounds for stopping someone from contributing content. Drink! UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 23:23, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
I kind of felt for the way Rob has been treated until I saw this article praising a great patriot, sorry, murderer who has since skipped bail.[3]--Mercian (talk) 23:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
(And now LT is back...) JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 23:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Nobs advocates bribery and corruption to re-elect drumpf.[edit]

Way to go in supporting law and order and the constitution nobs Oldusgitus (talk) 13:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Christian Fascism is inevitable.-RipCityLiberal (talk) 16:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Wait, nobs is back? So what about Karajou's (Hi Brian! Glad to see we're still squatting in your mind, as you fixate on some mythical "take-over attempt" Pics, or it didn't happen.) impotent rage (as always!) blog post? Aw, was the widdle swabbie owwverwuled? Also, it should be clear that to nobs, "LAW AND ORDER" doesn't apply to conservatives, only brown people. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 19:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Ken forgave him it seems on valentine's day and changed his block period to 10 minutes. I'll leave the shippers to work out the rest and the rest of you with a desire for brain bleach. Techpriest (I am Alpharius! / Pencil.png / Tux icon.png / Shield.png) 20:14, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Rob's on a roll. Posting an unbelievably stupid idea is classic Rob; passing it off as his own is a bonus. LondonGrump (talk) 00:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
I thought I couldn't be any more disgusted with nobs, and then I saw the "free Kyle" sig. Pizza SLICE.gifChef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 21:27, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Ah yes, KenTears. The ultimate CP ship since Ken/TK. --Goatspeed. Goat bless America🇺🇸CircularREmail2.gifasoning🇺🇸🇺🇸-->Steal my ideas 22:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Up again[edit]

CW is presently accessible.

Anyone care to do a CW version of the hokey cokey? Anna Livia (talk) 13:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Sure, but im gonna get banned very soon anyways.--Syncronyzer (talk) 17:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Screen Shot 2021-02-19 at 2.07.26 PM.png
It went down again? Lol at this rate, I'll bet a 3pi-day block that the site permanently closes down (with nothing of value being lost) within the next 5 months. Anyone else willing to place their bets? --Goatspeed. Goat bless America🇺🇸CircularREmail2.gifasoning🇺🇸🇺🇸-->Steal my ideas 22:47, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Just tried to see what happens when you say something right on CP.[edit]

Probs gonna get banned lmfao. Check ContactCP quick before it gets removed and i get banned.--Syncronyzer (talk) 17:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Ha its been removed! Im gonna post again.--Syncronyzer (talk) 18:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Woah message from Karajou the cronie himself!--Syncronyzer (talk) 18:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Irrelevant? This is surprising, i wasnt banned. --Syncronyzer (talk) 18:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Got banned lol--Syncronyzer (talk) 19:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Screen Shot 2021-02-19 at 2.26.35 PM.png
Screen Shot 2021-02-19 at 1.52.11 PM.png

Idiots who can't read[edit]

Or just bad faith? Andy confuses reduced immunity with reduces immunity. Move along, nothing to see here. Just your typical Conservapedian incompetence. God bless antifa and keep us-Hastur! (talk) 18:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

This is laughable if you understand the terminology. Priceless.--Syncronyzer (talk) 19:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
That is very deliberate by Andy. He's betting that the 3 people who visit CP won't actually click the link. Intellectual dishonesty are Andy's middle names. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 19:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
I didn't even have to click the link lol. Just needed to hover over it-Hastur! (talk) 19:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Handy Andy...--Syncronyzer (talk) 19:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Anger bear and Kenny boy get into a block war with each other.[edit]

So this afternoon (UK time) anger bear blocked Nobs - again. Wikignome72, a ken sock as most of you know, promptly unblocked nobs. So anger bear blocked wikignome72, expiry 5 years. Of course Ken promptly unblocked himself and Nobs. I wonder how this will end? andy surely can't sit out an ongoing war between ken and anger bear can he? block log Oldusgitus (talk) 12:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Andy will do what he always does when sysops are squabbling in public - nothing. I see I'm sure there's some interesting conversations going on behind the scenes though. Personally, I'm 100% behind Swabbie driving off Ken and Rob. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 19:14, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
But then Ken would start trolling our site more often- which I am not looking forward to. I enjoyed not having to deal with his bullcrap up until a few days ago. --Goatspeed. Goat bless America🇺🇸CircularREmail2.gifasoning🇺🇸🇺🇸-->Steal my ideas 00:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Real conservatives may get results but by golly do they take a long time to achieve them. An example would be a pamphlet questioning evolution which should have taken a month to produce and another 2 or 3 to distribute. I believe this pamphlet was promised back in 2010/11, any updates? PS, the closest we have seen of evidence so far is a photo of a fairground entertainer on stilts holding the pamphlet, this was about 4 or 5 years ago. A closer look at the photo shows that by the cars and the way people dress it is obviously from the 1980s or 90s. How did you manage this time travel event? scientists are dying to know.--Mercian (talk) 00:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

So nobs is quitting now...[edit]

[4] And I bet LT will soon leave CP as well. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 04:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

And andy has downgraded ken's wikignome2 account from admin to just skipcaptcha, allowing anger bear to infinite block the wikignome2 account. What move next for user:conservative? He and nobs appear to be losing big style to karajou on this. Oldusgitus (talk) 11:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Nobs will be back - he has no pride, and no other source for his right wing conspiracy theory of the week shitposting. Surprising to see Andy willing to lose editors who post quantity (never quality) to Karajou, who does nothing but block people, and occasionally update his list of birds. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 17:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
If Schlafly promoted contributors, Conservapedia wouldn't be where they are right now. With the dear leader's utter incompetency, who needs trolls to destroy CP at this rate! [5] It's honestly quite sad seeing a few people spending so much time adding content there only to find out that Comrade Schlefli the gulag operator not giving a piece of cat litter whether they can access the site, whether they may need more privileges or help for editing... UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 18:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
If you're about to start asserting that competence is ultimately more valuable than unquestioned ideological loyalty, you're going to make my monocle fly off and my mustaches straighten out. Semipenultimate (talk) 00:19, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
You can forget any more promotions to sysop by Andy. He was burned by good sysops turning bad and quitting, when he promoted TK again, and then by TK leaking all the secret chats... again... and then nearly everybody who did get blocking rights, almost immediately turned out to be parodists. Looking at the content produced by the current crop of sysop lites, this is still the case. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 11:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Andy's got better things to do now. He's playing with the big boys. LondonGrump (talk) 13:04, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
The USA already has one Ted Cruz, a man so craven he'd lick the boots of the guy who insulted his wife if it meant more access to power, it doesn't need another. Semipenultimate (talk) 18:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Damn, I'd didn't know World Nut Daily was still a thing. I wonder how Farah's crypto scam scheme worked out? RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 19:26, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
There is this from Right Wing Watch[6]Praising "Fun Seeking Protestors", who happened to murder people. — Unsigned, by: Mercian / talk / contribs

Called it. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 21:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

It's cause Rob speaks out too much against racism. That's why he was silenced. -hgwt — Unsigned, by: / talk
I'm just enjoying Rob mewling on Main Page Talk. LondonGrump (talk) 17:56, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Andy wants to preserve mom's legacy, so he had to get Rob off MPR. [7] ~hgwt — Unsigned, by: / talk
On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the sign button: SigButt.png on the toolbar above the edit panel. You can also indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line. Thank you.
Who’s hgwt? Christopher (talk) 20:33, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Have Gun, Will Travel. -hgwt — Unsigned, by: / talk
Sign your posts properly. Christopher (talk) 22:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Lack of disclosure. Karajou may have a financial interest in Conservapedia, which is the only explanation for Andy keeping him around (apart from the only other plausible explanation of a shared bigoted ideology). Here Andy Schlafly is introduced as "co-founder" of Conservapedia, impying others. -hgwt (talk) 21:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
...and hence why Schlafly simply doesn't have the machismo to discipline Karajou. LOL! UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 22:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
It doesn't make any sense. Rob would be best positioned to refute accusations of mom's segregationist sentiments. If Karajou is not sharing the server bills, the only other explanation is Andy wants to leave undisturbed the contempory takes of Phyllis being a segregationist and opposed to anti-discrimination laws. -hgwt (talk) 22:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

How Conservapedia spins the killing of Osama bin Laden[edit]

Apparently, it was a bad thing? I'm impressed, honestly, that CP's cognitive dissonance continues to surprise me-Hastur! (talk) 08:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)…

And evert single word of that page was written by Rob Smith. It makes me glad the plonker's not here anymore. Spud (talk) 10:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Er, wait a second...[edit]

So LT compiles some info to argue in cp:U.S. "Party-switch" myth to argue that the parties didn't switch, only for it to be contradicted by his good 'ol pal BHathorn in pages like over here and here. Note in the latter it says: "A strong liberal Democrat but originally a declared segregationist who signed the Southern Manifesto..." So there's now a contrast between liberalism and racism despite CP's attempts numerously to link them?

Huh? UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 04:20, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Is LT Dinesh D'Souza cause he constantly makes that argument, and consistently gets absolutely shit on by Twitter historians.-RipCityLiberal (talk) 17:42, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
I don't believe so. While it's probable that LT has read some of D'Souza's books, his arguments go beyond the mainstream right-wing arguments against the party switch talking points. Much of his recent contributions on U.S. politicians seem to reflect the fact that he's trying to tie conservatism to civil rights and liberalism to racism in certain instances that are rarely mentioned. However, seeing how CP's founder is literally the son of a conservative activist who opposed civil rights in the 60s, as "hgwt" mentioned above, LT's articles on CP is arguably the equivalent to Kevin D. Williamson's work on National Review.
Here's one of LT's recent page creations. Evidently he exhibits a fascinating interest in random politicians form the time period most people have no clue of. This diff also shows something that appears to reflect his agenda on CP. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 17:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
He didn't write much of that at all. I initially thought he plagiarized it from the Wikipedia article, but it looks like RJJ is the culprit. LT, is just a teenage aspie obsessive changing stuff like but to though. What in the world makes you think he actually has ideas? — Unsigned, by: / talk
That's also probable, and it certainly reminds me of an interesting story you guys might like to hear. It's related to my days as a naive kid from a long time ago that I'll never forget, and whether it's mine or someone else's is up to you guys to conclude upon:
So there was a particular kid I knew since elementary school, since around 2nd grade. He never seemed to quite fit in with everyone else, and looking back, I have reasons to suspect that he's autistic but never knew that about himself... There were different groups of kids he would hang out with, and the second grade seemed to reflect that. We were generally able to get along well despite our different opinions. He loved writing, I loved reading, so on and so on. Now, there were many kids I got along with fine that wasn't always the case for him. One of them was a good friend of mine who moved away... those two didn't get along all the time, especially because of some silly mini-war that started with a prank. Fourth grade was memorable because many people we knew pretty well, including him, were all in the same class together. There were many disagreements because some were crabby, which he didn't take well. He always was a rather sensitive person who didn't handle things well. I myself moved away during middle school. I didn't talk to that guy as much in middle school because we didn't share any classes together, though still would talk in the lunch room. I remember some other nice kids he probably got to know during that time... There was one particular day that still comes to mind. There was a big assignment/project for social studies, and we both had the same teacher for that subject though different hours. We had a nice conversation, and he in some ways seemed the same as back in the elementary school days. Another nice kid also came over, and he had the same social studies teacher as well. It was great because we all probably had things we missed from our elementary school days, especially him because I didn't see that guy hanging out with his friends from even a year ago nearly as much, almost as if he got thrown under the bus...
As for how he is now and whether I'll ever see him again in the future, I don't know. I would certainly hope so, as he was the type of person I wish more people in my life currently are like: he was imperfect, but had an interesting worldview, would think critically, and in some ways was more open-minded than the vast majority of people. I've recently been thinking about him infrequently because my life has been becoming boring...
UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 00:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

CP Editorial Cartoonist[edit]

Nobody's mentioned Karajou's new sideline, Worst Cartoonist Ever. Each one is dumber and cringier than the previous one. Whoover (talk) 01:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

At least Ken is amusing, Anger Bear just seems like he's going to blow an aneurysm at any moment. I'd hate to be his cardiologist, that level of stress can't be good for his blood pressure. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:23, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Yeah he used to do those cartoons years. We even had an RW competition of sorts on who could rewrite them the funniest. Something like that anyway. AceSimple Maze 03:53, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Ken is about as amusing as a dose of VD.--Mercian (talk) 04:34, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
I’m unsure of what Ken thinks the outcome is going to be. That because the Chinese atheists are feminine I need to rethink my entire belief system. AceSimple Maze 04:44, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
"Indirect tactics, efficiently applied, are inexhaustible as Heaven and Earth, unending as the flow of rivers and streams; like the sun and moon, they end but to begin anew; like the four seasons, they pass away to return once more." - Sun Tzu
ha ha ha Ken, are you trying to tell me I believe in God? That’s fucking hysterical. AceSimple Maze 05:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Terrorist sympathisers are in no way funny, Read his article on the 2011 mass murder in Norway and views on kid's being murdered at pop concerts. Salman Abedi and Breivik have his sympathy if nothing else. As for 2020, us commie liberals managed to stop the world with our coronavirus hoax, successfully carried out a bloodless coup and stole The US Election whilst stopping a bloody counter-coup. Truly, 2020 was a TERRIBLE year for conservative Christianity.--Mercian (talk) 07:06, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Ken would be a dangerous ideologue if he were actually man enough to do anything. Currently he is just a pantywaist - couldn't argue himself out of a wet paper sack. Ken is, for all intents and purposes, a fucking coward. AceSimple Maze 07:27, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
He's like the weedy kid at school who was the bully's stooge, stood behind him and threatened his victims. Conservapedia is Ken's bully but the site is like a bully who will moving to another region in the summer, they are both on their way out.--Mercian (talk) 07:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Ooh! Do we need to resurrect Making Karajou Funny again? RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 07:52, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
BOOM! Thanks my man. That’s what I was referencing earlier. AceSimple Maze 08:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

I am on my way out? I recently helped a website amp up its monthly web visits by millions of web visits a month.

"In all fighting, the direct method may be used for joining battle, but indirect methods will be needed in order to secure victory. In battle, there are not more than two methods of attack – the direct and the indirect; yet these two in combination give rise to an endless series of maneuvers. The direct and the indirect lead on to each other in turn. It is like moving in a circle – you never come to an end. Who can exhaust the possibilities of their combination?" - Sun Tzu

"Indirect tactics, efficiently applied, are inexhaustible as Heaven and Earth, unending as the flow of rivers and streams; like the sun and moon, they end but to begin anew; like the four seasons, they pass away to return once more." - Sun Tzu

"Do not repeat the tactics which have gained you one victory, but let your methods be regulated by the infinite variety of circumstances." - Sun Tzu

"Subtle and insubstantial, the expert leaves no trace; divinely mysterious, he is inaudible. Thus, he is master of his enemy's fate." - Sun TzuMarquette (talk) 21:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

For those of you playing along at home, you can now place markers on 'Repeated Sun Tzu Quotes In A Desperate Effort To Sound Smart' and 'Bragging Without Presenting Any Evidence Whatsoever'. Semipenultimate (talk) 21:52, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
What was that? Some BoN advertising spammer? IveBeenFrank (talk) 22:59, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The internet is a very large place, gentlemen. If you want to know which website, go fish, gentlemen! Go fish!
Poundland Deepak Chopra. LondonGrump (talk) 23:44, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Why would I give you the URL of the website I helped jump up in millions of views in monthly visits? So you could DDOS it like you did with Conservapedia? No thanks, gentlemen. The internet is a very large place. If you want to know which website, go fish, gentlemen! Go fish!
Just keep this in mind. I am unstoppable!
"The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear the sound of it, but you do not know where it is coming from and where it is going; so is everyone who has been born of the Spirit.” - Jesus.Marquette (talk) 23:53, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Is it a website where conservative gentlemen who may be part of a collective can meet submissive long haired creationist ladies from the developing world? LondonGrump (talk) 09:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
I'm fairly sure Grindr was doing well, without you talking up their numbers, Ken. How's Operation Flying Fortress going? Are those Question Evolution leaflets coming out any time soon? How's your mum's basement? RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 17:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Liberals/Atheists are scared of collection of genetic code[edit]

[8] A genetic code that has so far killed more Americans than in any war, in fact it has killed more than any two wars combined. It has killed more than all recorded terrorist deaths in history. Ken, as a supporter of terrorism will be hoping that all of that changes of course. Half a million deaths.--Mercian (talk) 05:32, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Looking at the discussion on MPR talk, most contributors are far less rational than Ken. LondonGrump (talk) 12:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
In the "good ol' days" of 1950s America that conservatives supposedly worship, vaccine inventors (unwillingly) became public heroesWikipedia. What happened, oh worshippers of nostalgia? Interestingly enough, regarding the Chuck Norris pic, it seems like Chuck Norris has toned down a bit his WND schtick of late and is more into endorsing online tank games and gym equipment. His syndicated column seems to be more wellness / fitness oriented than culture war whining, and a brief scan seems to show it is reasonably sensible vs. NaturalNews style supplement woo. So, yeah, Conservapedia... Listen to Chuck! Wear a mask! PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 12:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
If they don't listen to Chuck surely they will listen to Donald[9]--Mercian (talk) 18:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Setback for Hollywood values.[edit]

[10]Point taken but perhaps Cinemas being closed for the majority of 2020 played a part. Church attendance was also down by over a third in 2020, a huge setback for Christianity?--Mercian (talk) 13:59, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

The largest streaming services has 50% higher subscribers in 2020. No duh some of the cinema statistic is pandemic related, some of it is "new tech" too... the real question is in what form cinemas will return when the pandemic ends. However, Breitbart knows what triggers conservatives to spew large amount of bile in their shitty Disqus comment section, and "Hollywood" certainly is a trigger keyword. (In that light, 136 comments on this story is disappointingly low. But Breitbart's readership appears to be too busy raging about a trans Sports Illustrated swimsuit model right now to notice this story.) PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 15:33, 22 March 2021 (UTC)


Ken has truly and utterly lost it. I just wrote about a paragraph about this but deleted it all. Ken ain't worth it. I have girlfrieds, a daughter and a good job and many RW editors I can say the same for. Happy, and getting on with life is what most of us do. Ken spent hours on this last "essay". He has nothing and nobody obviously. So I'll leave it at that. Ace://about blank 09:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Apparently we have an obsession with Conservapedia[11] The evidence shows otherwise. Ken also deleted the part when a covid nurse called him a cutie. My experience of nurses in these situations that they do not engage in this type of talk with people even if it were true. They have better things to do, like saving peoples lives. The false witness is building up Kendoll, Hell awaits you.--Mercian (talk) 11:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Ken just be mad his RW socks are too obvious and keep getting blocked. (And Ken would probably hate my job even if he could perform it. I work with colleagues in Asia all the time. Which tend to be, you know, ATHEISTS!!! OOGIE BOOGIE!!!) PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 12:58, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Ken, sitting on a Nazi-adjacent hate-blog (or in his care home, whichever you prefer), where one of the admins literally believes the coronavirus vaccine contains nanobots, saying another site's members are weird, is peak Ken. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 17:38, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
More comforting to believe the problem is something nebulous and completely unprovable that you can easily politicize rather than, say, the MULTIPLE ANTENNAS designed by companies they hate that they are carrying in their pockets right now. Semipenultimate (talk) 17:46, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
THAT. IS THE GREATEST THING. I HAVE EVER SEEN HIM WRITE. PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 17:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Given that his "essay" sits in a quiet niche of a fringe website that probably has eight visitors outside of their editors and us, why worry? LondonGrump (talk) 18:54, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Not worry, just fascination. It's always interesting to watch people with delusions of grandeur and try to catch the moment when reality sets in, if it ever does. Semipenultimate (talk) 23:58, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Alan Turing[edit]

