Bibliolatry

From RationalWiki
Revision as of 21:55, 12 August 2020 by GrammarCommie (talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by 1.152.111.52 (talk) to last revision by Spud)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Light iron-age reading
The Bible
Icon bible.svg
Gabbin' with God
Analysis
Woo
Figures
v - t - e
“”Fundamentalist: I believe Jesus is my Savior because the Scriptures are inspired and they say He is.
Lutheran: I believe the Scriptures are inspired because Jesus is my Savior and He says they are.[1]
—Kevin D. Vogts on bibliolatry vs. orthodoxy

Bibliolatry (from the Greek, biblion, "book," + latria, "worship") is the practice, within Christianity, of worshipping the Bible in the place of God.

The practice of bibliolatry received a boost in the Reformation when proto-Protestants emphasized the doctrine of sola scriptura.[2] Such high regard for books came in the wake of the Renaissance with its respect for old texts, and not so long after medieval times when literacy was uncommon, books were rare, and the written word represented Strong Magic.

Pejorative

The term is used exclusively as a pejorative, and is mainly used against fundamentalists who interpret the Bible very literally, or put such great stock by it as to make the appearance of upholding the Bible for the Bible's own sake rather than because they believe it was dictated by God. In other words, the accusation of bibliolatry is to directly imply that the accused essentially worships the Bible, itself, as or in place of God, thus, using the Bible as a graven idol.

Southern Baptists

In 2000, the Southern Baptist Convention removed language from their creed, the Baptist Faith and Message, that had established God as the "exegetical standard" for interpreting the Bible. They also went on a witch hunt, purging seminary teachers and brass who suggested that advances in history and archaeology could lead people to a better understanding of the Bible. These actions drew charges of bibliolatry, and SBC vice president A. William Merrell, in a colossal snit, accused those making the charges of political motivations and heresy.[3]

Bibliolaters

Examples of careful enough wording not to count as bibliolaters

  • Institute for Creation Research's tenets has this:
    • "Its unique, plenary, verbal inspiration guarantees that these writings, as originally and miraculously given, are infallible and completely authoritative on all matters with which they deal, free from error of any sort, scientific and historical as well as moral and theological." Notice "infallible and completely authoritative" leaves room open for God to change it whereas "ultimate authority" or "final authority" does not.
  • Got Questions
    • We believe the Bible, comprised of the Old and New Testaments, to be the inspired, infallible, and authoritative Word of God (Matthew 5:18; 2 Timothy 3:16-17). In faith we hold the Bible to be inerrant in the original writings, God-breathed, and the complete and final authority for faith and practice (2 Timothy 3:16-17). While still using the individual writing styles of the human authors, the Holy Spirit perfectly guided them to ensure they wrote precisely what He wanted written, without error or omission (2 Peter 1:21).[5]

See also

References

  1. ↑ http://www.confessionallutherans.org/papers/vogts.html
  2. ↑ See the Wikipedia article on Sola scriptura.
  3. ↑ Baptist 2 Baptist: Bibliolatry — A Fraudulent Accusation
  4. ↑ http://www.chick.com/information/general/statementoffaith.asp
  5. ↑ http://www.gotquestions.org/bibliolatry.html They have an article on bibliolatry... And use a different meaning from ours.
Retrieved from "https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Bibliolatry&oldid=2212944"