RationalWiki's 2018 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $1980Goal: $5000

Judy Carman

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Potentially edible!
Food woo
link=:category:
Fabulous food!
Delectable diets!
Bodacious bods!

Judy Carman is an Australian medical researcher who became (in)famous in 2013 after publishing a study in the little-known open access Journal of Organic Systems purporting to show evidence of a link between genetically-modified (GM) maize and inflammation of the stomach in pigs.[1] She is a prominent anti-GMO activist and the director[2] of the self-aggrandizing Institute for Health and Environmental Research, an anti-GMO group composed of three people[3] whose claim to existence is supported solely by their website and a South Australian PO box.[4]

The pig study[edit]

Titled "A long-term toxicology study on pigs fed a combined genetically modified (GM) soy and GM maize diet", the study has been described by David Gorski as "a massive fishing expedition",[5] as the study did not present a hypothesis to be tested, and it picked a wide variety of variables to compare without providing a reason as to why those particular variables were chosen. The researchers fed one group of pigs a diet of "widely-used varieties of GM soy and GM corn",[6] and another group of pigs were fed non-modified maize and soy as a control. They let the pigs mature as usual, and autopsied them after slaughter in an attempt to find any difference between the two. Unsurprisingly, they found differences.

The observation Carman seems to believe is most damning is the amount of inflammation of the stomach in the pigs fed the GM diet, as she prominently displays photos of four of the autopsied stomachs on her website.[7] The amount of inflammation was determined by gross visual examination; in layman's terms, by simply looking at the stomachs and declaring the reddest stomach to have the most inflammation. Unfortunately for the researchers, the redness of stomach tissue is a poor measure of inflammation.[5][8]

In fact, there were more pigs with stomach abnormalities in the non-GM group than in the GM group.[9] Even so, when using proper statistical analysis, there is no statistically significant difference between the amount of inflammation in the non-GM group and the GM group.[5][10][11][12]

See also[edit]

External links[edit]

References[edit]