Why did England put this obscure homosexual on the 50-pound note? Whoover (talk) 22:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

The most prominent road in Manchester, by some accounts The UK's second largest city is called Alan Turing Way, that's hardly obscure. Schalfly is nothing more than a rabid homophobe who has expressed support in them being stoned to death.--Mercian (talk) 00:03, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Alan Turing was vital in saving the world from Nazism. He deserves to be celebrated as a hero. And his sad fate is a reminder that, not so long ago, the kind of rabid homophobia that Andy Schlafly still feels was the law of the land in Britain. I was delighted that the Bank of England chose him to go on the new ₤50 note. And I wonder what the Conservapedia crew will make of the new Harriet Tubman $20 bill when that comes out. Will they even try not to sound ,like a bunch of racist and misogynist shits when they say how much they dislike it? Spud (talk) 03:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
(sarc) Turing is so obscure, there is a significant museum in England dedicated to the operation he worked in.Wikipedia (And no IT nerd would have ever heard of Turing, so Google would never do something special if you Google "bletchley park". (/sarc) Tee hee.) PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 03:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
When they protest the new $20 bill they will insist is not racist, just as they insist the new Jim Crow 2 law in Georgia is not racist. They insist they are not homophobic either, stoning to death homosexuals is all part of God's plan. They insist they are law and order unless they do not like a particular law, then it is OK. Storming the Capitol in a coup attempt is perfectly OK whilst giving water to people queuing to vote on a hot summers day in Atlanta is now a criminal offence. Their whole philosophy is nothing more than a charade and since Trump they don't even attempt to hide it anymore. And Ken, you homophobic racist, I would rather have a pothole problem than a mass murder problem. Then again they support mass murder when it suits their aims. They are less conservative Christians and more of a death cult. Come now Ken, lets see you deny this.--Mercian (talk) 09:18, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

I wonder how many Conservapedia editors would pass the Turing test? LondonGrump (talk) 18:05, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Unfortunately, the answer is: most of them. That's because the Turing test sets the bar very low. It doesn't test for comprehension, learning, depth of thought, or anything of the kind. The easiest way to make a program pass the Turing test is to keep in mind the principles of basic magic trickery: making it look like a human presence is there is all about perception. A simple project for a beginner learning to program is to make a program which keeps writing like a stupid troll with a repetitive message. It wouldn't be difficult at all to make it seem like the real deal. --ApooftGnegiol (talk) 07:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
I just remembered this. Turing is so obscure that he only ranked a paltry 21st place in a popular vote for the greatest Briton of all time. This ranks up with Schalfly's assumption that the pro gay marriage Spain's National Football Team was extremely over-rated despite winning successive European Championships with a World Cup sandwiched in between. Of course rabid homophobia has nothing to do with his insights.--Mercian (talk) 23:04, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

2017 Finsbury Park attack.[edit]

Was not an incidence of Islamic terrorism. It was a case of a far right nutcase seeking revenge. In fact the attacker survived due to the constraint of the victims. The most simple of searches confirms this.--Mercian (talk) 12:11, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

No duh, it was an Islamaphobe committing terrorism against Muslims. Is this CP news actually? Main thing I see in CP's front page is RW's current favorite sockpuppet actually adding "in the news" items that continue to demonstrate an unhealthy obsession with this site. I don't see anything on Finsbury. PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 12:52, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
So the mainstream media isn't covering the major news story that @Shabidoo hasn't converted to Christianity? That's the first time in about a decade that something on Conservapedia has actually made me laugh out loud. Spud (talk) 13:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
And I see that Mercian is referring to Ken's vile newly created article on the Manchester Arena Bombing in which he suggests that Britain should expel its Muslim population just like Spain did in 1492. Just after seeing something on CP that made me laugh, I've seen something else that made me feel sick. Ken, you are a loathsome Islamophobic, homophobic, sexist, self-centred, big-headed piece of shit religious bigot. If heaven is full of people like you, I'll happily spend eternity in hell. Spud (talk) 14:13, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
People like Ken and Andy will happily yell "Kill/Deport/Put in Camps people we don't like!" and "Vaccine passports are the Holocaust!" with no sense of irony. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 15:28, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
That part along with the expulsion of Muslims has gone. I am guessing that the author will now spew more false witness and deny it was ever written in the first place.--Mercian (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Ken is a fucking nitwit incapable of self-reflection. He's a fucking dope with very few redeeming features. Awful person. Ace://about blank 18:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
I think Ken's essay on my bubble-world-limiting-atheism deserves a Pulitzer prize. ShabiDOO 20:06, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

CP stuff from the Saloon Bar[edit]

I signed up there, but nobody ain't doing anything, except the same 3 dudes who have some sort of obsession with the wiki. It is the saddest wiki I ever joined. 2A0B:F4C0:16C:16:0:0:0:1 (talk) 14:37, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, the wiki boom ended long ago and CP has lost judt about all relevance by now. Not just its relevance to Rationalwiki, but the internet and world in general. There's a reason this site has moved on from being the Conservapedia Ridiculing Club. (talk) 17:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
I wonder how much it costs Andy to mantain that dead Wiki. GeeJayK (talk) 18:25, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Not much, they're on shared hosting (and a cheap one at that because they have server problems all the time). So Andy probably pays a fairly low amount each month. Techpriest (I am Alpharius! / Pencil.png / Tux icon.png / Shield.png) 19:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Supposing God is real I'm quite sure He would rather see that money being spent on charity or something more useful. But whatever. GeeJayK (talk) 19:36, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
FOR CP IS DEAD... and we have killed it... Roman Sionis tends to be inactive during summer 19:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Aren't you that guy who doxxed Oxy? 2A02:120B:C3FB:3B40:41BF:C653:4511:A885 (talk) 21:47, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Wait, do you mean me? No. No, I didn't. Roman Sionis tends to be inactive during summer 22:04, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
I don't think they meant you, I think the meant the BoN. Serene (talk) 22:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, it's the same person. Plutocow (talk) 22:18, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

I implore you, please do not post Conservapedia-related stuff in the Saloon Bar. Put it on Conservapedia talk:What is going on at CP? We have indeed long since moved on from just being the Conservapedia Ridiculing Club. Spud (talk) 00:55, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

He probably can't since I can't. It says view source on the page. He'd need an account to post there. 2A02:120B:C3FB:3B40:842C:F44F:D04B:2E87 (talk) 12:56, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
They're a banned user who shouldn't be editing here in the first place anyway. Plutocow (talk) 12:58, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
When I said "you", I wasn't really referring to the BoN. I meant everybody. Spud (talk) 13:17, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Plutocow, you're famous[edit]

Rationalwiki is infested by pansies, and the butterflies are absolutely fabulous!

It's your first time appearing on an essay on CrackPotwiki,,_pansie_infestation MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 20:45, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

What's with the weird spelling of "pansy"? Is he circumventing a censored word list or just stupid? Whoover (talk) 21:20, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
A case of 'potatoe'-ism? Anna Livia (talk) 22:50, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
That's the first thing I thought of too. An arrogant version of Dan Quayle. Whoover (talk) 05:05, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
The correct answer is insanity. From my vantage point, Conservapedia is slowly morphing into a kind of Time Cube under the weight of a barrage of strange essays and articles. PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 00:35, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Oh my! A certain wiki starting with C is falling under the burden of its weirdos and pansies? What a turn of events! I do hate to do it, gentlemen, but in the name of secularism, I declare VICTORY! Ole Ole Ole! Pizza SLICE.gifChef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 00:46, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Duce M - are you referring to [12]? Anna Livia (talk) 18:59, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Please move this post to WIGO talk:CP; thanks[edit]

I'm getting increasingly tired of CP. Karajerk and User:Conservative have turned the site into a second-rate parody and a mess. Andy has only enabled their lousy behavior with utterly pathetic hypocrisy/double standards, or he's simply blind and shouldn't even be running the site to begin with. I implore everyone to take a look at this and see how cheap and ridiculous *some* admins on the site have become. Someone (talk) 15:11, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

"turned the site into a second-rate parody and a mess" was it ever not a second-rate parody and a mess? Uncle Mark (talk) 15:12, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
It never seemed that bad to me before. Maybe I just haven't always realized how Karajou has constantly destroyed the place... Someone (talk) 15:16, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Look at this total bull: Karajou just assumes that everyone else is as selfish and self-centered as he is? When will he realize that some people in the world have more integrity than him, and enough to help others out of their own good will? Someone (talk) 15:38, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
If you want to appeal your ban LT, I'd be more than willing to assist. Glad to see you're at least awakening to the fact that Conservapedia is just the echo chamber for a couple of guys in their 50s and nobody else's. Techpriest (I am Alpharius! / Pencil.png / Tux icon.png / Shield.png) 15:49, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
I mean, the fact that CP was founded because even early 2000s Wikipedia wouldn't buy Andy and Co's crap might have been an indicator about its legitimacy... ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 16:13, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you Sirius, I'll give that some consideration. Someone (talk) 16:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
It's always been like this. All this stuff happening to you has been documented in this wiki and for good reason. It's been going on your nose and I still recommend really self-reflect how anything has changed from the documentation in this wiki and today. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 02:27, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
So why did the banned user LT choose to sock up and come back here? Was it to say he's finally realized that Conservapedia, a site he championed so many times, actually is shit because it promotes pseudoscience, pseudohistory, conspiracy theories and hate speech? Did he decide he could no longer be associated with a site whose admins have celebrated the deaths of children and laughed off old people freezing to death as "one of God's little jokes"? No. He just came here to moan about Karajou and Ken getting a bit angry with him. So LT welcomes back the very obvious sock of a banned user with open arms. A more senior editor gets pissed off and has a go at him for that. Pretty much the same thing could easily happen here and on dozens of other wikis. Something similar could even happen on Wikipedia (although it would all be couched in much, much more polite language). Yawn! LT, it wasn't worth socking up just for that. Spud (talk) 06:32, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
It happens to everyone who is not Ken or Karajou. LT had his little trolling session here a few months back, the standard crap thinking he was now among the CP elite. Now he is feeling the backlash. To be among the CP elite you don't just have to be a far right jerk you have to subscribe to every wingnut position out there without fail or diversion. Fall short of those standards then you are just another liberal. Ha.--Mercian (talk) 23:47, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
And emphasizing heavily on racism and civil rights history comes off as too woke and liberal for the CP elite. Hence why 1990'sguy gets Andy's recognition for his advocacy of modern-day right-wing populism while LT doesn't get as much praise. It's practically sociopathic with the way Andy treats faithful contributors including LT, RobSmith, and BHathorn - he takes their work for granted and goes out of his own way to promote, as would be defined under his style of vocabulary, unproductive goons. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 00:30, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
If you want to get back in favour LT you need to author articles such as this[13] which despite it's racist undertones accuses the Canadian authorities of being the new Gestapo. If you were to take the article as gospel you would be under the impression that the "Chinese Communist Party virus" was far worse in Canada than it is in The USA where Trump is praised for his outstanding leadership with reference to the pandemic. Lies and deceit is what these people thrive on and to get back onside you have to be a deceptive liar. Rob Smith weaseled his way back in that way, I am sure he will give you some tips.--Mercian (talk) 17:50, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Whoa, I'm famous!!![edit]

[14] Unclescrooge (talk) 13:42, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

I love it how Ken thinks we're are like: "UNGH OOGH. ME SECULAR. ME ATHEIST. ME MAD. MAD AT OTHER TRIBE. ME SMASH ROCK AT OTHER TRIBE." PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 14:44, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
I still love how Ken calls people "pansies". MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 14:47, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations! GeeJayK (talk) 14:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Thanks!! I hope there will be more opportunities here for me to be featured on his essay!!! Unclescrooge (talk) 15:06, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Matt Gaetz, Fake Conservative of the Week.[edit]

[15]Very predictably Schlafly has disowned one of his favourites but not because he is an alleged sex offender facing a lengthy prison term but because he is an enabler of the "Homosexual Agenda" His priorities have not changed then. --Mercian (talk) 12:49, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

To the fucking nitwit emailing me pretending to be Ken...[edit]

Nice try but you made some pretty basic errors which Ken wouldn't. But hey, if it is the real Ken why don't you admit to it on CP? I'll wait. Ace303, 808, 909 04:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Ken hasn't made an edit for 4 days, It's most likely not him. PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 05:34, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
What did he say? GeeJayK (talk) 05:40, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Never mind what he said - Ken never refers to himself as Ken like this idiot did. Also they tried to fool me with a kdbuffalo email address which, again, Ken would never do. Ace303, 808, 909 05:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
There is no Ken, it's been you all the time, Ace. I see your patterns. Wheels within wheels! Semipenultimate (talk) 15:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
I am Spartacus. LondonGrump (talk) 09:12, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Anti -Vax Conservapedia and the greater lunatic Trump cult.[edit]

The 2021 Darwin AwardWikipedia ought to go to anyone who actually takes Tucker Carlson seriously.

I thought these people were firmly pro life but nearly everything posted on that shit sheet proves differently. Death threats to those who urge that people are vaccinated. Idiots like Tucker Carlson stating that the vaccines are doing more harm than good and mocking people for wearing "Obedience masks" Bradlee Dean using random Bible quotes to justify his his anti-vax hatred and Schalfly ranting and raving against "vaccine police". Since the vaccination process has hit top gear here in the UK the death rate has fallen by over 95%. It is similar in some of the more liberal parts of The US whilst in other places Covid is still running riot. They have the nerve to call us nihlists where they by their statements on this subject combined with their rabid bloodlust whenever a liberal is killed by terrorists or a gay person or adulteress are stoned to death by pre medieval regimes proves they are nothing more than a death cult.--Mercian (talk) 20:29, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

"Dr. Fauci also expressed frustration that 'a disturbingly large proportion of Republicans,' who have been critical of many coronavirus restrictions, have expressed a reluctance to be vaccinated. 'It’s almost paradoxical,' he said. 'On the one hand they want to be relieved of the restrictions, but on the other hand, they don’t want to get vaccinated. It just almost doesn’t make any sense.' - as reported by the New York Times today. Behold, the power of the pattern of thought that fears a personal tracking chip in a vaccine for some reason, but livestreams their treason from their personal tracking devicesWikipedia to Parler. PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 15:45, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations! PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 18:56, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Holy Shit Ken, Get another fucking hobby[edit]

CP:Essay: A humble Christian's glorious victory over the RationalWiki editor Anna Livia PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 12:27, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Call me old fashioned, but I'm fairly sure a humble person wouldn't gloat about a "glorious" imaginary victory. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 21:58, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Old school muscular Christianity, Syd, old school muscular Christianity. Bonus points for a victory over people with darker skin. LondonGrump (talk) 08:18, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Even moar special announcement![edit]

This discussion was moved here from RW:BAR.

Ken wrote an essay about my upcoming work! See my interaction with the barrel of cunts here. P.S. How would one include a music note in wikitext? Roman Sionis tends to be inactive during summer 14:33, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

you are debating with a chimp flinging his shit. all you do is give him a target. AMassiveGay (talk) 14:36, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
[EC]Any general CP discussion goes here. If you want a specific musical note I don’t think there’s an easy way, if you just want a general stereotypical music note the easiest way would be to google it and copy/paste. Christopher (talk) 14:38, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Karajou's fall from grace[edit]

My first thought was of those old Spanish Stalinists, forced to wander Europe like lost souls after the CP turned its back on them. Then, as befits my age, I remembered Chuck Connors having his sword broken ... {[us|LondonGrump}}

What makes it weirder is that most nearly all of his recent edits have been him reverting trolls, and those were on the 12th & 17th. I'm assuming nobs has been whispering in Andy's ear in one of the secret chat rooms. Of course, it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy. Anybody have access to his blog, because I'm sure a cheap-booze rage-fest will be forthcoming soon. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 09:53, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Assfly has also restored nobs administrator rights. And liberaltears has got some of his back. I reckon it's more likely kenny that has been whispering in andy's ear tbh Oldusgitus (talk) 10:03, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Karajou despite being a hate filled wanker has one quality that is totally unacceptable for a Conservapedia admin, sanity.--Mercian (talk) 15:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
sanity being a relative term here. i seem to remember him being convinced he saw a horseman of the apocalypse at some riots in egypt. AMassiveGay (talk) 17:09, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
My first thought was the excommunication of Trotsky by Stalin. Gangster Computer God (talk) 16:22, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Trotsky got his shit together. Some of the accounts of those Spaniards, who had no life and no friends and no chance of going home to family, are heartbreaking. Not that I'm at all sympathetic to Karajou. His cartoons are shit. LondonGrump (talk) 18:17, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Who's left of the original admins, anyway? It's looking a lot like a Soviet photo album over there.--Martin Arrowsmith (talk) 16:13, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

So anyone know the background to why Karajou was de-sysoped? CPWatcher (talk) 13:01, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
He quit in protest over that rat troll nobs being re-sysoped, but after a day of sobbing at home, he begged to come back. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 03:24, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

You know you're a notable RW editor[edit]

When you inspire the creation of an entire shitpost essay from our biggest stan. Note how he thinks I'm a Brit and not a Yank. Not gonna lie- given how bigoted Kenny Baby is, I was expecting him to just automatically assume that I'm from India and make this about how India's version of SCOTUS recently ruled that certain religious groups have a right to never be offended and therefore will soon go back to the Good Old Days, when their women (who BTW are only ever good for demonstrating their religiosity and what they think of naastik (literally meaning "atheist" in Hindi) Hemant Mehta by doing sexy dances, apparently) were always given zero say in when and who they marry and gays could've had their heads cut off thanks to the good ol' homophobia introduced by the Christian and Islamic missionaries centuries ago. --Goatspeed. Goat bless America🇺🇸CircularREmail2.gifasoning🇺🇸🇺🇸-->Steal my ideas 01:41, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Ken - stop fucking emailing me. As I told you several times now...I. Don't. Fucking. Care. Ace303, 808, 909 03:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
The "man" is obsessed. How sad to crave the attention of those who do nothing but mock and ridicule him because no on else will give him the time of day. What I expect now is for him to create a sock account and send me a message on my talk page saying that he wears masks. He believes in killing gays, children and ethnically cleansing Muslims but he wears masks. --Mercian (talk) 14:05, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
It took less than 15 minutes Ken to do exactly what I said he would. He is now saying he does not believe in the above. His record proves otherwise. Showing pictures of rat infestations to describe atheists, a headline that could have been from Der Stürmer 70 years ago. Within the last 2 weeks he has said that The UK should ethnically cleanse it's Muslim population. He has creamed his pants at the killing of young people in Norway or Manchester. He does wear masks.--Mercian (talk) 14:46, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Please move this to WIGO talk:CP, thanks[edit]

CP seems to be going downhill. Some of the admins and assistant sysops are total aschlaughingstocks (pun intended) who literally won't listen to facts presented straight to their face multiple times, and it's an embarrassment. I haven't given up on the site completely, though improving the user base and online performance will take a good amount of effort.... Sodium hydroxide (talk) 18:36, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

There was very little down to go at the start. They hit rock bottom early in the Trump era after he brought bigotry and hatred into the mainstream. An example being which copper is a murderer, the one who knelt on a handcuffed black mans neck for 10 minutes or the one that shot a violent insurrectionist attempting to break into The Senate to "Hang Mike Pence". According to them it is the latter, after all one was a violent black man and the other a peaceful protestor--Mercian (talk) 21:08, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Gee, I wonder who declared victory for all anti-feminism and Conservapedia?[edit]

Fucker forgotten the "Olé! Olé! Olé!"

PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 15:32, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

They've made it very clear, in word and deed, how they are fully in alignment with Brenton Tarrant, Patrick Crusius and Anders Breivik, so it's only baby steps to Marc Lepine and Scott Dekrai. Semipenultimate (talk) 15:50, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
It never hurts to suck up to the boss. I think he has something on Schlafly to be honest. Years back I emailed him (when I actually had a sliver of respect for him) to point out that Ken mistakenly linked to a borderline illegal sexual video rather than the one he intended. Apart from burning the entry he did nothing about it.--Mercian (talk) 15:57, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Ken made a sock just to give himself another excuse for an "essay"[edit]

Essay: RationalWiki briefly embraced religious immigrants to the United States who have machismo PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 16:58, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

I thought he was going to mention me since I was the one that removed his garbage. Not sure how should I feel. GeeJayK (talk) 17:12, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Conservapedia machismo means celebrating killing children, dodging debates for charity and mocking those who suffered during wars whilst dodging conflicts themselves. It means celebrating schools that sack teachers for being vaccinated and ripping masks of children's faces. It means targeting children because they are the only demographic their machismo would have a chance against. Conservapedia machismo means cowardice. Oh, an it also means posting borderline child pornography on public wikis by mistake, something a certain macho man has not denied --Mercian (talk) 17:46, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
I believe it's spelled kowardice. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 17:58, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Proof and evidence that Conservapedia lacks machismo. 𝒮𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓃𝑒 talk 18:03, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Your Google and Alexa statistics are falling Gentleman Conservative! It'd be possible that Conservapedia would've lost all remaining prestieges of credibility by my graduation ceremony, So Gentlemen, I hate to do it, but on the behalf of all sane Christians I declare VICTORY! Olé! Olé! Olé! PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 18:16, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
They also cream over macho leaders of "Human rights advocacy groups"[16] who (fail) to slaughter helpless elephants[17]--Mercian (talk) 19:42, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Ken effectively admits he is a virgin[edit]

[18] A very sad man, no wonder he watches very dodgy pornography which he mistakenly posted to COnservapedia.--Mercian (talk) 07:58, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Ken, it's not pre-marital sex, if you never get married. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 09:14, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
You might call me a SJW for that, but I don't think it's nice to bully people because they can't get laid. I'm not talking about Ken since apparently he belives that's a good thing, but I do think that intimidates actual virgins and it's not good for their already low self-esteem. GeeJayK (talk) 15:09, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
But it depends why. Because being a virgin, or saving yourself for marriage is one thing. But actively claiming you are virtuous over others, or worse claiming that your superiority of trying to find a specific person who shares your virtues, that's bullshit and deserves ridicule.-RipCityLiberal (talk) 15:42, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
I agree, but the idea that you're superior because you get laid is also ridiculous in my opinion, and I think it is present in this thread. GeeJayK (talk) 15:56, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
He must get his kicks from somewhere. He has a thing for bestiality which he projects ad infinitum and has not yet refuted that he once mistakenly posted a borderline illegal video onto Conservapedia.--Mercian (talk) 22:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Ignoring the complete mish-mash of a statistics cherry pick (such as using partial US statistics to somehow complain about the evils of the Netherlands single parents), the Kenster clearly fails to realize that his Wiki is against a major solution to his self-described "problem". That is, young couples are far better off reading the Rationalwiki page on birth control (and other scientifically sound documentation on the subject) than literature like the abstinence!abstinence!abstinence! Conservapedia page on "birth control". Abstinence only education has failed miserably. Which makes sense; proper knowledge of family planning tools and how to use it certainly makes the single parent family event far less likely. I do think a bit of the "I'm superior 'cuz I got laid" paradigm popular back in the day is sort of fading a bit in American society (at least in non-incel culture), and a combination of less sex and smarter use of birth control is driving the US teen pregnancy rate way down these days. PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 22:42, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Bill and Melinda Gates[edit]

After Melinda Gates no longer wants her name associated with forced vaccines, experiments on children, Jeffrey Epstein, crimes against humanity and genocide, [19][20][21] how does Andy respond? Andy attacks the feminist Melinda [22] and defends the greedy capitalist Bill who raped the planet and stole billions of its resources. [23] UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 21:41, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

I'm sorry. Fucking what? This entire post reeks of bullshit.-RipCityLiberal (talk) 21:45, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
P.U. Someone light a match! —cosmikdebris talk stalk 21:46, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
This is 100% a sock for some fuck at CP.-RipCityLiberal (talk) 21:48, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Dear Mr. UShistoryanalyzer, your stupid complaint reminded me of this. Very truly yours, Semipenultimate (talk) 14:27, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Seriously? You've just realised UShistoryanalyzer is a Conservapedian? Could his user name be any more obviously CP? LondonGrump (talk) 20:24, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Schlafly crap divides Conservapedia[edit]

[24] So Schlafly thinks that Steve King's remarks were completely fine? Just for some context, apparently Andypants was among those who signed a letter asking for King's reinstatement into committee assignments a while back. [25]

I've been talking a lot with LT lately, and he's increasingly irritated with Schlafly for being a third-rate nitwit. Not sure why he still edits CP despite clearly having contempt for so much of the site by now... LT's also rambling on over and over about he misses Dataclarifier. It'll be interesting to see how the current drama between him, Northwest, RobSmith, Karajou, Andy, Conservative, etc. plays out in the end. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 02:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

I don't know what's going on since I don't browse CP, but I'd bet Schlafly will end up banning him. GeeJayK (talk) 02:51, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
It's rather complicated. LT has had a strong passion for CP editing (based on specific things he told me privately) and the site as a whole, but particularly can't stand Andy, Karajou, and DMorris. From my understanding, he's likely to get blocked ultimately if his personal schemes and efforts get exposed, though Schlafly is too dimwitted to ever understand certain basic things, hence the mess over there the way it currently is. LT's probably one of the few CP users I can have some sympathy for at this point. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 02:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
It's going to be interesting watching Andy spin the Golden Globes - Bad Hollywood meets cancel culture, which will win? RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 10:44, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Ken if you can read this...[edit]

Get psychological help. Firstly, you seem to be under the bizarre impression that political advancement is meritocratic. Um.... It isn't? It's all about wheeling and dealing, favors for favors. Oh, and there's some weird naive people who get starry eyed about justice and morality or whatever, but most seasoned political types ignore them. Also umm... Ken... Despite your weird impressions, I'm not a god. I don't control everyone on RationalWiki. Hell, they don't even listen to me half the time so... um... I can't do anything about your supposed harrassment or whatever it is actually got you worked up. Stop spamming my talkpage please. I'm going to calm down so I can stop laughing at your last few comments. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 19:54, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey Ken, I think you'd like to collect records again. PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 20:00, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Guys, just, do something else. If you want to vent about Ken, do in Discord dms or something. Reason he's spamming in your talk page is that you keep engaging with him. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 21:32, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


LT just sent me this (and he said in a separate reply that he's fine with me sharing it here):

UShistoryanalyzer, the thing is that Andy's increasingly showing the pathetic sociopath he is. He evidently cares zilch about the contributions I've put into Conservapedia as if it means little to him. He doesn't care that I put in hours and hours and hours of effort to adding educational content. He hardly reaches out to solid editors, and instead hands out user rights to blatant trolls. Andy has betrayed the faithful users of Conservapedia by letting them be persecuted by goons he enabled. He refused to unblock me last year in the summer after I was targeted by the subversive infiltrator Shobson20. He refused numerous times to listen.

I recently asked him in an email if I could just have a private conversation with him, and he refused to reply. It's as if he's playing in the sandbox, I call his name, and he immediately buries his head in the sand.

I'd compare him to a pile of turd, though the latter is actually useful, deeming such an analogy fallacious.

As for people being ignorant and lousy to this extent, it's the type of experience I've practically had to deal with my whole life, unfortunately.

UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 04:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

In other news, Queen Anne's dead. Spud (talk) 05:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Who gives a fuck? Seriously, who does? If you and liberaltears want to jerk each other off just do it.Oldusgitus (talk) 17:50, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
I'm with OG. This is tedious, incestuous bullshit, even if you have grassed on LT. LondonGrump (talk) 18:06, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Huh?? What's going on????? Unclescrooge (talk) 20:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
It all seems too complicated to explain fully, and I don't even know a lot of what's going on specifically. The impression I've gotten from LT is that there are back-door CP discussions which plays a significant role in what's happening on the site. There's some of it he won't tell, some of it he says he may not even be included in. The reason I talk to him in particular is because he's very unlike the other CP users... UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 21:09, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Can you clarify???????? Unclescrooge (talk) 21:58, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Based off what I know, here's an analogy that might help: imagine Conservapedia being run by an absentee landlord who has no idea about the rats that the tenants have to live with. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 22:10, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
He embraces the rats. That is how that sort of organisation works. The leader encourages discord among his disciples, that way they never turn on him and always look upon him to favour them. Ken seems to be number one now forever praising Andy's mother and using Trump like pseudo words like bigly. His stay at the top may be short lived though. He seems to be taking the pandemic with some seriousness and is clearly pro both masks and vaccines. Andy will not like that at all.--Mercian (talk) 22:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Conservative (along with LT, last I checked) also isn't being a pearl-clutching pansie about the Chauvin verdict, unlike Schlafly. (this topic perhaps deserves its own section here) He also seems willing to address the cons (no pun intended) of right-wing populism, which perhaps he deserves some credit for. It doesn't justify his stubborn sockpuppetry on this site though. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 23:05, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

The thing is "Andy's a dickhead" is not news. He was a dickhead back in 2006 and he hasn't changed. LT is now saying he's just realized Andy's a dickhead. What he's really just realized is that he's never going to be made an admin. And so what if LT now thinks Andy's a dickhead? It doesn't make him any better than when he was being a fucking troll here. Spud (talk) 23:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

He has always been a dick but now he is a thoroughly nasty piece of work. Perhaps he has always been that way but he has gone from right wing evangelical to full on fascist and I do not think I am exaggerating. --Mercian (talk) 23:34, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
There's some truth in that. But it started years ago. Back in 2011, Andy was shrugging off Anders Behring Breivik's massacre as no big deal. Conservapedia was already a hate site where the admins took pleasure in people's deaths as a "setback to the homosexual agenda" and laughed them off as "proof that God has a sense of humor" long before LT came along. If LT had realized that he had been part of a hate site, left and apologized for ever having been a part of it, then I'd have some respect for him. But he hasn't. He's just realized that he's been contributing to a wiki where he's never going to be made an admin. Big, fat fucking deal! Spud (talk) 00:07, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
This is the God who slaughtered the population of two cities because they had a crime problem and red light district. My city has both of them so that's me buggered. I better write my will.--Mercian (talk) 01:15, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
I've not even bothered reading anyones attempts to justify posting shit on here about emails some child has sent them about their thoughts on Andy. Spud got it spot on above. I don't give a flying fuck what a child troll like LT thinks about anything AT ALL. TBH I'd prefer to have a conversation with Ken than with LT and I don't come here to read what lt has written in emails and graciously given his 'permission' for them to be shared. Oldusgitus (talk) 13:07, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Schlafly the pearl-clutching pansie[edit] continuously whining about the Chauvin trial verdict. It doesn't reflect well when you're complaining about a bad cop being prosecuted. Whatever happened to law and order? UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 23:13, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

It depends on the victim. Mr Floyd was an unarmed black man who offered little or no resistance, fair game. Award that copper. Ashli Babitt was a violent insurrectionist violently trying to break into The Senate in order to "Hang Mike Pence" and other members of congress. Being the good conservative that she was means she was murdered though. First degree capital murder. Hang that copper. Seriously that sums up his view on these matters. --Mercian (talk) 23:28, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Conservapedia's revisionism on mask wearing.[edit]

Apparently it is all Fauci's fault and Trump has always been pro mask and social distancing. A few choice quotes from the Dear Leader.

"I don't wear masks like him. Every time you see him, he's got a mask. He could be speaking 200 feet away from it, and he shows up with the biggest mask I've seen,"
"I just don't want to be doing -- somehow sitting in the Oval Office, behind that beautiful, Resolute Desk, the great Resolute Desk, I think wearing a face mask -- as I greet presidents, prime ministers, dictators, kings, queens, I don't know, it somehow, I don't see it for myself,"
"Maybe they’re great, and maybe they’re just good. Maybe they’re not so good.”
"Well, I'm tested, and I'm sometimes surprised when I see somebody sitting and -- like, with Joe. Joe feels very safe in a mask. I don't know, maybe he doesn't want to expose his face,"
It doesn't sound like he's the champion of COVID restrictions.--Mercian (talk) 18:22, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
How soon until they both argue that Trump deserves all the credit for vaccine availability, and also the Covid vaccines are a threat to conservatism.-RipCityLiberal (talk) 19:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Conservapedian senility hits a new record[edit]

[26] UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 04:10, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Oh, big fucking deal! So somebody thinks the title of an article about an actor should be the actor's real name instead of his stage name. So fucking what? So fucking what that the someone in question happens to be Rob Smith? I'm giving what UShistoryanalyzer has just done a bug thumbs down. Spud (talk) 06:11, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
I think the majority of their stay here can be summed up as thumbs down. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 16:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
They like the people who pretend at war which is something John Wayne only ever did. Being a star was not something that ruled service out. Jimmy Stewart was another star at the time who enlisted and demanded active service which happened, he was reportedly very brave. He was also a staunch conservative so I wonder why he is not revered by the gang. Perhaps he did not slap enough women.--Mercian (talk) 05:54, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Since Ken is on an anti-immigration roll...[edit]

Was noted Conservative economist Milton Friedman a dirty commie? Ken, there world deserves to know the truth! Please respond with an essay on Conservapedia explaining whether Milton Friedman was a communist or not. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 17:09, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

and don't forget to include Friedman's part in the rise and rise of the Chinese economy.LondonGrump (talk) 20:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
I requested that Ken make an essay on whether or not Milton Friedman was a communist for supporting mass immigration, including illegal immigration. Ken has so far engaged in a lot of defensive waffle and written not one but two "essays" rambling on about how he isn't actually an overgrown manchild and xenophobe and then turning around and rambling on about subjects not relevant to the core subject. Oh, and neither "essay" mentions Friedman. Ken, you've failed my admittedly petty challenge. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 13:45, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
This should keep Ken spinning some more. Ace303, 808, 909 03:55, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Conservapedia's definition of news differs somewhat from the norm.[edit]

That is that most other organisations do not consider 13 year old articles as such[27][28].--Mercian (talk) 18:21, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Ken seems to have buried the posts in question. I wonder why... ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 03:50, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Schlafly propaganda again[edit]

According to the Dear Leader:

  • (cur | prev) 03:14, May 30, 2021‎ Aschlafly (Talk | contribs | block)‎ . . (127,525 bytes) (+137)‎ . . (gobbledygook | 1944 | circular bureaucratic directives; term was coined by conservative Texan Congressman Maury Maverick) (undo)

Maury Maverick was a conservative? Ah, not exactly. [29] UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 04:33, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

And? LondonGrump (talk) 07:14, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Conservapedian logic in a nutshell[edit]

CP logic.png is indeed a great program. 😀 UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 22:15, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

LMAO that's hilarious!! Can you teach me how to do image editing???? Unclescrooge (talk) 23:31, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Exactly. Conservapedian evil is not wanting people to freeze to death, not wanting young "liberals" or black people to be murdered, not wanting gay people or those who commit adultery to be stoned to death, not wanting people to get reasonably priced health care if they get ill, not wanting people to be vaccinated to possibly save their lives and those of others, not wanting to beat or rape your wife if she does not follow your every command and not getting pissed off at attempted fascist insurrections of the democratic process.--Mercian (talk) 02:44, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Unclescrooge, do you have an email account for me to contact you with? UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 03:52, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Yes!!! However, I don't want to share it here, so you can message me on Discord: Unclescrooge#0105 Speaking of Discord, did you know that the fascists running the RW server there banned me from the group????? They are so intolerant!!!! Unclescrooge (talk) 04:08, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Hmm, I haven't used Discord much before and haven't been there in a while... UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 04:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
So @UShistoryanalyzer, best buddy of LT, now you want to contact that fucking troll Unclescrooge. No way will I allow you to be made a sysop. Spud (talk) 06:25, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Scrooge and LT's biggest stan sitting in a tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-G. --Goatspeed. Goat bless America🇺🇸CircularREmail2.gifasoning🇺🇸🇺🇸-->Steal my ideas 07:45, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Will cite that in the coop. --Gale5050 (talk) 21:45, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Sigh, you guys realize that this type of nonsensical overreacting only validates the claim made over at CP that this site is "just a bunch of pearl-clutching pansies," right? UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 00:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

What makes you think we give a shit what CP thinks of us? LondonGrump (talk) 09:54, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

no it really isnt. and im not sure you grasp the point made. i will clarify for you. after finally realising about cp what is immediately obvious to most people and has been known by folk here for years you created and shared with us a meme encapsulating your new opinions. a noted troll (drawing attention to somewhere else they have been banned by the 'fascists' there should have set off alarm bells in your head) currently in a coop case to be banned approves of your work. thanks for the kind words you say. lets be pals. noting your friendship with another already banned user/noted troll while you make friends with another about to be banned someone expresses the opinion that this does not bode well and perhaps you shouldnt be trusted just yet with your own set of keys.
im sure you are friendly chap and all, but it doesnt look good does it? that maybe your judgement is a bit off. that maybe, considering the friction you yourself have generated elsewhere, that maybe some here are lukewarm to you at best and less than thrilled at your cosying up with someone else here whose produced even more toxic friction and soon to be banned?
cp think we are pearl clutching pansies because of what mercian says above. and for not blocking you for even acknowledging someone persona non grata here, or soon be. the opinion emphatically made was not much of an over reaction. it would take a lot more for any action to be taken. but caution is probably good sense. for some you havent quite earned the benefit of the doubt. not just yet. that was the point.
hope that clears things up for you. AMassiveGay (talk) 01:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

@AMassiveGay Thanks. You put it perfectly.

