Blood type diet
| Potentially edible!|
The diet was founded by Peter D'Adamo (a naturopathic "doctor") and published under the catchy-titled Eat Right 4 Your Type (the misuse of a number in place of a word is our first warning sign that it's bogus). It was founded based on the evolutionary theory of blood type. Although the diet ignores factors such as Rhesus negative/positive and other rarer sub-types, D'Adamo claims that 90% of the properties of the blood are due to the ABO groups.
There are four primary blood groups in the ABO system. Types A, B, AB and O. For each group, a different diet is recommended for healthy living. Each is also very scientifically assigned a cool comic book villain nickname.
- Blood group O: The Hunter; stated to be the earliest human blood group. D'Adamo recommends a higher protein intake for people of this type.
- Blood group A: The Cultivator; claimed to be a more recent blood type that has evolved since agriculture. As a result, the diet claims group A people should avoid meat and consume vegetables instead.
- Blood group B: The Nomad; D'Adamo claims that people with group B blood can indeed thrive on dairy products due to it being associated with a healthy and highly evolved immune system.
- Blood group AB: The Enigma; As a combination of types A and B, it is considered the most recently evolved blood type. As a result Eat Right 4 Your Type suggests a diet part way between that of A and B.
While it is certainly true that genetics plays a part in what humans can effectively digest and that blood type is also dependent on genetics, correlating the two is as dubious as linking metabolic rate to hair color. One of the central aspects of the diet claims that lectins (a type of protein present in certain foods) react differently depending on blood type, something currently not backed up by any biochemical research.
There is also a considerable lack of genuine clinical trials testing the diet, despite multiple claims by D'Adamo to the contrary. His own trial, which has apparently lasted 10 years, still has not been published — so the results he claims cannot be accepted at face value. Indeed his unwillingness to publish the findings in full could indicate that the methodology may not be rigorous or the results may not be as conclusive as he would like his supporters to believe. The only evidence he has properly presented was a survey on his website, saying that about 70% of people thought it worked. However, self-reported "data" like this are subject to bias because they are inherently not double-blind, and in fact are highly self-selecting.
- Should I adjust my diet based on my blood type? on The Straight Dope
- What’s behind your blood type? on Ars Technica