And I certainly don't give a fuck what Conservapedia, well, let's be honest, Ken, might say about RationalWiki or about me in the future. I'm already one of the deer that he shot dead and whose heads he mounted on his wall, after all. Spud (talk) 16:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

AttomWaffen being correctly labeled as Neo-Nazis is "liberal name calling" according to Andy.[edit]

Screenshot 2021-06-01 at 11-38-56 Recent changes - Conservapedia.png

PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 16:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

And here's Schlafly's third-rate excuse [30] in responding to a reply to this. So if a blatant neo-Nazi says they're not a neo-Nazi, then per the Dear Leader's logic, asserting the fact that they're a neo-Nazi is "name-calling". UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 20:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
At least he is consistent with this policy. All instances of pansies, pantywaists, girly, limp-wristed, woke etc have also been removed. Oh wait. --Mercian (talk) 09:10, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Good post! 🤣 UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 17:11, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
I presume 'big girl's blouse' is UKEnglish and therefore verboten. Anna Livia (talk) 19:36, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Ditto absolute melt. LondonGrump (talk) 19:54, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Ah, I see someone's utilizing doublethink and hoping we won't notice[edit]

LMAO: [31][32] UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 23:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

You would have loved RW ten or eleven years ago. LondonGrump (talk) 14:45, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Oh? UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 17:10, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, when stuff like that was still funny and / or noteworthy. WIGO CP used to be on the front page of RW because, well, RW started as a reaction to CP. CP is now well past its sell by date. Andy seems to have stopped giving much of a shit now that he has a WND column. Coke Eyes is milking his boiler plate website for all its advertising worth. Ed Poor got bored and went away. Karajerk sits there laughing at his own "jokes" when he can tear himself away from reminscing about rum, sodomy and the lash. JPatt is busy ranting away on his private blog. There was a brief flurry of entertaining madness when the lunatics took over the White House but even that failed to give CP any real momentum. Now there's just Ken - who, bless him, seems an interesting fella if you don't actually engage in him but just throw some nuts at him every now and again - Peter Ka, Joaquin Martinez, you youngsters and the occasional passing parodist. It's a moribund horse. LondonGrump (talk) 19:52, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Ken up for his second Nobel Prize in 5 years.[edit]

After his 2016 Nobel Prize for Medicine by making huge strides in eliminating global obesity by determining the cause is atheism surely the 2021 Prize for Physics is already his bar the shouting. After 70 years on speculation of exactly what UFOs are he cracks it. They are demons, the work of The Devil. I would not be suprised if a third prize is not on it's way after proving beyond doubt Satan exists.[33] The man is a truly the greatest American polymath since Benjamin Franklin. Only time will tell if he goes down as The GOAT.--Mercian (talk) 20:16, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Oh look, I found a topic on this page that wasn't started by USHistoryanaliser-Hastur! (talk) 05:06, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

LT begins to go full RobSmith[edit]

[34] UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 03:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

The only thing interesting about LT is identifying the sources of his plagiarism. You are entirely boring. Nutty Roux (talk) 10:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Guess who's abusing their power again[edit]

If you were thinking of User:Conservative, correct! Of all the revisions he's rampantly deleting extraneously for the past few days, he appears to ignore the blatantly inappropriate ones. Hydronium hydroxide (talk) 23:24, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

I'm not surprised. LT has told me that Conservative has abused his power before in this manner, mentioning something about Dataclarifier's talk page related to extensive squabbles last year. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 00:42, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Waitwaitwaitwait, you have contact with Liberaltears? Hydronium hydroxide (talk) 01:22, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Yep. His email is posted on his CP user page. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 02:25, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Wow, thank you! Hydronium hydroxide (talk) 02:33, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
You're welcome. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 02:49, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Hmm, speaking of LT, I see he's becoming more like BHathorn in his editing patterns... UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 04:00, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Get a room. LondonGrump (talk) 13:58, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

@UShistoryanalyzer. Noone here gives a fuck when you talk to yourself and one of your socks. You make me wish Nobs and Ken were back, at least they had some kind of thought in their trolling. Oldusgitus (talk) 18:47, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Rob did. Ken reminds me more of an 8 bit computer with 16k RAM. The variation changes but the content and diversion is extremely limited. Kennodore VIC 20.--Mercian (talk) 07:43, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
On The Spectrum 48? I'll get my coat. LondonGrump (talk) 15:34, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
I was 9 in 1983 when I got one for Christmas. The tape recorder for loading had to be mono for some reason. It would then make a noise like a modem for 4 minutes. The alternate blue and yellow stripes had to be the same width or the dreaded "R: Tape Loading Error" would result. Most games would draw a picture on the loading screen. Even then load success was 70% at best. Great machine for it's time though and somewhat of a style icon.--Mercian (talk) 13:19, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
I came across an old magazine which talked about a program taking up 'a massive 5MB.' Anna Livia (talk) 15:49, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Gone of topic completely as this has nothing to do with CP anymore but a simple JPEG is larger than the average 8 bit game and my mid-range gaming PC is more powerful than every Sinclair Spectrum ever produced combined. In 1960 1MB of hard drive space cost £20,000 which would be hundreds of thousands of pounds today. Today you can get 25MB for 1 penny. Moore's law is very powerful, as powerful as a new conservative term which themselves rise exponentially.--Mercian (talk) 22:51, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Couldn't the entire programming for an Apollo mission spaceflight fit onto a floppy disc? (Not certain which size.) Will link back to CP with this - will note the 'follow the money' take on the Moon Landing Hoax conspiracy theory, which is actually 'sensible.' Anna Livia (talk) 14:43, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
But see who's accused of the conspiracy: "There has been speculation spread by liberals that the Apollo moon landing missions never actually took place, that it was a hoax filmed in a Hollywood studio. Supporting this interpretation is the fact that the American flag placed on the Moon should not wave, though it appears it does. Also, no stars appear in the lunar sky in photographs supposedly taken on the Moon, as they would be expected to do. Moreover, the shadows in the photographs run in different directions, rather than parallel, as if the sun were not the source of light." Scream!! (talk) 15:25, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
This, this and this answer my question (if anyone is interested).
I was identifying the valid point ('curate's egg') - and anyone care to analyse the logic behind accusing 'the Liberals' (whether or not in Chesham and Amersham) of the conspiracy theory? Anna Livia (talk) 16:38, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
It's possibly the only well know conspiracy theory that Conservapedia, or at least Schlafly, is not on board with, therefore liberal. You should check out some of the things he considers liberal. Ku Klux Klan, National Front (British, The French NF are good conservatives), Hitler, Mussolini and countless other fascists but not Pinochet who is another good conservative. The moral of the story is, if Schalfly does not like something it is liberal, if he likes something it is conservative. George Orwell was a conservative in his eyes, so were The Clash and The Sex Pistols. I kid you not.--Mercian (talk) 20:48, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
PS. The Sex Pistols are conservative because of the song "Bodies"[35] He sees as as anti abortion, a huge plus for him. It is not so much anti abortion but about a young woman who had a backstreet abortion and dumped the remains on John Lydon's doorstep. The line "She was an animal, she was a fucking disgrace" also sums up his views on women. So he likes them.--Mercian (talk) 21:08, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────Whilst the pistols themselves weren't 'conservative' as such it is without question that lydon was and is. He recently said that he is a conservative voter iirc. And the song Bodies is anti-abortion. Again I recall hearing lydon saying exactly that once. It was a while ago and, being a punk at the time, I was probably wasted on speed and cheap cider but I do recall him saying it. Oldusgitus (talk) 22:08, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Lydon may be conservative in the way us in The UK might describe conservatism but he is centre-right, not a far right nutcase and this is a viewpoint he has developed as he has aged. Schlafly has labeled people far further right than him as liberal, the likes of Tucker Carlson, Mike Pence and Dick Cheany for instance. Being anti-abortion is not necessarily a conservative viewpoint here, more of a religious one and it's is not a requirement to be right wing to be religious in The UK.--Mercian (talk) 06:16, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
There are several types of right-wing in the UK - 'small c conservatism', 'Tory grandee and person from the shires', 'Daily Express reader', to membership of certain political parties and 'Enoch was right'. Anna Livia (talk) 11:19, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Generally speaking though the vast majority of Tories do not want to deny people healthcare, a casual homophobia may be present but they are not rabid about it and do not want to deny gay people basic rights, they do not want the citizenship to be armed to to the teeth and except defeat with a stiff upper lip, not encouraging the heir of Guy Fawkes. I can argue with them on policy and it can get heated but they do not hate my guts and vice versa. All this seems increasingly mainstream among American conservatives.--Mercian (talk) 12:53, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Most of the Tory voters I know haven't got a clue what The Party's policies are beyond some vague soundbites. LondonGrump (talk) 15:56, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
thats probably more than labour voters can say about labour policy right now AMassiveGay (talk) 16:07, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Most voters have very little idea what the policies of the party they 'support' are, in most countries. IIRC there was a survey here in the UK quite a few years ago where tories have the least idea and labour the next bad understanding. Liberals, as in supporters of the liberal democrat party in the UK, have the greatest understanding of their parties policies. But that is because in the UK Lib Dem members tend to be the most politically engaged of any mainstream party. ukip, the bnp,the nf etc don't count as 'mainstream'. The survey asked voters which policies they supported and tories overwhelmingly supported labour party policies when they didn't know which party it was.Oldusgitus (talk) 17:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Labour Party policy? Keep your head down, don't rock the boat, keep the media barons happy, fuck the unions. LondonGrump (talk) 18:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
... and above all: "don't let those lefties in again!". Scream!! (talk) 18:46, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
The Kennadore is doubling down. Apparently homosexuals getting attacked and threatened are more setbacks for "The homosexual agenda", a phrase he is now using frequently whilst reveling in extreme violence.[36] Setback, homosexual agenda and Godspeed are all Schlaflyisms he is using more and more as his nose gets increasingly browner. It will soon match the proverbial brown shirt he wears.--Mercian (talk) 10:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

The CP internal division continues[edit]

Another day, another message from LT:

Thank you UShistoryanalyzer for continuing to help me find top-notch sources! I've recently been able to get some great books that will be perfect for some upcoming CP page creations!

And that's probably one of the only few reasons for continuing to stay on CP. The sheer stupidity from the admins on the site is beyond ridiculous. What the hell was wrong with DavidB4 a while back to post a link to the neo-Nazi site The Daily Stormer??!?!? The only valid excuse he could make is that he was severely drunk, as no sane person with any shred of common sense would be that obliviously brain-dead. This comes to my mind because a few hours ago, he decided to undo my block of Shobson20. Was he too lazy to read the block log details? Why is he shilling for a blatant troll who unjustly persecuted me last year? What's with the utter stupidity?

If I had any previous respect for DavidB4, it's now lost, period. He's becoming as bad as Andy, a kowardly, traitorous, cold-hearted sociopath who doesn't have the spine and guts to thoroughly stand up for good Conservapedia contributors.

And as usual, LT specified in a follow-up that I can post this here. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 20:05, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

What would Will Hay say? LondonGrump (talk) 23:09, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Good post! Scream!! (talk) 00:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

This is what happens when you vainly copy-paste blocks of text[edit]

[37] "President Donald ====Ballot dump====" 🤣

And then there's RobSmith sometimes copy-pasting content he didn't write. LT has told me more than once that he wasn't quite impressed when his work got outright spammed across other Conservapedia articles. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 04:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Who gives a flying fuck what that little turd LT thinks? Spud (talk) 04:25, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Well, I guess you do to enough of an extent to give an input on that. Also, maybe you haven't talked to LT much, but calling him a "little turd" is not very accurate, to say the least. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 04:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
No, I honestly don't care what he thinks. And I talked to him more than enough while he was still here and being a fucking troll. What does bother me, however, is that we now have a sysop who keeps going on about fucking LT and keeps trying to make out that LT is somehow better than the other cunts on Conservapedia. He isn't. If he was, he wouldn't edit it. Spud (talk) 06:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Good post! Scream!! (talk) 07:38, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Are we that desperate for sysops? LondonGrump (talk) 11:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Reading the current version of the page - Canada seems to have become part of the US and the UK is the only other country to get a mention. A case of 'Fog in Channel - Continent cut off'-itis. Anna Livia (talk) 23:18, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Oh, are we still pretending Analyzer is not a sock of LT?-Flandres (talk) 23:21, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Unless we've got definite proof, we can still safely assume that this is just someone who wants to marry him. He seems to be mostly good-faith in his blockings of trolls, so I do begrudgingly respect Analyzer. --Goatspeed. Goat bless America🇺🇸CircularREmail2.gifasoning🇺🇸🇺🇸-->Steal my ideas 23:50, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
(EC) Flandres, LT has told me his disdain for using profanity, which can't exactly be said of me. Now please go sober up before you start sputtering other unsubstantiated claims. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 23:55, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
How about you go mature a little before you post anything else related to the tedious little shit from CP and how he has graciously 'given you permission' to repeat his drivel on here. Genuinely, I doubt anyone other than you gives a fuck what the child on cp thinks about anything. Oldusgitus (talk) 18:32, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
One prominent Conservapedian pretends to be more than one person and another less prominent minion denies being so. A strategy meant to keep liberal atheist woke sissy boys of their guard perhaps?.--Mercian (talk) 06:58, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
i was thinking they are trying to bore us into submission with the most tedious posts imaginable AMassiveGay (talk) 07:10, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Mercian - I understand that the problem is when one starts to lose the arguments with the alternative personas - or tries to doublethink the several different personas into one. Anna Livia (talk) 18:39, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Schlafly goes back to crying over scumbag Derek Chauvin being punished[edit]

Schlafly's claim that the guidelines require 10 years for second degree unintentional murder is false. The guideline presumptively requires 150 months and permits a judge discretion to sentence for between 128 and 180 months without being required to justify a departure according to pretty rigorous standards. 128-180 months /= 10 years. In this case, the judge found that several factors justified departing from the standard and imposed 22.5 years. The only thing that's remarkable about this sentence is that it was given to a white cop, which I believe is the only reason Schlafly is commenting. Nutty Roux (talk) 14:40, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Can someone tell me why he is supporting this policeman who killed an unarmed man but he is calling for the head of another who killed someone who was attempting to break into the senate with the intent to commit serious felonies possibly even murder? I really do not understand the mindset.--Mercian (talk) 20:51, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
According to sources familiar with the matter, Schlalfy uses the word "clean' and "family-friendly" interchangeably. In this leaked video, Schlafly gives instructions to sysops to "figure out" how to implement CP policy. Dutchbag (talk) 00:23, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

@Mercian From my experience people like Schlafly don't actually have ideas, they just react to facts in a binary way: if something is right-wing, then it's good, if it's left-wing, then it's bad. I've seen people reasoning like this through the whole political spectrum, many centrists think if an idea is not between the center-left and the center-right then it's wrong. GeeJayK (talk) 00:47, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Mercian, you've got it back to front. Andy Schlafly has no real "conservative" principles or you'd see him be able to justify traditional conservative positions according to some sound philosophical, historical, or legal basis. Instead, he just has gut feelings and a strong but shallow identity as a "conservative". So it's not that he thinks things are bad because they're "liberal", he thinks they're "liberal" because he doesn't like them. His lack of any well-considered basis for his beliefs explains the quick proliferation of RINOs when there's a Democrat in the White House or a Republican whom anyone with actual principles would abhor, and why he makes unsupportable legal arguments in favor of heavy-handed and patently undemocratic nonsense like throwing election results out when he believes the result suits his black and white feelings-based worldview even though literally no responsible legal thinkers agree. Nutty Roux (talk) 18:31, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

@GeeJayK That's about 75% true. Schlafly is as much at war with RINOs and neocons, whom he considers liberals, as he is with the left. Realize "liberal" is the most derogatory term that can be flung around at Conservapedia, more so than pedophile, holocaust denier, communist, socialist, Marxist, mf'er, S.O.B., etc. etc etc. Although he does have some tolerance for some brands of Libertarians. Dutchbag (talk) 02:35, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

@tedioustroll ushistoryanalyser. The stuff you just removed is as relevant as any shit you post about conservapedia and your little friend over there. Oldusgitus (talk) 22:05, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
How nice of you to lecture me about shit. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 02:39, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Fuck off, boy.
Anyone watching the football? LondonGrump (talk) 17:20, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Will be tomorrow. Actually finally got the evening off work for a match. And did you see Cav? Fucking amazing ride by him. Bet you he takes the record on the Champs just for fun.
@cptroll. You can't teach stupid so there's no point 'lecturing' you about anything. Why don't you fuck off back to cp and leave the adults to talk amongst themselves.Oldusgitus (talk) 08:27, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Cav’s having an amazing tour. Tbh I haven’t kept up with the tour for a few years now. Is Peter Sagan in this year’s tour? LeucippusTalk 13:07, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Yep, P Sagan was riding this year but withdrew abandoned 2 days ago due to knee problems. Possibly trying to recover before Tokyo? Oldusgitus (talk) 22:06, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, I last watched the tour during the years when Froome and Nairo Quintana were duking it out in the GC. Froome was a machine during those years. How do you think the current GC battle compares to the tour circa 2015-17? LeucippusTalk 14:04, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Good luck to Southgate and the boys. Spud (talk) 16:47, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
@Spud Hear, hear!! LeucippusTalk 17:27, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
We lost on penalties. I put it down to three things. Southgate is a superb man manager but is tactically lacking. If you are going to play with wing backs more dynamism is needed in midfield instead of two defensively minded stoppers. Mount should have played there but he was stuck on the wing, a position he does have the pace to excel in. There is also the lack of experience in the side which will obviously improve. Thirdly, Gianluigi Donnarumma.--Mercian (talk) 23:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
England losing was absolutely the best thing that could happen, if only to stop the nationalistic wankmaggotry that would've followed. Now Johnson and the vile Patel, instead of yelling about how football "came home," can face up to the building Covid disaster looming, the racism (that Patel endorsed with her saying fans can boo players taking the knee) against the footballers, and the million other disasters befalling the UK. Not that they will, they're more focused on prosecuting life savers, if they don't let migrants drown. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 16:55, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
I tend to agree, particularly as the squad seem to be the nearest we have to an effective political opposition. This way, they cannot be co-opted by Bodger Johnson. LondonGrump (talk) 17:49, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Rob Smith's idea of violent thugs.[edit]

[38] in contrast to his idea of peaceful protestors. [39].--Mercian (talk) 17:55, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

You don't recognize Linda Sarsour in that first clip dressed in all pink head to toe with the purple headscarf? Dutchbag (talk) 08:07, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Rob has been on a roll recently, including his claim that the FBI were in collusion with "Antifa Black Bloc" (like Canada Mexico, I suppose) and the Capitol Police to kick things off on Janaury 6th and a splendid discussion about totalitarianism where he links to a lengthy article about Hannah Arendt he obviously didn't understand. Even Ken is starting to sound reasonable when "debating" with him. LondonGrump (talk) 22:25, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
And then this garbage. It remains on the article months after the quackery nonsense has been debunked. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 22:55, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
tl:dr LondonGrump (talk) 00:22, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Rob is insane and the shit he posts to CP should be ignored like the rest of that sad webshite. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 03:17, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
IOWs, not all Conservapedia content is equally terrible. A few entries on that website by BHathorn (and even at least a few by LT) aren't awfully written. Apparently the former cites his own publications from time to time. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 03:42, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
That's like saying a burglar is not terrible because he only robbed 99 houses and let the 100th be.--Mercian (talk) 06:50, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
At least robbers are an actual problem to society unlike Schlafy's circlejerk, but that's already a very low standard. PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 06:58, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Teenage Conservapedian says his favourite Conservapedians are not as bad as the ones he doesn't like. Hold the front page. LondonGrump (talk) 07:00, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
The only noteworthy thing Rob's ever done on CP is orchestrate Karajou's demise. That was some impressive work. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 07:17, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
I think Schlafly is a huge problem to society. No him alone but the as a part of the Trump cult as a whole. They/he are vehemently anti vaccine, anti minority, anti gay and anti democracy whilst being very pro themselves and those who think like them.--Mercian (talk) 19:57, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
All very true, but one can't help but notice the tendency of people on this very wiki to engage in ableist rhetoric ("perhaps Rob's meds are in review"). In that respect we're not much better than them, if we're better than them at all in that respect. You can critique something without resorting to ableism, you know. Oxyaena Harass 07:08, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
It's a fair cop. My reasoning is immaterial, it was crass and clumsy. Comment deleted. LondonGrump (talk) 06:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. I appreciate it. Oxyaena Harass 07:06, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Ken and Rob go full erasure mode on Karajou[edit] PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 04:42, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

I think the defrocking of Karajou is that, if I remember correctly, he admitted through clenched teeth that Trump lost and Biden was the legitimate POTUS. A Capital Crime in Schalfy's fiefdom.--Mercian (talk) 18:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
I got a whole list of emails (no, not from this person) between Conservapedia sysops that explain a lot. And partially thanks to an ally of Karajou for obtaining them. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 04:05, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

These morons can't even hide their blunders[edit]

I hope this is the last time I ever create a topic on this page. So, Ken is asking about the lack of blacks. If you were here yesterday, you saw that he started his rant talking about latinos, and how CP had Joaquín Martínez as a sysop. That was on his essay about RW. Problem is, as I told him, I live in latam and I am running. So he edited his essay again and changed Latinos to Blacks, hiding the older edits to cover the change. However, he forgot to hide all the edits, so we can still have a glimpse of his first attempt to whine. The first version was huge, but you're not losing anything if you didn't read it. GeeJayK (talk) 12:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

I'd really appreciate if the wiki could curb its casually ableist tendencies. Oxyaena Harass 13:21, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Ok. I edited the headline to something less ableist. GeeJayK (talk) 13:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
one has to wonder what diversity is like over at cp. i suspect its exercise in hypocrisy AMassiveGay (talk) 14:08, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
A mixed race man raises his head.--Mercian (talk) 14:17, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Ken hasn't realized that we have four candidates running for four vacant positions on the Board. One will be Brazilian, one will be a Chinese-American, one will be a trans woman. It's a foregone conclusion. GeeJayK has every right to count his chickens. And it will be a very diverse Board with me as the only straight, white cis male from an English-speaking country.
And I love how Conservapedia now has a page that says "cunts" on it three times. Spud (talk) 14:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Add the word Hypocritical before "cunts" and that sums CP up. A place where Black Lives Matter are terrorists, children who die at pop concerts are sluts and whores, gays deserve to be stoned to death, insurrectionists are regarded as peaceful American heroes as are anti-vaxers and atheists are portrayed in a similar manner to what Jewish people were in 1930s German propaganda films. (As vermin/rats, mentally handicapped, scourges of society etc etc). I for one are glad they hate us, it means we must be doing something right.--Mercian (talk) 15:03, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
@Mercian Well said. So CP had one Mexican admin and Ken shared his password with a black man? It does nothing to stop the place from being a hate site. Spud (talk) 15:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
RW is probably more diverse than it superficially appears - not everybody will declare all their 'particular attributes' (eg hair colour, glasses-wearing...). Anna Livia (talk) 17:12, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
How does it appear? We have almost no idea of the ethnic background of our editors (or for that matter readers). It's not something that comes up a lot. But as far as LGBT stuff is concerned I think that we can be confident that we are streets ahead. On the other hand CP is probably too prejudiced to understand that that makes us better.Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 17:29, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
I'm aware of black and latino editors as well as those with chinese an indian origins, as well as a plethora of LGBT+ editors. how diverse are they at conservapedia? AMassiveGay (talk) 17:40, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
'What unites us (developing RW, interacting with each other) is greater than what divides us (non-RW-relevant topics).' The difference between RW and CP is 'Who is not against us/the RW mission is with us' and 'who is not with us (and our strict-but-changing-'CP principles is against us.' Anna Livia (talk) 18:55, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
(ec) It's also worth noting that while JM might have been an admin, he was excluded from all the secret admin chatrooms, and they basically ignored him to do his art posts, until he left / was booted out. Likewise, they treated the only two women to show any interest in the site, Jallen and HSMom, like absolute garbage. So yeah, Ken sitting in Angry-White-Man-Central, trying to call us out, is just more of the hypocrisy we expect from the biggest loser on Conservapedia. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 17:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────Ken just made 40 edits on his essay to answer me.Though he also flamed Trent in the end. Wow. Just. Wow. GeeJayK (talk) 17:40, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

is no surprise. dogshit can only create more dogshit. thats all they got. AMassiveGay (talk) 17:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
He's just done a lot of hiding/over-siting, a favourite trick of his. He has a a go, pretending he is some sort of debating god, gets trounced and deletes his embarrassment. It makes you wonder what he his hiding considering what he allows to stand. Not words I would normally use but using his terminology he really is a weird pansy.--Mercian (talk) 19:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
So, he literally spent 10 hours writing and something just do delete and hide it right afterwards? @Mercian in case you want to read his gibberish, you can check here. I'll probably stop posting in this thread now. I only created this turd because it was at least in part about me. GeeJayK (talk) 19:17, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
If it takes 40 edits with that time and effort, I think we should continue keeping it up. I love how concise our responses are and this guy takes an entire afternoon scribbling screed as a response. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 20:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Or writing new essays about how racist we are, ironic when CP is racist to the core. We pluck his string he makes, well music would not be the word, perhaps the horrible disjointed sound a piano makes when used by a two year old.[40] Keep banging on the keyboard Kendol.--Mercian (talk) 21:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Aw, bless Ken. He has the IQ of a PhD, love him. LondonGrump (talk) 21:54, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

LondonGrump - IQ as in 15+8+4 (numerological value)? Anna Livia (talk) 12:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Honestly, it's the 4th grade spelling bee win that leaves me in awe. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 09:42, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Mercian : He did go by GuckyPiano, I think. The poetic metaphor suits him. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 22:33, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
I believe it is a typo by londonGrump, I think he meant the IQ of a Pug one of which also happens to be his girlfriend.--Mercian (talk) 15:51, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Wasn't Pug One in De La Soul? LondonGrump (talk) 06:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Him, himself and he!--Mercian (talk) 15:09, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Evidence of Deep State being LT[edit]

Yes folks, you heard it here first, that little pesky troll LT is the Deep State. He edits cp:John Warner on May 22, 2021 [41]. Three days later, Warner died at age 94 [42]. And yet our pal nobs was too clueless to notice. Hmhmhmhmhmhmhm.... UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 16:36, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Anyone watching the Olympics? LondonGrump (talk) 18:42, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
No,sorry. Scream!! (talk) 19:15, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
@LondonGrump. Dropping in and out. Bit of a shame the BBC hasn't got the full coverage due to discovery buying the european rights though. Was mildly amused to read that Annemiek van Vleuten actually thought she had won yesterday after the women's peloton completely fucked things up. Oldusgitus (talk) 08:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

A Strange Statistic[edit]

So apparently, the average Conservapedia visitor now spends 156 minutes on the website, an increase of 1500% over the last 90 days!Do You Believe That? I don't. Omicron (talk) 21:04, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Something's fishy here... UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 01:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
I don't know. If you tot up the hours spent on there by Ken, Rob and the usual suspects, then add the time spent there by the dozen or so casual visitors every day, it could quite easily work out that high. LondonGrump (talk) 14:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Boom. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 16:54, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Olympic Fail and Political Correctness[edit]

Andy attributes the lousy first day for US medals to political correctness. No explanation, of course. Anyone have an idea what he's on about? Real men won't try out because they're afraid they can't insult girls? Whoover (talk) 16:45, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

I would pay significant money to watch any of the CP editors do a single gymnastics or track & field event.-RipCityLiberal (talk) 17:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
And yet Team USA leads the medal table. I thought he might have learned after the debacle of the last episode. --Mercian (talk) 20:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Hey hey, one of them has a gold medal, albeit for a 3rd grade spelling bee. PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 21:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Has he done his "gay marriage = fewer medals" routine yet? Was it the last Olympics when he started declaring that certain sports weren't "real" sports, when he was proven wrong? RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 10:25, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Perhaps there could be a 'Conservapedia-sponsored sports day/weekend' where only "properly Conservative athletes" can compete. Anna Livia (talk) 11:14, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
@Anna Livia That's the first time you've ever intentionally made me laugh. You're getting better at this lark. Keep it up. Spud (talk) 12:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
I guess this great conservative sports star will be downgraded to a BLM liberal.[43]--Mercian (talk) 15:51, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Spud - don't forget I follow UK humour (including understatement) conventions. Anna Livia (talk) 09:08, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
So do I. I'm a Limey too. Spud (talk) 12:15, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Different senses of humour - and I do fanfic as well (so can visualise some things better). Anna Livia (talk) 10:20, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
I like fanfic, what kind of fanfic? As long it does not involve Hermione being the secret lover of Lord V.--Mercian (talk) 19:13, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
@Mercian The don’t call him “Lord V” on account of his vocational skills. “In the quiet words of the Virgin Mary …. Come Again! LeucippusSalva veritate 21:02, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Olympic medal table.[edit]

A terrorist sympathiser brags that The US has more medals then China despite having fewer people. In perspective Atheistic Japan has 7 fewer medals than The USA despite having less than a third of the population. Atheistic Britain has 20 fewer despite have 1/5 of the population. Liberal Australia has 18 fewer despite have less than 1/15 of the population.[44]

Medal table when adjusted for population. Japan: 75 medals. Great Britain: 90 medals. Australia: 300 medals. This make The USA's 38 medals look like a very poor haul, after all this time he still has not learned to think before he posts. --Mercian (talk) 00:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
What even is his point? That atheism and Shintoism cause a lack of fitness? --Goatspeed. Goat bless America🇺🇸CircularREmail2.gifasoning🇺🇸🇺🇸-->Steal my ideas 02:28, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
What about the influence of monarchy? (282, 322 and 1031 days to go for Elizabeth II to move up [45]) Anna Livia (talk) 18:13, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

A new Schlaflyism[edit]

The Conservapedia Supreme Leader says liberalism and atheism is linked to iNfIniTy dEniAl!!11!1!! And yet he denies the existence of infinitesimal black hole singularities. The usual logic fail, I'm noticing. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 02:21, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Great non sequitur, particularly as this might be, in parts, one of Schlafly's stopped clock moments. Why not stop and think about what you write? LondonGrump (talk) 08:36, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
@LondonGrumpThe problem word in that is 'think'. Our CP child doesn't think. As for the 'new schaflyism' it's just yet another rehash of his usual rubbish and part of his ongoing feud with the redoubtable AugustO. August seems to have given up trying to educate andy on classical greek and they've moved onto fighting about andy's misunderstanding of irrational numbers Oldusgitus (talk) 11:57, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Playing chess cures homosexuality.[46]--Mercian (talk) 15:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

The game in which if a pawn goes all he way, it turns into a queen. Nothing gay about that. Spud (talk) 11:31, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

The People's Poet at his finest. RIP Rik.--Mercian (talk) 23:47, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
in typical liberal deceit you failed to mention the bible's role and refuse to admit how amazing and brilliant it is ancd you wouldnt have gays in the first place if you read the bible more. try sodom and gommarah for the truth about gays. stop before you get it to the bit were lot fucks both his daughters. thats for ministers only that bit. 20:17, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Ahh, you see it was the daughters who conspired to fuck lot and not the other way around. Checkmate atheist Oldusgitus (talk) 22:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
that sounds most unlady like. sure they didnt reach town with daughters up the duff and they came on to me actually so nuuh. like mary totally was a virgin and not a slapper. ooooh the source of incest and cuck videos on pornhub. how prescient they were. AMassiveGay (talk) 22:23, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
starting to think what happened to lots wife might an allusion to bukkake. turns out pornhub is bring people to god via hardcore porn. just stay away from the gay bits. AMassiveGay (talk) 11:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Lot was drunk, and the girls said, "ya gotta do watcha gotta do" for survival of the species. Dutchbag (talk) 03:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
and they were his daughters, i guess. you can do what you like with your own property. AMassiveGay (talk) 10:58, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
@Spud that was brilliant bravo-RipCityLiberal (talk) 23:41, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
@RipCityLiberal Credit where it's due. I got that from "CultureWikipedia", the second episode of the second season of the British comedy seriesBottomWikipedia, first shown on BBC 2 on 8 October 1992. But in the original, they said "prawn" rather than "pawn". I'm glad you liked it anyway. Spud (talk) 04:19, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
"Denial that pi contains pi is another manifestation of infinity denial." What in the name of Baby Jesus is that supposed to mean? Cantabrigian (talk) 14:45, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Bloody hell Cantabrigian, you've been away for a while. Everything ok? And the quote is just another manifestation of andy's ongoing battle with the estimable AugustO and AO's attempts to insert some sanity into andy's shit. Oldusgitus (talk) 15:58, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Where's the sportsmanship?[edit]

Schalfly takes a cheap shot at the US Women's Olympic Soccer Team[47] before, without reference or citation, accusing liberals of doing exactly that.[48]--Mercian (talk) 16:54, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

'It's not cricket'? Anna Livia (talk) 17:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
If there was ever a Conservative Olympics, I think we know who ‘The man to beat’ would be. LeucippusSalva veritate 00:48, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Would it be held on Bramble Bank (or one of these places? Anna Livia (talk) 19:03, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
The effete US Team may actually win a gold medal in boxing if it were only conservatives competing.--Mercian (talk) 06:46, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
The only Summer Olympics where the US picked up a higher percentage of medals was 2016 and 1984. If it wasn't for the USMTF pulling in less than 20 medals, we would have picked up more than 2016.RipCityLiberal (talk) 17:51, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
This was in no way a knock at the US Team, more of a piss take of Conservapedia. They say that atheistic liberals are crap at sports as God does not look after them so if only US conservatives were allowed to compete they would have done even better, at least according to their philosophy. An example is the largely liberal US Women's Soccer team who Trump and by extension Conservarpedia actively mocked because they lost. In reality the team are aging with a lot of the ladies in their mid 30s. Football is a sport where player's peaks are in the 25-31 age range, it is all downhill from there.--Mercian (talk) 00:59, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Would Conservapedia users be capable of jogging for even a mile in the hot sun? Now that's a mystery to ponder! UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 02:04, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
@USHA-That depends … LeucippusSalva veritate 21:33, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
The 'how far can you go before you get banned on CP' medal? Anna Livia (talk) 22:36, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Ken is contention for one of those. He is pro vax, pro mask and recognises COVID is a real problem which is abhorrent to Schlafly. Him blaming Fauci instead of Trump for the pandemic response is the only thing keeping him off the podium.--Mercian (talk) 06:58, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
USHA’s just bitter because nobs beat him in the egg and brown-nose race last year; said race occurs downhill, Schlafly the bottom. LeucippusSalva veritate 13:43, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
What about cheese-rolling? The medals *might* feature the Cerne Abbas Giant. Anna Livia (talk) 17:00, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

LT goes full nobs again[edit]

[49] That said, the subject of LT's research ranks high on the most fascinating events of the McCarthy era. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 02:02, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

What would the Anti Nowhere League say? LondonGrump (talk) 20:26, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Schlafly and the evacuation efforts from Afghanistan.[edit]

He first berates Biden for not sending planes[50] before berating Biden for sending planes[51]--Mercian (talk) 03:56, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Countdown until CP editors post that the Taliban is an ideal example for America....-RipCityLiberal (talk) 19:20, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Conservative Trump JR has already done so so that is a thumbs up. "Liberal" Fox News has also so that is a thumbs down.--Mercian (talk) 19:27, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
What am I missing here? In both instances, he links to CNN and puts it in quotes without comment. Dutchbag (talk) 15:08, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Can you guys help me debunk this Conservapedia essay: "Vaxxed Higher Risk of Covid than Unvaxxed"[edit]

I for example can give the example of Iceland which has over 800 active cases but incredibly little deaths

BeardOfZeus (talk) 23:08, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

A) This source from AAAS being used is being misrepresented. The story is more "vaccines work, but not well enough". "Higher risk of Covid than Unvaxxed" is the type of bullshit take that shit extremist Wiki is known for.
B) The second source is a preprint paper. The conclusion is this: "Natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity". In other words, the take is on whether natural immunity is better than the vaccine alone. The study also notes that natural immunity + vaccine is better still. The Science news item quoted as the third source, which basically references the second, once was here but has since been removed. I don't know if there are issues with the study or whether they pulled it due to covidiots not being cautious about the word preprint and failing to recognize the "natural immunity" part.
C) The fourth source I cannot find through a Google search. Since it's supposedly ProPublica but suspiciously includes political tones that don't sound consistent with ProPublica, I consider this made up bullshit until proven elsewise (suggesting that Mr. Schlafly change that publication date to April 1st, I suppose.)
D) The fifth source actually appears to come from a fake news site called CrackNewz, which actually got it's information from Off-Guardian, a shit conspiracy site whose founders openly boast that they were banned from the Guardian's comment section. So, less news and more rants from the new digital green ink wielders.
E) The sixth source actually seems to be this piece of Medscape and primarily concerns the reporting of breakthrough cases. As it is quote mined, statements like "And as the new CDC data showed, vaccines continue to effectively shield vaccinated people against the worst outcomes." are suspiciously missing.
It is well known that the vaccine's interaction with new variants and breakthrough cases is an area of concern, especially with further variants emerging. But "Vaxxed Higher Risk of Covid than Unvaxxed" is, naturally, a bullshit take. PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 00:13, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, @PanGalacticGargleBlaster BeardOfZeus (talk) 03:47, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Is the full statement actually 'Vaxxed at higher risk of surviving Covid than unvaxxed and suffering from resultant Conservapedia-rants-itis'? Anna Livia (talk) 09:16, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
If 99 out of 100 people are vaccinated then Schalafly's statement is true. He says it himself that Israel is one of the most vaccinated nations in the world, something that the regularly linked Bradlee Dean consistency denies justified by the use of Bible quotes. Is anyone, even the most moronic CP readers, actually fooled by their deliberate deception?--Mercian (talk) 12:40, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
I read this article in WaPo [52] describing the illusion that vaccines aren't as effective as the government says they are. I was unfamiliar with Simpson's paradox, but if you don't want to read it;
The initial study gives the impression that vaccination decreases the likelihood of sickness leading to hospitalization by a factor of three, which isn't great. But when you break down infections by age group, older people skew the data, and the real protection from infection is more like a factor of 10. Raw numbers put more vaccinated people in the hospital than unvaccinated people, but when you break that down per million, unvaccinated people are six times more likely to be hospitalized.
The article has a great comparison to Oklahoma, a place with very low vaccination rate, which presents a more extreme picture both per million and raw numbers.-RipCityLiberal (talk) 18:19, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
He is now pushing horse de worming treatment for COVID claiming that Joe Rogan, who has taken this dangerous substance, has beaten COVID by taking it, without reference of course.[53] The fact is that it seems Rogan is quite ill with the disease. Ironic that so called "pro life" morons like Schlafly are determined to get people killed with their bullshit. They applaud terrorists that kill innocents, they rip masks off peoples faces, literally is some cases and want to criminalise those who push vaccines or mask mandates. I say it again, these "pro life" wankers are a fucking death cult.--Mercian (talk) 11:51, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
The supreme irony here is that for all their bullshit innuendo and conspiracy theory about the COVID vaccine being a way to deliberately kill people or make them infertile, their chosen snake oil actually does that. If there is a conspiracy to kill a shit-ton of people, that call is coming from inside the Republicans' own house. Semipenultimate (talk) 21:30, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
With the liberal/dem vaccine take up at over 80% and the conservative/rep at under 60% they are just killing their own. No wonder that Republicans across the country are stepping up Gerrymandering and voter suppression measures. Without doing so they would not have a hope.--Mercian (talk) 01:22, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Wow. And who and what do you call conspiracy theorists? Dutchbag (talk) 21:58, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Ken shows his preference for the Taliban over liberalism.[edit]

[54]They do carry out acts that he applauds, abuse of women, execution of atheists and terrorism that kills kids so hardly a suprise. Does he not understand that he former Afghan government were hardly secular leftists as he puts it?--Mercian (talk) 10:45, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

I've been thinking on this. The Chief of The General Staff stood up in congress and condemned The January 6 Insurrection. This along with other factors like homosexuals and women allowed in resulted in the military being labeled as woke among other less polite descriptions by the far right. The great conservative leader Putin paid The Taliban to kill woke American soldiers in Afghanistan, something Trump failed to condemn so that's a thumbs up to The Taliban. The Taliban also treat women and anyone else who does not stand by their terrible religious ideology like shit, comparing them to vermin, something done more than once by Ken himself and this hits a chord with his type and another thumbs up. 9/11 is something that seems to have faded in their hatred and they realise that Islamic fundamentalists have far more in common with them than other Americans who disagree with them. This is verging on treason. Are you a traitor Ken? --Mercian (talk) 15:21, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
To call anyone a traitor, you first have to be a racist nationalist. Dutchbag (talk) 22:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
What if I called Vidkun Quisling a traitor?-Flandres (talk) 22:54, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
everyones a traitor in the us it seems. if someones calling someone a traitor or talking about treason, then 9 times out 10 its an american doing the talking. AMassiveGay (talk) 23:08, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
or its the daily mail talking about something brexity AMassiveGay (talk) 23:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
I mean, traitor has some very specific political implications. Certainly he's a traitor to the Constitution.-RipCityLiberal (talk) 19:37, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
So how would the quote 'I would rather betray the world than have the world betray me' fit into the discussion? Anna Livia (talk) 23:09, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
In a democratic society if you support another's armed forces over your own and turn a blind eye, even applauding, another nation paying your enemy to kill you nations soldiers than that is treason. The dictionary definition of treason is "The crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill or overthrow the sovereign or government." by that standard the whole bloody lot of them are traitors with Trump at the head--Mercian (talk) 16:46, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
(Historical person) Cao Cao's comment about rather betraying the world than having the world betray him might be appropriate here. Anna Livia (talk) 09:21, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Let's take Count StauffenbergWikipedia for example; he is regarded as a hero, not for anything he did to promote democracy, but because he felt Hitler and the Nazis betrayed the nation. Dutchbag (talk) 21:13, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
I look forward to "Essay: RW user Dutchbag compares a member of the User:Conservative collective to the man who bravely attempted to overthrow Hitler" complete with photos of Douglas MacArthur, sinking ships, a man sitting at a computer with his head in his hands and Chuck Norris looking hard.--Mercian (talk) 10:43, 13 September 2021 (UTC)


Conservapedia, the family friendly encyclopaedia, now featuring the word cunt. Charming. Acegodfuckingdamnit 23:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

When I saw this topic I thought Salon was covering Ken's essay on RW (he uses the c-word three times on that page). I'm a bit disappointed. GeeJayK (talk) 03:37, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Apparently 'cunts' is OK but 'fucking' is not on CP ("By the way, using profanity like the words "fu**ing and "cunts" is very common for atheists"…).[55] Bongolian (talk) 07:17, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
I'm sure Anna Livia will agree when I write "good enough for James Joyce... " London Grump (talk) 09:56, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
And "the language of Chaucer, Shakespearian and the other usual suspects" should be referenced.
What does 'pansie' mean (rather than 'pansy') - presumably from the dictionary that includes 'potatoe'. Anna Livia (talk) 11:35, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Since Ken was quoting me, it looks like I'll have to chime in here. Using the language of Chaucer, I'd just like to say that I'm not a cunting sexist and there's nothing wrong with my cunting vocabulary or my cunting imagination. It did make me laugh seeing Ken censor the word "fucking" but not the word "cunt". And it makes me laugh that Ken seems to think it's OK to call women cunts but not men. Oh, and I didn't just call LT a cunt. I called all Conservapedia editors cunts. And Ken is definitely a massive cunt. Spud (talk) 12:32, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Cunt is far to nice of a word for somebody who calls people he does not like "Mutants" and indirectly suggesting that they they be ethnically cleansed and put in camps and Schalfly is just as bad for allowing it to be posted. They have the nerve to call fascists.--Mercian (talk) 15:06, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
I won't deny that "cunt" isn't a strong enough word to describe the likes of Andy and Ken. But I'm still firmly in the belief that anyone who continues editing Conservapedia after they've seen Andy, Ken and whoever else edits the main page delighting in people's deaths is most definitely a cunt. Spud (talk) 15:37, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
I wonder if Conservapedia has a page for Derek and Clive? LondonGrump (talk) 17:20, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Can anyone diagram this sentence: "Don't ever ask me to defend something you haven't even had the courtesy to read."? Is he saying he refuses to defend something he wrote that others refuse to read? Dutchbag (talk) 00:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
It's fairly straightforward if you understand the 'minds' of Nobs and Ken and also andy's, and CP as a whole, mindset. Ken has posted one of his usual immigration and 'religion' things, Nobs has responded in typical CP style by not reading the linked article but deciding from the headline he knows what it says and that it is rubbish and Ken has run out of patience with Nobs gradual slide into Q inspired idiocy and basically told him to fuck off, albeit in more polite language. I'm more intrigued by andy's latest man crush and mania on angels 'walking amongst us'. Oldusgitus (talk) 05:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
I can't tell whether Ken is making Rob look bad or Rob is making Ken look good. LondonGrump (talk) 19:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
It's like mixing five pounds of shit and five pounds of broken glass. Whatever happens, you ain't getting ten pounds of ice cream in the end. Semipenultimate (talk) 22:12, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

"Conservative New Zealand"....Wait, what?[edit]

huh? New Zealand has never been conservative. New Zealand has consistently been one of the most liberal societies on the planet. Andy has no fucking idea what he is talking about. Though no surprise there. Acegodfuckingdamnit 22:45, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

A shame we banned RobS - NZ has one of freest market economies in the world. Neo-liberal capitalism baby. Yet just came back from the pharmacy with a handful of drugs I need which cost me $0.00. Rob would lose his shit. Acegodfuckingdamnit 00:41, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Eh, he didn't even read the article he linked to -- the article says Auckland's lifting some restrictions in the third paragraph. And it's pretty easy to Google that most of New Zealand asied from Auckland right now is at alert level 2, which isn't terribly restrictive, and later news showed that, now with the vaccines, New Zealand is abandoning "zero COVID" type restrictive policies. So Conservapedia saying "COVID restrictions will remain indefinitely", yeah right. Since the paleocon American Conservative, while very biased (as you'd expect), accuracy wise is a ton better than most of the fake news sources used in that sidebar, I guess he had to completely make shit up. Figures. PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 02:01, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
What? We banned Rob? Maybe that explains why he's gone completely Jerome Corsi. LondonGrump (talk) 08:36, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

What is the problem with Conservapedia and vaccines?[edit]

Countries, states, counties, cities etc that have high vaccination rates have considerably lower cases of deaths and serious illness from Covid 19. The vaccines have been proven to be highly effective with very low rates of complication. It is estimated here in The UK that Covid vaccines have saved as many as 100,000 fatalities. They work where hydroxychloroquine has proven to offer no more than minor therapeutic relief and ivermectin is downright dangerous. At least half of all "news" stories are about anti vaccine pushing previous favourites like Trump is God and Biden The Devil to mere side-notes. Schalfly is a big anti vaxxer but certainly not the most prominent so why do these so called pro-lifers deny something that obviously prevent deaths?--Mercian (talk) 06:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

pretty sure its because they are all pricksAMassiveGay (talk) 07:32, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
I'm fairly sure Andy doesn't believe in germ theory - there was some post ages ago where he seemed to be anti-hand washing. Plus, God-Emperor Trump hasn't endorsed them, so they can't be for them. Wasn't Karajou shit canned for daring to suggest vaccines might be ok? RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 11:36, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Conservapedia has an article on vaccines and it is worth nothing that in 2009 its vaccine article was surprisingly decently acceptable. It even (ironically, given what was to come) made a snarky comment on fundie Islam idiot imams in Nigeria stiffing the polio vaccine. Before COVID, I think the whole HPV vaccine "controversy" (due to fears that the HPV vaccine would encourage promiscuity for some reason, and of course if there's one thing that triggers fundies, it's sex) helped to implement the anti-vaxx seed in some of the fundie crowd. It has come to fruition, and the current article on vaccines, while not a complete trainwreck, contains a lot of bullshit, mostly inserted by the usual suspects. In articles written entirely by the usual suspects, such as their COVID vaccine article, it is worthless junk, fueled by "citations" of the fake news that litter the site these days (in this particular case, heavy on Gateway Pundit bullshit). PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 17:56, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Racist Conservapedian essay I found.[edit],_Sexual_Preference,_And_Nothing_Elseimg This site is a joke. BeardOfZeus (talk) 01:10, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Quoting Stefan Molyneux approvingly, and using Breitbart as a primary source? Seems right up their ally.-RipCityLiberal (talk) 18:27, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
It's perfectly fine as it was published by a conservative. When a group of (liberal) women walked into The Capitol to peacefully protest they were violent thugs but when a rioting mob at least 50 times larger stormed the building causing deaths and millions of dollars of damage they were peaceful people protesting because they were conservatives. When a far right moron rode into a group of people in Charlottesville murdering one and injuring many more is was self defence because the driver was a conservative, when someone drove into a crowd of anti vaxxers injuring one it was an act of terrorism because the driver was not a conservative. When George Floyd was killed by a cop because he passed a dodgy bank note it was a lawful killing because A: he was black and B: not a conservative. When Ashli Babbitt violently tried to break onto The Senate Floor in order to "Hang Mike Pence" it was capital murder because she was a conservative. And these bastards accuse us of having double standards.--Mercian (talk) 08:10, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
I'm sometimes amazed at how people fail to reject outright some ideas that are so laughably and obviously bullshit. IQ is caused by... brain shape? LOLWUT? PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 13:26, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
This article feels two degrees of separation away from bringing up the Bell curve. Yet, somehow, anti-racists are the real racists. Their cognitive dissonance is truly baffling at times. Jake Holmesyell at me 13:39, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
I don't believe it is cognitive dissonance at all, that gives them some excuse for their behaviour. IMO it is deliberate deception and bigotry. If you, I or anyone else compared religious people to vermin, suggest they are mutants, should be locked in camps and banned from breeding we would rightly be vilified for it but when Demyer or one of his collective (He is pushing that shite again) says it about atheists it is not only accepted but applauded and if any criticism is given it results in a ban. It is only one step away from him pushing for "resettlment" in Eastern Europe.--Mercian (talk) 16:03, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

O really Ken?[edit]

Conservapedia is against gossip! PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 18:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

CP misunderstands things[edit]

The discussion on potholes in the UK and Switzerland (in the UK the potholes are there as a means of defence - for the same reasons that road and place names were removed during the war, and replaced only with reluctance).

And the link to the 'good definition of copyright' on the main page is both wrong and links to a UK website. Anna Livia (talk) 19:47, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

So that’s why Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov spoke of 4000 holes in Blackburn Lancashire. LeucippusSalva veritate 00:40, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
And though the holes were rather small
They had to count them all
Now they know how many holes it takes to fill the Albert Hall.
I'd love to turn you on BeardOfZeus (talk) 04:46, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
'The war' is not necessarily the most recent one (the locals know where they are - and will use pubs and other landmarks that disappeared years ago in their directions). Anna Livia (talk) 14:31, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Andy consults his dead mommy over a made-up problem[edit]

Phyllis Schlafly comic strip - 10-27-21.png

PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 18:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

This and other articles apply, along with quite a lot of Korean actors (they often have darker lipstick than the actresses). Anna Livia (talk) 20:00, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Mom sure has some perky boobs there. Dutchbag (talk) 02:12, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Is it me, or does she look like the pop singer Marilyn from back in the 80s? LondonGrump (talk) 18:21, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
What's the source of this comic? Has Andy started writing a comic strip somewhere? CPWatcher (talk) 10:28, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Ken spouts KKK talking points[edit]

His usual drivel: "Immigration restriction! Populism! Catholicism is evil!!!" We've seen this before. Hydronium hydroxide (talk) 19:52, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

What's he advocating for now, selections on the ramp? Dutchbag (talk) 02:18, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
He's not quite there yet as Schalfly has not given the green light to do so, it is still showing amber. For the time being he is limiting himself to supporting political violence and the actions of Anders Breivik[56]--Mercian (talk) 07:49, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Slanderous material was removed concerning him complete with a vield threat to sue.[57] If you think I am committing slander Ken then I invite you to sue me. Of course your fat arse dog shagging Neo Nazi self will then have to show himself. Bring it on, I fucking dare you.--Mercian (talk) 08:11, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Johnny Thunders[edit]

When I first heard “You can’t put your arms around a memory”, it instantly became a favourite. Thunders’s lyrical ability easily puts him clear of the usual bands lumped in under the heading “Punk”. Indeed, apparently Bob Dylan himself gave praise to Thunders for song writing ability. A further case in point is this gem (that fucking guitar aswell!) “It’s not enough” by Johnny Thunders & The Heartbreakers (Oh and yes, Tom Petty, living up to his namesake, admitted to stealing ‘the heartbreakers’ name for his own band, fuckin freemason). Was it you @London Grump, or you @Oldusgitus who mentioned that they were in the punk scene way-back-when? LeucippusSalva veritate 03:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

I was. As well as hard core thrash metal scene, Anthrax. Amebix, SOD etc. Never saw Johhny Thunders and the one time I tried to see Iggy Pop the police shut the Electric Circus in Manchester for the night for some reason. Oldusgitus (talk) 10:35, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Not me. Saw a few punk/punkish/post punk bands at the Marquee back in the day but I was more of a headbanger. LondonGrump (talk) 10:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
@Oldusgitus Manchester was the place to be! So many great bands came out of, and visited, Manchester during the late 70s and the 80s. R.e. Police shutting down Iggy Pop gig: fucking shame that, I wonder if Iggy was carrying too much skag.
@London Grump The Marquee was a legendary club (shame it shutdown in the 2000s, but “the candle that burns twice as bright, burns half as long”), at any rate it seems better IMO than what Trash was. LeucippusSalva veritate 22:11, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Karajou does hari-kari[edit]

[58] Dutchbag (talk) 01:25, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Aw, man, he deleted his blog, too? Hope he's alright. He'd be what, in his 60's?-Hastur! (talk) 01:47, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
He might start socking up. It'll be a real challenge, trying to convince people he's a normal person. Dutchbag (talk) 02:37, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Karajou's gone? What happened? CPWatcher (talk) 10:28, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
I am guessing that as someone who had at least a degree of sanity he saw the madness get out of control and quit. CP is now dominated by three people. The now unashamedly full on fascist Andy, the "I make Alex Jones look sane" conspiracy theorist in charge Rob and in his own words the "Slightly right of center" Ken. Slightly right of centre of what I wonder.--Mercian (talk) 17:57, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
'To the right of Genghis Khan - or possibly his claimed reincarnation'? Anna Livia (talk) 18:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Before Karajou left CP, there was conflict between Karajou and RobS.[59][60][61][62][63] Mooseman (talk) 21:55, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
I am guessing that as someone who had at least a degree of sanity he saw the madness get out of control and quit.
Wow. Who just fell of the turnip truck, Mercian or me? Dutchbag (talk) 03:58, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The dispute between Karajou and RobS is quite easy to understand (and you're going to laugh when you see this): Karajou posted on Andy/talk earlier this year, "everyone saw my email regarding Stalag 17, and the comparison I made was to Rob being an RW mole within the site." That is because Karajou took literally for years Fun:The_truth_about_RationalWiki#.22Nobs.22, "My sources have identified Nobs, real name Barack Hussein Obama, as the ultimate mastermind behind Operation Nightingale. Trent Toulouse is merely the face used to deflect suspicion away from the Head Honcho and real founder of RW, Barack "Nobs" Obama." This is too good to let go. It should be added to his bio. Dutchbag (talk) 06:04, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

There is too much speculation and attempts at mindreading going on when it comes to Karajou's thoughts before he left. Mooseman (talk) 06:57, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

He was embarrassed in his unsubstantiated charges, and according to people familiar with the matter RobS refused to return as either a subordinate or on equal footing with Karajou. RobS blamed Karajou's paranoid blocking habits for having destroyed any chance for CP to grow its user base and demanded he be reined in. Eventually, Karajou acceded to Rob's arguments. Dutchbag (talk) 10:35, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Most wikis have back channels. And an outsider cannot see what happens behind the scenes so they have an incomplete picture. So you're largely speculating about why Karajou left.
And you're not a conservative, so you have a more difficult time understanding Karajou's frame of mind. Mooseman (talk) 11:09, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
If you don't have access to Conservapedia's back channels and you're not a conservative, you don't have the necessary Sitz im Leben in order to truly understand why Karajou left. Mooseman (talk) 11:23, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
I did some additional analysis on why Karajou stopped editing Conservapedia. Conservapedia's block/unblock log shows User: Conservative and User: Wikignome72 (a sock of User: Conservative), repeatedly unblocking RobS. from February 14, 2021 to March 3, 2021 and Karajou blocking RobS. The last unblock of RobS by User: Conservative says "as per email discussion". On February 22, 2021, Karajou posted on User: Wikignome's page: "You're going to talk to Andy FIRST, before you unblock RobS. I'm sick of his lies and behavior, and I'm fed up with anyone who insists on making that behavior happen."[64]
In March of 2021, User: Conservative updated Conservapedia's civility guidelines with Andy's approval.[65]
I propose that via email/telephone User: Conservative lobbied Andy to reverse Karajou's block of RobS and that RobS also lobbied Andy via email about this matter. Karajou, who had a personal conflict with RobS, wasn't happy about RobS staying at Conservapedia and so he left. Mooseman (talk) 18:45, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Karajou's accusation of RobS being an RW mole didn't carry much weight after RobS permaban from Rationalwiki in January 2021. He retreated in disgrace. Dutchbag (talk) 19:35, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
What larks! Reminds me of G K Chesterton's The Man Who Was Thursday. LondonGrump (talk) 12:32, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Andy's lack of loyalty is staggering. For better or worse, Kara's been there since the initial conservative influx at the start, but the second Wormtoungue whispers in his ear, boom! You're outta here. I almost feel sorry for him. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 14:08, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Racist Ken...[edit]

...only deletes diffs that need no deletion. He lets the n-word stay on the site. [66][67] Hydronium hydroxide (talk) 23:33, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

After the courts and OSHA suspend Biden's vaccine mandate, and Fauci says vaccines don't work, he's backing off his support for big government vaccine mandates. [68] The upside is, nobody can call him anti-science now. Dutchbag (talk) 08:47, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Ken's attack on USER:Andrew.[edit]

[69] Ken, I remind you that we have back-office Conservapeda archives where everyone and I mean everyone calls you demonic/weird/obsessed/ a danger to the Trusworthy encyclopedia and himself to name but a few. Do I really have to dig them out again? The old proverb says people who live in glass houses should not throw stones or they will rebound to hurt them and your house is 100% glass. As for serial liars, another proverb springs to mind regarding pots and kettles. Again there are numerous proofs of such behaviour.--Mercian (talk) 09:24, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

PS, I have just got up as it is relatively early here. What time is it there? Half past Four I think. What kind of person posts bollocks on a shit sheet like Conservapedia at 4.30 in the morning? I will answer that, a sad sad bastard.--Mercian (talk) 09:31, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

I do love winding you up Ken "I'm of to join The Orange Lodge with a sash and a Bible in my hand, can't you see I'll always be a loyal Ulster man" As for paedophilia, ask Andy about that that very dodgy video I alerted him to a few years back, posted by mistake by your good self. Ole Ole Ole.--Mercian (talk) 06:57, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

There are certain trigger words that just cause him to vomit all over the page, and then everybody is standing ankle-deep in puke. You guys need to stop exploiting Ken like that just for fun. Dutchbag (talk) 20:43, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
I find extremely weird that he can't even acknowledge how the topic on Andy pretty much contradicts his entire essay. GeeJayK (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Anti violence Ken is the man who described the victims of The Manchester Arena Bombing, one who was only 8 years old, as "Pro sodomite sluts and whores". From that day onwards anything is fair game. The inquiry of the death of 8 year old Saffie Roussos is going on now, she did not die straight away and realised what was happening asking the paramedic if she was going to die before crying for her mum who lay severely injured a few yards away unable to move or get to her daughter although she could hear her pleas. She was crying uncontrollably when giving her testimony and it bought a tear to my eye also. The person we should not take advantage of reveled in her death. Anyone who feels sorry for DeMyer should remember that.--Mercian (talk) 22:51, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
"obsessive, creepy weirdo with bad judgment (who is also a serial liar and a wikiholic)". First thing that comes to mind is most certainly not Andrew. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 23:08, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
FYI Dutchbag back in 2016 I was reading an "Atheism and" article, I forget which one, written by DeMyer and he linked to the wrong video. The video he did link to was of 2 girls and 2 boys aged 14/15 years old showing the girls playing with the boys private parts. At the time I had some respect for Schalfy and we occasionally exchanged emails. I thought about posting the link on here but emailed Schalfy making him aware of the post, he thanked me and said he would deal with it. He dealt with it by the process of deep burning but allowed the poster to keep spewing over the pages of CP. It is not vomit if it is true.--Mercian (talk) 23:11, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Ken is set off by ANY word anyhow. If not, he'll find an excuse. There's always one. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 23:49, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Mercian, wow, the Manchester bombing story certainly is an eyeopener. Unless he's expressing sympathy for the crazed suicide bomber (who was probably acting from the same sentiments), he needs to just STFU. He says these crazy things just to be provocative, but in doing so reveals too much of himself. Dutchbag (talk) 00:28, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Meh, who gives a shit about Ken's ranting. He hasn't done or said anything new or interesting in over 5 years. Acegodfuckingdamnit 01:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
He's ever done anything interesting? All I know him for is that he says stupid things to people who're more qualified to him and keeps getting publicly humiliated all the time.BumblingBuffoon (talk) 10:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The poor screencapping is both funny and incredibly confusing to me. Why would you edit the screenshot like that? It seems unnecessarily hard to do that, especially since he's using Snip and Sketch, as demonstrated by the leftover artifact that says "free from snip" on the third cap. I didn't even know you could do that. Putting a white border with an incredibly high stroke pen tool is just completely unnecessary and very very funny to me. armed_roomba (she/her)What am I doing wrong this time? 04:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
When a totally nuts person goes beyond being totally nuts, what do we call it? Supra nuts? Dutchbag (talk) 08:35, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
If he is so intelligent why does he get his pronouns mixed up? He seems to forget that it is Users:Conservative not User:Conservative. I also notice that he does not deny he revels in the death of children or sympathises with a male only hardline protestant group with known links to not one but two terrorist groups, The UDA and UVF. Not only does he not have a high IQ he struggles to pass The Turing Test.--Mercian (talk) 09:06, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
This is beyond narcissism and megalomania. Who would advertise and boast about people hating them? Dutchbag (talk)
Questions: How well do RationalWikians lie through their teeth compared to User: Conservative? Do any RationalWikians have a record of posting positive views on Anders Behring Breivik? How many times have RationalWikians refered to victims of terrorisim as "Pro sodomite sluts and whores? Do RationalWikians mistakenly post pornography on Conservapedia? Do any RationalWikians have a fetish for cute poodles?--Mercian (talk) 09:18, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────For fucks sake, we've known (or at the least STRONGLY suspected) for a long time - at least 8 years I am aware of - that ken has mental health issues. Sometimes when he's 'well' he comes over as rational. Other times he goes all compulsive and gets into his massive editing phases. But tbh what you are all doing right now is, imo anyway, the equivalent of pointing at the 'retard' and laughing in order to get him to perform further for you. Ken is ill, and whilst he can be a deeply unpleasant individual please bare that in mind when you post about him here. Oldusgitus (talk) 15:08, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

denying them the attention they crave is the best option in either case. AMassiveGay (talk) 15:35, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
So he is only a Class A dickhead due to diminished responsibility? --Mercian (talk) 18:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
He's obviously in the midst of a manic phase. On the very day SCOTUS takes up the first case that may overturn Roe v. Wade after nearly 50 years, he's plastered crap boasting about his IQ and winning all over MPL now, as well. Where's the hell is Andy when you need him? Dutchbag (talk) 21:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Ken still uses Alexa which is completely flawed. I actually have some real data which I'll upload when a tech fixes our file upload. It has an error at my end at least. Acei9 21:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Hey Ken[70] Invite me, lets see if you can live up to your boast.--Mercian (talk) 22:59, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Um, Ken, we're still waiting for you to put your money where your mouth is. C'mon, step up to the plate. Show us you have an IQ higher than the speed limit. This chess match could be a pay-per-view event. Dutchbag (talk) 03:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Dutchbag - do not insult the speed limit: it saves lives (and generates a revenue in fines as a by-product). Anna Livia (talk) 10:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
He's chickened out anyway[71]Apparently I would download a program I have never heard of. Maybe if I offered £100 to a charity of his choice to play, surely he could not turn that down.--Mercian (talk) 17:14, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Oh Ken...[edit]

I know you love using Alexa, making strange pronouncements about how bad RW's traffic is, about how searches for atheism are down etc etc but as a manager at an SEO company I have access to some nifty tools (instead of shit like Alexa) and RW beats CP by nearly every metric...

So...yeah... Acei9 20:06, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

CP is Right Again[edit]

The Michigan shooter played Call of Duty, which is why he shot up his school. But that leaves about 400 million players who are ticking time bombs. Why aren't we rounding them up? Whoover (talk) 19:08, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

They're all in Europe, particularly in Scotland, home to the GTA series. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 20:22, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
He has a point. I still the love the ageing game Skyrim, especially playing as a mage. I spend my afternoons burning down buildings and making people either calm or frenzied. I never heal them though as restoration is not a valid school of magic and no-one will convince me otherwise.--Mercian (talk) 22:00, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
I like to keep my school shootings old school by playing Quake, Doom, emulators, & the Master Chief collection, but I also sometimes like to dabble with the new armory of Cuphead, Rocket Leauge, the Kid A Mnesia Exhibition & Garry's Mod Hide-and-Seek. PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 15:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Considering I love God of War and look forward to the latest entry, I frequently go about obliterating people with a magical ax, tearing through their chests with my bare hands, collecting orbs.-RipCityLiberal (talk) 20:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
I'm still enjoying Civilization III and often tempted to break into my neighbours house and give him a good kicking when I'm out of milk. LondonGrump (talk) 00:38, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

The shortest 66 days in history, Time flies.[edit]

[72][73]--Mercian (talk) 06:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

The 66 days has been removed anyway. With reference to proof about posting porn all I have is this as I delete after a while, sadly I delete old mails from time to time[74]
A emailed a you a few years back

Mark Mark <Address removed>

Jun 2, 2021, 8:41 PM

to aschlafly Reference borderline child pornography mistakenly posted on your website. I was wondering it it was removed and dealt with? Thanks.

Mark Mark <Address removed>

Thu, Jun 3, 9:13 AM

to aschlafly The question was rhetorical as the man who posted the video still runs riot on your website calling UFOs demons. I would have thought a man of law like yourself if only for self preservation would have got rid of him. As it stands you enable him. Think about that, --Mercian (talk) 17:22, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

He does this silly little ruse. There is embarrassing stuff out there on Talk:MainPage making him look like an idiot. He tries to burn it, but editors won't let him vandalize the page. So then he Archives it with a new twist - creating two Archive pages to divide the conversation so no one can make any sense out of it. Then he announces he's going on vacation and doing some maintenance work before he goes. With all the embaraassing conversations burnt and hidden, then he returns from vacation prematurely with a clean slate cause everything is forgotten and it's ancient history. During his sojourn in the wilderness, he picks up new inspiration and has returned to lead his people.
It's at least the second time this year he's pulled this stunt. I'm losing count. Dutchbag (talk) 11:27, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
This episode illustrates the primary problem at Conservapedia: Leadership. None of them, from the top on down, possess requisite people skills for management or a leadership position. It's not so much a whacked ideological perspective, but without leadership, there is no organization. Call it rightwing anarchy. The common thread among bosses is they take pleasure in sticking it to their enemies, like a parent who gets a nut off by spanking a child. It's pretty sick. Dutchbag (talk) 18:18, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
On the other hand it is relatively benign when compared to the latest TerryH/Bradlee Dean episode. Fauci is as bad as, if not worse than Mengele[75] [76]WTF?--Mercian (talk) 18:50, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Yes. That's a debate going on within the conservative community right now. It started with Lara Logan quoting unnamed sources whispering in her ear. Some people reacted saying the comparison between Mengele who participated in the murder of six million people, and Fauci, who funded gain-of-function research which murdered six million people,is outrageous. Dutchbag (talk) 03:44, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Someone missed a hyphen in good-natured, someone else missed an apostrophe and letter in the reply pointing it out. [77] I am not sure but I think it should be "It's sad" and not "It sad". The poster also cannot give a citation as, like hundreds of others posts including more than ten in the last few days it was burned. Given some of the appalling content you allow to stand I can only imagine the depravity in those over-sights.--Mercian (talk) 06:53, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Setback for Public Health Vaccine Tyrants.[edit]

Once again pro-death Schalfly creams himself at the potential deaths of thousands.[78]--Mercian (talk) 21:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Ah, good ol' "dying from Covid to own the libs." I'm weirdly ok with that. --RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 07:35, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
I have a sneaking suspicion that the GOP is going to be in for a rude awakening when they realize they're actually killing their voters and lose a close election.-RipCityLiberal (talk) 18:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Dear oh dear Ken[edit]

Thanks for your nice little essay directed at me but it's a fact RW beats CP in nearly every single SEO metric. Alexa, which you are so fond of quoting, is completely flawed (which has been brought to your attention before) and rudimentary in comparison to more robust and in-depth tools. RW has a better rank, more backlinks, more traffic, more users, more edits and greater domain authority. I manage an digital marketing agency, second only to the director positions, and am being offered directorship mid-2022. Hence, and I'm sorry to burst your bubble, I have a little more form than you in this area...mainly because, you know, this is what I am paid to do. I'm sorry to sound like a narcissistic prick but you're worse than me in that respect so you get what you give. Face it man, you're a very small person waving his dick around in a very large place. CP is near moribund and all the Alexa graphs, Google trends and personal bluster you can find doesn't change that. Hey man, where's the QE! booklet? So, you know, accept your failure. Acei9 06:17, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Here is your answer.[79]--Mercian (talk) 18:25, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

RationalWiki admits it has a weirdo pansie infestation has been deleted[edit]

Wonder why? armed_roomba (she/her)What am I doing wrong this time? 06:30, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

It's just Ken in one of his phases. He gets these ideas and flogs them to death then quietly burns all evidence of them, rather like the wonderful 'transitional animal the flying kitty' page he once had - one of my all time favourites of his as it happens. More interesting for me is that nobs has finally been calling ken out on his posting of shite all of MPR. Oldusgitus (talk) 10:23, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
My mistake, his flying kitty opus is still there in all its glory Oldusgitus (talk) 10:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
What does MPR stand for - does any of [80] apply? (MPREG as a trope would [, give the CP-ers kittens[). Anna Livia (talk) 10:31, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Main Page Right. CP's section titled "In the News. what the MSM isn't fully covering." Becuase the MSM for some unfathomable reason isn't covering the fact that RW allegedly has a weirdo pansie infestation Oldusgitus (talk) 10:42, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
I thought MSM were Barcelona's front three in the mid 2010s. I am not sure Messi thinks twice about pansie infestations--Mercian (talk) 09:53, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Pansies are pretty flowers (CP members have not imbibed enough Gardeners' World).
Many people not being CP-ians find MPREG slightly squicky. Anna Livia (talk) 19:06, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
He wrote an answer for you. Apparently we're too irrelevant to have our own WIGO:RW on CP, but still relevant enough for him to answer explain in details why he totally doesn't care about RW. Also, sorry, Ken, immigration from Latam will not prevent the demise of Christianity in America. Hispanics are leaving the doomed religion Christianity on the same pace as whites. GeeJayK (talk) 19:13, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
rw and ken have a co dependant relationship. we eagerly await each others replies knowing full well that he will never concede to anything we say, and we wont to his repeating the same talking points and same old tired memes that are only memes to him and us. we can ignore him with no fear of him propagating dangerous lies to gullible fools if we dont expose them because its only us who gives him the time of of day. ken dont care if we refute his stuff, he'll just repeat it ad nauseum. to us. and exposing his bullshit to us is redundant. its bullshit by default in these parts. hes not trying to win any arguments, prove us wrong, show jesus is real or get trump reelected, he is just stringing us along. each refutation tells him we are still playing. he'll keep going as long as we keep responding. no one else is paying him attention. does anyone on cp even? without us hes got no one but rob at best. if we dont bite, he get bored and stop talking to us or he can carry on posting nonsense and giving us shout outs no one will ever read and no one will ever respond to if his only audience wont. we can stop repeatedly showing obvious bullshit is obvious bullshit and pretending we are not as obsessed with him as he is with us. what do we risk by ignoring the twat? will he finish his question evolution booklet finally? we dont need ken, and if he dont need us why we still playing this dumb game? do us all a favour ken, if we so irrelevant, cut us off. be the bigger man and let us move on. im sure you can do something useful with your pals in your collective. or are they united in the need for us knowing that we are all fat weirdos and pansies? i'm guessing you'll keep poking us and we will keep poking you, and i'll keep rolling my eyes at the same old shit. dnftt. but we will. AMassiveGay (talk) 21:41, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Good post!Thank you for that.-Flandres (talk) 21:47, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
The entity(s) that is/are User(s):Conservative fails The Turing Test. He has about 1MB of memory and spews out the same crap time and time (and time and time) again.--Mercian (talk) 09:56, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Consider how much 'computer storage/memory' CP has, and how little the Apollo rockets had - the achievement is the reverse. Anna Livia (talk) 12:03, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
I would've pointed how that Ken has a tendency to recreate pages after deleting them but I didn't find it too important to let you know. Anyhow, it's back up. It's been up for probably a few days but whatever. That should be expected. As for the "codependent relationship", Ken's gonna find any sort of disagreement in our userbase as material. If there's none (when hell freezes)? He'll make some up. He depends on us more than we depend on him. Carry on. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 21:42, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Yes, in his essay about me, he took information present in this diff (but only the first section) to update his essay and is constantly finding new screenshots. Also, the more you look at his CP essays and compare them here, the easier it is to find Kenspam. --Andrew5 (talk) 22:08, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Phyllis Schlafly illustration[edit]

Why is she smiling? Does she think political prisoners are funny? LondonGrump (talk) 10:48, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Bingo! The now-evident concern troll antics of Aschlafly outed as a deep cover liberal seemingly prove he's a mere opportunist out to seek attention while in panic to reverse Conservapedia's inevitable demise, notwithstanding his selfish inflated ego as de facto self-appointed spokesperson for his late mother who accomplished more than he ever will. Almost a pitiful sight to behold! Ushit the dipshit (talk) 15:05, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

I was trying to figure out why the eagle brooch appeared in the second panel. But I realized it must be a Wuhan bat that just landed on her from her lab. She's on the case and will reveal the true story of Fauci's perfidy in next week's strip. Whoover (talk) 03:04, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

He's portrayed his mum as a very attractive woman is her early 30s. No issues there at all.--Mercian (talk) 08:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
He also seems to have no idea what patriot means. Patriotism is about staying loyal to your country and it's constitution, not pissing all over it and attempting a coup and the murder of it's second highest elected official "Hang Mike Pence" if things do not go your way. Those "patriots", if found guilty, are traitors, just as Schalfly himself is.--Mercian (talk) 08:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Conservapedian "standards" designate Kenpoot a liberal[edit]

So says CP: "Liberals support the following political positions and practices: ... Hypocrisy[26]" And what is the stated record of Ken's recent demonstrated behavior? Violation of 90/10 after arbitrary "enforcement" of 90/10. The jeniuses are caught, tripped up on their own wires they held expectations of using to foil those evil libruls! 😂 Ushit the dipshit (talk) 04:52, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

"Conservatives" aren't hypocritical, they are just using situational ethics. LondonGrump (talk) 09:31, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
You spelled genius wrong. Acei9
Libruls are communists and Conservatives are pragmatists. Neither one has anything to do with ideology. Ideology is just crutch for young people to lean on in place of experience. Dutchbag (talk) 11:34, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
For my friends, everything; for my enemies, the law.

GeeJayK (talk) 15:39, 4 January 2022 (UTC)


lmao Ken, that's now my new favorite bullshit thrown at us now. PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 15:32, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

My favourite part is Andy's pic claiming that CP doesn't allow gossip even though the entire essay is a huge gossip. I think Ken's reasoning is basically "See, boss, I know this looks like gossip but I swear it isn't, I'm even using your quote to prove I'm not gossiping at all!" GeeJayK (talk) 15:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
It's kind of funny how it seems like most of the edits on CP these days are Ken's "I wish I knew how to quit you, RW!" obsessive essays. PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 16:23, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
I think presentation matters in this case. Were that screed on canvas, it would be welcomed as a piece of outsider art documenting one man's manic passion. Pasted onto the internet, it's trash curated by your least favorite drunk uncle. Semipenultimate (talk) 18:27, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Aaaannd the conservative of the year for 2021 is.....[edit]

Drum Roll, please! brbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrb PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 14:24, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Conservapedia! Bringing you what the mainstream media won't cover on JEWISH SPACE LASERS! PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 15:03, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Ken the Pathetic[edit]

Ken, I’m on holiday with my daughter and have no interest in your pathetic challenges. Even if I were in the office I not going to use the considerable resources of my company to blackmail RW into kicking LGM out. You idiot. I get paid for what I do so I’m not going to spend my time doing some dumb shit like you’re suggesting for free. Now, back in your hole. Acei9 21:52, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Ken believes his regurgitated bullshit has the capability to banish us into oblivion, willfully ignoring his ramblings and bigotry merely acting to repel other Conservapedians. What else provides for an adequate explanation of the abrupt departure of LT? Ushit the dipshit (talk) 00:48, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

2 things, Ken[edit]

I have just driven back from my vacation as starting work again Monday and I got thinking, 6 hours on the road will do that (also 6 hours is the fastest time I have completed the journey so - go me). And it struck me Ken that you can have never worked in the corporate world before and here's how I know it.
If I were to take you up on your "challenge" to use my SEO resources to send RW traffic to a competitor I would first need buy-in from said competitor because, as an SEO whiz-kid (which you have proclaimed to be in the past), I am sure you know link-building is only part of the puzzle - to do proper, sustained and long-term SEO you also need to work on content and the back-end mathematics - which you of course knew. Theoretically you could do link-building without a businesses knowledge but that would only have limited effect. So I would need to call RW's next highest ranked competitor (undoubtedly a US based website) and convince them to give me back-end access to their website. When asked why someone from a NZ based digital marketing agency was calling a US based business for SEO work and I said "I want to blackmail another website to kick off a user I don't like because someone said I lacked machismo"
I am sure they'd be more than happy to hand me over the keys. Once that was done I would have to ask my Service Delivery team to get to work on the project which would garner some strange looks but they'd get to work as if it were any other client. However this genius plan would fall to pieces during the weekly management meeting in which we all open a beer and go over the new clients for the week as well as looking at problems with existing clients. When asked "Hey Ace, why is the Service Delivery team looking after this US business for free?" and I told them the reasons (blackmail and worried about my machismo) my directorship ambitions would That's how it actually works. Hell even if I owned the company outright or was freelance I wouldn't waste my time on this horseshit. That's how the real world works when not making endless edits to a website no-one cares about over 36 hours.
Secondly, and this one is important... you told me my Ahrefs data was "found wanting" so here is a challenge to you. Below is the data I posted. Can you provide me with your own data to contradict the data I shared? Same areas of comparison, same data, but data that shows something significantly different from what I have provided? In order to malign my data you must have some of your own so lets see it. This should be very easy for you since you have said mine isn't worth much so you must have more robust data than I have. So lets see it....Acei9 10:49, 8 January 2022 (UTC)


I'm waiting...[edit]

Where's your data? Acei9 06:23, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

You've missed the point[edit]

You've showed me your data about RW. But my point was the comparison between RW and CP. Do what I did - compare RW to CP. Who ranks better. Also, dude, I made it very clear that I have a whole team of people to manage and I am not going to have them boost RW traffic - for free for no other reason than to settle personal vendettas. That ain't how a business works my man. Show me the comparison. Acei9 10:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Here's some unsolicited advice for you my friend - if coming 4th in a spelling bee when you were a child and having a high chess score are the best achievements you can list then I suggest you get out more. Acei9 17:00, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Hey Ken...[edit]

Not sure if you missed this or not but the point of my post was the comparison of RW to CP so just wondering if you have that data yet? The whole point of screen grabbing the Ahrefs data was to show how RW outranks CP - data which was "found wanting" to use your words. I've been wondering then if you have data which contradicts mine? I am happy to be shown wrong... Acei9 20:29, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Last Chance, Ken...[edit]

Ken I asked you something very simple. I showed you how RW ranks compared with CP – data which you said was ‘found wanting’ so I asked you to provide me with data of your own that contradicted what I posted. Very simple. I did not ask for screeds of bullshit I am not going to read because I don’t have time to read your repetitive bullshit. Give me a simple side-by-side that shows the data I posted to be incorrect. I am not talking about individual pages, I am not talking about Google search volumes. Show me the comparison. This should be very easy. I’ll give you one more chance to do so. If you fail this time it is either because you can’t or you can but you don’t want to capitulate and admit my data is accurate. One more chance to prove your machismo. Acei9 22:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

His answer(s) to you is very similar to hist last one[81] Who cares what a prick who revels in the deaths of children/homosexuals/Catholics/liberals/atheists etc thinks anyway?--Mercian (talk) 23:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
I love that half of recent changes over there is now Ken writing to you and then deleting those posts. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 12:22, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Apparently Jan 6 riot was a false flag operation.[edit]

I wonder how much mental gymnastics one have to go through to believe that. Epic Games (talk) 06:56, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

The same amount of mental gymnastics they went through to convince themselves that drumpf is a republican and a devout bibul believing xian and that Hillary Clinton is a child raping blood drinking monster. Oldusgitus (talk) 08:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Are they also trotting out Ray Epps? He literally spoke to the J6 commission and said he wasn't an FBI informant.[82] Ted Cruz tried a bit of bollocks to get the FBI to confirm or deny they knew him,[83] but considering they don't do that as part of their policy he was more interested in the optics.-RipCityLiberal (talk) 23:11, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Even Breitbart admitted at the time that ""TRUMP SUPPORTERS STORM D.C." and it's pretty clear that sites where many a deluded Trump fanboy posted from were cheering them on at the time. (One example: a certain .win site for r/TheDonald refugeess. [84][85][86]) There's no doubt to anyone sane, really, who was behind the riot. So anything you encounter with "antifa"/"false flag" narrative is really a case of psychological projection. No big mental gymnastics required. Deep down in their hearts, they know that the rioters were very naughty people, but they are too deep into the paranoid style cult to admit it, so they have to conjure up a fanciful false narrative to support the evil boogeymen that is in their head. In this case, since the bulk of the Capitol riot article was written by RobSmith / nobs (who was finally banned from here after his bullshit on the Capitol riot crossed the line), such is rather expected. PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 00:12, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
It's all part of the "conservative" rewriting of history to fit a convenient narrative. I'm hoping PeterKa will develop his account on MP Talk of Pinochet's coup. LondonGrump (talk) 07:01, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
I disagree that it is a case of psychological projection, at least in the majority of cases. I think for most it is a case of downright dishonesty combined with a zero % respect for the democratic process and the law. They know Trump lost and that his personal militia attempted a coup and they support it.--Mercian (talk) 19:33, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

LT quits, CP falls[edit]

It was New Year's Eve of 2021 that marked LT's departure from Conservapedia. And under the span of two weeks afterwards, the sharp drop of CP Alexa rankings is observed. Mere coincidence? Ushit the dipshit (I shit, Ushit...) 00:20, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Dont use Alexa it's flawed. Epic Games (talk) 00:32, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Since when do we let Ken set the agenda? LondonGrump (talk) 00:43, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted post[edit]

I know why you deleted the last edit, Ken does not seem to be a racist per say. These people seem more of his ilk as he has shown support for them and their rabid anti Catholicism within the last month.[87]--Mercian (talk) 17:51, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Those fine upstanding loyalist paramilitaries with links to neo-Nazi groups around Europe? LondonGrump (talk) 18:29, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Back in the 90s one of the main Loyalist Terror Group's cells (I'm not sure if it was The UVF or The UDA/UFF) planned to carry out an attack at a Catholic girl's school in County Fermanagh before being stopped by their leadership. Seeing how Ken supports terror attacks against and the murder of European youth (Manchester Arena 2017 and Norway 2011) he would have creamed himself if this had happened. He would have also approved of Loyalist thugs throwing (Thankfully not killing or injuring) hand made pipe bombs at 5-7 year old Catholic school girls at Holy Cross in Belfast.[88] Anyone who tries to reason with Ken should know he is one pro terrorist bastard--Mercian (talk) 02:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Here we go again[edit]

The annual 'assfly forgets to update the certificate and/or pay the hosting costs' time of year. CP is down as I type this. Oldusgitus (talk) 17:39, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

It's still up and running albeit very sluggishly, Chromium is displaying an insecurity warning due to said lack of certificate updates. PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 17:54, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Didn't they forget at least once before?
In the UK we have such things as 'direct debits' and 'standing orders' - do they exist in the US, and, if so, perhaps CP could be so told. Anna Livia (talk) 23:35, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Conservapedia 404ed[edit]

See for yourself ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 00:26, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Update, it's back. Pity. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 20:34, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
If and when Conservapedia dies the conspiracy theorist in chief and terrorist sympathiser in chief will no doubt want to revive their accounts on Rationalwiki and history suggests they will be allowed to.--Mercian (talk) 19:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Not if I have anything to do with it. If Ken, Rob Smith and LT are allowed to come back to RationalWiki, I will LANCB. Spud (talk) 12:05, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

That reminds me. If you want to laugh at Rob Smith's bullshit, he's on Above Top Secret now. LondonGrump (talk) 10:23, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Phyllis knows what to do with "Never Trumpers"[edit]

Or at least her scumbag of a son does. If you do not agree with them drown them in the lake. [89] What sort of people believe in murdering political opponents? People that I would be heavily criticised for comparing Schalfy to that's who.--Mercian (talk) 04:49, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

New one-issue editor finally PROVES that Cultural Marxism isn't totally Nazi bullshit ugais![edit]

Trying to debunk cultural Marxism’s existence via accusations of anti-semitism are also fruitless because the existence of it doesn’t rely on finding out if any of its creators were Jews, and most people who acknowledge its existence don’t do this anyway.


Other common rebuttals include downplaying the impact of the Frankfurt Schools’ ideology on the world, in spite of the fact that its modern-day adherents have unprecedented power and the ideology can be found in the West’s most powerful institutions.

PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 16:29, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

It looks like we've forgotten to mention this episode[edit]

"A man accused of assaulting a gay man with a wooden club after setting up a meeting with him through the dating app Grindr is accused of a federal hate crime. The FBI arrested Daniel Andrew McGee, 22, on Monday and he made his first appearance in U.S. District Court in Eugene in the afternoon. He’s accused of targeting and assaulting the man because of his sexual orientation, according to federal prosecutors...From October 2020 through July 5, McGee accessed pages on "'gay bashing' and 'Homosexual Agenda' on Conservapedia, an English-language, wiki-based online site, the complaint said." PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 15:17, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Heh. Generally Conservapedia rarely makes the mainline news these days, except to note how much of a failure the site is. Usually, if you see a lot of Conservapedia references in an article, it's a clear indication that the article might step into batshit insanity territory. Such as this "crazy local news" website article, that apparently represents some batshit crazy COVID conspiracy stuff that was apparently created by a "Hannah Rose" "attorney", who worked with batshit insane British anti-vaccine activist Michael YeadonWikipedia. No surprise that some rando batshit insane homophobe also looked at the batshit insanity homophobia on Conservapedia.
(In contrast, Rationalwiki, while certainly cited far less than the other Wiki, is cited sometimes in mainline media, particularly for fallacy definitions, conspiracy theories, and far-right asshattery.) PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 19:56, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Liberals Erasing Hell[edit]

The WIGO entry about Liberals Erasing Hell leaves out the best part: Andy's example bemoans that the Greek word "Hades" is mistranslated by liberals as "Hades." Whoover (talk) 02:56, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

The illogical foolishness of both eternal torture and eternal ecstasy were two of the many factors that allowed the fundamentally flawed nature of Evangelicalism's endgame to be made clear to a young Semipenultimate. Therefore I support Andy's desires to keep them rolled into the material as much as is humanly possible. Enhance it! Make every other sentence speak to the promise of the eternal fires for the heathen unbelievers! Speed the clarity! Semipenultimate (talk) 17:53, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Ken's obsession with SimilarWeb...[edit]

...obligates my mention of this. A 54% affinity is deemed between Conservapedia and white supremacist hate site National Vanguard. And Nobs' dubbing of vanguardism as Marxists thus deems Conservapedia's apparent affinity with Marxism, per their own words. Ushit the dipshit (I shit, Ushit...) 00:20, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Ukraine Crisis: It's the fault of the gays.[edit]

Like fascists or similar throughout history Schlafly scapegoats those he does not like. It can't be Putin's fault as he is worshiped by the far right.[90] A turd of the highest order.--Mercian (talk) 11:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

'Is the Russia v. Ukraine conflict really about the homosexual agenda?' - no. no is the answer. even putin would tell you that. maybe schafly should read putin's essay on ukraine (and ben wallaces's take down of it). or just remove his head from his arse. schafly must really be able to hold his breath. he never seems to come up for air. AMassiveGay (talk) 12:05, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
The bloke's a prick mate and that is the nicest thing I can say about him. A few years ago he creamed at Brunei's law to stone to death homosexuals describing it as a "Massive setback to the homosexual agenda". When the law was reversed a few weeks later it was a "Massive cave to the agenda". I'm not gay but am a liberal so I will be given an easy death being drowned in a lake. Sadly you will not get off so easy. --Mercian (talk) 14:38, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
indeed. i stopped paying too much attention to cp when i stopped finding there insanity hilarious and just purely hateful. that happened years ago. AMassiveGay (talk) 15:02, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
they have dogshit running through their veins over there. AMassiveGay (talk) 15:03, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
I actually have been pretty bemused by this American right-wing split over Ukraine/Russia. The old school neoconservatives are yelling at Biden for not doing enough and urging Biden to get tough on Putin, eg the usual political shit you expect of "the opposition". Meanwhile, the Angry Baby "conservatives" are yelling at Biden for doing too much and urging that the US needs to kiss Putin's ass. At least the neoconservatives don't sound like ignorant lapdogs. We all know that the only reason for this "American far-right" bromance with Putin is that Putin is pushing the same bigoted white nationalist propaganda that this group adores. As seen by Conservapedia, who promotes Russia propaganda because Putin hates the gay too! Oh, what would Saint Ronnie think of this lot... PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 16:12, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
I'm with the Neo's on this one. If someone like Putin makes threats they should be matched with similar threats. "If you invade Ukraine we invade the Kaliningrad Oblast and return it to Germany/make it part of Poland, whatever." That would make Putin think twice. Instead Biden threatens sanctions which have a poor history of working. CP in general and Rob in particular is very much in the other camp blaming Ukraine for the crisis and accusing them of genocide in The Donbas region which Putin has just given recognition to. In a hot war between NATO and Russia there is only one winner. Where's Dubya when he is needed?--Mercian (talk) 21:03, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
I know I'm adding to the drift here, but when did we become the disinterested world's policeman? LondonGrump (talk) 09:39, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
i dont quite follow your meaningAMassiveGay (talk) 09:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
So when do we become the police? When Putin decides that all the former Warsaw Pact nations should be under his control and he invades Romania, Poland, Slovakia and the former East Germany? How about when he decides The Low Countries and France should be his puppets? How about when he has an army massed on the French Channel coast 25 miles from Kent, would be a good time?--Mercian (talk) 10:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
First up, apologies to AMG - you're right, my post was unclear. I was clumsily reacting to Mercian's assertion that we should take a chunk out of Russia because of the Ukrainian War. I'm not suggesting that Russia's invasion is at all justified or acceptable.
Being the World's Police is not and has never been a question of right and wrong. It's about getting what we want at the point of a gun. If foreign policy was about morality, we wouldn't stand for what's happening in Yemen or Palestine or any number of flashpoint and repressive regimes.
The idea that we need to do it over there before it happens here is a failed policy from Vietnam to Iraq. Why would it be any different now? Like anarchists used to say in the 1980s, it's just a different finger on the trigger to the people of the areas we invade.
I see the word "appeasement" thrown around a lot again. Thing is 1930s appeasement was never just about avoiding a scrap with Hitler - it was about hoping the Axis would start on Stalin with a side order of racial superiority. Muddled historical analogies don't help.
Mercian has a point about where we draw the line. It's already drawn at NATO. Thing is, Putin's money and influence has eaten away at our government and the US Republican party from the inside. We would do well to put our own house in order before we push back.LondonGrump (talk) 07:10, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
im believe the us and the west has always been 'world policeman' of some description. just selectively so. i dont believe the other 'great powers' - russia or china, have ever really occupied that rule in any real sense. i do think a 'world police' role is a necessary one, i only wish it was done via a beefed up UN. AMassiveGay (talk) 08:57, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
At the end of the day the "conservative" support for Putin has nothing to do with sovereignty, security or traditional conservative values, it is all about rabid homophobia. When I say rabid I mean that these bastards are as homophobic as the Nazis were Anti-Semitic and I do not give a crap if anyone accuses me of evoking Godwin's Law. There is nothing conservative about about Putin or his policies and the only reason that rabid homophobes like Schalfy support him and that is because he "Hates the gays". He has already blamed the so called homosexual agenda for the war in The Ukraine which has disturbing parallels to Judaism being blamed for Germany's defeat in WW1 and for starting WW2. The secondary target is atheism as proved by the arse-licking Demyer's [91] article about 2022 being the worst year in the history of atheism. The article reads that 2022 is going to be an economic disaster and in hard times people turn to God. So what if the entire planet goes bankrupt as long as their are a few less atheists in the world. The Ukraine is a flawed democracy, it is not perfect by any means but it is trying to make it work but Conservapedia's idea of a flawed democracy is a democracy that does not hate and persecute gay people. AMG pointed out that CP has gone from amusing to a downright non apologetic hate site. This started when the treasonous Trump came to power and moved these diabolical views to the mainstream. Steve Bannon said he supported Putin because he only recognises two genders and (forgive me, I have a slight dyslexia where I sometimes confuse the letter t and f) Fucker Carlson proverbially masturbates whenever Putin's name is mentioned. In my opinion both of these excuses for humans are preferable to Andy Schalfly. Schalfy is Conservapedia and Conservapedia is Shalfly. "Schalfy! Hail fucking victory" Rant over.--Mercian (talk) 14:32, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Luckily Conservapedia is incredibly irrelevant, so their "commie" Putin bootlicking ways (unlike Trump or Carlson) can be safely ignored. So the "Putin is liberating Ukraine from the homosexual agenda" angle they push becomes more a darkly humorous case study of a descent into complete madness. The homosexual red mist has so clouded their vision, it obscures what could have been the more accurate headline for this crowd in other times ("KGB Stooge Invades an Overwhelmingly Christian Nation"). I will say that their idiotic "framing" is probably some of the most solid proof that Conservapedia is no longer either conservative or Christian, instead they are fascist jackbooted thug wannabes. Although we've known that for a while. PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 15:08, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Indeed. The inability of Conservapedia's aschlaughingstocks to comprehend what constitutes conservatism reaches astounding levels. Ushit the dipshit (I shit, Ushit...) 02:01, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Andy jumps ship, abandons the pro-Christian defender of conservative values Putin and embraces the drug addicted neo-Nazi Zelensky and the homosexual agenda. "a Russian tank invasion of Kyiv, if shocking as expected, could cause the end of Putin's career in Russia". I guess Andy thinks Russians are a bunch of panzie-ass peaceniks who gave Putin a 70% approval rating and ignored how he prepped the Russian people before the invasion, "If Nukes Head Towards Russia We Are Going to Paradise But They Won't Have Time To Repent". Dutchbag (talk) 09:32, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
And in a stroke he makes Knob's entire 2022 posts contrary to Conservapedia's stance.--Mercian (talk) 14:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
I think he's just trying to create plausible deniability cause he doesn't know which way things will turn out. Now he's jumped on the neocon regime change bandwagon. Who woulda thunk it? Berliners have the power to overthrow the Moscow government. Hitler's prayers come a few decades too late. Dutchbag (talk) 03:52, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Basically he's playing both sides so he can add it to Conservapedia proven rightConservlogo late april.png whatever the outcome. Dutchbag (talk) 05:12, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
No doubt nobs will wipe out 100% of those comments; after all, they've been sabotaged by agents of Emmanuel Goldstein into making it look like nobs supported Putin at one point. A Nazi state with a Jewish president and broad LGBTQ support? You've been sucking down Russian propo for a decade, Republicans. Get your heads out of your fucking asses. Semipenultimate (talk) 18:49, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
I don't believe I've ever seen Andy do such a 180. Impressive-Hastur! (talk) 20:23, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
i doesnt think hes done one here. robs comments on the talk page are just too fucking insane and they'd be liability to if they were ever cp's 'official' line. rob seems to have made the mistake of believing all that shit. the line schafly has to take and appears to have been taking, is that its all bidens fault, or by west's fault, due to gays and atheims making us weak or by aggressively attacking a fellow christian nation and a fellow 'conservative'. you are supporting putin if just reporting news - its not their fault if the news is all negative one about ukraine and nato. it is not required to support the war to say it was provoked by western lies and weakness. its not supporting the war to mention that while their are there in the ukraine. anything that is clearly and unambiguously 'yay putin' is unwise when you talking are about putin and shelling of civilian. you mmight look like some kind of monstern and make biden seem like the one with principles. you cant go all in against putin either. that might mean having to 'agree' with biden in a non partisan way and may push away crazies like rob, and its crazies like rob cp cannot do without. the line on mpr seems very much and pointedly 'not taking sides' and 'war is bad' but you still come away with ukraine is full of nazis. nato are liars and war mongers. it wouldnt havent happened under trump. its all the gays fault. the talkpage is not the partyline. AMassiveGay (talk) 00:22, 1 March 2022 (UTC)